Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree7Likes
  • 1 Post By Robertvincent
  • 3 Post By JamesinUSA
  • 1 Post By Transilvanian
  • 2 Post By Leto Atreides II

Thread: Neo-Nazi case won't be heard by Supreme Court

  1. #1
    Contributing Member Robertvincent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,748
    Rep Power
    23

    Default Neo-Nazi case won't be heard by Supreme Court

    Neo-Nazi case won't be heard by Supreme Court

    OTTAWA — Canada's top court will not hear an appeal in a case involving a neo-Nazi leader's web postings that could have determined the power of Canada's quasi-judicial human rights tribunals.

    Regina's Terry Tremaine, the head of the National-Socialist Party of Canada and a former university math lecturer, was found in contempt of court by the Federal Court of Appeal in November 2011 for refusing to remove web postings he made about blacks, Jews and First Nations people.

    Neo-Nazi case won't be heard by Supreme Court

  2. #2
    Contributing Sr. Mod
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Alabama
    Age
    55
    Posts
    1,828
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Re: Neo-Nazi case won't be heard by Supreme Court

    "Made under the moniker "mathdoktor99," Tremaine's postings called Jews a "parasitic race" and said "blacks are intellectually inferior to whites" and "Hitler was a lot nicer to the Jews than they deserved," according to the tribunal's judgment."

    I don't get it! There's a lot of truth here, but where's the 'Hate'?

    I have a feeling the reason the High Court doesn't wish to here cases such as this, is because the court, and the public would have to hear the opposing arguments of the defense, and for the record! Arguments that will make to much sense, will be to factual, and will make the case that 'Truth', when it comes to minorities, isn't always 'Hate'!

  3. #3
    Executive Patriot Silver Stallion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,160
    Rep Power
    28

    Default Re: Neo-Nazi case won't be heard by Supreme Court

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesinUSA View Post
    I don't get it! There's a lot of truth here, but where's the 'Hate'?

    Truth is no defense in a hate crime case.
    Brad Love quotes: Africa produces children faster than we can print foreign aid money. " “I hear too the developing world. What ‘developing’? Africa has been there for 100,000 years. They should be sending us money.”

  4. #4
    On leave
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Age
    40
    Posts
    915
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Neo-Nazi case won't be heard by Supreme Court

    "Hate" is when you disagree with a jew. They hate you so your hateful, get it?

  5. #5
    Voice for Our White People Transilvanian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    433
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Neo-Nazi case won't be heard by Supreme Court

    Quote Originally Posted by Silver Stallion View Post
    Truth is no defense in a hate crime case.
    Very true. This case is a very good example of what happens in Canada when you're a bit too vocal with your disagreements. Freedom of Speech, eh?

    The truth is hate to those who hate the truth.
    tamithomas likes this.

  6. #6
    Tyrant Leto Atreides II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Arrakis
    Posts
    114
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: Neo-Nazi case won't be heard by Supreme Court

    "Hitler was a lot nicer to the Jews than they deserved,"
    I will say that to anyone who believes the popular myths promoted about Hitler and the 'Holocaust', this would indeed sound like an extreme statement.

    Personally, I agree with Mr. Tremaine on this point. It was in fact because Hitler was far too lenient with the Jews that they got away with destroying the Third Reich, and got into a position where they could flood the world with their 'Holocaust' myths and use them to dominate and crush the White race.
    Astragoth and tamithomas like this.
    "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship."
    - Alexander Tyler, 1787
    Join my forum to become part of an entertainment site project!

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-06-2012, 12:36 AM
  2. Supreme Court to Hear Affirmative Action Case
    By William Gayley Simpson in forum American News For White America
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-22-2012, 09:17 AM
  3. Supreme Court to decide police GPS tracking case
    By Robertvincent in forum American News For White America
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-27-2011, 01:28 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-20-2011, 01:41 PM
  5. Westboro Baptist Church case heard by Supreme Court
    By Legrange in forum American News For White America
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-05-2010, 04:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •