Thread: Citizenship

The Quest for Albion:

Citizenship



The Travails of a Once and Future People






by

Faustus







~ Howard David Johnson ~








Citizenship

The world-city means cosmopolitanism in place of "home" . . . To the world-city belongs not a folk but a mob. Its uncomprehending hostility to all the traditions representative of the culture (nobility, church, privileges, dynasties, convention in art and limits of knowledge in science), the keen and cold intelligence that confounds the wisdom of the peasant, the new- fashioned naturalism that in relation to all matters of sex and society goes back far to quite primitive instincts and conditions, the reappearance of the panem et circenses in the form of wage-disputes and sports stadia--all these things betoken the definite closing down of the Culture and the opening of a quite new phase of human existence--anti-provincial, late, futureless, but quite inevitable.

Oswald Spengler

i.

A City is made up of individuals who, like cities, states, and nations have a rhythmic cycle in which their lives and fortunes are inextricably bound: Birth, Life, and senility, and in just this order. Individuals, those basic building blocs which are the elementary source and strength of any social dynamic which envisions the socialization of its unique tribal acquaintances are, so called, ‘fellow citizens’. Up until recent times, these tribal acquaintances were, as the word ‘tribal’ implies, of the same racial stock, and was duly understood to mean that, each in turn, were part of an extended family, and basked in the sacred fraternity of citizenship, the gift which organized city-states inferred upon its fellows to mark them unique, and empowered with special privileges as compared to the dark and abysmal counterparts which, in ancient times, were considered barbarians. This marked a complicated and natural aversion to ‘outsiders’, and invoked the enmity of opposites.

It is said that opposites attract.

In this regard, as a simple matter which is axiomatic, the pull between light and dark, good and evil, small or large is a natural phenomenon which signifies either a lesser or greater degree of acceptance or rejection. In the first case, it is amity, friendship, and social intercourse which benefits the individual person or group; to reject a thing, person, or idea, as in the second case, is to utilize a proportionate sense of discretion, of discrimination. This is a person’s, or people’s sense of beauty, right or wrong; in short, their sense of what belongs to them by right of affinity, of personal desire. With time, and through the extension of biological groupings, this becomes the social mores of the social acceptance of what is good for the group, or what is bad for the group. This is the true meaning of discrimination.

To be a ‘citizen’, by definition, is to discriminate from persons who are not citizens. We, here in America, are citizens of villages, towns, States, and belong thereby, to a Nation. When we were first empowered with ‘american’ citizenship, it was through the right of conquest, the right of being empowered by military supremacy: Once the revolutionary dictum of victory imposed a new set of standards by which peers could demonstrate the fact that the English Monarchy no longer ruled and, hence, ‘subjects’ of the Crown were no more, a new set of standards became the law of the land. We were, after the departure of the English military occupation, citizens of a new commonwealth, a new sense of natural and legal definition of just who they had become. The term ‘citizen’ of the United States implied not only legal status, but naturalized status as well – being a part of a larger, connected people, a people connected by long-standing traditions, both in Law and ‘common law’ which allowed the disparate qualities of religion, ethnic sub-divisions, and familial interactions to merge, graft themselves, and finalize their aspirations into a voluntary assembly of persons in which the term Citizen became the nomenclature which described the totality of a People. Citizenship, not only by definition, but by inference as well, was a racial designation.

How far the Modern has taken us!

Citizenship has, since then, gone through quite an evolutionary morphology.

ii.

In the beginning of all epilogues, nature, as the instrument of ‘accident’, purpose, or destiny, has been present at the first cries of every life, at every instant, of this great Epic we call Life; each cry, resounding off fur, thatch, or walls of mason and steel has also been witnessed by its own, unique and natural corresponding kinsmen: A Mother, Father, family (by extension both immediate bonds of blood, as well as common acquaintances, held in common by racial affinity), and others known to the community-at-large. That first breath, inhaled involuntarily, a hot rushing wind into the organisms which, for eighty years or more, will function, unfailingly, to support the ongoing existence of this new, precious person: the newest member of the nation-at-large. The die is cast, a new Life, a new Citizen has been thrust upon, and interwoven with, the great tapestry of its own unique, and corporate destiny, which encompasses the entire movement and dynamics of the earth itself.

