Global Warming Hoaxers Freezing Their Butts Off

[Jamie Kelso]

Global Warming Hoaxers Freezing Their Butts Off

The Global Warming Hoax isn't as hot as it used to be. Obama, Al Gore, and the Neocon carbon credit taxers are having a hard time on the credibility front as the frostiest cold fronts in memory continue to grip America, Canada, and Europe. The Warmists are finding out the hard way that Mr. Sun is the guy controlling Earth's temperature rather than Mr. and Mrs. carbon unit who drive a car. When Mr. Sun goes into one of his periodic cold cycles, as he is doing right now, we carbon units are certain to get colder winters. When Mr. Sun goes deep into one of his cooling cycles, we carbon units get to experience an Ice Age or mini-Ice Age.

Even though this article below is light on the good meteorological science put out by anti-warmist scientists, it does do a good job of noticing that our controlled media is curiously uninterested in the fact that Mr. Sun doesn't seem to have seen Al Gore's movie. Or just isn't buying it if he has.

SUPPOSE the climate landscape in recent weeks looked something like this: Half the country was experiencing its mildest winter in years, with no sign of snow in many Northern states. Most of the Great Lakes were ice-free. Not a single Canadian province had had a white Christmas. There was a new study discussing a mysterious surge in global temperatures - a warming trend more intense than computer models had predicted. Other scientists admitted that, because of a bug in satellite sensors, they had been vastly overestimating the extent of Arctic sea ice.

If all that were happening on the climate-change front, do you think you'd be hearing about it on the news? Seeing it on Page 1 of your daily paper? Would politicians be exclaiming that global warming was even more of a crisis than they'd thought? Would environmentalists be skewering global-warming "deniers" for clinging to their skepticism despite the growing case against it?

No doubt.

But it isn't such hints of a planetary warming trend that have been piling up in profusion lately. Just the opposite.

The United States has shivered through an unusually severe winter, with snow falling in such unlikely destinations as New Orleans, Las Vegas, Alabama, and Georgia. On Dec. 25, every Canadian province woke up to a white Christmas, something that hadn't happened in 37 years. Earlier this year, Europe was gripped by such a killing cold wave that trains were shut down in the French Riviera and chimpanzees in the Rome Zoo had to be plied with hot tea. Last week, satellite data showed three of the Great Lakes - Erie, Superior, and Huron - almost completely frozen over. In Washington, D.C., what was supposed to be a massive rally against global warming was upstaged by the heaviest snowfall of the season, which paralyzed the capital.

Meanwhile, the National Snow and Ice Data Center has acknowledged that due to a satellite sensor malfunction, it had been underestimating the extent of Arctic sea ice by 193,000 square miles - an area the size of Spain. In a new study, University of Wisconsin researchers Kyle Swanson and Anastasios Tsonis conclude that global warming could be going into a decades-long remission. The current global cooling "is nothing like anything we've seen since 1950," Swanson told Discovery News. Yes, global cooling: 2008 was the coolest year of the past decade - global temperatures have not exceeded the record high measured in 1998, notwithstanding the carbon-dioxide that human beings continue to pump into the atmosphere.

None of this proves conclusively that a period of planetary cooling is irrevocably underway, or that anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions are not the main driver of global temperatures, or that concerns about a hotter world are overblown. Individual weather episodes, it always bears repeating, are not the same as broad climate trends.

But considering how much attention would have been lavished on a comparable run of hot weather or on a warming trend that was plainly accelerating, shouldn't the recent cold phenomena and the absence of any global warming during the past 10 years be getting a little more notice? Isn't it possible that the most apocalyptic voices of global-warming alarmism might not be the only ones worth listening to?

There is no shame in conceding that science still has a long way to go before it fully understands the immense complexity of the Earth's ever-changing climate(s). It would be shameful not to concede it. The climate models on which so much global-warming alarmism rests "do not begin to describe the real world that we live in," says Freeman Dyson, the eminent physicist and futurist. "The real world is muddy and messy and full of things that we do not yet understand."

