Thread: Why I Support Ron Paul

Ron Paul is not giving up, and neither are his Supporters!

It ain't over till we win!

Ron Paul in 1999 - Same as he ever was!

Originally Posted by Sigrid

The Romney's are from Mexico?

"Mitt Romney's Mexican Roots; His Father Was Born In Mexico, Could Choose Dual Citizenship "
Four years after electing its first black president, the U.S. could soon have its first presidential nominee whose father was born in Mexico.

It's already been published: Mitt Romney's father is Mexican. George Romney was born in 1907 in an American colony in the Mexican state of Chihuahua.

This could could make his son, Mitt, today's favorite to be the GOP presidential candidate, a potential Mexican citizen, with full rights

.

Ron Paul Draws 6,200 Roaring Student Revolutionaries April 3, 2012
at Cal State Chico in California

Ron Paul's crowds continue to be far larger (and far more fired up) than any tired crowds generated by Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich. And the media continues, as they have since 2007, to wildly under-report or not report the size of these crowds. Ron Paul will be at a university I attended, UCLA, tomorrow, April 4. I'll be phoning friends to urge them to join what is sure to be a huge crowd in Westwood, California for that event.

Ron Paul - Secession is the Right of Free Men!

More Than 8,000 Roaring Ron Paul Revolutionaries At UCLA
April 4, 2012

Look at this video just to see the huge size of Ron Paul's cheering crowd at UCLA yesterday. There were more people outside. This crowd size points to the fact that Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty is building an enormous mass base for permanent action.

Ron Paul before packed Michigan State crowd Feb. 27, 2012

Originally Posted by Poor Richard

Electable?

What does that Mean?

I'll take a stab at your question.


First, someone that is the right....age.

12 years old is too young. 76 years old is too old.

Second, someone who can win the support of poor and working class White Voters.

White union workers (Reagan Democrats) don't go for libertarianism, economic conservatism. They don't want their wagers to be determined by " the market". They correctly believe that management will prefer to hire minimum wage Mexicans, illegal alien workers instead of paying White American union workers a living wage.

Third, someone who gets better than a D- immigration grade from NumbersUSA.

Yeah, Ron Paul is really that bad on immigration, the only candidate worse on immigration is Obama. Bad, insane, treasonous immigration positions are just another bad part of being a libertarian.

Fourth, someone that doesn't welcome the Islamic immigration invasion of the USA, the West.

WTF was Ron Paul thinking on the tenth Anniversary of the 9 -11-01 Muslim terrorist attack when he tries to explain the 9/11 attack, Saudi Arabian anger at the US for our foreign policy?

We have to do better on these issues. We have to break out of this 5 percent race denying libertarian cult.

Ron Paul's Crowds Just Keep Growing - Huger and Huger
The Ron Paul Revolution Is Going Full Steam - Changing Our Future

Watch some of this video (it's an hour long) and marvel at the good news that you hear. Not primarily from Ron Paul, either! The biggest good news you're hearing in this packed Rudder Auditorium at Texas A & M university yesterday (April 10, 2012) is the ROAR of a huge crowd of young, intelligent, achieving White folks who are self-identifying as members of a revolution!

Look at the huge size of Ron Paul's crowds. They get bigger by the month. The crowds we saw in Ron's 2007-2008 campaign were big, very big. But these 2012 crowds are even bigger, and even more fired up. And...very importantly...they are now ORGANIZED. Ron doesn't even feel the need to run for his Congressional seat any more. He finds it more important to devote ALL of his time to his revolution. So he isn't even running for his Congressional seat (14th District of Texas) for a 13th term.

The folks at WhiteNewsNow can be proud to have been the first to have correctly seen the importance to our White future of the Ron Paul Revolution. While others in our cause were ridiculing and burning their bridges with these huge crowds of the best and the brightest of White folks whose importance you foresaw (even before we had even before we had created WhiteNewsNow), you were doing what we do here at WhiteNewsNow, which is to BUILD friendly and appealing bridges to the Ron Paul Revolution. Thanks for that foresight.

Originally Posted by Instauration Fan

I'll take a stab at your question.


First, someone that is the right....age.

12 years old is too young. 76 years old is too old.

Second, someone who can win the support of poor and working class White Voters.

White union workers (Reagan Democrats) don't go for libertarianism, economic conservatism. They don't want their wagers to be determined by " the market". They correctly believe that management will prefer to hire minimum wage Mexicans, illegal alien workers instead of paying White American union workers a living wage.

Third, someone who gets better than a D- immigration grade from NumbersUSA.

Yeah, Ron Paul is really that bad on immigration, the only candidate worse on immigration is Obama. Bad, insane, treasonous immigration positions are just another bad part of being a libertarian.

Fourth, someone that doesn't welcome the Islamic immigration invasion of the USA, the West.

WTF was Ron Paul thinking on the tenth Anniversary of the 9 -11-01 Muslim terrorist attack when he tries to explain the 9/11 attack, Saudi Arabian anger at the US for our foreign policy?

We have to do better on these issues. We have to break out of this 5 percent race denying libertarian cult.

Ron Paul answered the question of Invasion a long time ago.

Numbers USA is a Loony Leftist organization, and not a dependable source for any truthful information!

Ron Paul - Republic of Texas

Originally Posted by Poor Richard

Numbers USA is a Loony Leftist organization, and not a dependable source for any truthful information!

Yeah right.

How about Peter Brimelow of Vdare.com (ex National Review editor purged by Jew Neo Cons for opposing mass NW immigration, noticing the War on Christmas)? Tom Tancredo (best immigration control Congressmen in the 21st century. Both Brimelow and Tancredo have stated their view that Ron Paul (while being a honest, sincere patriot on many issues) is simply clueless on immigration - and yes RP deserves his D- immigration grade from NumbersUSA.

Rand Paul gets a much better immigration grade, so it's pretty clear that a big problem is simply Ron Paul's old age - he doesn't want to say or do anything "RACIST" and he likes to be on TV, get warm receptions by young people, Latinos, Muslims and RP will simply pander to whoever is in the room with him and then try to share his Libertarian gospel of the TRUTH.

Originally Posted by Instauration Fan

Yeah right.

How about Peter Brimelow of Vdare.com (ex National Review editor purged by Jew Neo Cons for opposing mass NW immigration, noticing the War on Christmas)? Tom Tancredo (best immigration control Congressmen in the 21st century. Both Brimelow and Tancredo have stated their view that Ron Paul (while being a honest, sincere patriot on many issues) is simply clueless on immigration - and yes RP deserves his D- immigration grade from NumbersUSA.

Rand Paul gets a much better immigration grade, so it's pretty clear that a big problem is simply Ron Paul's old age - he doesn't want to say or do anything "RACIST" and he likes to be on TV, get warm receptions by young people, Latinos, Muslims and RP will simply pander to whoever is in the room with him and then try to share his Libertarian gospel of the TRUTH.

If the Federal Government was obeying and enforcing Federal Law, then the Mexicans would be in Mexico.

Ron Paul wants to enforce the Law and take away all the incentives attracting Mexicans to America.

Mexicans don't like being in America, and they don't like Americans; take away the free handouts and they will go back home, quickly. It is EXPENSIVE to live in America without free handouts.

Originally Posted by Poor Richard

Mexicans don't like being in America, and they don't like Americans; take away the free handouts and they will go back home, quickly. It is EXPENSIVE to live in America without free handouts.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Blah, blah, blah. We know. It's ALL ABOUT ECONOMICS. No it's not.

Mexicans like to be in America, they want to go where things are better. Why would Mexicans want to stay in Tiajuna with all the crime, terrible pollution, not even a city sewage system when they can go to....

California, where things are so much better.... well, lots of places in California look, smell and feel like Mexico (tens of millions of dirty, dirt poor Mexicans will do that to a place).

But, if California is now bad - how about Chicago?

Too many Mexicans.

Maybe Kentucky or Tennessee.

Here's hoping tens of thousands of dirty, low IQ Mestizo Mexicans come to the neighborhoods of idiot, race denying Libertarians. On the live or die issue of mass immigration, Libertarians are just as bad as idiot liberals.

14 Words

Originally Posted by Poor Richard

Ron Paul in 1999 - Same as he ever was!

OK, but here's Ron Paul in 1988 - running for President of the United States (same as he ever was) pushing the century rejected program of Libertarianism, unregulated Capitalism as the solution to all of America's ills and also defending treasonous immigration policies, the worst part of libertarianism.



Ron Paul's hard core supporters have been ENABLERS of RP's insane/treasonous positions on immigration for a long time. It was the same with other supposedly Libertarian great White leaders like Jack Kemp. Younger readers here on Whitenewsnow must not make the same mistake for new White political leaders coming up. They/we must be uncompromising that we may like many parts of some candidate's political/economic philosophy if they are insane/treasonous on the live or die subject of the NW immigration invasion, their political careers are finished. We will not invite them to debates, we will not tape record their guest appearance on the MSM television news shows. They are to be shunned.

Originally Posted by Instauration Fan

OK, but here's Ron Paul in 1988 - running for President of the United States (same as he ever was) pushing the century rejected program of Libertarianism, unregulated Capitalism as the solution to all of America's ills and also defending treasonous immigration policies, the worst part of libertarianism.



Ron Paul's hard core supporters have been ENABLERS of RP's insane/treasonous positions on immigration for a long time. It was the same with other supposedly Libertarian great White leaders like Jack Kemp. Younger readers here on Whitenewsnow must not make the same mistake for new White political leaders coming up. They/we must be uncompromising that we may like many parts of some candidate's political/economic philosophy if they are insane/treasonous on the live or die subject of the NW immigration invasion, their political careers are finished. We will not invite them to debates, we will not tape record their guest appearance on the MSM television news shows. They are to be shunned.

That theory has been around for a long time, that a booming economy would suffer from a shortage of labor, but that has never happened. The theory does not originate with Libertarians, it originates with International Bankers and International Corporations, and is supported by Neocons, Communists, Socialists, Republicans, Democrats, and any other political movement that is funded by the Banks and Corporations.

There are no jobs that White Folks refuse to do, there are just Corporations and Governments that refuse to hire White Folks.

Ron Paul wants to reinstate the Federal Constitution as the Law of the Land, and return to Rule of Law (having the Federal Government obey Federal Law) and that is step one for securing the Future of White Children.

Originally Posted by Poor Richard

That theory has been around for a long time, that a booming economy would suffer from a shortage of labor, but that has never happened. The theory does not originate with Libertarians, it originates with International Bankers and International Corporations, and is supported by Neocons, Communists, Socialists, Republicans, Democrats, and any other political movement ...
.

One of those other political movements is.....

Libertarianism.

The Wall Street Journal used to run an editorial on July 4th "there shall be open borders".

Reason magazine when nuclear against Ron Paul for his newsletter which said negative things about Black gang members and some immigration. That other clueless Libertarian ex-governor of New Mexico who ran for President this year and got 0%, he was also for open borders immigration.

So yeah, Libertarians are terrible/treasonous on immigration and Ron Paul justly deserves his D-immigration grade from NumbersUSA.

The moral of this story is

Stop Being an Enabler.

Don't cheer on Libertarian candidates who are insane/treasonous on immigration. If Ron Paul's supporters had just taken him aside in say 1988 and made him aware in no uncertain terms that RP's insanity/treason on immigration had to stop and it had to stop now - we wouldn't be in the mess.

Stop being an Enabler!

Originally Posted by Instauration Fan

One of those other political movements is.....

Libertarianism.

The Wall Street Journal used to run an editorial on July 4th "there shall be open borders".

Reason magazine when nuclear against Ron Paul for his newsletter which said negative things about Black gang members and some immigration. That other clueless Libertarian ex-governor of New Mexico who ran for President this year and got 0%, he was also for open borders immigration.

So yeah, Libertarians are terrible/treasonous on immigration and Ron Paul justly deserves his D-immigration grade from NumbersUSA.

The moral of this story is

Stop Being an Enabler.

Don't cheer on Libertarian candidates who are insane/treasonous on immigration. If Ron Paul's supporters had just taken him aside in say 1988 and made him aware in no uncertain terms that RP's insanity/treason on immigration had to stop and it had to stop now - we wouldn't be in the mess.

Stop being an Enabler!

The Federal Government is in favor of an open border for the Federal Union, but helps to defend the southern border of Mexico (so that Mexico won't be invaded) and the Jewish border in Occupied Palestine (so the Jewish Race can remain safe).

Ron Paul has NEVER said that he is in favor of an open border.

A Libertarian is supposed to be in favor of PERSONAL LIBERTY. An invading army of Mexican criminals is a violation of the Personal Liberty of every Citizen in every State in the Federal Union.

PROPERTY RIGHTS are at the heart of PERSONAL LIBERTY a State in the Federal Union belongs to the Citizens of that State. Citizens of Mexico have no right to the property of the Citizens of a State in the Federal Union.

Every Libertarian has to be opposed to illegal immigration (invasion) because it is illegal (that should be obvious) and because it violates the Personal Liberty and Property Rights of the Citizens in any State in the Federal Union.