"presumption of innocence" & knives outlawed in 0zz.....are rocks next

[jimbo]

it's a slippery slope, when governments (especially those controlled by sinister international cablas!) are bequeathed the power to dictate what people can and can't own....

( an old Chinese proverb springs to mind: governments are more to be feared than tigers! )

Aussies, basically, had their firearms confiscated as the result of a ZOG "false-flag" psy-op

with the resulting upsurge in violent crime, an increasingly desperate government now sees fit to negate the traditional, common law right of all those citizens residing under the Westminster system of laws......the presumption of innocence!

and....to make it an "offence" to be caught by over-zealous cops "carrying a knife" in public!

uh......that's a "fail", Mr Brumby!

the "offence" should be the illegal use (as determined by the courts) of a knife or a gun....not the mere possession of said article!

so....when this current hysterical "offensive" on the traditional rights and liberties of ordinary Aussies falls in a screaming HEAP (as, of course, it will!).....what then?

make "rocks" and "house-bricks" illegal items?

NO!....you EFFIN' ZOG-bot clowns....there in ONLY ONE WAY to curb the current epidemic of out-of-control thuggery!

make firearms easily accesible to the average citizen

t'aint "little ol` me" saying that.....but

Amazon.com: More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, Third Edition (Studies in Law and…

Amazon.com: More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, Third Edition (Studies in Law and…
Amazon.com: More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, Third Edition (Studies in Law and…

cheers!

(jimbo)

[Jay Of Melbourne]

Race is real and it matters.
If Howard had let you keep your Assault rifles he wouldn't have been able to bring the Africans here.
Think about it.
As for unlimited powers of stop and search, was it ever thus?
Yes.
Twenty years ago Cops didn't give a damn about people's rights, I remember being grabbed by the hair from behind, pushed up against a tree and searched for no reason in Rosalind Park in Bendigo, they went through my pockets, dumped my wallet out on the ground, shoved me around a bit and said that they would "Get Me" sooner or later. Why? No idea, bad hair day maybe.
A month later the CIB pulled me over on the Calder, rushed the car, guns drawn, held me at gunpoint for 30 seconds or so then burst out laughing, one leaned in the window and said "Whoops! You're not the **** we want!"
I could go on for hours, don't even ask me about the Special Branch or the Drug squad. Touch Up, Set Up, Lock Up
Point is if they can drag you away, hold you incommunicado for a week, force you to answer questions and give you five years for even telling your wife where you were, which they can and will do..the rest is small potatoes.
Worry about the Coercive Powers of the Sedition/Anti Terror laws, or their planned Human Rights Tribunals and Internet Ombudsmen, that's what they'll come after you with.

[jimbo]

we don't want or need Africoons in 0zz....with or without "assault rifles".....as for Howard....he was nuthin' but a pathetic puppet being told what to do & when to do it by those same sinister international cabals, amongst which was "the Soros Foundation";

the recent ABC-TV series ("The Howard Years") had several senior Coalition ministers of the time, in particular John Anderson, former Deputy Prime Minister and Leader of the National Party, clearly saying that they were very uneasy indeed about Howard's gun laws....but, they were pushed through by Howard, "Dim Tim" Fischer and a rabid anti-gun media;

the point is: the lawfully acquired property of law-abiding Australian citizens was stolen from them by threats & menaces.......that's the equivalent of "armed robbery" and the pre-text was totally bogus....an intelligence "false-flag" black-op' (the Prt Arthur massacre).....that means Howard & Fischer, at least, both privy to ALL intelligence matters through the auspices of the Prime Minster's Department, have blood on their hands and, at some stage in the near future, can be indicted as accessories both before and after the fact to 35 murders at Prt Arthur, Tasmania on April 28th, 1996!

it's true that cops have always "bent" the law to suit them-selves.....the n° of inquiries into corrupt police behaviour and the n° of convictions for various forms of police mal-practice are many...if not being only "the tip of the iceberg";

but: it's a difference of degree....they now have the legal right to stop you, search you and, if needs be, arrest you on the basis of no legitimate pre-text what-so-ever; i.e: they do not need "probable cause" as they say in the US!

considering the above "black marks" that they have accrued over the years, the police do not merit nor should they be trusted with such authority!

personally, i'd much rather have ASIO and/or the AFP granted such powers because they have little or no inter-action with the general Australian public and because their budgets and expenditures are strictly monitored....therefore, they are only likely to go after real threats;

the pending "internet filtering" is a joke....it can be got around in less than a minute by a ten-year-old kid.....they can't even properly stifle the internet in Communist China, a military dictatorship......how likely are they do to it here effectively


cheers!

(jimbo)

[Jay Of Melbourne]

Heh, I was reading an Anarchist site the other night and the author was slagging off the Black Bloc, he goes up to them at demos and yells at them to take off their masks because the, he tells them, Feds don't have the brains, the time or the money to track people down.
Anyway I was under the impression you thought the security services were in on Port Arthur as the "Cleaners" for whomever it is that's in the frame this week.
You really want to give them more power than the Anti Terror laws they already have?

[jimbo]

the actual Prt Arthur "shooter" was a 21-yr-old rogue SAS trooper called "Hans Overbeeke" (sic?) now, apparently, dead!

he wore a long, blonde wig to make him look vaguely like Bryant!

there were ASIO agents involved.....they were all either in the Broad Arrow café or in a Volvo nearby in the car park....they were all shot dead by Overbeeke! ( no doubt, acting "under orders" );

Bryant was nowhere near the Prt Arthur Historical Site when the massacre occurred.....there are independent witness statements to the Tasmanian Police that verify that!

but...the man who has ALL the facts on this ZOG atrocity is Mr Andrew MacGregor who, i believe, will be interviewed in the near future by VoR

the actual scenario has been "nailed down" now for the best part of a decade....so: it doesn't change significantly "on a daily basis" or even a monthly one!


cheers!


(jimbo)