WhiteNewsNow.com Forums - 1st Amendment - Free Speech, Press, Religion http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums en Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:58:38 GMT vBulletin 60 http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/techforums/misc/rss.jpg WhiteNewsNow.com Forums - 1st Amendment - Free Speech, Press, Religion http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums On Sacred Ground http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/9222-sacred-ground.html Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:53:50 GMT _On Sacred Ground_ by Faustus
On Sacred Ground



by

Faustus




The cacophony of musings and gnashing of teeth recently, regarding the rebuilding of ‘ground zero’, has become palatable, gaining momentum within the national consciousness created, in part, by MSM outlets, and their incumbent agendas, driving the focus of the latest (and greatest) calamity to befall the ‘survivors’, both nationally and personally.

Over the last several weeks, a mantra has begun: No invasion of the National psyche by outsiders, seen here in a Religious context, which would compromise the new status of Sacred Ground, as ascribed to the remnants of a once vibrant, economic citadel; the banner, if you will, of everything modern, up-to-date, and extending that persona around the world.

To prove this point, the staging of a new, re-designed center, is to be named, appropriately enough, the One World Trade Center building, seemingly, to assuage the wounds and scars left by the most tragic political/cultural affront in American history. This has led to an interesting development, which, as happens in all evolutionary struggles, morphed, into something different, unique, and continues to whatever end in which nature has in store.

The cacophony of interests, as well, has prompted an almost angelic appreciation of struggle and overcoming, a thing unique to natural disasters and War. The latter, indeed, is the clarion call of today’s adherents of a new world-view, a new America, in which the disparate elements, both racially and religiously, will forge a new will, a new direction for the betterment of all concerned. Sacred Ground, after all, establishes a parlance of sincerity, of oneness.

I have often found historical parallels potent stuff, when dealing in the hear-and-now; this case affords us the same clarity. The historical record, as well, is much simpler, as it is ‘recent’ history. Kosovo.

In the eastern fields of american history, there can be no doubting the evolution of culture and spirituality; of violence, loyalty, and simply the will-to-exist of our antecedents, those Mothers and Fathers who bore us. Indeed, that ever-long struggle with the environment, disease, conquest and that richness of identity, of tribal inclusiveness, those mechanisms of science and industry which, working harmoniously together, defines that victory of man’s interdiction into Life itself. All these parts, grinding together, gears contacting each other, turning that greatest of machines, human organism, makes itself that much more personal, robust and important, when faced with extinction.

The human element of survival cannot be considered in its proper perspective, unless one realizes the implication of finality, and of human passing. Such is the marker of Death, personal loss and family tribulations which, as may be the case, effects the entire familial setting, the extended family as it were, and promotes the various manifestations of the Irish Wake, the Catholic dirges, as well as the various manifestations of memory, those snap-shots of Life, as we remember them, thereby extending the life of that person, or persons, into the next state of being, held by us, individually, to continue for the future. When we inter those memories, that practical and substantive quality of life, we claim this ‘portion of soil’, and declare it, sacred ground. This is shared, in one way or another, by all race-cultures, and remains a sustaining part of the mechanism of survival.

***

Such is the memory of Kosovo and ‘ground zero’. Both have a resonance, clear to each party to its birth, life, and death. This comparison is two-fold:

1. Each center comprised the nexus of its own unique ethos;

2. Each seeks to establish a memory of that Life which had gone before.
The american public, in the modern world seems, at the outset, to be shy on both respect and memory, for they appear to want one value, yet have fostered and enabled this very value to be torn from those who would live and fight in their own fashions, but for the very same essence as is promoted in the tragic destruction of parts of our native soil. Moreover, this dichotomy was enacted, using the name of the ‘american people’, as the sole raison d’etre of american foreign policy in saving the American ‘way of life’, and to continue the expansion of ‘equality’ for all peoples.

A little reflection on both instances is in order:

Kosovo Field:
Kosovo Field (or Kosovo Polje) is the site of a famous battle in 1389 that the Serbs regard as the tragic demise of their mediaeval flowering. If all this seems a little remote to today's conflict, remember that the symbolism of Kosovo and the battle there is at the heart of Serbian nationalism not just in this region, but across the whole of the former Yugoslavia.

The Ottoman Turks were the new superpower of the fourteenth century. Originally horsemen from the central Asian steppes, they settled in Anatolia and in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries took over almost all of modern-day Turkey. In 1357, they burst across the Bosphorus into Europe and conquered Macedonia, Serbia and Bulgaria and continued to threaten Western Europe for the next 200 years.

Serbian nationalist myth has rated the Field of Blackbirds at Kosovo Polje in 1389 as a cataclysmic defeat in which the flower of the mediaeval Serbian aristocracy was slaughtered. Third-party historians would probably rate the battle as an expensive draw, but it was certainly the beginning of the end for the Serbian kingdom. They had thrown all the forces they had into the battle, while the Turks were able to return year after year in greater strength.

The heroism of Prince Lazar, the Serb ruler, at the Field of Blackbirds has now become the founding legend of Serbian nationalism. Six hundred years later, pilgrims were still visiting his bones at Gracanica monastery, nearby. According to the legend, at the start of the battle, the Ottomans offered Lazar the choice between fighting to the death and surrendering.

Elijah appeared to him with a message from the Virgin Mary:

What kingdom shall I choose? Shall I choose a heavenly kingdom? Shall I choose an earthly kingdom? If I choose an earthly kingdom, An earthly kingdom lasts only a little time/But a heavenly kingdom will last for eternity and its centuries.

Prince Lazar chose death.

All was holy; all was honourable/and the goodness of God was fulfilled.
The Ottomans, of course, were non-western, and Muslim.

***

As a Spiritual value, Kosovo represented the last ‘resting place’ of those who had given their lives in extending the cultural and racial history of this people. It had become, indeed, Sacred Ground.

The religious entanglements between Islam and Christianity, as used by opposing forces is well documented, and the Christian West of that time, faced incredible forces, as the Europeans of that day and region, were outnumbered and out gunned. The incredible courage and stalwart defense of the West, not to mention its faith, must have been a marvelous thing to live through, rough though it was, for it saw the minority regional population stop, for some six-hundred years, the inroads of both racial and religious aliens.

Present Day:

Between March 24 and June 10, 1999, NATO intervened by bombing Yugoslavia aimed to force Milošević to withdraw his forces from Kosovo; this action (UNMIK), spearheaded by the US, although not covered by the UN Security Council, and in the name of equality of religion and personal dignity, gave this territory to those same invaders, albeit under the banner of Islam, and received kudos for doing so; garnering enough momentum that the commanding general of this mission, Wesley Clark, could utilize this conquest to run for President of the United States as a ‘war hero’.

Was sacred ground enough of a deterrent to keep our bombs from destroying not only buildings, but of the very ‘spiritual center’ of this kindred nation? Hardly.

Now, of a sudden, we are all to remember the ‘war dead’ of our own soil, to declare a portion of our territory as sacred ground, and refuse the very interests which we willingly and with aforethought, demanded of the Serbian people. The American Ox has been gored, and we demand justice for the wrongs inflicted upon us; how then, in retrospect, can we not expect the same treatment, indeed, the same result as Kosovo for our valiant efforts of the past?

The vicious circle of ‘international affairs’, fostered and led by those who know ‘what is best for us’, have left a hollow, sinking feeling, in the hearts and minds of our countrymen. What is, really, in the best interests of our Nation and those children of the West who, as has been noted before, know very little, if anything, of the connection between ourselves and these far-flung colonies of our antecedents? This disconnect is overwhelming, considering that what affects one does, indeed, affect the other. Thus, it is the understanding of Race-Culture, which should provide the answers, if not limited by State sanctioned ‘public policy’ and its revolutionary attendants.

The destruction of edifices, of material goods, is nothing like the destruction and dismantling of the spiritual edifices of our traditional past. The coming compromises will dwarf, in many instances, what our forefathers suffered after much greater loss of life and liberty. Will we, then, allow this destruction to both ourselves and our distant kinsmen? Only time will tell, but in the passing of time comes a place, a line, which if crossed, will prove once again, that once a people is conquered, the road back is every a winding one.

In the end, do we, as Western Men and Women, allow the loss of our racial and national territory to invaders - no matter the flavor or religious inclinations? Are the needs of zionist and islamic members of the population to be recognized at the loss of our sovereignty? Do the christian churches really expect the lamb to lay down with the lion?

If the question of 'sacred ground' is to resonate with the American people as well as those who seek to articulate their desires and best interests, as only White Nationalists can, then the sacredness of our Blood should share the same standing, as does Soil.

The emblem of a tower, in which it seeks to represent 'the One World', means nothing less than the multicultural progress of the modern which, of course, means the anti-white wish of destruction and genocide of our person, if not our way of life.

Should we not, simply, cast all the aliens out?

Copyright 2010

 ]]> 1st Amendment - Free Speech, Press, Religion Keltoi http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/9222-sacred-ground.html White Nationalism With A Black Face? http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/9157-white-nationalism-black-face.html Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:55:34 GMT _WNN_ *I was watching Obama give his speech in Milwaukee, Wi. this morning. Like what has happened to our way of life or not, you have to... WNN



I was watching Obama give his speech in Milwaukee, Wi. this morning.

Like what has happened to our way of life or not, you have to admit that his 'interaction' with common folk, is telling.

I have been promoting, for many years, the 'nationalization' of the GNP - the difference I see, is that the GNP is the Race, our Blood, ourselves. Along with this, it is commonsense to increase infrastructure, which many call Public Works, and has been a main-stay in White Nationalist circles for thirty years.

It has been our own people, in the main, who have denied their own people this opportunity, willing to line their pockets with lucre, provided by those institutions and individuals who care nothing about the Race-Culture of the West.

In this speech today, Obama repeatedly speaks about his [white] Grandparents, indicating and promoting self-reliance, speaking of Public Works, increasing the infrastructure (which promotes jobs) just like the White Nationalists of the past - in fact, the irony does not pass one by, if looked at objectively, Obama is encouraging White Nationalism like very few 'white men', and he is doing it with a black face.



Quote:
The White Magic of Obama


Over the past several weeks, the coverage of the Presidential race has literally saturated the airwaves and visual punditry of this nation, and the World.

As a White Nationalist of long duration, having seen the political gamut of Kennedy to G.W. Bush, and having paid more than simple attention to the machinations of those who ‘claim’ to rule our country, I have been somewhat in a state of denial regarding the overwhelming response of our own People for the liberal Senator, Barack Obama, a man of African descent, who was graced with a Public Seat of government, representing a particular constituency within this american political monstrosity.

As White Nationalists, we all know the various aspects of Race. As Nationalists, we have considered the political landscape, and have decided that we have no representation, no real, credible support mechanisms which will lobby and fight for what we know is right for us, for our future, and for our children; we have certain personalities, characters, and leaders (small L) which, here and there, speak for us to whomsoever will listen. As White Nationalists, we can reasonably assume that we know each other, male and female.

Whether male or female, White Nationalists fight for what moves us: Race, Nation, Territory, and Freedom. Simple, basic, and wrapped neatly in what each of us feel deeply about what and who we are; being american, relatively speaking, is secondary, as we are men and women of the West first, and foremost. There would be NO America without US.

I am passionate about this.

The Presidential Race is another matter, entire. With the same old slogans of ‘change’, the healing of ‘racial and political’ divides, the constant verbiage from all comers regarding ‘our future’ and just what each candidate is going to do about it, is just so much intellectual masturbation, and keeps the average american in patient, albeit droll, lethargy. However, in this years contest, one thing has stood out, blatantly, which bodes well for us, White Nationalist, any way you slice it: Race.

Barrack Obama, as a Black man, albeit of a hybrid nature, educated in the finest Western temples of education, (his wife as well is a product of the ‘vestiges’ of western education) comes across as a well-spoken, measured, and passionate individual who elucidates his ‘charismatic’ charm as well as any that I have seen in a modern context. Looked at objectively, this a reality.

A reality, also, is the manifestation of ‘white affinity’, which many of our folk have showed, and are growing in numbers, in a demonstrable way. Our ‘women’, especially, are flocking to his banner; one simply has to look at the numbers, and observe the televised accounts. Just look at one of his speeches, in the background one may observe dozens, indeed hundreds, of white females who, in almost orgiastic frenzy, shout his praise, and work tirelessly for his election to the highest seat in the nation. White males, as well, have turned to this ‘man of change’ in greater and greater numbers. This is the present reality; it is the quandary of us all.

Why?

Why would our own people, deracinated as they are, be so overtaken by this black man? Is it his charm, his positions, his religious predilections, or his political acumen? Of what specific magic does he share that the others do not have? Moreover, just what source within our own folk, has he tapped?

If one ascertains the various aspects of Obama’s rhetoric, and lay them out for us to observe, and coupled with his delivery, one would come to the conclusion that he is more of a [white] ‘nationalist’ than many give him credit; ironic as this may seem, whoever is handling him, knows full well the pressure-cooker of Western disillusionment which has been building these past fifty-five years. He speaks*, as all white men should, about the War, FISA, american jobs, imperial hubris, and domestic rights and sovereignty. Not in the Paulian sense, or that of Buchanan, but he does voice similar chords of refrain. Do I advocate this man’s rise to the leadership of our Western people’s? Certainly not! Nevertheless, it behoves us, as white nationalists, to be cognizant of what is motivating our own people to swarm to his message: That the lack of our own voices, our own leaders, our own identity is to blame.

When our men and women reveal themselves inclined to follow a light complected African, in lieu of the ‘usual suspects’, it is obvious that our own people are ready for leadership, which is grafted from their own ribs; who see and feel the same way that they see and feel. This is axiomatic. But what do we do, as individuals, or as a group? In this democracy of our modern age, the pan et circes of our americana is the myriad hoops we are willing to go through to Vote in the ‘process’. What a sham! Or should I say, Shame! We are all prisoners, in one way or another, and voting will not make it any less. A prisoner, or ex-prisoner will tell you this; for this ‘type’ of individual is not really free – he is like Solzenitzen – a Man without a Country! Such are we.

So, with this said, there is no single White Nationalist who should participate in this farce of our so-called elections. I will not vote; and any who do are simply propping up a system, which has nothing to offer any of us. Economic programs, which, as the merchants of our nation remind us, bring a certain equilibrium to the masses, but this is just smoke and mirrors. The larger programs of jobs and their creations is but more smoke and mirrors; there is not one real nationalist/racial program by which to strengthen our nation, which is to strengthen our People, entire by those presently in power. They have betrayed us, and I will not support traitors who daily kiss their wives goodbye, and then proceed to steal the birthrights from their fellows.

Boycott is a term which arouses distrust and bile in my own sensibilities, but to not vote, en masse, is a typical approach when one wishes to makes some form of statement – whether this statement is heard or not, is another matter altogether. Impotent rage? Perhaps. However, the simple actions of this nature have a telling effect over the long haul, if we can maintain this position, and garner public awareness and tacit sympathy. Short of doing what men do about this type of dangerous and despicable treason, I can think of nothing else.

As stated above, this presidential race is, and will be, about race like has not been seen in this country in my lifetime. We, as White Nationalists, have to start really thinking in terms of who are leaders are, naming them, even if limited to forums or e-media specifically; hammer the point home on what few radio shows we have, and put them out on you-tube type formats, but get this position out to our folk. Then do it again! Race has come to the forefront; let us not allow this momentum to pass us by.

For my money, Obama would be no better nor worse than any other, and better, by far, than McCain, his military history not withstanding. But my presence will be felt by its absence, and by a continued application of measured persuasion amongst my own peers regarding this, and other issues which have much more bearing on their lives than any ‘president’ could make in four years time.

Let us practice our own White Magic, in our own way, for our own People, come what may.

© 2008

________________________
* His booklet, ‘A Blue Print for Change’. http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/Obama...tForChange.pdf
This booklet, however one views it, is not a Nationalist document; the catch-phrases of ‘middle-class’ and working americans are the same tripe as the others espouse. In certain areas, however, Obama makes inroads into the Anglo/Jewish stranglehold of Capital, finance, and labour, which all nationalists support for our own reasons and interests. Unions have always been a problem to those who distrusted the individual worker willing to work for their daily bread, and make a profit to boot. These are the small business owners, which we, as White Nationalists, support for our own existence. All in all, many of these proposed platforms could work, if utilized in a purely racial context; the ‘across the board’ rhetoric is hollow, and will, of course, fail, given the wide berth of disparate needs and wants of the strangers among us.

White Nationalists have promoted our own desires and needs inherent to our own makeup. As we all know, they are ridiculed and discarded as those of simple rantings from the disenfranchised, and politically impotent. When we carve a moment in history in which we can make these issues heard by our own People, they will react in the same fashion as they have fallen for the magic of a different elixir than has been fed them by individuals who see them not as part of a similar organism, but as their own masters see them and us: as Cattle. This stranglehold will end; let us continue to prepare for the day when we are called, we will be prepared to answer.
]]> 1st Amendment - Free Speech, Press, Religion Keltoi http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/9157-white-nationalism-black-face.html Why I am not a libertarian http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/9156-why-i-am-not-libertarian.html Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:31:48 GMT *This was recently passed on to me:* ---Quote--- Why I am not a libertarian... This was recently passed on to me:



Quote:
Why I am not a libertarian



Published April 15, 2001




Not only is no man an island, but no man is self-made.I'm going to tell you why I am almost, but not quite, a libertarian.

First, capitalism, unless moderated by Christian virtue or government, is just as brutal and cruel as communism.

I know that's hard for baby boomers to believe. After all, they grew up in the incredibly prosperous post-World War II United States. Most have never experienced really hard times. Most have not bothered to read much history or literature. Many were content to believe the fairy tales woven by Ayn Rand and her cohorts.

Try digging coal for a few pennies a ton in an unsafe mine where you are forced to buy your own tools. Try imagining a disabling injury and, instead of receiving workers' compensation or disability insurance, your broken body is just tossed off the company property.

That's capitalism.

Try a six- or seven-day work week with 12-hour days, a pittance for wages, in a hellish and unhealthy environment and absolutely no benefits.

That's capitalism.

You can still see pure capitalism in places such as Calcutta or Mogadishu. Capitalism is great if you're the capitalist, just as communism is great if you're the commissar or the party bigwig.

I wonder how many Americans would be willing to cut and sew a pair of finished blue jeans for 75 cents in a sweltering, bug-infested building. How many pair do you think you would have to cut and sew in order to feed your family?

Those $30 to $50 pair of jeans we wear were made by what amounts to slave labor in Central America or Asia.

I've never been a union member and don't intend to be one, but I can at least appreciate the struggle that union men undertook to improve the lives of working men and women. I guarantee you that without the "threat" of unionization, most working men and women would see a quite different face on their employers.

And that may not be too far off. Under phony free-trade deals, unions are being broken and pressured by the movement of and the threat to move factories overseas. Anybody who expects real compassion from a corporation would mistake Hannibal Lecter for a vegetarian. Unfortunately, the union leadership is so infected with socialists that they would rather pursue their ideological goals than look out for their members.

So, although I strongly believe in the maximum possible freedom, I also believe in community and in responsibility to that community. Not only is no man an island, but no man is self-made. Some people are just good at forgetting all the people who helped them get where they are.

If you aspire to total freedom and want to be entirely self-made, then go to a deserted island and live entirely off your own labor. If you survive, you can claim to be a self-sufficient person.

But don't live in a community with all its protections and benefits, don't go to public schools, ride on public roads, enjoy the benefits of publicly provided clean water and sanitary sewers and proclaim yourself an individual who owes nobody anything. That's just bravo sierra, and you know it.

Freedom is not a virtue per se. It can mean the freedom of the strong to bully and enslave the weak. It can mean the freedom to exploit the poor, to despoil the land and the water, to turn your back on the oppressed, the sick, the dying.

That's why, instead of a libertarian, I fall in with those old-fashioned conservatives who believe in ordered liberty, strict observances of the Constitution and a mind-our-own-business foreign policy. Don't confuse me with the neo-conservatives who like big government and imperialism as long as they run it. Most of those guys are just ex-Troskyites, anyway. And don't confuse me with chamber-of -commerce conservatives who say that anything good for big business is good for the country. That's horse manure.

At the same time, I'm definitely not a socialist. An ex-socialist, John Dos Passos, has remarked that the world was becoming a museum of socialist failures. And so it is.

The idea of a mean, something-short-of-pure, unregulated capitalism and pure, over-regulated socialism is what we should strive for.

Reach Charley Reese at 407-420-5315 or creese@orlandosentinel.com
]]> 1st Amendment - Free Speech, Press, Religion Keltoi http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/9156-why-i-am-not-libertarian.html Blog: Old Atlantic Lighthouse http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/8943-blog-old-atlantic-lighthouse.html Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:51:11 GMT _Our Greatest Shame: Letting Diversity Take Our Land _ Our Greatest Shame: Letting Diversity Take Our Land Old Atlantic Lighthouse...
Our Greatest Shame:

Letting Diversity Take Our Land


Our Greatest Shame: Letting Diversity Take Our Land Old Atlantic Lighthouse ]]> 1st Amendment - Free Speech, Press, Religion Keltoi http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/8943-blog-old-atlantic-lighthouse.html The Outsiders: The Governor Races http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/8895-outsiders-governor-races.html Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:16:43 GMT *The Outsiders: * *The Governor Races* Posted on August 26, 2010...
The Outsiders:


The Governor Races




Posted on August 26, 2010 by Hunter Wallace



Robert Bentley Wins in Alabama


In my last post, I looked at the U.S. Senate. I pointed out that many of the supporters of the Bush amnesty have been purged in primaries, defeated, or disgraced. Several others have died, retired, or renounced their views.

The incoming Senate will be much improved on immigration. In the Bush years, a two-party consensus in favor of “comprehensive immigration reform” reigned in Washington. In the Obama years, immigration has become more of a partisan issue.

The battle lines are still not perfectly clear. There are still a few Republican holdouts who support “comprehensive immigration reform.”

Likewise, there are a few conservative Democrats who oppose amnesty. Their numbers have dwindled in recent years though.

Conservatives and Independents have been challenging and succeeding in defeating the GOP establishment. In the Senate, Rand Paul, Sharron Angle, and Joe Miller are symbolic of this trend.

The Governor Races

The Governor races are another arena where the transformation of the Bush GOP is playing out.

1.) Arizona - Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona is the apple of my eye in this respect. She has reaped a huge political dividend from banning ethnic studies and signing SB1070 into law. Brewer has gone to court to defend SB1070 from the Obama Justice Department.

In recent years, Arizona has moved to the forefront of the immigration debate. In 2007, the Grand Canyon State passed a law that penalized businesses who hired illegal aliens. More than 100,000 illegal aliens have since left Arizona. More will leave after SB1070 and if Arizona continues heading in the right direction.

Gov. Brewer has a commanding 12 point lead over Terry Goddard and will almost certainly win re-election in November. From 2003 until 2009, the god awful Janet Napolitano, now Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, was Governor of Arizona.

Arizona’s SB1070 set off a political earthquake that was felt across America. An obscure state bill set off a polarizing national conflagaration over immigration that pushed moderates in a more radical direction.

The consequences of SB1070 were felt in other states. This was especially true of the South.

2.) Florida – In Florida, Rick Scott defeated Bill McCollum in the Republican Primary. McCollum had the support of the entire Florida GOP establishment.

Like Arizona, Florida has one of the largest populations of illegal aliens in America. Immigration resonated in the Sunshine State and became a battlefield in the Republican Primary there.

In the wake of SB1070, Bill McCollum initially staked out a moderate position on immigration, saying that the Arizona law wasn’t needed in Florida. Rick Scott responded by promising to bring SB1070 to the state. McCollum flipflopped two weeks before the election, but it proved too little too late.

Scott made immigration the hallmark of his campaign and beat the drum against the “Tallahassee insiders” to victory.

From 1999 until 2007, Jeb Bush was the Governor of Florida. With his Hispanic wife and children, Jeb was a prominent symbol of the Bush GOP and its attempt to woo Hispanic voters with “comprehensive immigration reform.”

3.) Georgia - In Georgia, Nathan Deal defeated Karen Handel in the Republican Primary. Handel was endorsed by Sarah Palin and her defeat was widely interpreted in the mainstream media as proof of Palin’s waning influence.

As in Florida, Arizona’s SB1070 became a hot issue in the Georgia Governor race. Deal released a campaign ad attacking the Obama administration for its lawsuit against Arizona.

Deal promised to bring SB1070 to Georgia and contemptuously told the Obama administration you can “sue us too.” The ad struck a chord in Georgia which is also home to a huge population of illegal aliens.

It is possible that Nathan Deal could turn out to be another Sonny Perdue who exploited the Confederate flag issue to defeat Roy Barnes and get himself elected Governor. Unlike Perdue, Deal has a strong record of fighting illegal immigration in Congress.

With an A+ grade from NumbersUSA, I am inclined to believe that Nathan Deal intends to follow through on his promises. He will face Roy Barnes in November.

Barnes, the former Governor and Democratic challenger, says he would support an Arizona-style law in Georgia too. It is nothing more than political posturing, but it shows how far the political spectrum in Georgia has shifted since the Bush years.

4.) Alabama – Alabama has gone through one of the most memorable primary seasons of the year. Candidates like Rick Barber, Tim James, and Dale Peterson (all unsuccessful) made national headlines with hilarious campaign ads.

Who can forget Peterson with his shotgun ranting about “thugs and criminals” or Barber “gathering his armies” with the Founders?

In Alabama, the plain spoken outsider Dr. Robert Bentley emerged victorious in the Republican Primary over Bradley Byrne, the GOP establishment favorite. Earlier this month, the Alabama GOP committed itself to a platform called the “Handshake with Alabama” which is committed to bringing Arizona’s SB1070 to Alabama

Robert Bentley will face Ron Sparks (the progressive nutroots candidate) in November. Sparks is a supporter of “comprehensive immigration reform.” As Governor of Alabama, Bentley would almost certainly sign Arizona-style immigration reform into law.

The Republicans have a chance this fall of taking over the Alabama state legislature for the first time since Reconstruction. Such is the extent of the backlash against the Obama administration and the Democratic Party.

5.) South Carolina – Like Jan Brewer, Nikki Haley isn’t exactly an outsider, but was propelled to victory in the South Carolina Republican Primary with a Sarah Palin endorsement and Tea Party support.
Haley is an Asian Indian, which is certain to provoke opposition from pro-White corners, but as Governor of South Carolina she would do to promote our interests than Meg Whitman in California.

South Carolina is one the handful of states that is most likely to become the next Arizona. Haley has emphatically stated that she supports Arizona and would sign an Arizona-style immigration bill into law.

Haley will face Vince Sheehan in November. Sheehan, who will almost certainly be defeated, claims to support an even tougher immigration law.

The political spectrum in South Carolina has also shifted to such a degree that both parties compete to sound tougher on immigration.

Arizona’s Imitators

There are plenty of other Governor races in this election cycle. I’ve mostly been following the ones closest to my own home turf. I’m excited by the possibility of a geographically continguous bloc of states in South passing Arizona-style immigration reform and entering into a polarizing showdown with the federal government.

Florida, Virginia, and Texas are the squishiest of the Southern states. Virginia has already followed in Arizona’s footsteps. Florida is poised to follow soon. Pressure from the conservative grassroots in Texas could force Gov. Rick Perry to flip flop like Bill McCollum and John McCain.

Tennessee has also been one of the most enthusiastic supporters of Arizona. The Tennessee state legislature passed a resolution congratulating Arizona for defending its borders. Bill Haslam, the next Governor of Tennessee, has indicated that he would sign Arizona-style immigration reform in the Volunteer State.

Mainstream vs. Fringe

Pro-Whites have two paths before them. The first path is to work within the mainstream and use polarizing national debates over issues like immigration to push moderates in a more radical direction. The second path is to work within the fringe to build a credible radical alternative to the status quo.

At least from my perspective, having tried the second path (and reaching its terminus in a bad experience), the first path has become more attractive as of late. It seems an easier task to radicalize moderates in the mainstream than to mainstream radicals on the fringe. It is easier to cure ordinary people of ignorance than odd people of more serious problems.

In the last five years, the only detectable movement has been the rise of the Tea Party and the demise of the Bush GOP in the mainstream. As we recently saw in Knoxville, nothing has changed on the fringe.

Until that changes, Whites will continue to look elsewhere for their salvation. ]]> 1st Amendment - Free Speech, Press, Religion Keltoi http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/8895-outsiders-governor-races.html The Transformation of the American Conservative Movement into Fascism? http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/8732-transformation-american-conservative-movement-into-fascism.html Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:00:53 GMT Mr. Blumenthal seems to be more concerned with the historical experience of his tribe, than in the true American experience. Hmmmm, perhaps... Mr. Blumenthal seems to be more concerned with the historical experience of his tribe, than in the true American experience.

Hmmmm, perhaps 'history' really does 'repeat itself'.



Quote:
The Transformation of the American Conservative Movement into Fascism





Fascist Palin and Tea Party
Crusading to restore a holy social order, Tea Partiers have promoted disorder. Claiming to protect democracy, they smashed windows of elected representatives.

By Max Blumenthal in Alternet

Editor’s Note: The following is the new epilogue from Max Blumenthal’s book, Republican Gomorrah, now out in paperback (Basic/Nation Books, 2009).


“He will tell you that he wants a strong authority to take from him the crushing responsibility of thinking for himself. Since the Republic is weak, he is led to break the law out of love for obedience. But is it really strong authority that he wish? In reality he demands rigorous order for others, and for himself disorder without responsibility.” — Jean-Paul Sartre, “Anti-Semite and Jew”

I am not sure when I first detected the noxious fumes that would envelop the conservative movement in the Obama era. It might have been early on, in April 2009, when I visited a series of gun shows in rural California and Nevada. Perusing tables piled high with high-caliber semi-automatic weapons and chatting with anyone in my vicinity, I heard urgent warnings of mass roundups, concentration camps, and a socialist government in Washington. “These people that are purchasing these guns are people that are worried about what’s going on in this country,” a gun dealer told me outside a show in Reno. “Good luck Obama,” a young gun enthusiast remarked to me. “We outnumber him 100 to 1.” At this time, the Tea Party movement had not even registered on the national media’s radar.

In September 2009, I led a panel discussion about this book inside an auditorium filled with nearly 100 students and faculty at the University of California-Riverside. Beside me sat Jonathan Walton, an African-American professor of religious studies and prolific writer, and Mark Takano, an erudite, openly gay former Democratic congressional candidate and local community college trustee.

In the middle of our discussion, a dozen College Republicans stormed the front of the stage with signs denouncing me as a “left-wing hack” while a hysterical young man leaped from the crowd, blowing kisses mockingly at Takano while heckling Walton as a “racist.” Afterward, university police officers insisted on escorting me to my ride after the right-wing heckler attempted to follow me as he shouted threats.

More
]]> 1st Amendment - Free Speech, Press, Religion Keltoi http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/1st-amendment-free-speech-press-religion/8732-transformation-american-conservative-movement-into-fascism.html