Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Use “Wordism,” But Don’t Distort It -Bob Whitaker

  1. #1
    Senior Moderator seriouswon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    599
    Rep Power
    14

    Default Use “Wordism,” But Don’t Distort It -Bob Whitaker

    Wordism can be effective if it is only used in the sense I give it here. Every time one says that overspending is Wordism, it hurts the cause that a BUGSer would make that mistake.

    Use ?Wordism,? But Don?t Distort It. ?Wordism? Has a Giant Job to Do : Bob?s Underground Graduate Seminar
    Me a White Rabbit, You a White Rabbit.

    Pink Rabbits, your days are numbered.

    From http://whiterabbitradio.net/

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Keltoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,851
    Rep Power
    20

    Default Understanding Words

    Faustus, a poster here, has said that 'nomenclature', or word usage, is everything, when defining WN'sm to the public.

    With this observation being said, I would like to know why Mr. Whitaker places tribalism in the category of 'negative' word usage?

    My invention of the term Wordism was to provide a direct counterpart to “tribalism,” “racism,” and a hundred other terms used against any kind of loyalty to one’s own kind.

    They talk about Hitler and racism and war to say that loyalties to one’s own POPULATION have a lot of bad things in their histories.
    I have never heard the term 'tribalism' used against WN'sts, as this description has come from the ranks of WN'sts to describe a 'natural law' of the specie.


    Reason and Knowledge only thou despise,
    The highest strength in man that lies!

    ~ Goethe ~

  3. #3
    Defender of Our People
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    521
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    With this observation being said, I would like to know why Mr. Whitaker places tribalism in the category of 'negative' word usage?
    Possibly because globalists have used it to attack their opponents.

    Tribalism vs. Globalization

    The conflict between America and its allies and bin Laden and the other Islamic terrorists is really a battle between a new and an old adaptive strategy, tribalism and globalization.

    ...

    We see remnants of tribalism in the Western nations in the campaigns of the anti-globalization protesters and our own religious fundamentalists (Falwell, McVeigh, Farrakhan), so this is not just another name for the division between fundamentalist Islamists and the rest of the world.

    ...

    Those cultures that accept diversity, in the most universal sense of the word, will survive. Those that do not accept diversity will be engaged in conflict and will not survive
    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White!

    B.U.G.S.
    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/

    Horus the Avenger's...Follow the White Rabbit

    http://whiterabbitradio.net/

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Keltoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,851
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    'Engaged' by whom? Anti-white, anti-tribal multiculturalists? The enemies of the White race.

    Tribalism vs. Globalization

    Originally written and posted Sep. 24, 2001

    [Recent events engaged Jim Fitzgerald and myself in email converation during which the basis for the following essay emerged. Most of the ideas are Jim's thinking, elaborated, clarified, and otherwise edited by me. Still, send flamemail to me.]

    The conflict between America and its allies and bin Laden and the other Islamic terrorists is really a battle between a new and an old adaptive strategy, tribalism and globalization. When the human race was young, small, widely dispersed, and challenged by basic survival, tribalism was an adaptive device that helped people cooperate to reduce risk. With tribalism you get an in-group/out-group mentality that is a liability in the current diverse and densely populated world. The Taliban represents this old adaptive model--tribal, closed, rigid--and they are railing against what are really evolutionary changes in cultural systems. When the tribes are separated with infrequent contact, everything's ok. Maybe a few skirmishes when they do come in contact. When the tribes are forced to live together, though, life gets complicated.

    Globalization, and not just in the economic sense but rather meaning the interconnection and interdependence of groups across national and other boundaries is the latest and so far highest level of human cultural evolution. In this general sense one might call it one-worldism except that few voices are calling for a single world government. This development values the diversity of individuals and encourages the contributions such diversity brings; it finally rings down the curtain on the view that just because someone does not belong to "my" group that person must be bad, wrong, put down, converted, or killed. We see remnants of tribalism in the Western nations in the campaigns of the anti-globalization protesters and our own religious fundamentalists (Falwell, McVeigh, Farrakhan), so this is not just another name for the division between fundamentalist Islamists and the rest of the world.

    An anthropologist might view the world this way: Behaviors persist over the long term because they have some adaptive latent effect. Just what happens when a behavior is no longer adaptive is less clear but is most likely some transient response followed by disappearance of the behavior in the long term. Putting a quantity to the length of long term is difficult, as is understanding the nature of transient response. The transient response, historically, appears to be violence.

    An anthropology professor at UC Santa Cruz once said that warfare was a form of rejection of the enemy's cultural values. Consider current and past wars, including terrorism, in light of this assertion and see if it holds up. The reasons why we went to war against Japan and Germany during WWII are clear, but Vietnam is less obvious. We went to war against Iraq to move them out of Kuwait because we had a treaty with them and because the flow of oil is strategic to us. We went to war against Panama because they were enabling the Medellin Cartel to flood us with drugs.