But for many people, the science of climate change is not nearly as important as the religion of climate change. When Al Gore insisted yet again at a conference last Thursday that there can be no debate about global warming, he was speaking not with the authority of a man of science, but with the closed-minded dogmatism of a religious zealot. Dogma and zealotry have their virtues, no doubt. But if we want to understand where global warming has gone, those aren't the tools we need.

Where's global warming? - The Boston Globe

Join the WhiteNewsNow.com Blog discussion of this story here

[Jamie Kelso]

Hundreds of scientists and engineers in the American Society of Chemistry (spelling?) and the American Physical Society (spelling?) have posted letters repudiating the politically-correct global warming hoax. I will post the links to these welcome developments as soon as I come across them again.

[Jamie Kelso]

This summer Southern California has recorded record lows in many locations. These are all-time record lows. More evidence that "global warming" is a hoax.

[FL Patriot]

YouTube - Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 11

YouTube - Fall of the Republic-The Presidency Of Barack H Obama-Part 11

[FL Patriot]

• Obama administration warns of cost of inaction
• Move met with opposition from Baucus and Inhofe

• Comments (62)
• Buzz up!
• Digg it

• Suzanne Goldenberg, US environment correspondent
• guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 27 October 2009 19.54 GMT
• Article history

Barack Obama speaks during a visit to Florida Power & Light's Desoto Next Generation Solar Energy Centre. Photo: Steve Nesius/AO



The epic confrontation about how America will power the economy of the future formally got underway today amid stark warnings from the Obama administration of the costs of inaction on energy reform.


Today's hearing, the first of three blockbuster sessions in the Senate, marks a last heave by administration officials and Democratic leaders to advance a bill to reduce America's greenhouse gas emissions before an international climate change meeting at Copenhagen, now just six weeks away.
They were met with strong opposition from a powerful Democrat as well as Republicans on the environment and public works committee.


With the clock running down to Copenhagen, the administration wheeled out four top officials to make the case that failure to act now on climate change would relegate America to lower tier status in the global economy.



"When the starting gun sounded on the clean energy race, the United States stumbled," Steven Chu, the energy secretary, told the environment and public works committee.



"If we don't choose to begin the development of this new technology, China and other countries will."


American legislation on climate change is seen as essential to reaching a meaningful deal at Copenhagen. But the White House held up action in the Senate on a climate change bill to focus on healthcare reform. The proposed law, which now stretches for more than 900 pages, would cut America's greenhouse gas emissions by 20% over 2005 levels by 2020 and encourage the development of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. Democratic leaders in the Senate are now struggling to advance a bill - which does not have solid support even among their own party - before the meeting in Copenhagen.


In an ominous sign for those prospects, Max Baucus, who ranks second on the environment committee and chairs the finance committee which will also review the bill, said the proposed 20% reduction target was too steep. "I have some concerns about the overall direction of the bill," he said.



"We cannot afford the unmitigated impacts of climate change but we also cannot afford the unmitigated effects of legislation."


For weeks, the White House, Democrats, and environmental organisations have lobbied hard to frame the bill as an economic opportunity.


Obama picked up the theme again in a visit to a solar plant in Florida where he announced $3.48bn in government grants to projects modernising America's electrical grid. In introducing the bill today, Barbara Boxer leaned heavily on an analysis by the Environmental Protection Agency that showed the shift away from oil and coal would cost just 22 to 30 cents a day.


Global warming isn't waiting for who is a Democrat or who is a Republican. Either we are going to deal with this problem or we are not," she said.


John Kerry, who co-wrote the bill with Boxer, said it would usher in a technological revolution akin to the rapid growth of the internet in the 1990s. "We are going to create the equivalent of five or 10 Googles and that is going to drive the economy of our country," said John Kerry, the former presidential candidate who is the other co-author of the bill.


But their arguments appeared to make little headway with Republicans
on the committee. James Inhofe, the Okalahoma Republican who notoriously declared global warming a hoax, called the bill a "temple of doom" which would cost Americans up to $400bn a year.


Some Republicans pressed for investment to build 100 new nuclear plants over the next decade, or to expand offshore oil drilling to meet America's future energy needs. Others argued that America would be damaging its own interests if it embarked on costly energy reforms - while emerging powers like India and China did not.

[Imbar]

More Evidence Global Warming Is a Fraud





That dripping sound you hear is the egg on the face of the liberals as their Great Global Warming hoax slowly collapses as the truth comes out. A BBC news article reports: “This headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998. But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures. And our climate models did not forecast it, even though man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be responsible for warming our planet, has continued to rise… Climate change sceptics, who passionately and consistently argue that man’s influence on our climate is overstated, say they saw it coming. They argue that there are natural cycles, over which we have no control, that dictate how warm the planet is.”

To make a long story short, accurate and scientific temperature records, which have only been taken in any methodical way for about the past century or so indicate that there is a pendulum effect, with global warming and cooling swinging back and forth about every 30 years. The last warming cycle seems to have peaked around 1998, and since then the earth has been cooling. In fact, this year has so far produced early winters, with snowfalls in the northern hemisphere coming earlier in 2009 than any within living memory.

The article notes “What is really interesting at the moment is what is happening to our oceans. They are the Earth’s great heat stores. In the last few years [the Pacific Ocean] has been losing its warmth and has recently started to cool down According to research conducted by Professor Don Easterbrook from Western Washington University last November, the oceans and global temperatures are correlated. The oceans, he says, have a cycle in which they warm and cool cyclically… The most important one is the Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO). For much of the 1980s and 1990s, it was in a positive cycle, that means warmer than average. And observations have revealed that global temperatures were warm too. But in the last few years it has been losing its warmth and has recently started to cool down. These cycles in the past have lasted for nearly 30 years.”

Hah!! Looks like the whole Global Warming scare of the past 20 years, which liberals and sneaky Red activists posing as Greens (also known as watermelons) have used as an excuse to scream for world government and socialism to “save the planet,” is bogus. The evidence that human activity is warming the planet, always tenuous at best, has crumbled before the inconvenient facts.



Despite alarmist claims that CO2 is increasing, the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere is still less than a tenth of one percent. Plants are so efficient at changing CO2 into oxygen that any increase in CO2 should be immediately matched by a growth in plants –as long as we don’t pave over the forests. The Left has endlessly blamed the US and Europe for alleged increases in CO2. Well, what about the six billion people in the Third World slashing and burning all the rain forests? Why is it that they aren’t blamed for wiping out jungles all over the world? How much CO2 do six billion Third Worlders produce? Maybe some birth control for the non-White hordes is in order.

There is already an effort to substitute the phrase “Global Climate Change” for “Global Warming.” That way, any severe winter or summer is “proof” that we need to give liberals a whole new governmental bureaucracy that will endlessly beat over the head any corporations that do not donate enough money to the Democrat Party.

by Jeff Davis

WHITE CIVIL RIGHTS

[Imbar]

BBC NEWS | Science & Environment | What happened to global warming?



What happened to global warming?



By Paul Hudson
Climate correspondent, BBC News


Average temperatures have not increased for over a decade

This headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998.
But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.
And our climate models did not forecast it, even though man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be responsible for warming our planet, has continued to rise.
So what on Earth is going on?
Climate change sceptics, who passionately and consistently argue that man's influence on our climate is overstated, say they saw it coming.
They argue that there are natural cycles, over which we have no control, that dictate how warm the planet is. But what is the evidence for this?
During the last few decades of the 20th Century, our planet did warm quickly.
Recent research has ruled out solar influences on temperature increases

Sceptics argue that the warming we observed was down to the energy from the Sun increasing. After all 98% of the Earth's warmth comes from the Sun.
But research conducted two years ago, and published by the Royal Society, seemed to rule out solar influences.
The scientists' main approach was simple: to look at solar output and cosmic ray intensity over the last 30-40 years, and compare those trends with the graph for global average surface temperature.
And the results were clear. "Warming in the last 20 to 40 years can't have been caused by solar activity," said Dr Piers Forster from Leeds University, a leading contributor to this year's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
But one solar scientist Piers Corbyn from Weatheraction, a company specialising in long range weather forecasting, disagrees.
He claims that solar charged particles impact us far more than is currently accepted, so much so he says that they are almost entirely responsible for what happens to global temperatures.
He is so excited by what he has discovered that he plans to tell the international scientific community at a conference in London at the end of the month.
If proved correct, this could revolutionise the whole subject.
Ocean cycles
What is really interesting at the moment is what is happening to our oceans. They are the Earth's great heat stores.

In the last few years [the Pacific Ocean] has been losing its warmth and has recently started to cool down




According to research conducted by Professor Don Easterbrook from Western Washington University last November, the oceans and global temperatures are correlated.
The oceans, he says, have a cycle in which they warm and cool cyclically. The most important one is the Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO).
For much of the 1980s and 1990s, it was in a positive cycle, that means warmer than average. And observations have revealed that global temperatures were warm too.
But in the last few years it has been losing its warmth and has recently started to cool down.
These cycles in the past have lasted for nearly 30 years.
So could global temperatures follow? The global cooling from 1945 to 1977 coincided with one of these cold Pacific cycles.
Professor Easterbrook says: "The PDO cool mode has replaced the warm mode in the Pacific Ocean, virtually assuring us of about 30 years of global cooling."
So what does it all mean? Climate change sceptics argue that this is evidence that they have been right all along.
They say there are so many other natural causes for warming and cooling, that even if man is warming the planet, it is a small part compared with nature.
But those scientists who are equally passionate about man's influence on global warming argue that their science is solid.
The UK Met Office's Hadley Centre, responsible for future climate predictions, says it incorporates solar variation and ocean cycles into its climate models, and that they are nothing new.
In fact, the centre says they are just two of the whole host of known factors that influence global temperatures - all of which are accounted for by its models.
In addition, say Met Office scientists, temperatures have never increased in a straight line, and there will always be periods of slower warming, or even temporary cooling.
What is crucial, they say, is the long-term trend in global temperatures. And that, according to the Met office data, is clearly up.
To confuse the issue even further, last month Mojib Latif, a member of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) says that we may indeed be in a period of cooling worldwide temperatures that could last another 10-20 years.
The UK Met Office says that warming is set to resume


Professor Latif is based at the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences at Kiel University in Germany and is one of the world's top climate modellers.
But he makes it clear that he has not become a sceptic; he believes that this cooling will be temporary, before the overwhelming force of man-made global warming reasserts itself.
So what can we expect in the next few years?
Both sides have very different forecasts. The Met Office says that warming is set to resume quickly and strongly.
It predicts that from 2010 to 2015 at least half the years will be hotter than the current hottest year on record (1998).
Sceptics disagree. They insist it is unlikely that temperatures will reach the dizzy heights of 1998 until 2030 at the earliest. It is possible, they say, that because of ocean and solar cycles a period of global cooling is more likely.
One thing is for sure. It seems the debate about what is causing global warming is far from over. Indeed some would say it is hotting up.

[FL Patriot]

Medium Topper Video Player





By Doyle Rice, USA TODAY
A record-setting snowstorm that dumped nearly 4 feet of snow across parts of the Rockies by Thursday will threaten parts of the Midwest and South today with heavy rain and flooding.
The powerful fall storm forced hundreds of flights to be canceled in Denver and closed schools and major highways. Heavy snow fell as far west as northern Utah's Wasatch Front to western Nebraska's northern border. In South Dakota, snow shut down the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. A blizzard warning was in effect until morning in northwest Kansas.
The heaviest snow was reported in the foothills west of Denver, near Pinecliffe, Colo., with 43.8 inches by midday Thursday, according to the National Weather Service. October snow records were set for Cheyenne, Wyo., and Fort Collins, Colo.
"Big storms like these, they seem to come around every 10 to 12 years," said Kyle Fredin, a weather service meteorologist in Denver.
The snow and windy conditions, which began late Tuesday, closed part of Interstate 70 through Colorado, plus other highways. Colorado Department of Transportation spokesman Bob Wilson said no serious accidents had been reported, likely because shuttered businesses meant fewer cars on the road.
The area around Denver International Airport received between 11 and 16 inches of snow, the weather service said. United Airlines canceled about half of its flights Wednesday and Thursday, because only two runways were open instead of the usual six, United spokesman Charlie Hobart said. Frontier and Southwest Airlines also canceled flights.
The worst of the wintry weather in Denver should be over by today, weather service meteorologist Dan Leszcynski said in Boulder, Colo. But the heavy snow could trigger avalanches, according to the Colorado Avalanche Information Center.
As the storm moves east, it will bring up to 8 inches of rain today in some parts of the lower Mississippi and Ohio valleys, Weather Channel meteorologist Mark Ressler said.
Flash-flood watches and warnings are posted from Iowa to Louisiana's Gulf Coast. Much of the area is already saturated. Standing water was reported in fields in eastern Arkansas, Ressler said.
The heavy snow set records for October in several areas:
•Cheyenne, Wyo., has had 2 feet of snow this month, shattering its previous October record, set in 1906. The average October snowfall in Cheyenne: 4.9 inches.
•Fort Collins recorded its largest October snowfall: 21.1 inches. The previous record was 20 inches.
•Denver had its biggest October snowfall since 1997, said Byron Louis, a weather service hydrologist in Boulder.
In Fort Collins, the snow and chilly weather didn't deter people from the prospect of a year's worth of free chicken.
More than 100 people camped overnight outside a new Chick-fil-A restaurant Thursday for a chance to win a year's worth of free chicken meals. They huddled around propane heaters supplied by the store and were invited inside for hot chocolate and cookies just before bedding down in sleeping bags and tents.
Winter's October surprise put a crimp in Halloween plans for outdoor attractions and events in Colorado.
The Northern Colorado Corn Maze in Fort Collins was forced to shut down for the season, owner Jason Martindale said. Cornstalks that stood 8-feet tall earlier this week are bent over with snow.
"It's made a mess out of everything out here," Martindale said.

[FL Patriot]

http://www.eclipptv.com/viewVideo.ph...estion_Al_Gore

[Jamie Kelso]

YouTube - Obama is about to formally surrender US Sovereignty

YouTube - Obama is about to formally surrender US Sovereignty

[FL Patriot]

Jose Manuel Barroso, right, said he was encouraged by the talks



President Barack Obama has said it is "imperative" the US and EU re-double efforts to achieve success at next month's climate summit in Copenhagen. Speaking after talks in Washington with EU officials, he said they agreed they should create a framework for progress.

The Copenhagen talks are aimed at negotiating a follow-on agreement to the Kyoto Protocol.

Meanwhile, former US Vice President Al Gore says he believes President Obama will attend the talks in Copenhagen.
He said the president would want to emphasise his administration's commitment to safeguarding the environment.

But Mr Obama's allies in Congress are struggling to push through legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and it is unlikely that any bill will be passed before the December talks.

'Potential disaster'

Mr Obama said climate change had been discussed "extensively" with EU leaders on Tuesday.

"All of us agreed that it was imperative for us to redouble our efforts in the weeks between now and the Copenhagen meetings to ensure that we create a framework for progress in dealing with what is a potential ecologic disaster," he said.

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said the talks with Mr Obama had made him more confident about progress.

Campaigners say the world's poorest are most at risk from climate change


"With the strong leadership of the United States we can indeed make an agreement," he said.
The Kyoto Protocol required 37 industrial nations to cut carbon emissions by an average 5% from 1990 levels by 2012, when it expires.

However, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has said world leaders are unlikely to agree on a comprehensive treaty in Copenhagen. He said it was more likely there would only be agreement on principles.

UN officials have also recently declared there is no chance of agreeing all elements of a new legally-binding UN treaty before the end of the year.

But Mr Gore, a leading environmental campaigner, said it wouldn't be a disaster if the conference produced only a framework agreement, and not a binding deal.

