• Court Rejects Gay Marriage Appeal

    Once again a court overrides the wishes of the people. Even in California. Hopefully the U.S. Supreme Court will overturn this horrific decision.

    A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that it will not review a three-judge panel's decision to overturn California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage.


    Following this ruling by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Proposition 8 proponents plan to appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, putting the battle for same-sex marriage on a national stage. The Supreme Court could decide to hear the case as part of its docket next year.

    The ruling comes after a federal appeals court in Boston ruled Thursday that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), that says states don't have to recognize gay marriages in other states and defines marriage as between a man and a woman for federal purposes, violates the Constitution and should be struck down. The Supreme Court could also decide to hear this case next year.

    In February, a three-judge panel in California voted 2 to 1 against the voter-approved same-sex marriage ban, upholding an earlier decision by Judge Vaughn Walker. The panel said that by denying marriage rights, Proposition 8 violated the equal protection clause and due process clause of the U.S. Constitution.


    "Proposition 8 serves no purpose, and has no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California, and to officially reclassify their relationships and families as inferior to those of opposite-sex couples," the court wrote in February. Proposition 8 supporters appealed, asking for a larger panel of the court to review the case.


    Same-sex couples in California will not be allowed to marry right away while Proposition 8 supporters are given a chance to appeal to the Supreme Court, according to the San Jose Mercury News.

    Court rejects appeal to overturn Proposition 8 ruling
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Court Rejects Gay Marriage Appeal started by Alexander Hamilton View original post
    Comments 9 Comments
    1. Nordic Angel's Avatar
      Nordic Angel -
      Gay marriages are inferior to Heterosexual marriages because gay marriages cannot produce offspring.

      It is my understanding that the marriage contract was originally designed as a loyalty contract for parental purposes "Before these witnesses." that a woman was agreeing that this man would be the progenitor of her posterity and she to bear his... He was agreeing to perform and take full responsibility for any children produced as well as give them legal inheritance and she was agreeing to carry his children only in her womb and also give him the right to her body to create his offspring inside her.

      Thus the idea of fidelity and adultery was created to protect the man in his role as provider and protector as to who he would be obligated to provide and protect and give inheritance to.

      I believe the idea that marriage is merely an emotional love-bond between any two persons or things was a gross distortion of what the marriage contract was designed to represent. I believe the distortion came when mankind discovered the science of procreation which enabled him to determine whether or not children would be produced as well as making the state play the role of protector and provider for his children (welfare.)

      I agree that the meaning of the marriage contract should not be changed. It was designed for responsible procreation and not for the anus or use of objects for pleasure.
    1. Nordic Angel's Avatar
      Nordic Angel -
      My comment to any gay people reading this....

      This article says the court overrides the wishes of the people. Such a statement assumes that only Gays are people since legal reference to "The People" defines the general populace as a whole or a majority ruling.

      Furthermore the Constitution and legal "Due Process" has nothing to do with Anal penetration or sexual toys as it does not prohibit the use thereof. Because there is no danger of procreating children in a Gay marriage there is no need for a marriage contract "Inheritance and Loyalty procreative contract".

      Forcing others to recognize your choice of sexual perversion has nothing to do with marriage/offspring and is merely an attempt to force your behavior to be openly accepted by those who are giving all their time and finance to create and raise the next generation. An "In your face" attitude for those who honor and respect the sacred and weighty responsibility of procreating and raising the next generation of a society.

      Procreating and Raising children should not be and is not equal to sexual perversions.

      To claim the two are equal is a vicious and devastating injustice to children, genetic inheritance, and the value thereof.
    1. JamesinUSA's Avatar
      JamesinUSA -
      The 'Will Of The People" means nothing, if every time that 'will' that threatens the Leftest agenda of undermining ever things that's normal, tradtional, and independent of government control is simply over ridden by Federal Judges!

      When are people going to wake-up to the fact, that it's only the trivial things that you're allowed to make definite decisions about. The Courts will decide the rest. And even if by chance the courts should decide in favor of 'The Will Of The People'. Who's to say that our own government will actually enforce the laws. Or will they simply be ignored, like we often see with Illegal Immigration.

      Eventually, what with the demographic changes we're now under going, and the 'Brainwashing' our Public Education is giving our young people, even the value of the 'Will Of The People' will one day be in question.
    1. PhilGarrand's Avatar
      PhilGarrand -
      Admin delete, very inappropriate. Please keep it civil.
    1. 357 Magnum's Avatar
      357 Magnum -
      Quote Originally Posted by PhilGarrand View Post
      For those who don't want to read all those paragraphs, I can sum up Nordic Angel's comment in one sentence: "I'm still angry that my dad raped me when I was a child."
      You should be ashamed of yourself. I can only hope that someone in Admin reads your vicious post and disables your account.
    1. Tom Smith's Avatar
      Tom Smith -
      Quote Originally Posted by 357 Magnum View Post
      You should be ashamed of yourself. I can only hope that someone in Admin reads your vicious post and disables your account.
      Done!
    1. 357 Magnum's Avatar
      357 Magnum -
      Quote Originally Posted by Tom Smith View Post
      Done!
      Thanks Tom. I had full confidence that this "Character" would be dealt with appropriately. Personal attacks and insults may be the bread and butter for other sites but not here at WNN, thank goodness.
    1. NC Pride's Avatar
      NC Pride -
      NC passed Amendment One (banning gay marriage) a few weeks ago so these activist judges could not re-define marriage to suit their own agenda. While the vote was pending, the propaganda the pro-gay crowd put out was stunning in it's distortions and out right lies about what was in the new law. When we overwhelmingly passed Amendment One, you should have read some of the comments on the articles about it. I tell ya'll, that pro-gay crowd are some of the most vicious, threatening, scary people on the net. This from the same people that preach tolerance, but ONLY if you agree with them and accept their preverted lifestyle. They claim to want equal rights, but what they really want is preferential treatment on all levels. They just need to accept the fact that most people do not agree with their lifestyle, and never will.
    1. Nordic Angel's Avatar
      Nordic Angel -
      Quote Originally Posted by 357 Magnum View Post
      You should be ashamed of yourself. I can only hope that someone in Admin reads your vicious post and disables your account.
      Looks like I said something politically incorrect and hit a nerve with the rainbows. One of those ever tolerant liberals thought he had something to contribute?

      Thanks Tom, and 357. You are kind.

      @Phil,

      I assume the truth has not yet set you free.
  • Donate

  • Follow Us

    Follow Us@whitenewsnow_Youtube
  • Amazon Search

  • Food Supply

  • U.S. Debt