The picture created above is, or will be said by some, to be romantic; thus it is. To think of life, in its pure state, and not be romantic in all its considerations, is to say that the person who is that hardened by the modern technics of life today, is a lesser individual, and hence, adds to an already complex and disinterested population which has lost its way. Romance, by definition, adds to the lustre of human contact, making the dark places submit to the light; making the heart beat faster, and fonder; allowing the memories of first light, new horizons, to live more vividly within the recesses of our minds. All this, to the person who never asked (that he or she is aware of) that this spectacle be awarded them.

Romance, however, is soon lost in the ever quickening pace of one’s environment and its various day-to-day habits and routines. It becomes the ever present compulsion which, in most cases, completely subsumes the individual and its innate personality. In the Modern’s age, idealism, real idealism, is passed into the deep pit of conformity, and mediocrity. Each one of us, especially those of the West become, at an ever increasing rate, ‘citizens of the world’ as seen through the eyes and ears of those who have lost their way; who would submit you and I, all of us, to the daily vagaries of mass man, demanding only that we ‘accept’ the status of citizen in a brave new world, replete with technics unimagined by our Fathers and Mothers of yesteryear. Citizen, in name, and in fact, but citizen with no raison d’être; no passion, nor reason to live.

To what end are the great devices, machines, and technology to be used? The overabundance of non-utilitarian technologies by the average person seems, too many, superfluous. It all becomes, in fact, simply production without direction; a complete arbitrary distraction which benefits no one excepting, perhaps, the manufacturer, the capitalist, the banker. In fact, these latter are over extended, and have forced the over-extension of the Western world, and who knows where this will all lead? Not the common man or woman, this is a certainty. Those who seek to rule, and are ruling will, seek ever more and more power, and will usher in upheavals which none, not even those in power, can imagine. They are prepared, however, to suppress, control, or dissuade by means of finance, political pressure, or death, those who do not accommodate their plans.All organisms seek their own survival.

The disparate individuals who now reside, for better or ill, with us, and within us, demand the same recognition, which we, those of the West, have declared ourselves, a unique and special people; they too, demand citizenship in the image of their makers. This demand however, seems unlikely to take shape in any voluntary fashion; in fact, its de facto acceptance, is already obvious but, without the full import being realistically understood, except by few in academia, the common folk, and fewer still, those of a demonstrable Nationalist perspective. The Modern has done, and is doing everything imaginable to force this upon the citizens of this Western colony; future ‘democratic’ elections on all levels will, without doubt, assure this. However, for the sake of discussion, let us continue with the facts needed for this understanding of our near and present future.

iii.



Immigration and Citizenship

The canard of ‘citizenship’ will, if left alone, continue to mollify and confuse, to the detriment of all, the decisions necessary to maintain and extend ourselves as a distinct and viable organism. We shall endeavor to cover, yet again, and there are truly magnificent studies which demand our attention yet, even these, erudite as they are, deny the passion, the need, the demand to have these issues heard; they are, for the most part, belonging to those conservative individuals who, in turn, allow their works to make the conservative rounds, speaking at conservative gatherings, and aiding in turn, the same soft-spoken and dedicated individuals who will, as have all before, continue to wither and die on the political vine. Instead of dealing with Immigration, not alone, but with the corporate support of their very Folk, the common man and woman, in the venues of the street, for there is no other venue open to the People at this time, they often seem surprised when they are denied places to speak and are denied the very tenure necessary to earn a living. This is dawning on many of these sorts which, at this time, still command a certain degree of financial support, either through publishing or writing, being Corporate heads, or civil servants, with the common man and woman – most, however, continue to fleece or betray the common man or woman, just like they have for the past sixty years.

To develop a unique and abiding sovereignty, a corporate political state, is to assume a more aggressive and dominant role; this role may be organic, but it also assumes that political features known as political activism, political finance, and political revolutionaries will be supported, and this in turn, supports the active political designs of the nationalist corporate structure. Nationalism is the only conduit which is, or can be, revolutionary in scope, demand the greatest number of adherents, and consequently maintain any so-called legitimacy to the future programmes and institutional mechanisms necessary for the growth of any call whatever, for the protection and sustenance of the people; and the ability to enforce and create 'national policy' regarding Immigration. To think otherwise, or encourage others to think in this fashion is racial treason, for it develops the old ‘tried and true’ wait-and-see mentality; a mentality which, as of today, has done little to reconcile the needs of Western stock, and the special needs of sovereignty. There is no middle ground, and there is no compromise. The jealousy’s, which have always plagued the conservative ‘movements’ will, very shortly, be wiped away by the revolutionary tenets of the burgeoning white Nationalist. This new individual will, without fear or favor, replace the conservative, and all those who favor them, without mercy, and develop those resources, which the conservatives have squandered for so long.

The lack of ‘support’ for the spokesmen, those who, from youth onward, have showed such promise, yet allowed to die, literally in some cases, will not be allowed to continue; the slow, yielding voices of the past, will not be allowed to suffer any more apathy and cowardice from their erstwhile supporters. We have no time to waste.

The conservative approach has brought some to their senses; but this has, also, died on the vine:

The CCH FMLA-ADA Leave Advisor will walk you through the maze of federal leave law to help you navigate the process, make effective decisions, and know when to contact legal counsel. Learn More - While the AFL-CIO leadership remains committed to what an immigration reform group calls "a massive illegal alien amnesty program," some rank and file workers and constituent locals are asserting that such a policy would do irreparable harm to American workers. The latest crack in the AFL-CIO's support for amnesty is Pittsburgh Plumbers Local No. 27, which approved a resolution October 10 demanding that their union dues not be used for activities that support undocumented immigrants.

The resolution sharply criticizes the AFL-CIO leadership's positions on dealing with illegal immigration. Local 27 "wants to express our outrage regarding the AFL-CIO's stance on supporting millions of illegal aliens." Illegal immigration is "harming our country," and specifically the interests of working Americans, it states.

According to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the plumbers' resolution follows a similar position taken last month by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, which represents some 750,000 building trades workers nationally. Earlier this summer, Teamster president James Hoffa expressed opposition to legalization for millions of illegal immigrants and called for an overhaul of U.S. immigration policies that he believes are detrimental to the interests of American workers.

"Americans from all walks of life at the grassroots are mobilizing to stop a massive illegal alien guest worker amnesty program being promoted by a disengaged elite," said Dan Stein, president of FAIR. "Whether it is union members acting to protect their jobs and wages, or local governments acting to protect local residents from costs and crime associated with illegal immigration, Americans are making it clear that they will not sit quietly while their interests are being sold out."

Both the AFL-CIO and its rival federation, Change to Win, have embraced immigrant workers' rights. Recently the AFL-CIO announced a partnership with a national day laborers organization, which advocates for the rights of these workers, who are often undocumented immigrants.1

Resolutions like these, while well intended, have done nothing to reduce this threat. The majority of working-class men and women of Western stock continue to suffer as a consequence, having no one to demand that their ‘citizenship’ be enforced, without fear or favor, having been sold out by the very vested conservative elements which would have us ‘wait just a little longer for reprieve’, for the dissolution of hard-won workers rights.

As a White Nationalist, one must never submit to the compromise of corporate America; to do so, limits not only oneself, but that of your brothers and sisters which, on a daily basis, suffer the indignities of Institutions which have, long ago, left these individuals to fend for themselves. Nationalists, will never forget this betrayal. The monies which would have been realized by supporting the studious, the industrious, and fellow citizens of the West have, unfortunately, been discarded in favor of the promise of certain elites which, for a time, have bought and paid for the complicity of these paragons of finance and conservative principles. No more.

These same individuals have for far too long, avoided the coming apocalypse. All those of Western stock can see, clearly, the inevitable change and disastrous effects it is having on them, their children, and their nation.

iv.

The coming catastrophe is beginning to make itself known to all.

