LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With QuoteI wonder what will become of all those websites that claim the Egyptians were African Blacks?
King Tut's DNA is Western European
It looks like Arthur Kemp has been right all along.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
King Tut?s DNA is a 99.6 percent match with Western European Y Chromosomes - Arthur Kemp’s BlogDespite the refusal of the Secretary General of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, Zahi Hawass, to release any DNA results which might indicate the racial ancestry of Pharaoh Tutankhamen, the leaked results reveal that King Tut’s DNA is a 99.6 percent match with Western European Y chromosomes.
The DNA test results were inadvertently revealed on a Discovery Channel TV documentary filmed with Hawass’s permission — but it seems as if the Egyptian failed to spot the giveaway part of the documentary which revealed the test results.
Hawass previously announced that he would not release the racial DNA results of Egyptian mummies — obviously because he feared the consequences of such a revelation.
On the Discovery Channel broadcast, which can be seen on the Discovery Channel website here, or if they pull it, on YouTube here, at approximately 1:53 into the video, the camera pans over a printout of DNA test results from King Tut.
I wonder what will become of all those websites that claim the Egyptians were African Blacks?
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White!
B.U.G.S. http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/
Horus the Avenger's...Follow the White Rabbit
http://whiterabbitradio.net/
I saw this in person...
I actually got to see Tut's cane in Cairo in the Egyptian Museum in 2005. It has a Black and a Semetic enemy/slave figure on it.
And most legitimate scholars know the ancient Egyptians were White. Even in liberal San Francisco's museum by Golden Gate Park admitted such. They had Blacks there, sure, but they were not the ruling class. Some Blacks did even become Pharoahs eventually, but it was a White created culture. L.A. Waddell wrote a great book on Egypt and its Sumerian Origin.
Amazon.com: Egyptian Civilization Its Sumerian Origin and Real Chronology (9780766142732): L. a. Waddell: Books@@AMEPARAM@@http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41AV5SGKAVL.@@AMEPARAM@@41AV5SGKAVL
There is a lot of hate visible in the comments of this Youtube video.
Originally Posted by Silver Stallion
There is a lot of hate visible in the comments of this Youtube video.
YouTube - King Tut Unwrapped - King Tut's DNA R1b | Royal Blood
The liberals and Afro Supremacists areand calling the science and the Discovery Channel racist! LOL
As Horus the Avenger says, "This is funny stuff."
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White!
B.U.G.S. http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/
Horus the Avenger's...Follow the White Rabbit
http://whiterabbitradio.net/
King Tut’s DNA is Western European | EUTimes.net
The significance is, of course, that R1b is the most common Y-chromosome haplogroup in Europe reaching its highest concentrations in Ireland, Scotland, western England and the European Atlantic seaboard — in other words, European through and through.
So much for the Afro-centrists and others who have derided the very obvious northwestern European appearance of a large number of the pharonic mummies. It seems like March of the Titans was right after all…
Despite the refusal of the Secretary General of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, Zahi Hawass, to release any DNA results which might indicate the racial ancestry of Pharaoh Tutankhamen, the leaked results reveal that King Tut’s DNA is a 99.6 percent match with Western European Y chromosomes.
Politics getting in the way of truth.
He was a white man.
something is up
When it comes to King Tut and Akhenaton....something is up. I do not know what is up. Or what some parties had or have plannned. But there is way too much smoke behind these characters for their not to be a fire.
One of the weirdest things about Akhenaton is how odd he looks in some statues.
Akhenaten - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Look at the top bust and then scroll down and look at the bust of him sporting the blue head piece. Tell me they don't look like different people. This has always been controversial. Why the difference?
By the way, He is Tut's father. They HATE revealing anything about Egyptian DNA.........and we know why.
No idea but it is kind of weird.
the wiki article (no time to read it all right now) does have this section:
"Akhenaten and Judeo-Christian monotheism
Further information: Moses and Monotheism
The idea of Akhenaten as the pioneer of a monotheistic religion that later became Judaism has been considered by various scholars.[40][41][42][43][44][45] One of the first to mention this was Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, in his book Moses and Monotheism.[46] Freud argued that Moses had been an Atenist priest forced to leave Egypt with his followers after Akhenaten's death."
and even credits the Freud-Fraud "founder of psychoanalysis" (lmao), as the first to point out Jews lifted monotheism from Egypt, and produced something called "judeo-C" when those two ethical systems have nothing to do with each other, really, and so on.
Definitely worth reading more about.
I mean: most readers will never think to question why on earth an explication of Judeo-C/ Moses and Egypt would be even be included here in wiki, in a thing about Tut's dad.
a book I just saw at the Houston Natural Science Museum Library:
More likely...
His jeweled death mask:
I thought one of the Hyksos, The "Shepherd Kings" changed his name to Moses.
Keep in mind, Tut was not at all a major phaorah. He is only highly regarded today because his mummy and so much else of his life was found. And there were defintitely Blacks in Ancient Egypt and yes there were Black pharoahs at some point. That of course no more makes George Washington or Ian Smith Black because the rulers of lands they once headed are now headed by Negroes.
This is a National Geographic Article that came out two years ago. It is biased towards Negroes but does indeed reveal that the bulk of the pharoahs and Ancient Egyptians were indeed White or at least not Black (if I remember it correctly).
National Geographic Magazine - NGM.com
You are correct. Tut is not significant. However, the characters around Tut at that time in Egypt were significant. Many parties have serious questions about Egypt at that time (hyksos). Furthermore, Egypt starting go through an epic racial transformation during the time of the Hyksos pharaohs. I am covering this in my next podcast. Our enemies have used Egypt to build their multiracial cult. Discovery Channel and History Channel specials full of Brown Egyptians. Furthermore, the head of Egyptian Antiquities, Museums etc etc....Dr Zahi Hawass has stated that he would not reveal genetic data on the mummies because he did not trust the science. Although, he trusted the science in regards to finding genetic connections (like who was Tut's father). He did not trust dna in regards to RACE. LOL
Why now reveal that Tut was in fact white? Why did Hawass change his position and allow Tut's race to come out? He has never done this in the past?
stay tuned the answer is interesting
I think the crux of the Negroes and multi-cults is that it was Black from beginning to end because it was in Africa. Not that you're not correct in their attempts, but I think with 90+% of Whites, you show that the founders, culture and science were White (which they definitely were) then you've won.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks