Poor liberals...having their own words used against them. Hahaha!
Read more: Richard Dawkins compares burqa to 'bin liner' | News.com.auBRITISH academic and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins has angered Muslim groups by comparing the burqa to a trash bag.
The 69-year-old author referred to the burqa as a “full bin-liner thing” in a magazine interview while discussing his forthcoming documentary about the dangers of faith schools.
From the article, Richard Dawkin is a liberal, he does not like how Britian is being dominated by Islamic thought and anyone who opposes is branded "Racist or Islamophobic" Funny when I look at the pics of Burqus being worn, they look like Wheelie Bin liners.![]()
Poor liberals...having their own words used against them. Hahaha!
I've been telling people that....
"Once they are here, they have rights".
"You dont like their burkas? Too bad."
"You dont like where they are building their mosques? Too bad."
"The only solution is to keep them out!"
Any thoughts on this? A good approach?
In my opinion it's a good approach. There's a lot of hate aimed at Muslims by The Christian Right and I've been using it to my advantage, believe me.
We need to get the word "illegal" out of their vocabulary as well (with regards to immigration) and make them hate all immigration because it will destroy our race. I've been replacing the phrase "illegal immigration" with "uncontrolled immigration".
not just uncontrolled immigration, what makes the govt think for one second that america can afford to take on refugees ? Nobody gives a hoot about some foreign countries refugees that their own govt. doesn't want or take care of their own responsibilities as the govts are supposed to care for their own people, not foreigners and especially not fss !
Remember the Mariel Boatlift?
If governments are letting people just walk out the door it might be because they want to get rid of them for some reason.
I can't just get up and leave this country if I feel like it, there are procedures, checks and obligations, Sri Lankans have the much same restrictions.
A lot of Jews and Gypsies ended up in Concentration camps alongside habitual criminals, Communists and aggressive "Out" Homosexuals, it's said that they were all there for the same reasons.
The Occupation forces were only too happy to get rid of these people, just like the Sri Lankans want to get rid of Tamil Gangsters, like the Lebanese wanted to get rid of crime families from the North of the country and why Castro emptied his jails and Asylums into the Carribean.
One thing I have learnt, never-ever put toasted sandwiches on to cook whilst reading WNN posts - they are far too interesting. My son has a chuckle at the smell of a smoke-filled Kitchen and yet another charcoaled dish.
You see, even Liberals like Richard Dawkins hold the key to this world, they use their eyes. They LOOK!
For example, One point Art Teachers want to teach their students is to LOOK! Ok, so there is a blue cup in front of you on a white Stool - paint the object on that surface. Hmm, the average beginner artist then looks into his, or her mind - they see things how they "should" be, they paint from in their mind - their memories!
NO! Have a LOOK! Yes, yes, there is ellipse on the cup lip and and base. The cup handle has a curved, white spot and line on the blue, where the light centres. What sort of basic blue in the cup? A Phalos blue perhaps? An Ultramarine blue that is more intense?
What about the shades and the highlights? Have a LOOK! Ahh, the shades are varients of grey, not blue. Payne's grey? Well, that is when theory moves into the grey mixture - one mixes all colours of the Study to form the correct grey for that individual study, which is then shaded, or lightened. So what are the colours in the Study? Blue, White, Vermilion (Orange/Red paint splatter on surface of Stool, reflecting light onto the base of the cup), Lemon, and Violet. Hmm, you had to LOOK huh? That is not in the memory bank is it? You had to LOOK and so on and so forth. LOOK...LOOK...LOOK!
Once people LOOK, they start to have the presence of their true Self and vibrancy in their language and interactions with Others. Richard Dawkins LOOKed and he saw women in Garbage Bags. He stopped being in the back of his head - that said "Don't, because that is Racist!", "Don't because you will be Punished as being a Racist or Islamophobic!" He even brought that inside messaging into some of the clutter, or justifications he announced to the outside world - I am not "racist or Islamophobic".
If an Art Student wanted to paint a Burqu, when they painted the black mass - the garment would be a black mass with maybe some reflective light in the woman's eyes - would they be racist?
What, HE, RICHARD DAWKINS, actually saw in front of himself was a foreign garment that on some level represented what is sweeping across the World. He saw an ugly, Garbage bags, that takes away the beauty and independence of a Woman and cover her in a heavy sense of Paranoai called, "Social respectability". Where she is dominated by the men of her own Race, that see her as Second Class. Imagine that! Your own children being born out of something (notice I did not say "Someone", I said "Something") Second Class?
So let Liberals wake up and LOOK!
Bookmarks