http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/ A news and discussion site supporting the interests of White people en Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:24:26 GMT vBulletin 300 http://www.whitenewsnow.com/images/misc/rss.jpg http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/ http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/153-europeans-jews-right-relationships.html Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:49:36 GMT There are several issues involved when we think of the interaction between Jews and Europeans as well as Jews and all Gentiles in general. The... [FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]There are several issues involved when we think of the interaction between Jews and Europeans as well as Jews and all Gentiles in general. The following are some:[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
[U][B]WHO ARE THE JEWS?[/B][/U][/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
There are several theories surrounding who the Jews are. One is that they are the people who today call themselves Jews. The following link shows the DNA evidence for this and indicates that the present-day Palestinians are practically blood brothers to the Jews: [URL]http://www.pnas.org/content/97/12/6769.full[/URL]. This is in accordance to what I feel the Bible says about who the Jews are. Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek and Latin evidence of the veracity of the Bible is so strong that to say the Bible is not true is to also say that the Greek and Roman empires did not exist as well as much of other history in that area. And based on this evidence, Jews lived for many years in the present day lands of Israel and Palestine and then were scattered over the globe.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
A second theory is that the Jews melted into the Khazar empire and their descendants will be found in the area from Turkey to Kazakhstan. Those who believe this often recite Revelation 2:9 of the Bible in regard to the "Jews" of today, "...who say they are Jews and are not..." (NASB) In other words, the "Jews" of today are total impostors.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
A third theory is based on the Europeans being descendants of Shem instead of Ham and that the European groups are specifically the 12 tribes of Israel. Again, Rev. 2:9 is quoted concerning today's Jews. I don't believe the Bible backs this up though there is evidence for the Europeans to be descendants of Ham and also of Shem.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
Then there are those who believe that the Jewish identity is a spiritual identity only. Members of Messianic congregations believe that they are the true Jews. Other theories involve Muslim theories that Abraham's offspring are in Yemen or that there were never any Jews in the first place and that it is only a religion.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
For the purpose of the rest of the article, I am referring to present day Israeli's and their relatives of the diaspora as Jews.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
[B][U]ARE JEWS GOD'S CHOSEN PEOPLE?[/U][/B][/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
Deuteronomy 7:6 says, "For you are a holy people to the LORD your God; the LORD your God has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth." (NASB). Many people including myself believe that God chose the descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to be a special people for God through whom salvation was to come for all mankind. I and many others believe that Jesus was the ultimate fulfillment of this choosing but that there are other purposes as well which continue to play out. As this verse does indicate, Jews are chosen for the purpose of [U]holiness[/U] (kindness, honesty, fairness, justice) - not to be leaders of wickedness. And many of us believe that Jews, if they become Christians, are still Jews and God's chosen and should marry only God's chosen just as Chinese should marry Chinese, Indians should marry Indians etc.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
[U][B]HOW SHOULD THE REST OF THE WORLD RELATE TO JEWS?[/B][/U][/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
Israel’s foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, said recently to foreign powers that whatever Israel does in ‘[U]not their[/U] (foreign powers') [U]business[/U]’ and that security of Israel’s citizens is the ‘[U]Israeli government’s responsibility[/U].' ([URL]http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/lieberman-u-s-russian-warnings-against-iran-strike-will-not-affect-israel-s-decision-1.414199?localLinksEnabled=false[/URL]) I and many others totally agree with this. Jews need to be left alone. They need to marry each other, take care of their own affairs and be responsible for their own protection without foreign aid (do we also want foreign aid?). In a Wikipedia article on Jews, James Carroll is quoted as writing, "Jews accounted for 10% of the total population of the Roman Empire. By that ratio, if other factors had not intervened, there would be 200 million Jews in the world today, instead of something like 13 million." ([URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews[/URL]) Jewish populations are going down because we are part of "those other factors". We don't help ourselves or Jews when we make their actions our business.
[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
Jews have been encouraged to integrate as well as assimilate into foreign populations because of a mutual encouragement to do so from both Jews and Gentiles to the point that both are equally as guilty. For example, Jews in Germany at one point were made to adopt German names (why?). And Jews who wanted to marry Europeans had to give up their Jewish identity to do so. This is also reversed so that sometimes Gentiles who want to marry Jews or work for them have to give up their European identities.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
It was a liberal Jewish professor who surprised me by alerting me to this real problem. She said Jews always got into trouble by assimilating. Many other Jews and many Gentiles have said the same thing. It seems that both Jews and Gentiles have not learned anything from history. But we cannot correct past mistakes. We have to live for the future.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
I believe personally that the Jews are "God's chosen people" (because God had to chose someone) but this doesn't mean I am not as loved as the Jews are by God or as special as they are or that I am inferior in any sense of the word. And it doesn't mean that I treat Jews in a special way or help them in a special way. If I meet Jews, I give them the respect I give all peoples. But in minding my own business, I involve myself with my own people which is only proper and right and which, incidentally, gives me no time to stick my nose in the business of others.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
In his documentary, "Defamation", Yoav Shamir interviews his mother (at the three-minute mark) about anti-Semitism. She wisely says that as long as Jews are living outside of Israel and making money off of foreigners, more anit-semitism will arise. She admonishes Jews to stay in Israel. Jews living among Europeans provide two temptations we must be aware of. The first temptation is to be reactive against the Jews. We need to be fully aware, for sure, of what Jews are doing but it needs to stop there (Jews do many positive things also). Our energies need to be focused in building our own communities up. The second temptation is to include the Jews in our lives. Inclusivity is detrimental to both sides and will result in the non-existence of a Jews in the future as well as the destruction of Europeans. Jews can survive on their own and so can we. They don't need our business and our patronage just as we don't need theirs. Interactions, of course, will always be necessary but should be at a minimum. Sadly they are not because of the many, many ways Europeans have become inter-dependent on Jews, and not just on Jews but on all non-Europeans.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]
Israel has said we should leave them (including all Jews which are citizens of Israel) alone. The first question is, why aren't we? The second and more important question is, why aren't we taking care of ourselves?

For those who do not agree with the my definition of Jews, we probably can agree at least that there should be separation.

For those who think that all Christians who believe that the Jews are God's chosen people are also Zionists, hopefully I've helped to clear that generalization up because many of us do not. We want to leave Israel and Israelis alone. Christian Zionists, in my opinion, are Christians who don't want to face present-day realities and who use the "blessing God's chosen people" mantra/ritual as a way to gaurantee a trouble-free existence.

My life has been affected just as much as the next person's directly and indirectly by Jews and while I could get bitter and angry, I have to look at my own actions first and realize I made myself vulnerable to their ploys through my own behaviour which emulated that of Canadians in general. Hopefully I am making myself invulnerable to Jewish actions as time goes on but my focus in not on reaction but on proaction. And hopefully Jews have benefitted from the changes in my life.
[/SIZE][/FONT] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/153-europeans-jews-right-relationships.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/143-cost-tradition.html Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:43:45 GMT A few months ago I was working late at night and met a woman at the job with whom I spoke for a while. She was African-Canadian from Angola with a... [SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]A few months ago I was working late at night and met a woman at the job with whom I spoke for a while. She was African-Canadian from Angola with a hint of Portuguese (she had a "Portuguese side of the family"), native Indian and East Indian. She was living with a blonde Ukrainian and had a teen-age daughter who looked European enough to draw attention. She and her common-law husband had bought a house in a Jewish neighbourhood so that the price would go up and they could make a profit and they were sending their daughter to public schools in that area for what I feel was an exposure to Jewish lads. She owned a housing rental agency which kept her busy.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]She was intent in business on getting as many Blacks as possible to live in non-Black areas.. She wouldn't rent to anyone in a Black area because she didn't want to ruin her reputation.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]She had two main problems in her life. Her daughter was drawing the attention of dark-skinned males at school who knew she was part European. As well, everyone knew she was bi-racial and therefore assumed she had grown up in a home without values. The mother's other problem was that few believed she was the mother of her daughter and therefore the East Asian maids in their area were really hitting on her Ukrainian partner.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]She was very uncomfortable with non-inter-racial situations. She didn't like anything (churches, crowds of any sort, communities, clubs) to be mono-racial. All the members of her family but one were married to non-Blacks. She had dedicated her life to creating multi-culturalism.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]I saw a woman in front of me who was money-hungry and lonely. She had reduced all of her problems to what made the most money. Remaining a Black person was poverty. She was a white supremacist and probably a Jewish supremacist though the likelihood of her daughter marrying a Jewish man is slim. She should have been at home with her daughter and husband but was out late at night surveying new neighbourhoods. There was little left to her life as far as customs and traditions. She did go to church - she said - but she didn't show any signs of wrestling with rules of any kind.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]One of the traditions I grew up with on the farms of Western Canada was that one did not ever, ever become a supervisor over others if one could not do the job. No weakling would ever have been in charge of the hay baling crew or the potato harvest. There are two exceptions - if one owned the farm or if one was paid much less than the others. This is a tradition that has gone the way of analog communication mainly because of feminism. Women want to be in charge and have equal power (not rights) as men. So the rules have been changed. Supervisors in many places are forbidden to do any work. They must dress nicely and keep their hands clean. This is strictly the result of feminism. Men with any common sense know that this is not profitable or moral.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Being a supervisor of integrity is a tradition, a European tradition, that I have kept. Has this cost me money? You bet. I have lost countless dollars because I would not take supervisory positions over hard-working men just because I knew how to read and write better than they did. It wasn't right no matter how much a business or a government says it is.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Traditions cost money. All traditions cost money. Do Europeans have a tradition of children taking care of parents? Absolutely! Every European cultural group has such a tradition. Will it cost money for a woman to stay at home and take care of her parents or parents-in-law before sending them to a home of some kind? Yes, it will. Women submitting to their husbands and taking care of their children will cost money. It will cost business' money to pay those with more children more. It will cost men money to establish stable homes. It will cost money to honour one's handshakes or to pay one's taxes. There might be no money left for retirement plans should one follow tradition. It might mean a day-to-day existence.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]If European peoples or at the least White Nationalists are to reclaim their culture, the priority of money will have to go. But - you say - we need money to fight the battle. The battle is won though on a moral level, not financial. Look at the money-centred minorities around us. Are they winning their battles with money? Hardly.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Traditions in my own family history have gone by the wayside as money crept in and became the ultimate god. Mammon has wrecked havoc with what should have been a great heritage. And if middle and lower-class Europeans have temptations to cast aside traditions for the sake of money what about the rich? The greatest betrayers of European peoples have been the rich, the aristocrats, the business barons, the opportunistic politicians of our countries. Wars have been fought for the sake of the selfish desires of the ruling aristocracies of Europe who consider themselves not to be obeisant to the traditions of their people but to be above tradition and custom.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]I am still not at the place where I want to be with tradition. I don't stand up for women when they enter a room. I find it very hard to give up a bus seat for elderly people who are causing my taxes to rise because of their demands. When it comes to certain traditions, I treat all people equally but if I were to open the door for every pregnant woman I see in Toronto I might not get to where I want to be. And following tradition is dangerous at times in a multi-cultural setting. Looking someone in the eye was a sign of respect where I came from. It was called the "clear eye". We distrusted those who looked away. That's impossible in my city and could result in danger and excitement quite quickly. And then there is the issue of political correctness. Opening doors for younger women just might result in sexual harassment.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]When I am so surrounded by the present that the past is obscure and I wonder if Europe is even out there, I practice tradition. And when I do, I feel grounded and focused once again. I am sure that the people among whom I reside as the "foreigner" are surprised that there is even a native Canadian who thinks about such things. I cannot just be European on the outside. I have to be European on the inside and I have to be in touch with my culture, my history, my roots to do so. I have to take the time for such an activity. I was asked the other day why I don't get a second job with the extra time I have in my life. One of the reasons is that I am not settled enough to do so and by that I mean, I am continually having to make an effort to touch Europe and remind myself that that is the reality. When one spends one's day almost totally outside of the realm of European peoples, architecture, art, culture, language etc., one has to take the time to look at the pictures again and read the history and the literature and to reacquaint oneself with even the words we use (because I pretty much have to keep my vocabulary simple). One way to remind myself is to practice being European internally and to retain a European thought pattern. Is it a European custom to dress presentably even to go to the grocery store. Absolutely. Then I need to make the effort. Is it a European tradition to support my own people financially first? Then I need to research products and services to make sure I do this. Is it a European tradition to flatter a co-worker by calling them "boss" or "bro"? Not where I came from. And I shouldn't fall into the practice even though everyone is calling everyone else "boss" deceptively.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]What is at stake when we don't do this? Then we do something else and make that a tradition. A hundred years from now, we might see a totally different world because of the choices we have made. The pastor's wife of a prominent church who told me that the faster we get rid of the white race the better was not only getting rid of the white race and Europe and European tradition, she was becoming non-European. What made her do that? Was it the pressure of the present and being in a big city? Was it for the sake of job (she had worked for many years in public service)? Whatever the reason, I felt sorry for her. I knew what she had grown up with but little by little she had let it go - to become something else, something that was unattractive and weird. And that's how it happens - little by little in small steps. We become apathetic after a while and say, "C'est la vie." But it isn't life. It's death.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Europe was/is grand and glorious. It's worth fighting for. Let's do it with all of our strength. And if we need discipline or encouragement, then maybe we need even to return to a church (but chose the church wisely). When we compromise, let's take up where we left off. If we are tempted by money, let's seek to practice restraint and humility. My life has been far from perfect but I'm a much better person today than I was years ago and that is partly due to the fact that because I am European genetically, I decided to embrace that identity. And if you are not European, then be that identity that matches your genes and work with that and find the grandeur that is there. I guarantee you will feel more at peace and centred.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]God bless - [/FONT][/SIZE] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/143-cost-tradition.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/139-6th-way-help-our-race-part-1.html Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:23:50 GMT [SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]6) Get rid of racial rights. Does the government legislate that business' have to hire 50% of its workers from your race? What if members of your race are so valuable that business' want to hire 100% of their workers from your [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]race? Should they still stick with 50%? But certain racial groups own the business', you say. Why doesn't your racial group own the business'?
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Racial rights have not been something that Europeans have engaged in heavily. In fact, we can have the opposite problem of having too many favours which are detrimental to us. As I have mentioned before, I have had lots of [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]propositions for marriage and most often with money attached to them as if I'm for sale. I tell the women of other races that among my own people I am average because to them I am very handsome with my blue eyes and [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]white skin and auburn hair. Women want me and don't care how much money I don't have. It's even worse for women. I know of a statuesque Dutch woman who is going to marry a short East Asian who is about two thirds her [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]weight. He is loaded with money and doesn't have to work a day in his life, she has blue eyes and dusty blonde hair (and sadly they have the blessing of the church). I honestly don't see how it's going to work but I underestimate [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]the power of money. This story could be told countless times by many members of this blog. White people are weak. We take mammon in exchange for security. We use our white genes to our momentary advantage not realizing [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]at all what we are giving away. And if it's not money, it's sex because again the desire for white flesh is strong among the people of the world. So will we ever be hated enough to be at such a disadvantage as to have to resort to [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]racial rights as some others feel they have to? The more-discriminated-against white male will have reason to do this more than the white female but at the moment, though there are laws against us, we still enjoy a measure of [/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]success admired by other races.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
Racial rights are in many ways an outgrowth of personal human rights so what has been the reaction of other groups to Europeans exercising personal human rights? Human rights as exercised by Europeans are encouraged by [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]the foreigners in our midst. Foreigners love feminism because feminism tears apart our marital relationships and make us, both men and women, vulnerable to inter-racial relationships. I've heard the comment from non-white men [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]and women that the more whites marry other races, the more whites there are for them. Non-whites rarely ever discourage feminism and human rights. I have spoken several times with "conservative" immigrants who appear to [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]have family values about the decline of western civilization and why they still vote liberal. I'm always told that their own cultural values will offset what their children learn in the public place and that they will vote for liberalism [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]because they can bring the rest of their family to the west much more easily. When I try to explain the decline in European cultures that led to the mass immigration of which they are a part, they have no interest, only to know the [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]process is working in their favour. When it comes to pro-family causes, rarely have I seen non-whites involved. The same goes for socialistic welfare issues that are destroying our communities. Foreigners enjoy seeing us on [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]welfare because they can become more powerful. The arrogance I have come up against of non-white males who are married to white women toward white men is a sign that something is wrong. Foreigners in general hate us [/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]and enjoy seeing us self-destruct.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
If the preceding is the reaction by foreigners to personal human rights as exercised by Europeans, what would be the reaction if we set up victim museums and have European victim holidays and produce movie after movie about [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]all of the wrongs done to us and go back to every situation where we experienced "discrimination" and demand reparations of every sort? Would non-Europeans stand up and notice and say, "We better not offend or do anything [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]against Europeans?" They might. One thing for sure though, as long as they are not personally put out, they wouldn't try to stop us. They would look on and say, "Wow, these people are making fools of themselves." We all know [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]what happens to other groups who do such things. It would happen to us as well. Should foreigners ever feel like they need to be more than just defensive, they certainly wouldn't think twice about picking up weapons and using[/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]them.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
Based on what I see as reactions to personal human rights, I believe other groups, even though they outwardly resist, would actually encourage us to stand up for our nationistic human rights. They would encourage us to expend [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]our energies in such endeavours. They would encourage us to feel sorry for ourselves. I personally think that the outcome of nationaistic human rights would be the same as personal human rights - disaestor.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
As I listen to white nationistic radio broadcasts I know these are issues that others are talking about as well and I know that whites all over the world who are aware of the attitude of non-whites against us are struggling to come [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]to terms with the situation. We can do one of three things. As just discussed in the preceding paragraphs we can be re-active (which I have concluded is counter-productive). Or we can give in. Instead of struggling for a living in [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]a city where I am living as a foreigner, I can join a group through inter-racial marriage and have much greater success. A white woman in South Africa will probably not be in danger of rape if she marries a black man of that [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]country, especially one that is influential. She can give in and appear to live a more comfortable life. An American man can marry a starry-eyed Mexican woman and will probably enjoy acceptance.

[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]The third reaction is to be proactive. In part 2, I have written some things just from the top of my head that we can do instead to promote our cause. Some of these points have been covered in my original article on "10 ways to help your race." [/FONT][FONT=times new roman]The following will have to be done by a core group of people who strongly believe in white nationalism and then the rest of the white population will join that core group when the financial advantages are enough to make that [/FONT][FONT=times new roman]commitment worthwhile.[/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
[/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/SIZE] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/139-6th-way-help-our-race-part-1.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/140-6th-way-help-our-race-part-2.html Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:35:57 GMT 1) We have to, as individuals, figure out what our own strengths and weakness are and to bring to the table the best of ourselves. Are we at our... [SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]1) We have to, as individuals, figure out what our own strengths and weakness are and to bring to the table the best of ourselves. Are we at our optimum when we are programming computers? Can we repair cars? Are we great [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]actors and singers? What are the giftings we have? And are we willing to pursue those giftings for the greater good? If we can fix cars better than be leaders, are we going to fix cars instead? Or are we going to pursue [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]leadership roles that might not be maximizing our potential? Women - are you going to fulfill your roles at home as wives and mothers before going out and earning money? The money a woman earns outside of the home is [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]almost always offset by the amount of money she saves her nation/race if she stays home.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
2) Are we as a people going to focus on our healthy homes first? Healthy marriages and well-brought-up children are the foundation of any great civilization.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
3) We don't just live for ourselves, we live for our family and we live for our race. Many times I have heard it said, "I don't want to work for others. I want others to work for me." Europeans can be some of the most individuastic [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]people in the world. We like to be in control and have our own business' and do our own thing. But having many small business might not be as advantageous as having a few big corporations where the whole can out-perform the [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]efforts of each part. The huge conflomerates and corporations of East Asian are what turned those countries into tigers economies but the people had to have a collective mindset. But should this happen will we accept profit-[/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]sharing over unionism?[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
4) We need greater group loyalty in our business decisions (see my "4th way to help your race"). Very important.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
5) We need to learn our history and in order to do this, we need to develope our own educational system. Western civilizations, when we adopted state education instead of private education, gave this responsibility up. We also [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]need to encourage every white youth to go to post secondary education and get a degree and we need to encourage higher standards of education in general.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
6) We need to develope/support our own media, not just for financial reasons, but for reasons of truth and integrity.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
7) We need to classify who are Europeans and who are not. This is a big issue and not one that is easy to solve. And we need a way to recognize the presence/existence of other Europeans. We need to go farther than genetics [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]though and have standards. Many of those on welfare in my own city are European and would be a burden on any group.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
8) We need to get back to responsibility and away from rights. A new constitution of some kind should not be filled with "human rights" language at all.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
9) We need our own judicial system. Are we talking about a separate nation at this point? Not necessarily. It depends on what people do. If a group of people decide on their own to submit to a group of respected elders in [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]matters of property and business (for example), who is there to stop them, especially if it saves their government money.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
10) We don't need to have a state religion. I think that there are certain realities that preclude religious dogma that can operate to guide a group of people.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
11) We need European-specific celebrations, traditions, arts and entertainment. We already have lots to work with here but more can be done.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
12) I believe there is at least one group of people if not more who give their own members loans at lower interest rates or no interest rates. Is that possible for Europeans? Do we even need our own banks run by our own [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]peoples (I believe there are banks around that are singly run by certain other groups).[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
13) We might be at an advantage to have our own language. Any language can be learned by others, of course, but having a distinct language can be helpful.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
14) We need an internal organization through which Europeans can affect the decisions for the whole group. Perhaps there should be special councils set up. We also need to work with the organizations who are presently trying [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]to bring unity. In relation to this, we also need a mechanism by which we relate to other groups in such a way as to avoid offense yet to make clear what the issues are. European views are being muddied by non-European [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]representation of our groups.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
16) Our focus needs to be on expansion in the direction of outer space research.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
17) I feel that we need, as Europeans, to investigate, develope and control our own robotic industries.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
The preceding are just a list of things I have come up with that any group might do to accomplish national unity. It has been based on the example of Korean and Japanese cultures and the groups belonging to the [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Hutterite/Amish/Mennonite cluster. And while I tend to lump all non-whites into the [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]catergory of dissatisfied-with-their-own-race persons, there are core groups of people of every race that are concerned with the future of their own peoples who are doing some of the things I've mentioned. For example, native [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Indians of North America want their own laws. An Eritrean told me that only when Eritrea had kicked out foreign aid could their country start to recover and become its own nation. Countries who have rejected abortion services [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]from the UN have been penalized monetarily but they had to do so for the good of their own people.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
All groups need to have these goals. Competition between groups can also spur others on (an argument for the separation of races) so nationalism can be good for everyone. Those who engage in inter-racial unions see the world [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]as becoming one and see everything I just mentioned as being antithetical to the goals they are working for. I believe that our greatest opposition in the future to the unity of Europeans (or any other group) will be the children of [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]inter-racial marriages as opposed to other races. I have been surprised at the vehemenance of these mixed-race children to nationalism [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]of any kind. These offspring also admit to great identity confusion. Already, though, these children are working to bring into place a NWO and are seeking influential places in all governments.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
[/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]But before we ever "seek" racial rights, we need first of all to take the harder road. For example, when the Japanese were prospering and visiting Canada as tourists, Banff, Alberta had many Japanese gift shops [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]with many Japanese signs, shops would only hire Japanese speakers and Japanaese could smoke inside shops when others were not allowed.[/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman] The Japanese didn't have any legislated rights to do what they did. Why did everyone cater to them so? They did [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]it because the Japanese were a successful people, united in vision and goal, and prosperous and wherever they went, people served them. Nothing was in writing. If [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]one slighted a Japanese, there was not going to be any lawsuit. But neither was one going to experience any more significant business. The Japanese after a long hard struggle had developed respect from the rest of us. And we [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]can all do the same.[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]
Any group in the world can become as succesful as any other group. The greatest threat to a group is not another group. It is the disunity within a group. When this disunity and selfishness is overcome then the group as a whole [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]prospers. Among Europeans, far, far too many Europeans are ruled by money and until that changes, we will be taken apart piece by piece. Those who promote a NWO are not in the least bit threatened by white rights groups, [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]black rights groups or another other rights groups. Neither are most people. If, though, any of us should start to take any of the steps toward racial unity that I and others have suggested, then the NWO and those who promote it [/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]will sit up straight and pay attention. And they won't be happy campers.[/FONT][/SIZE] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/140-6th-way-help-our-race-part-2.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/135-5th-way-help-our-race.html Mon, 20 Feb 2012 08:41:48 GMT [SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]5) Do not fight for any personal rights whatsoever. Equality cannot be legislated. [This is where feminism is a fantasy. No matter how much women push for their rights, they are still not equal because they have not understood equality among men. Men are not equal with each other until they have earned equality. We, as men, know we don't join a football team legislatively. We join a football team by proving our strength and ability.] What should replace rights? Responsibility. Instead of fighting for your "unionized" rights at work, be the best worker. Get rid of medical rights, pension rights, disability rights, racial rights, religious rights etc. Take care of yourself.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]In my present job there are a couple of issues I could go to the government over because I have rights. But I won't do it. I believe that the government should stay out of the workplace. My employer has choices that will make or break the business. I hope and pray they will make the right choices and do the right thing about the issues at present that I have with them. I'm leaving them alone for the moment because they could reverse their actions at any minute. And they know what they are doing that they shouldn't.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Throughout my life I have been fortunate enough to understand these issues and have avoided claiming my "human rights". I am thankful that I go to bed at night with a clean conscience.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]But, you say, what is the other option? What do we do if we get rid of human rights? Well - we get back to reality.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]One of the reasons, for instance, that at the moment the people I work for are ignoring certain "human rights" that I have is that I don't have anything to negotiate with. I'm in my forties, few skills, having gone from job to job, having dealt with illness for the first half of my working life. I can't just pick up and go somewhere else. Who else at the moment would hire me? I have no degrees. It was hard enough getting my present job and we are in a recession. My bosses are treating other people differently because they are more valuable than I am. This is reality. I've tried the best I can in my life to get to where I am at and am not ashamed of myself and the strides that I have made. Unfortunately, I am going to be treated in a certain way because I am at a disadvantage. What is the answer? The answer is to try to get into a place where I am at an advantage and to negotiate with my bosses at that point for better benefits. Could I try to legislate myself into a better position? I could but I won't.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Legislating rights is possible for any of us to do but these are the following reasons we should not:
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]1) Human rights cost the government money. It involves lawmakers, lawyers etc. and is a huge burden on the taxpayer. If we are concerned about our governments' debts, we won't exercise our human rights.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]2) Human rights were introduced into our countries to destroy us. Research which groups or peoples headed up human rights legislation and why they did so.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]3) Human rights ignore options. The problem with options is that they take years to implement and we want what we want when we want it. It will take me another five years to be trained and skilled enough to have something to negotiate with in regards to my present situation. I could go to the government right now and automatically get what I want at work. But I am ignoring the options that I should be taking if I do so.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Do illegal immigrants have options? Do gay and lesbians have options? Do women have options? Do the disabled have options? Absolutely.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]4) Human rights ignore human realities. As I said in my introduction, feminism is a joke. Women are not as strong as men. Why are women in positions of authority over men whom they ask to do the harder work? I work at a job that is physically hard. I have to work as hard as the other men, otherwise I am fired. And my immediate boss has to work harder than all of us. That's the reality. Why then is there a woman over him as a boss who cannot do even half of what we do? To get around this though, we have a rule at work that we cannot describe one job as harder than the next. Not allowed.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Another ingored reality is the reality of language skills. A training manager at a company I worked for told me he could not train the employees to read and write properly. The result on the floor was diseaster. The reports that were being written were often unreadable.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]The homeless of the inner city are unpredictable. Business' know this. But over and over again, the government foists these people on the private sector. And these people, even in their worst states, know they have rights and will make use of them.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]5) Human rights take the focus off of human responsibility. Women will flirt incessantly with men but as soon as the men express an interest, the women take them to court for sexual abuse. What about the woman's responsibility to dress properly and be respectable? This is completely ignored. The disabled have a responsibility to forgive and be patient with those who are not disabled and do not understand their disability. I recently had to watch a video about the rights of the disabled. One cannot even call blindness a disability anymore. The onus is totally on the business establishment to make sure the disabled are not reminded of their disability. Over and over again, personal responsibility is abrogated in favour of human rights.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Do we as white nationalists clamour for human rights? Many want to. I am going to go on record though as saying that this is not a good idea. We are taking the easy way out. After WWII we were still over 25% of the world's population and we had power and influence. Now we are much less.Why? It is not because of the population growth of the other races. We are in decline because of ourselves and what we have done.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]I recall a woman who grew up on a farm with nine brothers and who stayed on that farm and continued to work on that farm. She could easily have left and gone to the city or somewhere else. She was an attractive and smart woman who might have really succeeded. She chose to stay and work for her brothers even though it was hard work and smelly. Believe me though, when she went to the mechanic to get her car fixed, the mechanic knew better than to try and scam her. Why? The mechanic knew she had nine brothers he would have to deal with if he screwed up. She was exercising her options and accepting the responsibility of getting along with her family. She didn't need feminism or human rights.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]We don't need human rights. What we as white nationists need is marriages and children and higher standards of education and much greater unity and less crime and pro-life laws etc. We need to understand [U]racial responsibility[/U]. In order for us to understand this though we need to really rethink human rights. In my opinion, we need to get rid of them. It is weakening our race, not strengthening it.[/FONT][/SIZE] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/135-5th-way-help-our-race.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/134-4th-way-help-your-race.html Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:28:21 GMT 4) Support your race financially. Do you work for someone of your race? Do you hire people of your own race? Do you shop at places where your own... [SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]4) Support your race financially. Do you work for someone of your race? Do you hire people of your own race? Do you shop at places where your own race would benefit? This is not to say that you don't buy the products of other countries. Every race has their own advantage according to their talents and the lands they possess. My race does not generally occupy areas where rice is grown easily. I will probably always buy my rice from other races. But do we support our own race as much as possible?