    Warfare between tribal groups in the distant past was probably an adaptive device as well. Cultures are conservative devices, the cultural systems of each group, and when taken as an indivisible whole constitute an adaptive mechanism for the group and preserve economically appropriate behaviour. When one unique culture comes into contact with another, cultural sharing could weaken the belief system and the associated economically appropriate rituals, leading eventually to the demise of the tribe. Therefore, warfare against out-groups would preserve the integrity of the cultural system, and improve the chances for survival for the individuals in the group. With widely dispersed groups this is actually a good thing; it's likely that different systems are required to adapt to differing economic environments, as different species do as well, so a little warfare following contact and then separation is a good thing. That said groups can and do borrow selectively from each other, which has occurred for thousands of years without always causing violence: the spread of agriculture, writing, spices, technology, and even ideas and religion as in the case of Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism.

    Those cultures that accept diversity, in the most universal sense of the word, will survive. Those that do not accept diversity will be engaged in conflict and will not survive, or alternatively, if humanity does not have that capacity, none of us will survive. Thinking out loud, perhaps there will be conflict on such an enormous scale that population will revert to 2000 year ago levels with the whole process then to repeat until humanity is able to get past it.

    If we don't learn to live together in a connected global community we will destroy ourselves. That is the next step in our evolution. We hope we can do it.

    p.s. An inspiring essay that touches on the topic as well is Steven Denbeste's What are we fighting for? (http://denbeste.nu/essays/whyfight.shtml).
    What type of site is this, exactly?

    The reasoning, espoused, is traditional anti-racial in character, if the premise is one of 'collectivization', without benefit of race-culture; comparing the Taliban with white ethnostates is, at the outset, limited in both duration and historical reality.


    Reason and Knowledge only thou despise,
    The highest strength in man that lies!

    ~ Goethe ~

  5. #5
    For The Win
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Astralasia.
    Age
    47
    Posts
    1,458
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Keltoi View Post
    'Engaged' by whom? Anti-white, anti-tribal multiculturalists? The enemies of the White race.



    What type of site is this, exactly?

    The reasoning, espoused, is traditional anti-racial in character, if the premise is one of 'collectivization', without benefit of race-culture; comparing the Taliban with white ethnostates is, at the outset, limited in both duration and historical reality.
    The big problem is in this line:

    Globalization, and not just in the economic sense but rather meaning the interconnection and interdependence of groups across national and other boundaries is the latest and so far highest level of human cultural evolution.
    What's next after "Diversity"?

    That's a question these people will avoid answering because they either have to talk about Final Solutions to the Race problem or admit that they have no plan and no ideas.

    The other obvious point is that the whole idea of interdependence is a load of crap, the extent of co operation or even contact between the various ethno Racial groups is in reality very limited but always seems to loom large in the minds of Self Hating Whites.

    I'd assume the quoted article begat this similarly addled piece from Alice Aslan
    Tribal Minds And Bigotry

    My response was as follows:

    This article makes no sense, or it makes sense only if one understands and can decode PC Newspeak.
    Wouldn't a "diverse" society be one that was Tribal?

    If a "diverse" society, (that is to say a society in which every viewpoint or trait bar those specific to the majority of it's members is accepted) is so fragile how is it going to be sustainable in the face of dissent or non co operation on the part of even a relatively small group like "Muslims"?

    "Diversity" still needs the 100% consent and commitment required of a population by Fascism and Socialism to work effectively.

    What is the point of "Diversity" as a final state for a society?

    If "Diversity" isn't a pathway to a higher state, a better way of living but and end in itself then why implement policies and laws that render it sacrosanct?

    What comes after "diversity"?

    What's the plan Alice?

    Where does "diversity" and "pluralism" lead us, what sort of society are we to become under this mode of living?

    Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Saturday, 25 September 2010 4:16:02 PM

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Keltoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,851
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Nice work, Jay.


    Reason and Knowledge only thou despise,
    The highest strength in man that lies!

    ~ Goethe ~

  7. #7
    Defender of Our People
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    521
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    What type of site is this, exactly?
    The source of the article is the Weekly Standard, but the link is dead.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/utilit...cle=12616&r=ed

    I found a link to it in the Naval Open Source Intelligence website:

    Naval Open Source Intelligence - is a digital library of operational naval news, curated from open source intelligence,
    and intended to serve as a source of continuing naval education
    Search for:

    Geopolitics – Return of the Tribes

    to find the dead link on this page:

    Naval Intelligence | Naval News | Naval Education | War Studies | NOSI – Naval Open Source Intelligence Geopolitics

    Whats interesting about the Naval archive, is it gives you a rough idea of what they are interested in, because they say they are using it to educate their people, which I assume means their officers.
    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White!

    B.U.G.S.
    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/

    Horus the Avenger's...Follow the White Rabbit

    http://whiterabbitradio.net/

  8. #8
    Lifetime Member Keltoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,851
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danger2443 View Post
    The source of the article is the Weekly Standard, but the link is dead.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/utilit...cle=12616&r=ed

    I found a link to it in the Naval Open Source Intelligence website:

    Search for:

    Geopolitics – Return of the Tribes

    to find the dead link on this page:

    Naval Intelligence | Naval News | Naval Education | War Studies | NOSI – Naval Open Source Intelligence Geopolitics

    Whats interesting about the Naval archive, is it gives you a rough idea of what they are interested in, because they say they are using it to educate their people, which I assume means their officers.
    Interesting.

    Thanks.


    Reason and Knowledge only thou despise,
    The highest strength in man that lies!

    ~ Goethe ~

  9. #9
    Defender of Our People
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    521
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Sorry, the source of that article was not the Weekly Standard, it is the owner of that blog William Lazar and someone called Jim Fitzgerald.

    I checked the About page:

    About | BillSaysThis

    and found this at the very bottom:

    Groups
    Jewish High Tech Community (JHTC)

    I found this in his resume:

    President, Jewish High Tech Community, 2006 – 2010


    Funny how he behaves in tribal manner and then writes articles saying how bad it is.
    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White!

    B.U.G.S.
    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/

    Horus the Avenger's...Follow the White Rabbit

    http://whiterabbitradio.net/

  10. #10
    Senior Moderator seriouswon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    599
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Those that do not accept diversity will be engaged in conflict and will not survive
    Chilling..

    Diversity is just a codeword for anti-White.

    If we don't learn to live together in a connected global community we will destroy ourselves.
    NO if you Jews don't learn to leave us the hell alone you will destroy YOURSELVES and possibly the entire planet.

    Without artificial incentives coupled with brainwashing provided by our government, we wouldn't have nearly the amount of non-Whites coming into White nations as we do. This is not natural. This conflict is being deliberately created but the author of this article is trying to convince our people that globalization is a MUST. It's NOT.
    Me a White Rabbit, You a White Rabbit.

    Pink Rabbits, your days are numbered.

    From http://whiterabbitradio.net/

  11. #11
    Defender of Our People
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    521
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    I just found the article republished by Amy Alkon, syndicated advice columnist, journalist and blogger.

    She agrees with him that globalism is good and tribalism is bad:

    Advice Goddess Blog

    Economic globalization is only a start. It really is a values thing -- global values instead of tribal ones.
    and surprise, surprise, she is from the very same tribe as Mr Lazar. What a coincidence!

    Amy Alkon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Alkon grew up in Farmington Hills, a suburb of Detroit, Michigan. Although currently a weak atheist,[1] Alkon was born to a Jewish family. Alkon recalls being shunned due to prevailing anti-Semitic attitudes, even physically attacked in seventh grade by her classmates.[2] Alkon credits her isolation as the catalyst that cultivated her early fondness for reading.[3]
    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White!

    B.U.G.S.
    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/

    Horus the Avenger's...Follow the White Rabbit

    http://whiterabbitradio.net/

  12. #12
    Senior Moderator seriouswon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    599
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Eh sounds like BS. I want to see the hospital records from when she was "attacked".

    Jews are scared to death of attacks though. They can't figure out WHY they are attacked . We're all supposed to be good little goy while they rape and pillage OUR people.

    Any decent, normal human being knows that they would be better off living in a country of their own. And they have one but they don't all want to live there because the rape and pillage model doesn't work well there. The other Jews are onto their games of course.
    Me a White Rabbit, You a White Rabbit.

    Pink Rabbits, your days are numbered.

    From http://whiterabbitradio.net/

Similar Threads

  1. By Any Other Name - Bob Whitaker
    By seriouswon in forum Bob Whitaker's Pro-White BBQ
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-24-2010, 01:29 PM
  2. Bob Whitaker - What Does Neo Mean?
    By seriouswon in forum Bob Whitaker's Pro-White BBQ
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-27-2010, 11:52 AM
  3. SES -by Bob Whitaker
    By Truck Roy in forum Bob Whitaker's Pro-White BBQ
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-28-2010, 10:02 PM
  4. Wordism and Ted Bundy -By Bob Whitaker
    By Truck Roy in forum Bob Whitaker's Pro-White BBQ
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-05-2010, 02:40 PM
  5. What Isn't Said -by Bob Whitaker
    By Truck Roy in forum Bob Whitaker's Pro-White BBQ
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-28-2010, 02:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •