Right-winger Ann Coulter silenced by angry protesters at University of Ottawa

**Keltoi** · 03-25-2010

Originally Posted by Ryan J. Murdough

Conservative News: Coulter - University of Ottawa, Parliament condemn speech as "hate speech" - HUMAN EVENTS

Oh, Canada!
by Ann Coulter

03/24/2010

Since arriving in Canada I've been accused of thought crimes, threatened with criminal prosecution for speeches I hadn't yet given and denounced on the floor of the Parliament (which was nice because that one was on my "bucket list").

Posters advertising my speech have been officially banned, while posters denouncing me are plastered all over the University of Ottawa campus. Elected officials have been prohibited from attending my speeches. Also, the local clothing stores are fresh out of brown shirts.

Welcome to Canada!

The provost of the University of Ottawa, average student IQ: 0, wrote to me—widely disseminating his letter to at least a half-dozen intermediaries before it reached me—in advance of my visit in order to recommend that I familiarize myself with Canada's criminal laws regarding hate speech.
This marks the first time I've ever gotten hate mail for something I might do in the future.

Apparently Canadian law forbids "promoting hatred against any identifiable group," which the provost, Francois A. Houle advised me, "would not only be considered inappropriate, but could in fact lead to criminal charges."

I was given no specific examples of what words and phrases I couldn't use, but I take it I'm not supposed to say, "F----you, Francois."

While it was a relief to know that it is still permissible in Canada to promote hatred against unidentifiable groups, upon reading Francois' letter, I suddenly realized that I had just been the victim of a hate crime! And it was committed by Francois A. Houle (French for "Frank A. Hole").

What other speakers get a warning not to promote hatred? Did Francois A. Houle send a similarly worded letter to Israel-hater Omar Barghouti before he spoke last year at U of Ottawa? ("Ottawa": Indian for "Land of the Bed-Wetters.")

How about Angela Davis, Communist Party member and former Black Panther who spoke at the University of Zero just last month?

Or do only conservatives get letters admonishing them to be civil? Or—my suspicion—is it only conservative women who fuel Francois' rage?

How about sending a letter to all Muslim speakers advising them to please bathe once a week while in Canada? Would that constitute a hate crime?

I'm sure Canada's Human Rights Commission will get to the bottom of Francois' strange warning to me, inasmuch as I will be filing a complaint with that august body, so I expect they will be reviewing every letter the university has sent to other speakers prior to their speeches to see if any of them were threatened with criminal prosecution.

Both writer Mark Steyn and editor Ezra Levant have been investigated by the Human Rights Commission for promoting hatred toward Muslims.

Levant's alleged crime was to reprint the cartoons of Mohammed originally published in a Danish newspaper, leading practitioners of the Religion of Peace to engage in murderous violence across the globe. Steyn's alleged crime was to publish an excerpt of his book, America Alone in Maclean's magazine, in which he jauntily described Muslims as "hot for jihad."

Both of them also flew jet airliners full of passengers into skyscrapers in lower Manhattan, resulting in thousands of deaths. No, wait—that was somebody else.

Curiously, however, there was no evidence that either the cartoons or the column did, in fact, incite hatred toward Muslims—nor was there the remotest possibility that they would.

By contrast, conservative speakers are regularly subjected to violent attacks on college campuses. Bill Kristol, Pat Buchanan, David Horowitz and I have all been the targets of infamous campus attacks.

That's why the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute (a sponsor of my Canada speeches) and the Young America's Foundation (a sponsor of many of my college speeches) don't send conservatives to college campuses without a bodyguard.

You'd have to be a real A-Houle not to anticipate that accusing a conservative of "promoting hatred" prior to her arrival on a college campus would in actuality—not in liberal fantasies of terrified Muslims cowering in terror of Mark Steyn readers—incite real-world violence toward the conservative.

The university itself acknowledged that Francois' letter was likely to provoke violence against me by demanding—long after my speech was scheduled, but immediately after Francois disseminated his letter—that my sponsors pony up more than $1,200 for extra security.

Also following Francois' letter, the Ottawa University Student Federation met for 7 1/2 hours to hammer out a series of resolutions denouncing me. The resolutions included:

"Whereas Ann Coulter is a hateful woman;
"Whereas she has made hateful comments against GLBTQ, Muslims, Jews and women;
"Whereas she violates an unwritten code of 'positive-space';
"Be it resolved that the SFUO express its disapproval of having Ann Coulter speak at the University of Ottawa."

At least the students didn't waste 7 1/2 hours on something silly, like their studies.

At the risk of violating anyone's positive space, what happened to Canada? How did the country that gave us Jim Carrey, Mike Myers, Martin Short, Dan Aykroyd and Catherine O'Hara suddenly become a bunch of whining crybabies?

After Tuesday night, the hatred incited by Francois' letter is no longer theoretical. The police called off my speech when the auditorium was surrounded by thousands of rioting liberals—screaming, blocking the entrance, throwing tables, demanding that my books be burned, and finally setting off the fire alarm.

Sadly, I missed the book-burning because I never made it to the building.

But, reportedly, a Canadian crowd hasn't been this excited since they opened a new Tim Hortons. Local reporters couldn't make out what the crowd was chanting, but it was something about "Molson" and a "sled dog."

I've given more than 100 college speeches, and not once has one of my speeches been shut down at any point. Even the pie-throwing incident at the University of Arizona didn't break up the event. I said, "Get them!" and the college Republicans got them, and then I continued with my rambling, hate-filled diatribe—I mean, my speech.

So we've run this experiment more than 100 times.

Only one college speech was ever met with so much mob violence that the police were forced to cancel it: The one that was preceded by a letter from the university provost accusing me of hate speech.

(To add insult to injury, Francois didn't even plan to attend my speech because Tuesday is his bikini wax night.)

If a university official's letter accusing a speaker of having a proclivity to commit speech crimes before she's given the speech—which then leads to Facebook postings demanding that Ann Coulter be hurt, a massive riot and a police-ordered cancellation of the speech—is not hate speech, then there is no such thing as hate speech.

Either Francois goes to jail or the Human Rights Commission is a hoax and a fraud.

Well done.

**beefcake** · 03-25-2010

Originally Posted by 30.06

He never said anything about breaking any laws . Please read the actual post !

Do not attenpt to twist the words of another poster .

There is nothing illegal about fighting , even with violence , when that violence is a counterattack against attackers .

If you can not tell the difference , between violence and illegality , then you are not ready to engage in political struggle .

Has the media been that successful in confusing everybody ?

Fair enough then, I did not pay close enough attention to his post.

The most Violent tactic we have right now is Words.

Sure there is a difference with violence and illegality. That line is very thin however. Especially when in a system that is slanted against us.

For example; say there is a big event and an anti comes in there swinging with fists. The only amount of force used should be the bare minimum for defense and to escort the guy out of the event.

If he gets beaten up, then that will be used as propaganda against us, weather we were in the right or not. Anyone at the event will then be prosecuted. You get in front of a Jury and you are NOT on trail for excessive self defense, you are on trail for being one of us. They will charge you with a hate crime, and use the whole thing as propaganda against us.

Right now, the way things are legally slanted our opposition CAN get away with some things we cannot.

At the same time they cannot deal with things like the Mantra. It cuts them to the bone and exposes the problem with all of their arguments. They are all just justifications for Genocide.

Exposing them there is the most violent thing that can happen to them.

**Berserker88** · 03-26-2010

Beefcake when protesters show up with bats and bricks. They're not showing up to debate you. They're showing up to do serious damage. I'm not going to try to speak I'm going to defend myself. Beefcake I want you to imagine living the rest of your life without a bunch of your teeth because a red knocked them out. Imagine living the rest of your life missing an eye because a red hit you in the face with a bottle. I'm not advocating violence, but respond appropriately. Defend yourself, your people and your freedom

**Berserker88** · 03-26-2010

Anyone who posts here about violence NEVER being the answer. I want you to imagine going to a political speech with your family, and one of those bricks hitting your daughter, or wife in the head. While your in the hospital that red will be bragging to other reds about it. How far does it have to go before enough is enough?

**Berserker88** · 03-26-2010

Jgun. Listen to his brown speech and the only answer to communism.

Victory Forever

**Andrew Jackson14** · 03-26-2010

I scaned the whole thread, but I didn't see anything stating if Ann Coulter is actually full White or not. So my question is she full white or not? What are your thoughts about a person that goes onto programs like Glenn Beck or Hannity and get's along with them just fine? I notice she has alot in common with that bunch, so my thinking is she's just another neo-con.

**30.06** · 03-26-2010

Of course she's a big Neo-Con mouthpiece , why do you think she's on the Jew run media ?

ahhemm....btw

"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."—Jeff Cooper, The Art of the Rifle

**Andrew Jackson14** · 03-26-2010

Originally Posted by 30.06

Of course she's a big Neo-Con mouthpiece , why do you think she's on the Jew run media ?

ahhemm....btw

"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."—Jeff Cooper, The Art of the Rifle

Love the quote but at this time is there really enough good men left? I know she is, but it was more of getting people to think about the crowd she runs with. They're all poisonist to our people and are helping in the destruction of what is left of our culture and heritage.

**Andrew Jackson14** · 03-26-2010

Originally Posted by Ryan J. Murdough

We fight with our fists when it is required. The Epic Beard man did just that thing but I am willing to bet that he did not want to have to do it. The Tea Parties are using no violence at all and nobody messes with those White people. What you are talking about is simply not realistic. Nobody wants to go to jail, plus we are of no use there. If we can continue to awaken people and radicalize them just like the Tea Party protesters have become radicalized, we will win this thing. The Tea Party has been effective because of numbers.
They might call us Nazi's but we shouldn't start fitting the profile just because.
Our enemy’s favorite symbol is the Swastika because they use it against us so effectively. They can call angry White people racists as much as they want but that just energizes us even more. It is pretty simple to counter the Nazi label by looking just like your average White American citizen. That is the reason why the Tea Party is successful so far, because they look like your average White Joe.

They are average White Joe's for the most part. I think A3P should be at ever Tea Party event, since they're the closest thing we have to White Racial political party.

**beefcake** · 03-26-2010

Originally Posted by Berserker88

Beefcake, like I said before I love the mantra and mantra style thinking. I'd much rather out speak someone. But sometimes reds don't want to hear words, they want your blood. There was another post just put up talking about a reporter advocating knocking out racist teeth, and that was about non violent tea party people. They are basically advocating terrorism. How do you deal effectively with terrorists? You make them afraid of you. We have great Aryan minds and Heroic Aryan bodies. The Gods made us like this for a reason. Odin the Allfather was the god of both war and wisdom, because BOTH are sometimes needed. Beefcake I've never met you but I would happily go to jail to defend you or any of my racial brothers or sisters (especially the sisters)

Originally Posted by Berserker88

Beefcake when protesters show up with bats and bricks. They're not showing up to debate you. They're showing up to do serious damage. I'm not going to try to speak I'm going to defend myself. Beefcake I want you to imagine living the rest of your life without a bunch of your teeth because a red knocked them out. Imagine living the rest of your life missing an eye because a red hit you in the face with a bottle. I'm not advocating violence, but respond appropriately. Defend yourself, your people and your freedom

Well said.

We do not need more dead white people, and for that matter we do not want to have to help feed our friends with blenders either.

I do think it is a VERY good idea to also have someone handy with a camera, or cell phone that can record the event.

This way if we have to defend ourselves we can have proof that we did not start it, and if anyone tries to use it as propaganda against us, we have proof of what happened to expose them.

BTW who was the reporter who advocated breaking the teeth of the Tea Party people?

They could not have done us a bigger favor. That kind of talk will piss off white people who are on the fence, piss them off and wake them up.

We can show these anti-whites as the bad guys, and make the distinction clear.

**Legrange** · 03-26-2010

Originally Posted by 30.06

No entity is going to enter the political arena and be able to win anything , if they are not prepared , to carry forth a brutal struggle against their opponents .

Do not be decieved into believing that numbers alone indicate any 'success' , it's where the group goes forward , with those participants , that will become either a success or a failure .

If the broad masses are going to disavow any movement , because it is seen as aggressively fighting for it's furtherence , then those masses were never truly supportive of the effort in the first place .

If you are going to use the Tea Parties as an example of anything , let me ask , how much involvement had you had in the Tea-Parties ?

I have been to one small rally in my hometown and I want to go to the one in Boston in April. I am not saying that the Tea party is the final solution but I do think that it could be a huge stepping stone. Time will tell. I think it really hinges on whether or not the majority of the Tea Partiers come to the realization that it is all about race.

**Legrange** · 03-26-2010

How about restoring a Constitutional government where states have the ability to govern themselves without the Federal government controlling them with an iron fist?