[FL Patriot]

The only disagreement between Al Gore and Exxon Mobil is who gets to sink the teeth in first



Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet.com

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

A common charge leveled against global warming skeptics is that they are on the payroll of transnational oil companies, when in fact the opposite is true, oil companies are amongst the biggest promoters of climate change propaganda, emphasized recently by Exxon Mobil’s call for a global carbon tax.

According to Exxon Mobil chief executive Rex Tillerson, the cap and trade nightmare being primed for passage in the Senate doesn’t go far enough – Tillerson wants a direct tax on carbon dioxide emissions, essentially a tax on breathing since we all exhale this life-giving gas.

In a speech last month, Tillerson brazenly called out the cap and trade agenda for what it was, an effort to impose a carbon tax camouflaged only by a slick sales pitch and deceptive rhetoric.

“It is easier and more politically expedient to support a cap-and-trade approach, because the public will never figure out where it is hitting them,” said Tillerson. “They will just know they hurt somewhere in their pocketbook,” he added, pointing out that he disagreed with this convoluted method of introducing a carbon tax, arguing instead that it would be more successful to openly propose a straight carbon tax.

Tillerson firmly expressed Exxon’s support for climate change alarmists in stating, “I firmly believe it is not too late for Congress to consider a carbon tax as the better policy approach for addressing the risks of climate change.”

Exxon’s push for a carbon tax was restated last week by its vice president for public affairs Ken Cohen, who told a conference call that he wants a climate policy that creates “certainty and predictability, which is why we advocate a carbon tax.”

Exxon Mobil and their ilk are not concerned about a carbon tax eating into their profits because they know they won’t have to pay it – the tab will be picked up by the ignorant taxpayer at the fuel pump at an inflated cost which if anything will hand the transnational oil cartels an even bigger cut.

Ideologically, Al Gore and Exxon Mobil are on exactly the same page – the only difference between the oil companies and global warming alarmists is the squabble over who will get to sink their teeth into the taxpayer and reap the dividends of the climate change scam.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)



Whereas parasites like Al Gore and Maurice Strong, the people who own the very carbon trading systems they claim will save the earth from CO2 emissions, want to enrich themselves to the tune of billions under a cap and trade scheme where they take a percentage of each transaction, the oil companies want to bypass this completely by simply imposing a direct CO2 tax. The consequence for the taxpayer under either scenario will be exactly the same, and the profits under both schemes would go towards filling the coffers of the global government that will enforce the whole scam.

Emphasizing again that oil companies are firmly behind the idea of man-made climate change and the introduction of a CO2 tax, in 2007 the Trilateral Commission, one of the three pillars of the new world order in alliance with Bilderberg and the CFR, met in near secrecy to formulate policy on how best they could exploit global warming fearmongering to ratchet up taxes and control over how westerners live their lives.

At the confab, European Chairman of the Trilateral Commission, Bilderberger and chairman of British Petroleum Peter Sutherland, gave a speech to his elitist cohorts in which he issued a “Universal battle cry arose for the world to address “global warming” with a single voice.”

Echoing this sentiment was General Lord Guthrie, director of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, member of the House of Lords and former chief of the Defense Staff in London, who urged the Trilateral power-brokers to “Address the global climate crisis with a single voice, and impose rules that apply worldwide.” Rules that no doubt will benefit the Rothschild family empire due to their personal ownership of a huge chunk of the carbon trading market.

Allegations that skeptics of the man-made explanation behind global warming are somehow doing the bidding of the elite are laughable in the face of the fact that Rothschild operatives and the very chairman of British Petroleum are the ones orchestrating an elitist plan to exploit global warming fears in order to achieve political objectives.

During the 2007 meeting, elitists along with oil industry kingpins called for imposing a $1 dollar per gallon tax at the fuel pump under the justification of fighting pollution and climate change.

Globalists love global warming. Oil industry kingpins, Bilderbergers and Rothschild minions have all put their weight behind it. This is a fraud conceived, nurtured and promulgated by elite, and to castigate individuals for merely questioning the motives behind climate change fearmongering by accusing them of being mouthpieces for the establishment is a complete reversal of the truth.

Claims by climate change alarmists that “deniers” are all funded by oil companies is yet another crudely contrived hoax. In reality, oil companies are the most vocal proponents of man-made climate change and the most aggressive in pushing to tax CO2 emissions.

The clips below, taken from Alex Jones’ new documentary Fall Of The Republic, expose how Al Gore serves as the front man for the global carbon tax cap and trade scheme, which is designed to bankrupt the United States and drastically lower the living standards of the American people, while introducing nightmare levels of regulation and bureaucracy into their everyday lives. Get the full DVD here or watch it online at Prison Planet.tv.

YouTube - Fall Of The Republic 10/14: The Presidency Of Barack H Obama

YouTube - Fall Of The Republic 10/14: The Presidency Of Barack H Obama

YouTube - Fall Of The Republic 11/14: The Presidency Of Barack H Obama

YouTube - Fall Of The Republic 11/14: The Presidency Of Barack H Obama

[FL Patriot]

Washington

Call it empty-table diplomacy — with a nuclear option.

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D) ended the morning today shuffling papers in silence at the head of an empty table, as Republican senators boycotted Day 1 of her panel’s markup of historic climate legislation.

“This is an opportunity. I ask my colleagues to show up. We’re going to be extremely patient. We’re going to be here. We’ll take some time to wait for our friends,” said Chairwoman Boxer, at the end of the aborted morning session of the Environment and Public Works Committee.
But if Republicans prolong the boycott, she hinted that Democrats, with a five-seat majority on the panel, are prepared to go on without them. “We’re not going to be deterred. We’ll do our work. It’s our job. We’re going to follow the committee rules to the letter,” she said.

That rule allows the committee chairman to bypass the requirement that at least two members of the minority are needed to constitute a quorum. Republicans call it a “nuclear option” that will undermine committee traditions and put a bipartisan bill out of reach.

Partisan fireworks are exactly what Democratic leaders had hoped to avoid.
Last month, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R) of South Carolina became the first Republican to endorse the Senate version of the climate bill. On Wednesday, he and Sen. John Kerry (D) of Massachusetts expect to meet with Obama administration officials to work out compromises in the Kerry-Boxer climate bill to expand bipartisan support.

Republicans are calling for a “full economic analysis” of the Kerry-Boxer bill, including the impact on jobs, consumers, ratepayers, families, and small businesses in various parts of the country.

“This bill will have an unprecedented impact on our national security, economy, environmental and energy needs. For that reason, members should have a full understanding of what this means for their states and constituents,” said Sen. George Voinovich (R) of Ohio, who read a statement outlining GOP reasons for the boycott at the top of Tuesday’s markup and then left.

In a speech to a joint session of Congress this morning, German Chancellor Angela Merkel told Congress that there was “no time to lose” in the fight against global warming. “We need an agreement at the climate conference in December in Copenhagen,” she said. “That requires the readiness of all countries to accept binding international commitments.”

“I’m confident that bipartisan support will win the day,” said freshman Sen. Tom Udall (D) of New Mexico, after the speech. “Senators who believe that climate change is real will not abandon the debate for too long. The stakes are too high,” he added.

So far, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has produced a 38-page “discussion document” of Kerry-Boxer that Republicans say doesn’t resolve their concerns.

“Madam Chairman, Ohio can’t afford to lose any more jobs. So for the sake of workers in my state and elsewhere whose jobs are hanging in the balance, slow down, take a deep breath, let EPA do what it needs to do, and let’s come back in four to five weeks and have a markup,” Senator Voinovich said.

“Otherwise, you will do great damage to the traditions of this committee and make it harder to reach a bipartisan compromise on climate change legislation.”

Boxer countered: “EPA has made it clear they stand behind the economic analysis and that it is more analysis than is typically provided before a markup.”

At the chair’s request, EPA officials were to appear Tuesday afternoon for a question and answer session with panel members on the bill. Republican senators say they expect to boycott this briefing, too.

“We don’t want another briefing. We want the analysis,” says a GOP aide

[FL Patriot]

As "reported" by the London Telegraph yesterday, scantily clad Miss Earth contestants are the latest cultural vehicles for delivering the seemingly omnipresent propaganda of the manmade climate change alarmists. In addition to signs with innocuous (if brusquely worded) rejoinders to "Repair all leaks promptly" and "Plants trees that are indigenous to your community", the contestants were also paraded in front of photographers with placards warning of the dangers of carbon emissions and urging "adaptation and mitigation" of climate change "NOW!" According to the Telegraph, this year's Miss Earth competition has adopted the theme "Beauties for a cause" and encourages contestants to help raise awareness of environmental issues.

Rest of the story below:

http://www.corbettreport.com/article...propaganda.htm

[FL Patriot]

James Corbett
The Corbett Report
November 5, 2009
As “reported” by the London Telegraph yesterday, scantily clad Miss Earth contestants are the latest cultural vehicles for delivering the seemingly omnipresent propaganda of the manmade climate change alarmists. In addition to signs with innocuous (if brusquely worded) rejoinders to “Repair all leaks promptly” and “Plants trees that are indigenous to your community”, the contestants were also paraded in front of photographers with placards warning of the dangers of carbon emissions and urging “adaptation and mitigation” of climate change “NOW!” According to the Telegraph, this year’s Miss Earth competition has adopted the theme “Beauties for a cause” and encourages contestants to help raise awareness of environmental issues.

The timing of such a photo op must make this propaganda especially welcome to the proponents of the manmade global warming hoax. Momentum to achieve a treaty to replace the Kyoto Accord at next month’s UNFCCC meeting in Copenhagen has apparently begun to wane. Two days ago it was revealed how Al Gore is poised to become the world’s first carbon billionaire and just yesterday it was reported that he now acknowledges that carbon dioxide is not responsible for the majority of global warming. The last few months has seen more and more acknowledgement of the fact that the earth has in fact been cooling for the past 11 years.
As viewers of The Corbett Report’s recent interview with Lord Monckton of Brenchley know, the coming Copenhagen treaty is in fact an attempt to establish a world government on the back of the climate change scare…a problem that isn’t even real.

But now along come a bevy of buxom beauties to not-so-subtly remind everyone that carbon dioxide is in fact the greatest scourge facing the earth and all the banksters and cap-and-trade hucksters can rest easy knowing that their scheme to set up the swindle of the century is still on track.This shameless lowest-common-denominator climate propaganda is by no means the only instance of pop culture being used to indoctrinate the public on the pseudo-science of manmade global warming. Sports have been used as a way to sell a phony message to an unsuspecting public as well, with the NFL, the NHL and FIFA all helping to miseducate the public on the “necessity” of paying billions of dollars in carbon indulgences to the bankers and well-connected businessmen who engineered the current economic meltdown…and every other market manipulation since the Great Depression. Rock stars, movie stars and

YouTube- An Inconvenient Question: The Age of Stupid NYC Premiere

YouTube- An Inconvenient Question: The Age of Stupid NYC Premiere

have all gotten into the carbon indulgence act. What this trend indicates is a much broader and more disturbing phenomenon than any isolated incidence of propaganda. As The Corbett Report recently demonstrated, the psychic assault that we are subjected to every day in all the various corporate controlled media outlets amounts to nothing less than the weaponization of culture. Culture becomes an instrument through which the ruling oligarchs can attack the public’s common sense and perpetuate their system of lies and control. For more information on this fascinating topic, download Episode 105 of The Corbett Report podcast here or listen in the player below:

As researchers on this subject like Alex Jones, Alan Watt, and Steven Jacobson have pointed out, infowarriors must continue to spread the truth on issues like the fake manmade global warming scare by presenting the facts in a coherent, effective manner. This helps to counteract the propaganda and reverse the tide of the information war whereby this weaponized culture continues to claim the minds of well-meaning but easily-swayed individuals. Only by educating the public can we hope to create a valid cultural movement of truth and liberty empowered by knowledge. Interested volunteers can start by educating Miss El Salvador on the proper spelling of the word “clean.”

[30.06]

The White House ,