The betrayal of those who ‘speak’ for those of Western stock, those who, for lucre's sake, have sided with the ‘mob’, with canaille, for to do less, in their mind, is the end of their power, their position, and their desires; the modern ‘aristocrats’ of the political machine, having made their compromise, their back-room deals have, at the expense of their fellows, embraced the ebony hue of difference, as the logical end of democracy, which they, themselves, ushered in, and bowed to the majesty of numbers, of that great leveling.

Citizenship, that particular and privileged gift, given away for the meaningless chatter of the voting booth, wherein those who cast their ‘vote’, vote only for their own special interests, which is normal, but which confounds and annuls the vote of each and every Western man and woman. With the weight of various misadventures, jealousies, power-grabs, and outright betrayal, the members of the West are confused, misdirected, and sensing, but not fully understanding, the source of their predicament, have also chosen to be swayed by slick tongues, and the cannon of inevitability, and have sold their birthright to any and sundry who promise them security, protection, and compromise. Such have all decadent rulers, be they ‘systems’, ‘individuals’, or technics of ‘law’, finalized their sway over the mass of men. Only one thing stands in their way: the Nationalist.

For many, many years, nationalists, specifically and independently, until very recently, were the only ones demanding an end, and extrication of foreign illegal immigrants; the call did not end there, and the demand for repatriation of a majority, if not all, immigration from non-Western nations. The abuse levied against these stalwart individuals and groups has been profound, and has continued unabated since just after WW II by the very ‘victors’ who held the world in their hands, for better or for ill: The conservatives of the day, leading the charge with purveyors of ‘civil rights’, and progressive leanings. These individuals knew the outcome of these policies, and hastened its inevitable consequences. The late, not so great, William F. Buckley is the perfect picture of such traitors as this.

Patrick Buchanan, cut from the same cloth, yet finding his way in more demonstrable ways, nevertheless failed to champion the cause of his own people, no matter the thousands of articles in which he describes the plight of Western peoples, as he ran a african-american female, to be his presidential running mate, courting the multicultural voting bloc. This effort, like so many non-racial nationalists, is the blatant earmark of the conservative political hack, that specie of american lethargy, and political suicide who, nevertheless, declares:

Americans of European ancestry are also declining as a share of the U.S. population, down from near 90 percent into 1960 to 66 percent today. Anglos, as they are called now, are now minorities in our two largest states, Texas and California, and, by2040, will be a minority in the nation that people of British and European stock built.

Last month, the Census Bureau projected the U.S. population would growby 167 million by 2060, to 468 million.

And immigrants and their children will constitute 105 million of that 167 million. That would be triple the 37.5 million legal and illegal immigrants here today, which is itself the largest cohort of foreigners any nation has ever taken in.

With the 45 million Hispanics here to rise to 102 million by 2050, the Southwest is likely to look and sound more like Mexico than America. Indeed, culturally, linguistically and ethnically, it will be a part of Mexico.2

This message has, dutifully, been preached to a certain conservative readership, yet the political action in real terms, has fallen much too short of the mark; the passive tendency to meekly submit what millions already know, and continue to ‘hope for the best’ has been the main impetus – for all enemies, foreign and domestic – seek ever to push their opponent to the limit, seeking the level by which will prove their advantage.

I, personally, am persuaded that Mr. Buchanan is a refined, cultured, and honorable man; the point here, is that he, truly, is no Nationalist, and his reticence regarding Race, along with the outright blatant, if not simple naive attacks, by radio personality, Alex Jones, against White Nationalists, as being part of 'germanic death-cults', knowing full well the imperative nature of this dynamic for at least the past 40 years, if not longer, and yet not even one time coming out in support of men who are known White Nationalists, in support of the nationalist positions held by these men. It would seem that conservatives are ashamed of their racial-nationalist brethren. On the part of the Nationalist, regarding any who treat us this way, we have our own feelings: Disgust.

Copyright 2008


_________
1. Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) - EMPLOYMENT LAW — (Immigration reform group: rank and file union members break with AFL-CIO over immigration) 10/23/06.

2. Patrick J. Buchanan-Official Website - Patrick J. Buchanan – The Decline of The Anglos, September 18, 2007.