LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With QuoteI understand that the first man on the moon was actually Sudanese as well.
History channel libels Western Civilization with new black history myth.
History channel libels Western Civilization with new black history myth.
A new documentary on the history of America contained a fresh new whopper of a lie. The new History channel documentary “America: The Story of Us” says that George Washington and the continental army learned how to inoculate themselves against smallpox from Negro slaves from America.
This lie is clearly tantamount to slander against Western Civilization as well as the English physician who really developed smallpox inoculation. In the past, these politically motivated pseudo-documentaries have claimed that Muslims taught inoculation to the West. This is the first time that the inoculation has ever been attributed to Negroes from Africa.
The staff at CofCC.org did some research and found a more detailed version of this brand new black history myth.
The Myth: Onesimus, a Sudanese slave owned by Massachusetts Puritan Pamphleteer Cotton Mather taught Americans how to inoculate against smallpox. Onesimus brought the technique to America from the Sudan.
The Truth: Variolation against the smallpox virus was spread all over the Muslim world by the Ottoman Empire. It may have even been used in the Sudan. However there is no actual evidence that Mather learned this from his slave. Variolation was also used in China and India, both of which claim to have used it hundreds of years before the Turks.
However, variolation is certainly not inoculation! In fact a study in the early 1700’s showed that variolation killed as many as 1 in 6 people the technique was used on. Also, variolation did nothing to prevent the spread of smallpox. The processed was eventually outlawed in Western Europe.
No inoculation against smallpox existed until it was developed by an English physician in 1796. Edward Jenner developed the smallpox vaccine using the cowpox virus. His vaccine was spread all over the world by white people.
Shame on the History Channel for propagating this politically motivated lie that is so easy to disprove.
The History channel is owned by A&E, which in turn is jointly owned by Hearst, Disney-ABC, and NBC. These are run by the Hearst family, Micheal Eisner, and Jeff Zucker. The entire lot are left-wing democrat supporters. Eisner was even an early backer of Obama in the Democratic Primary.
I understand that the first man on the moon was actually Sudanese as well.
Have you ever noticed that there is almost never a movie these days showing "cowboys and Indians", or early settlers arriving in America?
There were huge numbers of these in the 50s and 60s.
I think they do not want to show the sacrifices that were made by our brave forefathers.
Every attempt is made to undermine the white claim and history to North America.
Long live the hard image of John Wayne, rather than the soft, sensitive types today seen on film.
The same people who complain about the treatment of the Indians thoroughly enjoy the comfort and freedom that are provided in the greatest predominantly White country the world has ever seen. Would they rather have not had those White settlers carve out this country with their own hands?Originally Posted by Silver Stallion
Have you ever noticed that there is almost never a movie these days showing "cowboys and Indians", or early settlers arriving in America?
There were huge numbers of these in the 50s and 60s.
I think they do not want to show the sacrifices that were made by our brave forefathers.
Every attempt is made to undermine the white claim and history to North America.
Long live the hard image of John Wayne, rather than the soft, sensitive types today seen on film.
Shut the
box lyiing tube off then. Write mass letters of displeasement and complaints about displacement.
Muslims are seriously horrid about rewriting history, they try to tell their kids they founded america. I kid you not. Texas has rewritten schoolbooks to "fix" the damages from enemy writers..
Americans for the most part already know and be sure to tell your kids to pay attention to what their kids get in school.
Best thing really is to pull them out and homeschool them with real american history.
Rewriting history is also a disgrace to the native american indians and they should have their history month before blacks do. Instead they are ignored as if they were never slaughtered in the droves....
forgot to add that many have opted to shut the tv off permanently costing cable companies a lot of money.
Or, if they do make a movie like that, it is plain crap.Have you ever noticed that there is almost never a movie these days showing "cowboys and Indians", or early settlers arriving in America?
There were huge numbers of these in the 50s and 60s.
I think they do not want to show the sacrifices that were made by our brave forefathers.
Every attempt is made to undermine the white claim and history to North America.
Long live the hard image of John Wayne, rather than the soft, sensitive types today seen on film.
But an excellent observation.
I have often said, westerns were a HUGE genre in the 50's, 60's and starting to tail off in the 70's, but there were still tv series around.
Westerns to me at least, are a very good thing to watch. I like to point out my theory, you want to understand freedom? Watch a western.
You can go where you want, when you want and so on and unless you interfere with someone or their property, there are no constraints on you.
That is freedom.
Crap indeed.
For years I wondered why many of the actors in "new" westerns were often the most homely people that you could find in a small city. But that again, is to present the original white settlers as knuckle-dragging refuse from Europe.
Hollywood cannot make a western. I question how "good" their Holocaust movies are too.
Some of the best movies of all time are westerns. One of my favourites, only partially because it was shot in Monument Valley, is The Searchers with John Wayne.
I love a damn good western, funny enough, more than a sci fi.
Define good. I am not a holocaustomaniac, so I scrutinise their movies as the hogwash they are.I question how "good" their Holocaust movies are too.
Ah, the usual suspects. No surprise. Thanks for the info. As we all know, practically all claims made by Marxist revisionists are completely unfounded. Media Bolshevism at its finest.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks