Isn't it time 'We, the people' get rid of the old fashioned way of politics?
Isn't it time 'We, the people' take our own future and lives in our own hands?
Why pay a system where the people you can vote for do NOT have the people's best interest at heart?
With the new technologies, we can put up a real democracy...
Democracy 3.0
- All the people can participate the debate and vote on the resolutions through Internet.
- The Resolutions can be made up by the scientists and the technological experts...
- They can defend their design on-line, and the people can vote for the best interest of the people.
Les us see if the Zionist and leftist agenda will still be executed in a REAL Democracy...
Then they will need to have at least 51% of the people willing to give up their freedom in a REAL debate. As the Resolutions are laid down by experts, the experts will inform the people also, the debate is OPEN and FREE...
Uninformed the masses are stupid, informed, the people are smart...
I believe some of the first things that will be abolished are the fiat currency and his interest system, unlimited immigration, abuse of the social system by newcomers and the treatment of big corporations as a human rather than the artificial entity they are...
Also, without 'career politicians', the lobbyists will be out of a job...
There will be a lot of rich people who will have to learn a real trade...
Nothing changes.
Please explain why you think nothing would change?
I think a lot of changes will occur,
In the society, there is a lot of money that will not be used to pay politicians, but can be used to better the life of the people and lower taxes for the people.
As it will be a real democracy, the money won't go to immigrants, but to the needy white folks, who now are f*ck*d by the banks...
(interest free loans, lower taxes, real good social houses, ...)
In the business world, there is a lot of money that will be used in an other way than buying corrupt politicians... (better wages?)
Yes, the corporations still can pay some engineers or scientists to make some propositions, BUT, they will have to pass the democratic process of being accepted by the majority of the people in the country...
Not so easy to do, and a lot more expensive if you want to buy law...
(51% of the politicians versus 51% of the people...)
I don't really want to say. I don't know for certain anyway. Either way I can see it probable things will get worse before a chance of getting better. Life has been pretty strange.
I think the internet is important, but not so much as a "quick fix" tool for voting but as a tool for gradual change by spreading uncensored information. The truth wins on a fair playing field, which means if we can keep the field fair we'll win.
After all, democracy is rule by consensus, which today means rule by propaganda.
to Kyl3Leach:
Of course things will go worse before they change, most revolutions need the people starving before they will join, for as long as the belly is full, the mind sleeps...
It is the curse of mankind...(even us, white folks)
to negative3:
It doesn't have to be a quick fix tool, it can replace the whole political system there is now...
After all, Democracy is nowhere to be seen in the world today...
This also implies there is no 'fair playing field'...
What do we see today:
plutocracy: money buys the law
Oligarchy: the 'elite' rules
Particracy: some groups (parties) make the law
Meritocracy: the ones who licks the best ass makes the law
Autocracy: one lucky bastard rules all
Diarchy: power is in the hands of TWO lucky bastards
Kleptocracy: thieves rule (I am the Don ...)
Theocracy: Priests Rule (call them priest, imam, guru ... they all suck)
But none of them can even start to compare themselves to a Direct Democracy, which I feel could be implemented the Democracy 3.0 way...
Democracy 3.0: The people rule
Off course we have to be vigilant so the Democracy 3.0 doesn't degenerate to a Illiberal Democracy, a Ochlocracy or a Pseudocracy...
The dangers:
Illiberal Democracy: the people give their freedom away (known to happen, as we are mere idiots)
Ochlocracy: Chaos... (aka as Mobocracy)
Pseudocracy: The people are been fooled by propaganda and disinformation... (don't we all know how this feels and how easy it could happen?)
Communism is just a little mix...
Take plutocracy, Oligarchy, Particracy, Meritocracy, Autocracy, Diarchy, Kleptocracy and Theocracy, mix em up, add some Jews and the right kind of propaganda and you get Communism ;)
Sadly, To obtain Capitalism, you just change the kind of propaganda you put in the mix...
You know, in the old continent, before the Romans brought in the Jews, The whole community looked out for each other, when someone's house burned down, the whole community got together to rebuild the House.
All the mothers looked after all the children together, cooking and making clothes, while the men made the weapons, went hunting, fishing or farming...
At evening, they got together, they ate together and told stories and legends to entertain them selves...
Why did they do that?
Because they were ALL white and a REAL community...
And then the Romans came, and brought in the Jew... The rest is history...
But the middleman can't really do anything in Switzerland, if the people get a certain amount of signatures, there has to be a referendum, the results of which are binding. From what I can see from the outside, Switzerland is a real democracy. But you are right that in general, there aren't really that many real democracies (or anything even close to it) in the World.
Bookmarks