Thread: The Latest Uploads of Instauration Magazine

Cover of April 1987 Instauration,
put online for the first time today (May 24, 2011)

Here's another great Instauration article from the early 1990s which cut to the truth about the Jewish Neo Conservative efforts to take over the American Conservative movement and promote wars for Israel, brutal censorship of pro White conservatives. I was just starting to become aware at the time that all these Jewish ex-liberals who had supposedly "Seen the Light" and were coming over to our Conservative, patriotic side - I was noticing that this was playing out very badly for our side. Well, 20 years later it's still the reality of fake conservatives, "Neo Conservatives" pushing endless US wars against Arabs/Muslims abroad and racial, criminal chaos here at home - and this is all somehow supposed to be "Conservative".
(Does anyone know if the great Instauration writer NB Forrest is still alive - or was this a pen name for Wilmot Robertson?)
Here's the article:

January 1992
The Battle Is Joined

Most Instaurationists and other racially conscious whites
are probably ex-conservatives. I know I am. There was
a time, long ago, when the arcane infighting of the dif*
ferent conservative schools of thought actually meant something
to me. My interest died as the quarrels of those people began to
degenerate into a cacophony of idiotic contradictions from the
mouths of paid puppets for the big Washington "Think Tanks,"
with kosher moneybags and Majority trucklers pulling the strings.
Still, I have retained a tad residual concern for what goes on in
conservative ranks. Many of our recruits will have to come from
that camp, and most of them are decent, honest folk. Confused,
mixed up, out of touch with the real world, obsessed with a dying
Communist dinosaur, but nevertheless basically okay. Surprising*
ly, a few brave conservatives are now starting to speak hard truths
and ask hard questions, the kind of forthright interrogation that
makes the Chosen break out in a cold sweat.
While most of us may not be aware of it, a vicious intellectual
war is brewing in the ranks of American conservatives, a fight that
has implications for all of us. It could revolutionize American par*
ty politics by shifting the focus of national debates to nitty-gritty issues.
The basic issue is the vision of America. Is the country a mere
abstraction, waiting to be twisted and pulled into any shape imag*
inable in the mind of whatever Jew, Chicano or Laplander who
drops in from outer space? Or is it a true nation, with a distinct
people and a native land? Needless to say, Majority Americans
are the vital component of the presumptive "American people" in
the view of the so-called "Paleoconservatives," the Old Right, the
America First crowd, represented these days by the likes of Pat
Buchanan and Thomas Fleming of the Rockford Institute.
The other "conservatives," the Neo-Cons and their fellow trav*
elers, reject the very idea that there is any such thing as the Amer*
ican people, except in the legalistic definition of the term. To
them, anything that walks on two legs, grunts a few sounds and
has some pettifogging claim to an American passport is an "Amer*
ican."

Like it or not, Paleo-Cons are Americans. The provenance of
the Neo-Cons is, to say the least, murky. To be sure, many are
simply befuddled George Wills and Jack Kemps, thinking that if
they can just put some bizarre economic plan into practice or
"bring back traditional values," the barbarians will be repulsed at
the gates, and we'll all be able to settle down and live out Ozzie
and Harriet lives. Most Neo-Cons, however, are kosher ex-Reds or
ex-liberals, who have undergone a miraculous conversion.
Irving Kristol is the chief guru of this bunch, with William F.
Buckley the titular head of the would-be "respectable" conserva*
tives, a category which now includes Neo-Cons and their friends.
Essentially a rum lot!

The first skirmishes of the Paleo-Neo war broke out several
years ago, but only recently have the gunshots been heard by
mainstreamers. The Fort Sumter of conflict was Abe Rosenthal's
column in the N.Y. Times, written as the Gulf crisis was heating
up. Abe's diatribe was a crude attack on Pat Buchanan, who had
suggested the blitz on Iraq was a scam engineered by the Israelis.
Pat also had the effrontery (or lack of common sense) to also point
out the role American Jewish dual loyalists were playing in this
dirty game.

The holy teeth of Rosenthal, a latter-day Neo convert, were set
on edge. His column was an attempt to read Pat out of "respecta*
ble conservatism" (i.e., the kind controlled by the Jews and their
goy trenchermen). Lamentably for Abe, hardly anybody paid any
attention to his maledictions and he was loudly rebuked by more
than a few of Buchanan's many friends. The Jewish community re*
sounded with much gnashing of teeth and rending of garments. It
did not help matters that Buchanan's boss, the eccentric, nonko*
sher TV mogul Ted Turner, showed no inclination to fire him. On
the contrary, Pat is as popular as ever.
That Buchanan is
merely one of a growing number of tough*
minded traditional conservatives starting to
speak their minds has
set off alarms in the
yarmulke crowd. Chronicles, the magazine of
the Rockford Institute,
has been gaining more
and mIJre attention, in
and out of the conser*
vative community. The
Southern Partisan, a
sharp-tongued, unconventional Southern journal of opinion, has
been veering towards the Chronicles line, even though a few of its
scriveners, unable to bring themselves to answer rudeness with
rudeness, have let the Neos off much too easily. The Conservative
Review, a relatively new magazine, is a hard-right publication
that makes no bones about the Neo-conartists. Meanwhile grass*
roots conservatives throughout the country are starting to wonder
whatever happened to their movement and how a band of intel*
lectual poseurs, ragpickers and reformed Trotskyites managed to
take it over.

Bill Buckley, who deserves much of the blame for this ideolog*
ical horseplay, has fallen back on his familiar role of circus mas*
ter, giving gentle rebukes to both sides, but clearly coming down
much harder on the Paleos. Bug Eyes always knows where to
brown-nose. His National Review, having been through rough fi*
nancial times, must curtsy lower than ever to those who hold the
pursestrings. His posturings are as shameful as they are predictable.
The latest blast in the Paleo-Neo war, a most dastardly one,
came from The American Spectator Uuly 1991). This issue con*
tained both a scabrous article by one David Frum, assistant fea*
tures editor at the Wall St. Journal and certainly no stranger to ge*
filte fish, and a toadying editorial by R. Emmett Tyrrell, the
Spectator's editor, an Irishman whose soul is shaped like a mezuzah.
Of late the Spectator has come to resemble a house organ of
the ADL. Nothing half so sadly funny or funnily sad as a goy who
has gone completely off his rocker and doesn't know it. It must be
a treat watching him jerk, roll, gape and drool around the copy
room. Frum's article goes far beyond the bounds of decency, but
since when has decency ever restrained the outpourings of an en*
terprising Chosenite, especially one in the service of a conserva*
tive sellout?
N.B. FORREST