Where I grew up, it was expected that people did business locally (and therefore with their own race). It wasn't until I went to the city that I understood the choices that need to be made. This reason was sparked in me when I watched the movie, "Gentleman's Agreement" with Gregory Peck. Although the acting was good, the message was insidious and it took several years for the hypocrisy of that movie to set into my thinking.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]But where I grew up, not only was supporting one's race convenient, race consciousness was strong. If two men worked at the same job and one had a family of five kids and the other was single, the married man was paid more. Local business' tried to support each other. Unions and feminism have done much to destroy all of this in the cities. Traditionally, the final outcome of business was to support race, not for race to support business (this latter attitude is far too common).
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Before adding race consciousness though we need to consider the issue of morality, both personal and governmental/business (for again, I observed a strong morality where I was brought up). What is moral for a oneself and what is moral for others such as governments or business'?
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Morality is fairly much the same across the board. Do not steal. Do not murder. Etc. Pornography is evil anywhere around the world. Before I decide whether to watch a European movie or a non-European movie, I need to make the decision to watch a moral movie. This type of choice should be made first and foremost. If a White nationalist or any kind of nationalist doesn't firstly make moral choices things will go haywire eventually. Personal morality also extends to the foods we eat and how we take care of ourselves and those around us. Many of us will not eat GMO's. We might not wear fur or have furniture of real wood or buy products from sweatshops. We might carry a gun or might not. I personally don't gamble so I don't get involved in lotteries. I don't support Islam so I don't want to buy any of the "halal" products that are flooding the stores.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]When it comes to governmental or economic morality how do we live in such a way as to encourage government or business' to act in the right way? One of the issues is privacy. I believe that state should be separate from family or government. Would I go on a social networking site that exposes my information either to governments? That would or should be instinctively wrong to do (I've read that the biggest social networking site we know of it continually sifting through our information which is why I don't go on it). I believe that government should be separate from business so I won't go to a governmental HR agency to look for a job. I'll go to a private agency even if it is operated by a non-European. If I hear of a business that doesn't pay it's taxes or it's bills, I won't do business with that business no matter who owns it. Instinctively, I have learned not to do this.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Another issue to do with government is the issue of unions. I am anti-union, having never joined a union at personal expense. I believe poverty is caused by family strife, not be the wages we make. Do I blame factories that relocate to other countries and cause job loss with my own people? I'll leave that response for another article I want to write. But when we think about it, we are continually being challenged to make moral choices that must be made before we get to the issue of prefering our race in business and having that "gentlemen's agreement" that so many other groups of people never did lose but continue to cultivate.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]I have to say that I am not where I need to be in regard preferring my own race. My resources are limited so where do I often shop? At the cheapest place. I often buy clothing second-hand so whether the clothing designer is a member of my own race or not, I just don't care. Finding a good white hairstylist in my area who is not going to break my bank account is impossible. But when I can I make the choice.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Supporting one's race is a complicated thing. If I go to a Mcdonald's restaurant that is owned by a non-white but hires only whites, I'm facing at least four groups of people. I'm facing the owner(s). Who owns MacDonald's (shareholders) and how much money does the franchise owner get? I'm facing the employees. How does rejecting the outlet affect my white brothers and sisters working at the place? I'm facing governments. What governments are benefiting from the taxes and how are they spending the money? And I'm facing the sources of the raw materials. If MacDonald's is buying all of their beef from Asians, I am not supporting my own race.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Ideally, the owner(s), the employee(s), the government(s) benefiting from the taxes and the wholesalers should all be of my race, whatever race that may be. That makes it simple.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]But then there is the issue of resources and trade. Rice is not grown in Canada but is bought from other countries which may buy metal from us in return. Rice is the advantage of the Asians and metal the advantage of Canada. This makes things complex.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]AND - after all of these issues come decisions about quality and preference. If Japanese cars are better and safer than those made by my own race, then what? What if I look better in a blue suit made by a Korean than in a brown suit made by a European? What about our ecological footprints? Supporting a European half way around the world might not be the best thing for the planet? Do I buy organic food from China versus non-organic from my own country. By this point we might start to feel like the Apostle Paul and say, "What a wretched man I am!" (NIV - Romans 7:24) and go out and simply buy the most convenient hair product there is without worrying about byproducts, sweatshops and who's profiting.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]One thing is certain. Other groups are making conscious racial financial decisions and are somewhat or very successful at it. We should study them and figure out what their rules are. And sooner or later we might simply need an select group of people to go through a scorecard, investigate where needed and come up with some kind of a marking system. A big issue that needs to be addressed is that of people's names. many people who look like Europeans and have European names are not European.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]I remember a Dutch community that I was privileged to brush against years ago. I met a Dutch lad who, at eighteen, had a good job and a good vehicle, lived at home and was thinking of a future family. He was benefiting from race consciousness. The Dutch farmers hired Dutch workers, preferably the sons of their friends and rarely had problems with laziness or theft. I told this lad never to leave that community. It was one of many examples that I saw of a community at work.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]A word of caution is needed for religious groups that develope strong communities and who will often leave certain tasks to "the world". Entertainment is often considered an evil thing but buying fruits and vegetables from each other is not. They traditionally will have large families and their communities are thriving and everyone can learn much from them. But when it comes to anything creative they go to other groups. For fashion they go to the fashion industry. For advertising they leave their group. The media might be off limits to them so they partake in the media of others. They know how to fix a truck but they wouldn't dare become involved in designing it. They won't get involved in government because government is evil. But they have to deal with government eventually.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Here in the city I work in, I see one group of people that delivers the complete package. If someone in this group starts up a catering business, others in the group will go out on the limb and hire this new start-up to cater for themselves. Within a few weeks the start-up caterers have a portfolio a mile long. The creativity encouraged within this group puts this group at an advantage and allows them to influence other groups to their views. And they always have ties to someone of their group who works for the government.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]We need to make sure we always say, "I want to support my own group." A deceptively false way of saying this is to say, "I don't want other groups to succeed." This is wrong. All groups can succeed.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]We also need to be cautious as Europeans because the laws are against us. A restaurant in my city that is full of Filipino workers will not have any trouble (and I think it's great that people find jobs for their own family and friends). Should a restaurant have only white people in it, all hell breaks loose. How do we network without creating a reaction? I don't know but I do know we need to.
[/FONT][/SIZE] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/134-4th-way-help-your-race.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/133-3rd-way-help-ones-race.html Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:10:53 GMT [FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]3) Get rid of crime in your life. Pay your taxes, don't steal, don't murder. These are obvious things but should it ever happen that there was a nation devoted to your race, would you be the kind of person they might not want as a citizen based on a criminal record.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]The main reason I have made this point separate from point #2 which promotes exemplary behaviour is that I want to stress habit.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]To be an exemplary European (or Black or Malay etc.) it is important to cultivate good habits of grooming, intelligence and successful living. We've all heard the saying, "Success is 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration." (Thomas Edison) Habits can save one's life in many ways. If one is in the habit of wiping off their leather shoes promptly after every outdoor excurion, those shoes remain in excellent condition for several more years. If one is in the habit of always looking for the positive in people, embarassing situations are avoided. If one is in the habit of speaking French, fluency in that language won't be lost.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]The same applies to crime. Let's pretend that we will have a strictly European country soon. If we are not paying our taxes now, why will we pay them at that time? If we insist on getting out of parking tickets now, what makes us think that will change? If we steal "small things" now, why is that going to change later?
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]One of the reasons my upbringing was idyllic was because everyone paid their taxes. People did not lock their cars or houses. When the newspaper boy came to collect his due, the money was promptly paid. The province I was blessed to grow up in had the lowest taxes of all of Canada for many years. That was in part due to the racial unity of the people of that province. People felt they were supporting their families, communities and their race all at the same time and it was a good feeling. And when the police came to the house, they were welcomed inside and given free reign to ask any questions they wanted.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]Now that we have multiculturalism, the whole situation has changed. I do not like to get close to immigrants because of the new and innovative ways I will learn on how to rip off the government. Each group is for themselves and often has one foot back at home and one here. A social worker told me no one knows the half of it because the scamming is so bad. Be that as it may, what will my response be to the government when they continue to ask for more taxes from me? Believe me, it's hard, because for the last several years Revenue Canada has returned to my account throughout the year for more money. It's getting to the point where I will have to use an accountant for my small account because the explanations are getting so complicated and one tax worker says one thing and another something else. The result is that they almost always want more money. I have challenged the government to go to these other groups of people for money (yes, go to these communities and start pounding on doors) because I know that if they get the taxes owing to them from these other groups, maybe my taxes will go down.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]I don't want to pay my taxes when I see what is happening. But I do. I pay my taxes to keep up the habit.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]This is not to say that white native Canadians don't pay their taxes. Some of them don't. It's not the taxes so much as their dependency on socialism that irritates me. Someone has to pay for all that free welfare money. And when I think of a possible future country of our own, believe me, there are many native white Canadians that I would not like to invite to participate.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]This brings me though to the second point. Not only should we avoid crime now to develope non-criminal habits, we should avoid crime for reputation, especially group reputation. What we do as individuals affects the whole group.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]The other day I got on a bus and then realized that I had forgotten my monthly pass. I apologized to the bus driver and he said it was fine and that I could ride the bus. Why? This was probably due to the fact that I am white and look like a professional (often being mistaken for a doctor or lawyer). I insisted on getting off the bus at the next stop though because behind me and having heard the whole conversation was a busload of non-whites looking at me (almost always on buses I am one of two or three whites among many non-whites).
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]I was thankful though that we still have a good reputation. I can go into any hotel lobby and use that facility's public washroom without security stopping me. Often I am acknowledged upon entrance when others are ignored. I am not suspected by police or security in many situations where others would be suspected. If I am at a restaurant, the waiter doesn't badger me to pay the bill because it is assumed I will pay. If I hail a taxi, I get one in seconds. If I walk into a store with a big backpack, I'm still not suspected of future theft or followed through the store.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]But this can change. I was in a store the other day where the store owner was glowering at me the whole time. I didn't take it personally because I figured that another white guy had just given the store owner grief. I've said in another submission that if I need a roommate, I don't want to get a single white man as a roommate. This is because of their proclivity to be on drugs and not pay their rent. Among single white men, this is a common problem. East Asians always pay and are the ideal roommates (they are also usually quiet and do not party much).
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]Sadly, around the world, Europeans will suffer bad reputations because of others who look Europeans. But for the most part we seem privileged. We need to make sure though that as individuals we are exemplary and don't ride on the coattails of others. We need to do our part.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]A third reason to avoid crime is that crime is a burden on any country. Few government officials want to discipline anyone for crime. It's not an enjoyable activity unless one is sadistic. It creates more government expenditure to governments which are already in debt. It's not an act of love toward a government to disobey it. Some people feel that crime is good because it "creates jobs". Huh? This is a short-sighted attitude.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]Should white nationalist groups ask for a criminal record check before accepting members or creating affiliations? It would be ideal to do so. But many whites are suffering unjustly and to sort out the innocent from the guilty is getting harder.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]All of us as individuals need to make sure we are obeying our governments as much as possible even though this is becoming harder to do in a gracious manner. We want to avoid taxes as a form of protest. Does this do any good? Not really. When is a government action worthy of criminal protest? What are we actually training ourselves to do? Are we focusing on being reactive to the expense of being pro-active. We can spend all of our energies on being pro-active and will still leave many things undone. If we fret and stew over a government action and spend 40 hours in succesfully not paying our taxes, that is 40 hours lost in pro-active activity that we could have spent for building unity among ourselves. And - would we end up treating a future all-white government the same way?
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]Jesus probably didn't like the Romans any more than anyone else did but he said, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's..." (NIV - Mark 12:17)[/SIZE][/FONT] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/133-3rd-way-help-ones-race.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/132-10-ways-help-ones-race.html Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:33:21 GMT [SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]I believe that God I believe in created the races for a purpose. Deut. 32:8 - "When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance, when he divided all mankind, he set up boundaries for the peoples according to the number of the sons of Israel." (NIV) And I believe that there are beneficial ways to help one's race just as there are good ways to be members of a family.

10 ways to promote one's race

1) Obvious - marry a person of one's race and have children of one's race. Mixed race people are confused about their identities and are really open to a NWO. And then there is the issue of racial disparities among races.

2) Be an example of a person that others will admire. In appearance, health, mental capacity and achievement, personableness etc., be a shining example of a person of excellence. Make your race attractive to its own members in appearance and achievement.

3) Get rid of crime in your life. Pay your taxes, don't steal, don't murder. These are obvious things but should it ever happen that there was a nation devoted to your race, would you be the kind of person they might not want as a citizen based on a criminal record.

4) Support your race financially. Do you work for someone of your race? Do you hire people of your own race? Do you shop at places where your own race would benefit? This is not to say that you don't buy the products of other countries. Every race has their own advantage according to their talents and the lands they possess. My race does not generally occupy areas where rice is grown easily. I will probably always buy my rice from other races. But do we support our own race as much as possible?

5) Do not fight for any personal rights whatsoever. Equality cannot be legislated. [This is where feminism is a fantasy. No matter how much women push for their rights, they are still not equal because they have not understood equality among men. Men are not equal with each other until they have earned equality. We, as men, know we don't join a football team legislatively. We join a football team by proving our strength and ability.] What should replace rights? Responsibility. Instead of fighting for your "unionized" rights at work, be the best worker. Get rid of medical rights, pension rights, disability rights, racial rights, religious rights etc. Take care of yourself.

6) Get rid of racial rights. Does the government legislate that business' have to hire 50% of its workers from your race? What if members of your race are so valuable that business' want to hire 100% of their workers from your race? Should they still stick with 50%? But certain racial groups own the business', you say. Why doesn't your racial group own the business'?

7) Do not accept any money from government. Almost every government is in debt. Would you take money from someone who is in debt? If you had a neighbour who was in debt, would you receive any money (or help) from such a man? Then why are you receiving free things from your government? Another way of putting it is, are you receiving more money than you are giving? Add up all of your taxes you are paying. Add up all that you are receiving (and will receive in the way of pensions and medical care in the future) from your government in the way of infrastructure, education, benefits, protection etc. Few people ever give more than they receive. But what should you do if you have broken even and your government is still in debt because others are taking more than they are giving? Then find a way to stop people from taking advantage of the government.

8) Do not work for the government for money. If you need money, earn it yourself. If you work for the government, do it for free.

9) Be honest about your race. Do people of your race steal? Don't defend such behaviour. In fact, apologize for your own race.

10) Do to others as you would want them to do to you. Do you pretend to be part of another race (change your name or appearance) to fool them into doing business with you? Do you try to gain illegal access into another racial group? Do you go on to their websites in the guise of being one of them? Do you insist on rights among that other group that you wouldn't give them if in your group? Do you want that racial group to be destroyed by division or by assimilation? Psalm 9:15 says, "They have fallen into the pit that they have dug." (NIV) What you desire for others will happen to you.

How to you rate? 60%? 90%? Do you even have these ideals? What would your list of 10 be like? What do you think I should change? [/FONT][/SIZE] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/132-10-ways-help-ones-race.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/126-2nd-way-help-ones-race.html Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:24:48 GMT 2) Be an example of a person that others will admire. In appearance, health, mental capacity and achievement, personableness etc., be a shining... [SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]2) Be an example of a person that others will admire. In appearance, health, mental capacity and achievement, personableness etc., be a shining example of a person of excellence. Make your race attractive to its own members in appearance and achievement.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]We have all met unattractive white people. Just go on to the streets of the city where I live and you'll see the worst examples of white appearance, intellect and achievement. Should any of those people start speaking about to anyone about white nationalism, the result would be disastrous and laughable. And should those people start representing our causes in the media through just plain exposure, we're in trouble.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]All of us can be unattractive, whether in word or deed or appearance. We can make a nuisance of ourselves. It doesn't help when in the process of making a nuisance of ourselves we end up speaking about white nationalism. We not only don't inspire but we turn people off. I have been guilty of this myself and some of my friends are tired of my rants which they feel are just a way of my pointing fingers at everyone else.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]First of all, though, what if we are not physically attractive people. "People shouldn't judge by appearances," we say. Oh, but they do. And it's not a bad thing. In life, we don't have the time to put everyone we meet through a 30-minute survey to figure out if we want to talk to them.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]One of the best ways to judge someone is to look at them. Is that person fit and in shape? Do they take care of themselves physically. This probably means they have a little bit of discipline if not alot. And being able to play a sport well was, when I was growing up, a way to prove one's character.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Do we have a good haircut or hairstyle and good grooming? Again, this indicates discipline and success. Who wants to be around someone unsuccessful? I have been in positions where I was homeless and people are wary. They don't know if they can trust you or what it is you want. A good hairstyle will balance our features and hopefully draw attention to our eyes and keep them there. Irregular features can be brought into balance with a hairstylist who knows what they are doing.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Do we dress nicely? Dress is a way to express one's personality as well as one's culture. I enjoy the mature English look of substantial shoes, a suit and an overcoat. It not only makes me look better but it communicates stability and dependability and discipline. It respresents all of this partly because it is from a European tradition and era of success.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Secondly, we need to be mentally fit. This is important for several reasons, the most important in my mind being that we can replace negative speech with positive. It is very easy for nationalists of any race to get together to speak about "the things that unite them" which usually are the negative things that are detrimental to their race. This is wearing at times to everyone and one of the best ways to avoid being overly negative is to be positive. Instead of white nationalists focusing on anti-white media, focus on white media. Instead of focusing on the lack of opportunities for European artists, focus on the European artists who are thriving. Focus on medical discoveries etc. Become an expertise at something. As well, being mentally fit may be necessary for survival in the future in different ways. If we had a European nation-state, what could we as individuals bring to the table? I'm in my forties and trying to get a degree because I know that simple general knowledge of life such as how to use a bank machine is not satisfactory.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]An area that Europeans need to focus on are European arts. This last weekend I spent time looking at houses in a rich neighbourhood of my city. I did this to respark my interest in European architecture because the houses were great examples of it. Europeans have been at the forefront of all forms of art in the world but as the anti-European media tries to promote the mixed-race stars or the minorities, it's becoming harder to find strictly European vendors. One of the biggest examples of this struggle is in watching Shakespeare plays. In the city where I live, it is the desire of producers to have every race as part of the same family. It is supposed to focus on the acting only but it doesn't make sense.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Thirdly, are we achieving anything? Are we starting a business, inventing anything, creating a work of art, mastering a skill, becoming better at anything? Or are we sitting in front of a TV all the time? Achievement is important not just for ourselves but for the people around us. I meet white nationalists who are on welfare. I would rather spend time with a foreigner achieving something than a person like that. This issue of acheivement is hard for many of us because the bread and butter issues are dominating our lives more and more. But can we spend an hour a day even to make something of ourselves.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]I grew up with what would have seemed to be ordinary people in the rural area of a small town in Western Canada. But behind those rough exteriors were extraordinary people who pursued excellence. When around them, I was always uplifted and encouraged. Their example pulled me out of a reverie that would have been my downfall. I would have been married to a foreigner by now, content with a lukewarm career and passively waiting to die. But I have chosen a different path because I became fascinated with a group of people of my own race who were making life work.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Examples of great Europeanism (or Chinesism or Africanism) are becoming more and more necessary in the bigger cities because the temptations to drift off of our racial paths are uncountable. Everywhere we turn there are opportunties to betray our cultures. To the white child who has never been in a small town community where white life worked (sans socialism) well in every way, the only other ways to understand such an experience would be to watch a show like "Anne of Green Gables", or to meet real people like you or me and learn from us.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]I have many goals to do with excellence. I need to keep my place neater and cleaner so that I can have visitors at any time. I need to see pay raises in the future at my job and see more money coming in. I need to get married and perhaps buy a place. I need to be in better health and more robust. I need to be less utilitarian in my dress habits. I need to make more friends of my own race. I need to eventually move to a European community. Whether I meet all of these goals before I die, only time will tell. I want, though, to be as fully European as I can be. People can look at my blue eyes and admire them (which they have done aplenty). But do people admire my speech, appearance or success? My blue eyes were given to me for free and actually only represent a fraction of my heritage. What can I do to make the rest of my heritage more attractive? I know that I have lots of work to do.

White people generally do not have the problem of being rejected by other races. The fear is from the other races being rejected by Europeans. There may come a time when that will change. Are we prepared for such a time? Are we prepared not only as individuals but as a group? At the moment I don't think we are. We have much work to do. How can we make our race excellent? It's quite the question that will result in quite the answers.[/FONT][/SIZE] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/126-2nd-way-help-ones-race.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/125-1st-way-help-ones-race.html Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:11:19 GMT [SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]1) Obvious - marry a person of one's race and have children of one's race. Mixed race people are confused about their identities and are really open to a NWO. And then there is the issue of racial disparities among races.

If everyone in the world did this, we would have more peace and harmony than we could ever imagine. It's not, of course, the panacea for all of the world's problems. And many people will marry within their own race out of simple convenience and availability and not understand the significance of such an act. Perhaps in their whole life they will even have hated what they have done.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]But why is it so significant that one marries within their own race?
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]Perhaps the question that should be answered first is why it is so easy to marry outside of one's race. "Easy?" you say? Aside from laws that might prohibit such a thing, yes it is easier. Let me give a similar example of ease. If a person is having problems with their family situation and trying to work together with siblings or parents or children (especially business wise), it's much easier to move away to another place and start anew. It's usually means that the problems still remain both in the lives of the people left behind and the person who left. Will the person who leaves find more success in another place? Probably not, but they will find that their problems are not as exacerbated. They will probably have left behind a higher standard of life because the more people in a family who work together, often the bigger the business and the more opportunity for profit there is. So this person is now probably working for someone else and is making less money but doesn't have to face the problems of a bigger and more complex situation. Cities are actually full of such people which makes for thriving corporations and big bureaucracies.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]When a person marries outside of their race they can run away from the past, present and future. They don't have to think about any such things. And the struggles their children might have to find roots and feel grounded are ignored in their own quest for ease. Time and time again, I come across white guys married to East Asians who cite the argumentative white woman as the cause of their escape. And now, bless their hearts, their lives are perfect. But their children suffer identity-wise and are much more susceptible to a New World Order. A book could probably be written about what has been done to our race in this sense but European peoples need to realize we have enemies who would love to see our European identity fractured beyond repair.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]It's hard to live with past wrongs, present fighting, and a disappointing future. No one wants to do this. But doing so will result in the greater rewards.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]We have to remember that these people who leave their present difficult situations to find ease in the arms of the foreigner don't always find comfort in the opposite sex. Many of these people find comfort in the same sex of a different race. The sexual playgrounds of the world are full of cross-racial interactions for a variety of reasons (the biggest one being the differences in the body types of the races). More could be said about this but one cannot ignore that inter-racial marriages thrive during sexual revolutions. This is something those involved in inter-racial marriages don't want to face.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]But, you say, there are moral people who engage in inter-racial legitimate marriages. Yes. I know. They are showing the world what "love" is all about. I've heard the message. But I disagree. I believe that 99% of these people are still running away from their problems. These problems include family problems which can be heavy to bear. But they also include problems within a race that preachers should address such as drunkenness, stealing etc. As well, there are the problems of feminism, socialism and communism. All of these things make races unattractive.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]I could have devoted this explanation of my first way to help one's race on the positive aspects of marrying within one's race but I chose instead to focus on the negative aspects of marrying outside of one's race. I believe this explains the situation better. But having said that, apart from marriages that bring peace between kingdoms, arranged marriages (which probably have a greater chance of survival than love marriages) are always between members of one race. Why? The reason why arranged marriages are within a race is that if there is no love in the marriage, at least [U]racial responsibilities[/U] (because many cultures still understand these responsibilities) will carry the marriage through the hard times. [U]Racial responsibilities[/U] are worth living for if nothing else is. They should be a part of each and everone's life.
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE=4][FONT=times new roman]I've written this from the perspective of a man not yet married. I have not proven the success of marrying within one's race but let me say this. I could have been married a thousand times over had I chosen to marry outside of my race. Two things were almost always offered in propositions - a submissive wife and (lots of) money. Fortunately, I have had the strength to refuse these offers and to continue to wait patiently for what I hope is a brighter future. And - I can look the foreign man, especially the East Asian man, in the eye and say, "I have not taken your woman." This is a very important thing to be able to say and may mean the difference between life and death in the future.[/FONT][/SIZE] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/125-1st-way-help-ones-race.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/123-what-women-used-like.html Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:54:38 GMT [FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]As I was growing up, I continually heard the women around me say, "I will not go out and work and take jobs away from our men." This was an remarkable thing for these women to say for several reasons and it saved me from the savages and ravages of feminism years later. These women were saying this for the following reasons:
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]1) They considered the men of their race to be their men just as the men would say, "Our women." This just didn't mean someone's spouse, it also included the others of the same race.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]2) These women showed remarkable contentment of their financial state. They could have gone out and worked for more money but did not. Each woman`s husband brought in a different salary but they usually were not jealous of other women. They shared bank accounts with their husbands who trusted them to live within their means. Some of these women whom I knew about personally did not live in fancy houses or have many comforts but they kept looking to their husbands for their sustinance.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]3) These women were charitable. Time and time again these women would say, ``We`ll put another plate at the table.`` If neighbours were struggling they would take the neighbours children into their homes for a while. It was a common thing to do. No one thought of themselves as special. Now we have to create these opportunities and in the process everyone is patting themselves on the back.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]4) These women knew the value of housework and keeping a home. They knew how important they were to the stability of the community. They took care of parents, children and anyone in their family who was sick. And they did it for free. Nowadays it is totally the opposite. Women go out and work and then ignore everyone around them who needs help and put the burdenon the taxpayer. Years ago women didn`t do this and were content. They had strong self-esteem and didn`t let anyone look down on them. They understood how important their role was.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]5) These women had the support of their husbands. It astounds me to hear some of the men around me speak of looking for wives who make good money. It`s none of their business how much money their future wives can make. Years ago the men did everything they could to make sure their wives stayed in the house.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]6) Men allowed the women to dominate the home. Women need to have that authority. When a man stepped into the house he followed the woman`s rules. It was understood in healthy homes that this was how things worked. As well, the best farms had that separation between the two roles. The woman would take care of the house, the garden and the small animals. The man would take care of the rest of the farm.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]7) Women were allowed and encouraged to be pretty. This was an unusual thing to see. I`ll speak on it later, but over and over again I saw, especially in English homes, the man doing whatever he could to make sure the woman had refinery around her and went on a regular basis to the hairstylist or anywhere else she needed to to look nice. As well, the home would have a good supply of books and nice furniture. I was surprised at the length men would go to to make this happen on farms way out in the countryside.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]8) Women saying such things had husbands who had fairly good incomes. These women were saying what they did for the rest of the men in the community, even those that might disappoint. It didn`t matter if a man was a drunk and a rascal, he still needed a job for his family. It was understood that this was how life was.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]9) Women encouraged other women to remain at home and take control of their children and house. It was understood that this was the role for every woman. The most successful homes had the woman doing what she needed to do in the home. I saw this over and over again with my own eyes.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]10) Women would put the pressure on younger men to go out and work by first of all preparing their sons to do so and then asking all the other young men in the community what they were ``going to do for a living.`` The community as a whole worked together to make sure families stayed in the community. If two men were working at the same job and one was married with kids and the other single, the married man was usually paid more. Women accepted this as life.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman][SIZE=4]All of this was seen with my own eyes and was a remarkable example of community at work. The situation nowadays is so strange as to make me pinch myself. I see women celebrating such things as menopause. It`s ridiculous. Years ago women didn`t fight like they do now and they supported each other and shared with each other. Now women have to form special groups just to share and support each other because they aren`t doing it naturally. Everything is backwards. I was fortunate enough to see what real life was like years ago.[/SIZE][/FONT] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/123-what-women-used-like.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/122-christianity-nationalism-they-separate.html Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:41:16 GMT [SIZE=3] B[/SIZE][SIZE=3]efore I begin, I just want to define "integration" and "assimilation". In this article "integration" means that one race attains to the same status as another race. Both races have people in the government, both races have access to all government institutions. But the races do not inter-marry. Both races can own land and prosper. "Assimilation" means that both races inter-marry and become one race. These words are used inter-changeably by governments and the media and usually end up meaning assimilation.

As well, I don't believe there should be such thing as a state religion. It should be fairly obvious to people that at least there is a God and that we didn't get here by chance just as it should be obvious that feminism doesn't work. Since most Europeans believe in Christianity and it influences our European cultures more than any other book, I'm here to discuss it with a point of view rarely found (people believe my nationalism came first and then my Christianity but it was the opposite).

In almost every church I enter today, I hear messages to the affect that Christ wants everyone to assimilate because this is a sign that we all love one another. I met a black man once who said he was attending white churches to gain a white wife because this would prove God's love. I know of a denomination which has set up a sub-denomination of churches just for this purpose. Most churches include all the races of mankind in their advertising and try to include them on their pastoral staff. Entering into inter-racial adoption and/or marriage is a sign that one has made it.

What does the Bible say?

[B][U]OLD TESTAMENT[/U][/B]

The Old Testament preaches a definitive "NO" to both integration and assimilation. This does not mean, as we shall see, that foreigners couldn't live among them. But they were always foreigners and never ever became Israelites, not even entering into governmental affairs.

Whom they could assimilate with:

Edomites and Egyptians

Deuteronomy 23: 7-8 says, "Do not despise an Edomite, for the Edomites are related to you. Do not despise an Egyptian, because you resided as foreigners in their country. The third generation of children born to them may enter the assembly of the LORD."

Edomites and Egyptians were given special permission to become Israelites but only in the 3rd generation. As we see, this started with marrying an Israelite and probably meant marrying Israelites to the 3rd generation. Whether the count started with the Egyptian and Israelite marrying in the first place or whether the count started with their children is debatable but the most important thing to understand is that they were to be fully assimilated in genetic appearance, customs, language etc. This was important to God. Only these two groups are ever given express permission. Moab and Ammon and the Ishmaelites who were all related to the Israelites were not mentioned much less Persians, Greeks or any other group of people.

[I][B]Captive women[/B][/I]

Deuteronomy 21:11 says, "if you notice among the captives a beautiful woman and are attracted to her, you may take her as your wife."
The condition to taking a foreign woman was that her people were captive (especially the men!). And it must be assumed that only at the 3rd generation would acceptance be gained. Moses married a Cu****e. Obviously she was alone and had no men who said to Moses, "Leave her alone." And any children born (we hear of none) would not have become Israelite until the 3rd generation.

Nothing is said in the Old Testament about carrying the identity through Jewish women. In fact, only men are mentioned in regards to marrying foreign women other than Edomites and Egyptians. It is generally assumed around the world that women adopt the identity of a man. For instance, if a French woman marries an English man, the children are considered English. Warring tribes in certain parts of the world will nevertheless exchange women if they need elligible wives who are not close relations. Almost always these situations happen among people of similar appearance.

[B][I]Foreigner status[/I][/B]

The word "foreigner" is mentioned 135 times in the Old Testament (NIV). It is mentioned right to the end of the Old Testament. Foreigners could live among the Israelites for hundreds of years and still be called foreigners. A good example of a group of foreigners were the Rachebites. They were descendants of the Kenites (Moses first wife was a Kenite, a group of people living among the Midianites, descendants of Abraham, and possibly Midianites themselves). The laws concerning the Egyptians and Edomites came after Moses married a Kenite. Approximately 850 years later, the Rachebites were still living among the Israelites and still living in tents to show that they were not a part of the people. Were the Rachebites unhappy? Did they consider themselves disenfranchised or inferior? Absolutely not. They knew who they were and had accepted it. They were not Israelites. They were foreigners. They did not marry Israelites and Israelites did not marry them. And, surprisingly, they are credited as believing in the God of Israel just as much as Israelites and of having a relationship with Him. Assmilation or even integration was not a part of their priorities. They probably kept themselves occupied with raising families and taking care of their business affairs. There are people in the Middle East to this day who claim to be descendants from Rechab.

Foreigners were to be treated in many ways with the respect Israelites gave to each other. They did not have to be enslaved to be foreigners. They could also worship God in a limited way.

The Bible prophesies that in the future foreigners will again live in Israel and still be foreigners and still be separate. There is no mention that they will marry Jews. Ezekiel 47 says that foreigners will be like native Israelites.

[B][I]But there was inter-racial marriage[/I][/B]

Those who promote inter-racial marriage as being permitted in the Old Testament will always promote the following examples as proof: Rahab, Ruth, Moses' Cu****e wife, Solomon and other kings and Esther and the Israelites in Babylon. Those who discourage inter-racial marriage based on the Old Testament will always promote the tower of Babel, the Old Testament law, the many mentions of the foreigner in Israel, and especially the action by Ezra to have the Israelites who returned to Israel and had married non-Israelites put away their foreign wives. I truly believe that the burden of proof is on the side of no inter-racial marriage. In my opinion, God wanted the Israelites to have a strong and complete identity. He wanted them to have a culture and to prove to the nations around that He could make a culture work, that following God makes for great marriages and great parent-child relationships and great art and great industry - and great peace. He wanted them to prove to the cultures around them that His law was perfect for every situation so that those other people groups could have great cultures. God never meant for those other people to inter-marry with Israelites as a shortcut.

People will always find the grass greener on the other side of the fence. Marrying someone of one's own racial group means facing one's own culture and it's failings and it's success'. It means thinking about the past and the future deeply. Marrying inter-racially is a quick and easy thing to do but is not wise. It is akin to someone in a culture with no automobile industry buying a foreign car. To build one's own cars, the people of a culture have to do many things such as invest in education, organization, a fair distribution of profit and fair wages, to say nothing of raising children who will work in such an industry. The task would be daunting to try to start from the ground up but it has been done by such people as the Japanese who were called racist for years by our media but who had a culture that promoted loyalty and was successful.

Many Christians will miss the point because they will never have investigated the Old Testament law enough to understand what was behind it. Instead they will go to the New Testament, to one or two passages, and stay there.

[U][B]NEW TESTAMENT[/B][/U]

Galations 3:28 says, "There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." (NIV) This verse has been used to promote feminism, the abolition of slavery (and almost the abolition of the employer-employee relationship), and definitely to promote inter-racial marriage. Other similar verses are brought into the mix and voila - the world should become one to the glory of God. There is no longer any authority in life, everyone has equal access to God and equal rights, yada, yada, yada. New Testament teachings against women becoming leaders over men go by the wayside. The end of the world will come when all men realize they are one.

It would take a big book to express why I believe the New Testament says the complete opposite and what Galations 3:28 really means. Suffice it to say, the world has overcome the church. In churches that promote inter-racial marriage there is also promoted all sorts of political correctness and the decline is much more rapid into liberalism than in churches that promote a cultural outworking of Christianity. Protestant missionaries of bygone years never believed in such things and their converts did not either to the point where the missionaries had to eventually hand over all responsibility to the indigeneous people (usually after the Bible was translated) or be kicked out.

The preceding is simply a quick summary of why I believe in cultural separateness. I don't believe in assimilation but do I believe in some integration? I will leave that question for another day except to say that competition can be productive. I would welcome feedback on whether integration is even possible.[/SIZE] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/122-christianity-nationalism-they-separate.html http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/117-why-you-white-nationalist.html Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:41:11 GMT Reasons for being a white nationalist. There are many reasons for being a white nationalist. Some reasons are better than others and create stronger... [SIZE=4]Reasons for being a white nationalist.
There are many reasons for being a white nationalist. Some reasons are better than others and create stronger foundations. The following are ones that I see in the white nationalist community.

1) Reason #1 that most people think of is "white supremacy". This, I believe is based on evolution and/or eastern mysticism. It is the belief that white people are the highest form of evolution. Many people around the world are white supremacists. Most of India is. White people are above caste, black people are below. If an East Indian can marry a white person, their progeny automatically jump caste. Many who seek inter-racial marriage with a white person and half-white babies are white supremacists. They truly believe their baby is above a baby of their own race. White people are white supremacists when they believe that their genes are the best.

I don't personally believe this. I believe we are all capable of evil behaviour. I believe that Christianity in European lives has contributed to the greatness of Europeans and that Europeans, through religion, have exercised that kind of restraint that does lead to success and wealth. Do blacks have a tendency to break into song and dance more than Europeans who tend to be more futuristic and serious? Probably. But song and dance is not a bad thing. It needs to be balanced out with academic skills just as Europeans could probably use more sports and singing in their lives.

2) Reason #2 that many people have is that they think negatively of other races. This group commits crimes. That group doesn't mow their lawn. Another group steals and cheats. Another group always smells.

The trouble with this view is two-fold. The white race is capable of all of these things. And secondly, there are neat and decent and nice-smelling people of other races. What do we do if we meet a black person who is exemplary in all of these ways? What if we fall in love with such a person after discovering that the stereotypes are not always true?

3) Reason #3 that a few people may have in being white nationalists is that they want to continue to maintain the beauty of the white race. There is a difference between wanting to have children that look like us and believing we are the best-looking people in the world. Everyone should want to have children that look like they do if they have a healthy view of themselves. To believe that the white race is the best looking race in the world is problematic in the sense that many non-whites think this way and therefore want the half-white baby. One solution to this is to contain our exposure of ourselves to the world to only ourselves. That we are the face of advertising and beauty is not good. I wish that all peoples had the thinking of the Indonesian leader who didn't want Brad Pitt on a billboard but wanted a native Indonesian instead. I have read that Syrian Jews in New York have rejected inter-racial
marriage partly because they don't want Jews to look like Europeans. If this is true, these people are to be admired because they are not idolatrous of white features. To want to have children in one's likeness is good but is it a strong enough reason to withstand inter-racial marriage? Many whites will have their white children with one spouse and then marry a non-white spouse (with or without children in mind) for the sex or wealth that person can give.

4) Reason #4 that some choose is that Europeans have been at the forefront of the technological advances of the world therefore we should remain European based on our tendency toward success. It's tied into economics. The house bought in the white area of town will go up in price the most. This is okay. But to me it's not strong enough. I don't believe it was by chance that we were successful. I believe we made choices that we can easily undo. And I believe that other races can make similar successful choices. And I believe that other races are already doing this and that our media is not telling us everything but only focusing on the successes of one particular group. And though other races may not be white supremacists, they often have a tendency to hang around whites because of our success. East Asians love to visit Europe to see the architecture and to view our accomplishments. Many move to the west just to have Europe brush off on them. I meet Asian and African Canadians who will not admit their ancestry at all. Could this attitude end up in white supremacy and the belief that actually being actually being white is the best? It certainly is a start.

5) Reason #5 that some have is a love and loyalty of nation and country. If we didn't have immigration forced on us, this might suffice. It doesn't anymore.

6) Reason #6 is that we are what our ancestors are. This is a good reason in some ways. It acknowledges what our lives are founded on. The trouble is that we are not taught the history of our and are not allowed to be proud of our ancestry. And, if taken to the extreme, we probably all had a common ancestor somewhere in the past. If we are general enough we have to divide our ancestry (according to the evoloutionists) into monkeys/apes/gorillas versus humans. I think we should use our recent ancestry for our identity but add to it.

7) Reason #7 is something that is not mentioned in the news. Inter-racial marriage creates an imbalance. Nearly 50% of black women in the States after the age of thirty never get married according to a Newsweek study ([URL]http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2003/03/02/the-black-gender-gap.html‏[/URL]). The flip side is that the same percentage of East Asian men never get married. White men should not marry East Asian women because they are taking wives away from East Asian men. White women should not marry black men because they are taking husbands away from black women. Should white women marry East Asian men and white men marry Black women to bring about the balance? Firstly, it rarely happens. Secondly, it sets a bad example and precedent. Thirdly, it affects the children because they are mixed-race (talk to a mixed-race person and you will undertand their problem with identity and focus and rootedness). Fourthly, it paves the way to a NWO like nothing else does. I don't believe God made Adam and Eve (yes, I believe the historicity of that account) to be a short East Asian man and a tall, buxom African woman. I believe they were the same race with Eve being slightly shorter than Adam but similar in appearance (imagine a non-white spouse commenting on the European features of the white spouse for nearly a thousand years - that would drive me nuts.). I believe that God told the Israelites in the Bible to only marry Egyptians or Edomites and to only accept them after the third generation because God wanted Israelites to look similar for unity). There was one other way a foreigner could become an Israelite. Israelite men could marry a foreign women only if they had that woman's men under captivity (slavery). This rarely happened.

I consider this imbalance to be our world's number one problem. Black women say being husbandless is like dying slowly. East Asian men are very discouraged. An aid worker told me that in the Philippines young male prostitues (there are many there) simply disappear. I believe this is due to to lack of hope. Not only are they struggling with addictions, they see Filipino women around them all the time with non-Filipino men. South Koreans have told me that the situation in Korea is two men to every one women (and white men are still going over there for brides - are we insane?).

8) Reason #8 is for myself the reason that turned me into a white nationist. It is the "authority" reason. I believe that women should submit to men. I believe that this is the natural order of things but we don't see this clearly at the moment because of our technological society where women can do the same jobs as men and because of debt. But I grew up on farms and saw first hand what life is like and the great need for men to be men and women women for survival to happen. And white women need to submit to white men. Filipino women need to submit to Filipino men. Conversely white men need to take proper leadership over white women. Black men need to take leadership over their women. I don't believe a Filipino woman should submit to me because she has her own men to submit to.

When I understood authority and the need for submission to authority in the work place and the need for wives to submit to men and children to parents, I automatically became a white nationalist. But when I say submission, I'm not talking just about having supper ready at six because one's husband wants that. I'm talking about women relying on their husbands for everything. Here in Canada, women have voted in socialism to the point where they need no husbands. This is why white nationalism is not as strong here in Canada as it is in the States. I rarely meet a white woman that has feelings about white nationalism here in Canada because most white women are concerned about what the Canadian government is going to to for them instead of what some husband will do for them.

In conclusion, I would like to hear from other white nationists what they feel is the best reason for white nationalism even if it is in disagreement with me. I was surprised to arrive at the conclusions I did (but I had to reject socialism totally to do so). I am wondering though if I have good enough reasons and whether there are reasons I have not mentioned. And if you believe that whiteness is the result of evolution to the highest, tell my why with some proof if possible. I don't like the emphasis of supremacy on white nationalist sites but I might be missing something.

Please contact me if you wish to quote me. I will be refining this quickly-written article also so it is a work in progress.[/SIZE] ]]> Europeantomyroots http://www.whitenewsnow.com/blogs/europeantomyroots/117-why-you-white-nationalist.html