There is nobody more racist than a left wing liberal.
They believe that the only way a non-White can be successful is if they come into a White country and have special rights and priviledges over the White population.
Northern Californian Jessica Tracy (Dr. Pyschology) only measured White prejudice against Asians and Gays, and White prejudice against African Americans and Gays. I suppose there isn't any other kind of prejudice but the White kind. I suppose future generations of Jessica Tracys will learn otherwize.
Pride and prejudice: How you are proud determines whether you're racist
There is nobody more racist than a left wing liberal.
They believe that the only way a non-White can be successful is if they come into a White country and have special rights and priviledges over the White population.
Socialism is not in the least what it pretends to be. It is not the pioneer of a better and finer world, but the spoiler of what thousands of years of civilization have created. Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) Economist and social philosopher
Actually, in hindsite I doubt that Dr. Tracy is all that naive or dumb. She does know what to put out in order to be PC, and get published in the MSM. I think Psychologists are amongst the more racially aware of the social Sciences. The Newspaper could print an article by Psychologists on mixed race adoptions, but they don't.
So called studies like this are totally useless, especially in light of the fact that the subjects don't even include Blacks! Who are some of the most 'racist' people on Earth!
For Whites to be proud of not just their on accomplishments, but those of other members of their race, whether it's in Art or Science, automatically makes you a racist in the eyes of the liberal and non-white. And yet, this is exactly what is being taught to Blacks in our educational system. That they're to be proud of Black scientist, Inventors, and those who in history have personally championed their cause as being Black people.
This is the kind of science that really is racist and needs to be removed from our society, rather than having our young people deny the obvious facts concerning racial differences.
That study's hypothesis is pretty easily falsified. I can think of a dozen "racists" off the top of my head who have been very successful. For example J. Philippe Rushton is one of the world's top psychologists. My guess is that the main error these researchers made is poor sampling, and poor controlling for normal population samples.
Still, it's probably a tiny bit true. Not here at WNN, but in many "pro-white" circles there is a disproportionate number of less-than-admirable people. I think this is because more successful people have to stay "in the closet" in order to remain successful. While those with nothing to lose can speak their minds freely.
I think that you're exactly right! I can well understand where many successful people are in fear of speaking out, and it's not that the voice of those who are less successful is any less important to our cause, especially since they are usually in greater numbers and often make-up the necessary soldiers and workers of any great movement But when someone who is apparently successful, one who seems to break all of the stereotypes that are adversaries work very hard at creating, their voice does have a great impact on the listeners I think. Even if people don't initially agree or embrace their ideas, they can't help but resonate somewhere deep within their consciousness and make some impression. Possibly having many people asking, 'what is the cost of success, when I'm having to ignore the obvious problems that we're seeing today, even if they don't effect me directly on a day to day basis, will no doubt one day adversely effect my children and their children', and my community as a whole?
I have often thought that the greatest motivator for me to try and speak out, even in my own modest way, is the 'fear' itself! Nobody likes being 'Afraid'!
Part of our cause itself, is to one day remove this 'fear', that has kept our people down!
Bookmarks