Thread: Nationalist Alternative

Eastern Europe is dirt poor, but Eastern Europe is regularly asked when it will be ready for this immigration. So why must Eastern Europe be "ready", before all the oil RICH countries in the Middle East and all the RICH countries in Asia? They are White. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

Do people actually listen to Jett and Jahn?

Do people really listen to that?

I really don't see what the "alternative" is here, compared to much of what our demands what are now. In the case of 'American Nationalism' for instance, it should go without saying, that true 'nationalist', should think of an 'American', as naturally being white. Just as I think of a British citizen, as being white.

During the course of our nations history, the intentions of our perspective founding fathers were twisted and allowed to evolve into concepts that never existed in the first place.

In the case of the United States, we do have a long, if not arguably illegal history of allowing non-whites citizenship in this country, when in reality, these people should merely be subjects, with laws that are unique and specific to their place in our society.

Of course we have to deal with the reality of what we're dealt with today, whether we like it or not. But, if there's any one thing that white Americans should insist upon, as in all white nations, and that's out nation remain predominately white, as it has existed at the beginning of its creation, throughout most of it's history to present day, and that trends that are having us becoming projected minorities be repealed, rejected, and reversed, to once against achieve the demographic status that our people enjoyed, for instance in the case of the U.S. before the Immigration Act of 1965 was passed, essentially destroying the maintenance of the racial balance in this country, that existed before its passage, and the privilege that our children and their children should be heir too, by virtue of being European Americans.

As much as I would like to include our nationalist ideals to encompass the entire Caucasian race in the world, I feel the better strategy, is that we create our own unique Nationalist movements and parties within our perspective countries, so that unique and specific problems can be better addressed.

Originally Posted by JamesinUSA

As much as I would like to include our nationalist ideals to encompass the entire Caucasian race in the world, I feel the better strategy, is that we create our own unique Nationalist movements and parties within our perspective countries, so that unique and specific problems can be better addressed.

Like it or not, anti-racists have already defined "White countries" for us.


Here's a conversation with an anti-White, a BUGSer just posted on Bob's blog. Sure she is Asian, but all anti-Whites, including the White ones, have this same double standard. We talk to them every day, so we know.

What they Demand for all White countries, they refuse to advocate for non-White countries. They know it is GeNOcide.

dude im asian and i love my culture but white culture is a culture too. dude its okay if the girl wants to date within their culture but its not okay for people putting down interracial dating.
Sweetiegirl18

@Sweetiegirl18 I’m white, I love my race and I wish to preserve it. Racial diversity ends with intermarriage. ONLY white countries are being targeted for a blended humanity. ONLY white children are suffering because of it. The reality is: Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for EVERYBODY. Only white countries are expected to import massive amounts of third world non-white immigrants and assimilate (intermarry) with them: no more white people. It’s genocide.
AusGael

@AusGael wait wasnt i talking to zomiekiller? and dude, there was never a rule or sign that says dont date asians, blacks, middle eastern, ect. it was all choice. how the hell is this genocide? marriage between two people that love each other very much is genocide? white countries is for everyone you say? well have you ever thought about this in a positive way? other races look up to white race because they dont live in third world, they have opportunities, they have power.
Sweetiegirl18

@Sweetiegirl18 As an anti-white – which you clearly are – would you also support the genocide of Asian people via mass non-Asian immigration and assimilation for each and every Asian country or do you only support white genocide?
AusGael

@AusGael as an *******, you really like to see beautiful relationships being tormented by people like you, dont you?
Sweetiegirl18

@Sweetiegirl18 You’re advocating white genocide on the internet. Most normal people find genocide abhorrent and totally unacceptable, but anti-whites like you drool at the prospect of world where there are no more white children. You’re not an anti-racist you’re just an anti-white who wants white genocide. Name a non-white people and justify their genocide as you do for white people.
AusGael

@Sweetiegirl18 Don’t be a coward, Ms Anti-white, answer my question: would you also support the genocide of Asian people via mass non-Asian immigration and assimilation for each and every Asian country or do you only support white genocide?
AusGael

@AusGael i dont need to take commands from someone that tosses the word genocide around like its nothing.
Sweetiegirl18

@Sweetiegirl18 You’re the one demanding white genocide. I was just wondering if you supported the genocide of any races other than white people. You seem afraid to answer my question. Anyone reading this might think that you’re only advocating white genocide. Say it isn’t so. So here’s your opportunity to explain yourself: Would you also support the genocide of Asian people via mass non-Asian immigration and assimilation for each and every Asian country or do you only support white genocide?
AusGael

@AusGael oh hell yeah im trying to avoid your question. thats why i keep commenting back to your comments. and this is my answer: this isnt a genocide. if bunch of pl want to come into asia and date asians, my answer is thank you. thank you for finding my race attractive, and wanting to start a life with asians. its a compliment. and i betcha you are going to go on how it is white genocide arent you? well save some time buddy. if you are so confident go outside and hold a poster.
Sweetiegirl18

@Sweetiegirl18 That is not what I asked. This is not about a handful of people involved in interracial dating. It’s about forcing EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to accept and assimilate with massive numbers of non-white immigrants the create a blended humanity: no more white people. For the fourth time: would you also support the genocide of Asian people via mass non-Asian immigration and assimilation for each and every Asian country or do you only support white genocide?
AusGael

Its been a while, quite a while time to post up some newer articles, there is quite the backlog.

The Neofascist Method: the EDL, Breivik and ‘Double Legality’

1. Introduction: anti-Islamism, pro-Israelism and the European Far Right

The Bush Jr. decade – the 2000s – was ‘the Islam decade’. For the first time in history, the world’s attention was focused on Islamic fundamentalism, or Islamism, and the beliefs and practices of Islam itself, and this attention was, of course, overwhelmingly negative. A loose collection of professional anti-Islamic scholars and publicists appeared – Robert Spencer, Aayan Hirsi, Bat Ye’Or, Bruce Bawer – among others, whose ideas segued in neatly with the agenda of anti-Islamist and pro-Israel Jews such as Michael Savage, Daniel Pipes, Mark Steyn and David Horowitz. ‘Anti-Islamism’ may have begun life as a secularist, humanist, and liberal anti-Islam movement, but, since 2001, has become subordinated to the Israeli ideology and political world-view – particularly that of the Israeli Right, e.g., Likud.

During the 2000s, the Western public – particularly in Europe – at last began to acknowledge that there were huge numbers of Muslim immigrants – around 17 million in the EU alone – in the West. By this point in time, that conclusion – that Muslims, in huge numbers, were living in the cities in Europe, and had more or less taken their neighbourhoods and formed Diaspora Muslim communities, with Muslim values, laws, customs, dress, and so forth – was inescapable. The West saw that what Francis Parker Yockey calls ‘Culture Distortion’ had taken place, on a massive scale, on the streets of Europe. Furthermore, the mass Muslim migration to the West had taken place with the acquiescence and even active encouragement of the élites of Europe – the politicians, academics, journalists, intellectuals, EU bureaucrats (and even economists and business lobbies, who demanded more immigration to deal with the problem of Europe’s ‘ageing population’).
In reaction to this, Western European voters began voting, in increasingly large numbers, for Far Right, and often pro-Israel, populist political parties: the Party of Freedom in Holland, the Danish People’s Party in Denmark, the Freedom Party in Austria, the Swiss People’s Party in Switzerland, the Progress Party in Norway, the True Finns Party in Finland, the Front National in France, the Swedish Democrats in Sweden. Unfortunately, these parties are not run by political theorists and intellectuals – the politician is, by definition, a man of action – and so the platforms of these parties became inflected with the anti-Islamist and Likudnik ideology, culminating in the absurdity of a Dutch nationalist party led by Geert Wilders, a maniacal philo-Semite who declares Israel to be his second favourite country, and who should be regarded as the political representative of the anti-Islamist movement. Wilders insists that anti-Islamism has nothing to do with race, and that indeed the racialism and nationalism of the ‘old’ Far Right has to be rejected. Non-whites, such as Aayan Hirsi, should be embraced so long as they have a principled opposition to Islam (and, ideally, a love of Israel)

....

Here I shall be taking a double-edged approach: while I condemn the ‘Gates of Vienna ‘ ideology of the EDL, I laud their tactics – in particular, their mobilisation of hundreds of young working-class British men to demonstrate in Muslim immigrant areas and confront Muslim, and radical leftist, counter-demonstrators. To me, the EDL is an amorphous, spontaneous mass-movement which has been penetrated, unfortunately, by anti-Islamists with a Likudnik agenda.

Not too bad a piece, particularly calling out the Jewish links, but more recent data to hand since this article has seemed to cement the success by liberal elements in steering it into a civic force.

" Hi all, updating the thread with another Nationalist Alternative article, please read discuss and forward on if you like it.

The article is titled Beware the Fake Opposition – Cowardly Conservatives

"that the vast majority of political discussion generated by the media, is created because someone PAID to say it. It is a fact that is too obvious for many people to notice.The Internet is an exception, which is why both the Government and Big Media are attacking the free flow of ideas and speech.
So when a major “Conservative” columnist, who repeatedly complains about left wing bias in the media, doesn’t ask questions as to why he is still paid, then he either doesn’t care, doesn’t see the problem, or is a sell out. To be a Conservative in mainstream media, one must first accept that one will play by the rules that the mainstream media demands, which usually, almost always, means accepting Political Correctness, if not in heart, then at least in word. To be a Conservative in the mainstream media, one must be what the left consider “Respectable” or “Reasonable”, which means, almost always admitting that Progressivism is the ideological destiny of the west and that this destiny is beyond negotiation


...


“Respectable” Conservatives therefore can’t really and usually don’t oppose Political Correctness. They barely have the courage to properly call out Marxists as the lunatic relics, who may be motived by hate, from a bygone era that they are and never, ever give support for any real opposition to Political Correctness. They usually lead the charge against people who don’t agree with their anti-white agenda masquerading as “anti-racism”. The conservative moment has lost ground, precisely because “Respectable” Conservatives, always, in the end, make the proper propitiations to their PC masters and Liberalism always, in the end, defines what non-PC speech is allowed.

....


This is the sad state of conservative, mainstream right wing politics in the country. You simply cannot critique multi-culturalism if you accept the basic premise that all white nations MUST become multiracial. If you accept this, then what recourse do you have against hate speech? How can you complain about ‘Macedonians’ writing slander against Greeks, when you accept Liberalism’s anti-racism, which is in reality an anti-white movement?
Because “hate speech” laws are a necessity to ensure that white people accept giving away their heritage and future, what right does someone who agrees that white people must accept this future have, in even questioning the laws which make this possible and prevent this program from being thwarted? And even if you don’t accept if, if you agree, that in principle, Western nations should head towards Liberalism, then who are you to argue against Liberals as to how its done?"

Hi all, updating the thread with another Nationalist Alternative article, please read discuss and forward on if you like it.

The article is titled: “White Flight” from schools

“One thing that can be said about the mainstream media, is that concerning real issues, they are often behind the times. “White flight”, a phenomenon which has been around for centuries elsewhere in the world, for quite a few years now in Australia, finally gets a mention in the Sydney Morning Herald.

An article titled “Fears over ‘white flight’ from selective schools” 1 examined the shrinking diversity in elite, selective schools. Dr Christina Ho of the University of Technology Sydney found that what is essentially racial segregation by voluntary means occurring in elite private schools (and no doubt occurring in public schools as well, though the article didn’t touch this). As the article lacks further detail aside from pointing out the obvious, the article itself is not really worth further comment. What is interesting though, is the comments from the readers. If the Internet has done one good thing for news, it’s to allow readers to comment thereby opening up a window to the thoughts of the public on what is being discussed currently. One can learn far more about what’s happening around them, from readers comments than from journalists.

...

A commenter called “Teacher” writes this quite succinct Orwellian comment, summing up Political Correctness’s desire to restrict freedom of speech. With teachers like this teaching Australians, it’s no wonder academic standards are failing. “Teacher” writes…
“Australia should stop asking questions about race because race questions lead to race statistics, statistics lead to racist theories and racist theories lead to divisive and offensive articles like this, and to racist policies.”
Commenter “Bourkie” writes…
“If they were born in Australia then they are Australian; they all have Australian accents. The racist ‘White Australia’ policy based on false supremacy of europeans (implying inferiority of asians and indians) has been proven wrong. These stats only prove one thing, and one thing alone – tall poppy much?”
So if “inferiority” of Asians has been proven wrong, then is this commenter implying they are superior? Besides, the ‘White Australia’ policy was not based on simple ideas of supremacy, but rather the idea that this nation was created by and belonged to whites. Discriminatory immigration practices have much more to do with ensuring the prosperity of the people who take part in the nation, than in some notion that others are simply inferior. It is Politically Incorrect to view the “White Australia” policy as anything other than simple minded. “Teacher” says so.

...

The Western attitude towards education and work has historically paid off very well, producing without a doubt, among the most, or what was once among the most enviable societies on the planet. “White Flight” may be partly driven by feelings of alienation, partly by a lack of a desire to compete with the offspring of “Tiger Mums” and partly, and perhaps most importantly, a realization that the practices and attitudes that we are importing are from places less desirable than ours, and their adoption here may very well make our own society a less desirable, less humane place to live.
We are certainly on the way down that path, as we are being asked to give up our Western ideals, even our very own racial existence, for the benefit of a few greedy autocrats and for social experimentation of the misguided Marxist left. The self guilt and self hatred that has been pushed onto us has made us devalue the ideals which created a society the second and third world want to flock to, and made us discard them out of guilt, self punishment and undeserved feelings of inferiority. Quality of life, making life itself worth living is no longer the goal and ideal it was once, and we are adopting more and more an ideal where life is something to be ‘endured’, and one where the harder done by you are, the better you are.”

Hi guys, just updating you on another great Nationalist Alternative article.

Overpaid, and loving it.

Here are some excerpts:

"The world is stagnating after the Global Financial Crisis of 2008. The cowboy bandits of Wall Street, the architects of the GFC, perhaps the only accomplishment outside of growing their own portfolio, got off basically scott free. Many are expecting Global Financial Crisis Mark II. As every cloud comes with a proverbial silver lining, the silver lining around the clouds of the financial storm is the increased awareness of people that something is wrong, and something needs to be done. Discussion about the flaws of our financial system are propelled by the sense of urgency and despair.

...

An article in The Age¹ by the economics writer for the Sydney Morning Herald titled "Top Bosses' riches are undeserved" doesn't just call into question whether our top CEO's are overpaid, but openly states they aren't. A bold move, for a mainstream publication. Her argument is that in Australia, we have many Oligopolies, and that making a profit in an Oligopoly isn't that hard. Corner the market, and you have your customers hostage.

Our greatest period of economic growth and prosperity, a period when the standard of living was on the increase, rather than the current trend downwards, was during a period when high incomes were taxed quite thoroughly, and where CEO remuneration where closer to that of average worker than today. Arguments that we NEED to pay our CEO's exorbitant ransoms fall flat as soon as one realises that our current economy is in a miserable state. The large quantities of money that CEO's rake in and pull from our economy seems inversely proportional to the health of our economy. Given the sick state of Western economies, we are clearly paying big amounts for nothing, yet CEO's, like snotty school children stamp their feet down and demand more and more, lest they leave.

They know where the door is.

...

There are people who are worthy of being wealthy. People who are truly entrepreneurs, who actually create a business and enhance the nation. Australians are not succumbing to "tall poppy syndrome", but are rightfully outraged at what is essentially hoarding through unproductive means wealth. They are outraged that our nation, our livelihoods and futures are being stripped so someone who knows where their next thousand hot meals are coming from, and has already a lifestyle better than pretty much any human who ever lived, can get even more.

True entrepreneurs are people like Dick Smith, who has added to our business sphere, who has supported the nation which game him such opportunity. Even now Dick Smith is still supporting the nation, arguing against our unsustainable population growth and supporting Australian made products by offering Australian made and owned varieties of popular foreign owned goods. Dick Smith is an example of the type of wealthy person we could use more of, people who's personal wealth represents the wealth that that person adds to our nation."

1http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/top-bosses-riches-are-undeserved-20111101-1mttj.html?comments=302#comments

Just updating you on another Nationalist Alternative article.

Nationalists and the Markets

'You have to choose between trusting the natural stability of gold and the honesty and intelligence of members of the government. With due respect for these gentlemen, I advise you, as long as the capitalist system lasts, to vote for gold'.

--George Bernard Shaw, 1928

"Introduction

What is wrong with the Western world economies today? Why is there a financial crisis?

In day-to-day reporting of economic and financial events, we heard a lot of phrases which have become clichés. Among them are the following recommendations, on courses of action, which come from politicians, journalists, economists worldwide: 'We must lower interest rates to stimulate spending'; 'We must raise interest rates to cool down the overheating economy'; 'We must raise interest rates to strengthen the dollar'; 'We must increase government deficits to put more money in the pockets of consumers, to encourage them to spend'. This sort of language, and thinking, makes up the Keynesian school of thought which has dominated economic thinking in the West, and the world, for the past sixty or so years.

Before that period, though, classical economics was the dominant paradigm. Politicians, intellectuals, journalists, economists, bankers, businessmen, all spoke the language of the gold standard. (Marx wrote the first few chapters of his 'Das Kapital' on gold and currency). This article will be more or less about the same thing. However, some readers may find it disorienting, simply because they are so used to Keynesianism, which has become part of the air we breathe. Rest assured, the economics of the matter are very simple, and I myself have no economic training - what I am writing about here I have learned from contemporary popular authors and journalists on the subject.

...

The present situation

One would think that 2008's disastrous monetary episode would bring pause to the world's central bankers and make them rethink monetarism and Keynesianism, but no. Bernanke's response - an orthodox Keynesian/monetarist one - was to begin a program of 'quantitative easing', that is, pumping huge amounts of money into circulation. The Federal Reserve perceived, correctly, that the crash of 2008 was mainly because of the liquidity; so it reversed course, and began adding huge amounts of that liquidity. It overshot the mark, however, and the US dollar was again devalued to an enormous degree: the gold-dollar price climbed to over $US1900/oz. this year, beating all records. Even the Australian dollar is now worth more than the American.

...

Options for Australia
Can't Australia return to a gold standard? In truth, gold standards only work for very large countries (or economic zones, e.g., the Eurozone).

Supposing that, for instance, the Australian Reserve Bank had maintained its currency at $AU550/oz. from 2004, while the rest of the world (Russia, China, America, Britain, the Eurozone) went on to devalue theirs. Australia's currency would, more or less, be gold, and, in effect, become Australia's most valuable export. All the rest of Australia's industry would be crushed. At present exchange rates, one Australia dollar would have bought $US3.16.


One option (to solve this) for Australia is to form a 'Pacific Union' with New Zealand and the Pacific countries, with one currency (similarly, it has been suggested, in the Scandinavian press, that Sweden, Norway and Denmark form a 'Nordic Union'). In such a union, perhaps, a gold standard perhaps can be implemented, because the currency area is big enough.

In the interim, however, Australia's best course of action would be to abandon interest-rate targeting and take up the policy of fixed exchange rates with a larger trading partner - e.g., Japan, which has, at the moment, a strong currency. The Reserve Bank would expand, or contract, the supply of dollars to meet the exchange rate target, that is, to keep the dollar fixed to the yen. (In just the same way, the Reserve Bank expands or contracts the dollar supply in order to keep the overnight interest rate fixed at, say, 4.75%).

...

The only difference between us, however, and the mainstream writers on these subjects is: we nationalists look for the deeper underlying causes of things. An everyday economist or journalist will look at what happened to the world once it left gold; a nationalist, on the other hand, should be asking why - what were the underlying racial (and spiritual) causes?"

Hi Guys, here's some excerpts from another Nationalist Alternative article I found at their website (Nationalist Alternative). It's titled: Constitutional Change: Liberalism, Liebler’s List and the coming Police State


The freedom of Australians to speak freely, particularly those of European/white heritage (the founders, builders, the people who comprised 98% of those who fought and died in two world wars, creators of the country that is so appealing it attracted thousands of migrants and currently still the majority demographic of ‘Australia’) is under threat, again, from Liberalism’s zeal to end any debate on multiculturalism in the name of ‘anti-racism’. A national debate is raging over a panels proposed change to the constitution, though one would hardly know it, as the public is taking very little part in the debate. The argument is about a 300 page report which contains proposed changes to the constitution to move racist sections and a recommendation to add a clause prohibiting racial discrimination.

The report was delivered to Canberra by Melbourne lawyer, Mark Liebler, (former President of the President of the Zionist Federation of Australia and apparently the National Chairman of lobby group: Australia Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) ) who Co-Chaired the Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. In a letter which was submitted to Parliament, Leibler writes

“When it was approved one hundred and twelve years ago, the Australian Constitution established the rules for governing one of the most prosperous, peaceful and democratic nations in the world. However, the Constitution understandably reflects the values and beliefs of the time it was drafted. The Founding Fathers deserve our gratitude and respect. But their perspectives – including those on race – were of the 19th Century, not the 21st.”

Mr Leibler doesn’t elucidate why perspectives have changed, very few Liberals ever do. It is merely to be taken for granted that 19^th Century views are to be discarded, and that the ‘view’ of the 21^st century conflicts with our nations constitution. This is a common line exploited by the left, the “It’s 2012, not 1812” argument, one hollow and meaningless. An argument which is supposed to impress upon the reader the modernity of their views in contract with their opponents archaic views, without ever having to explain why it is that the supposed modern views are to supplant the old ones.

....

What is particularly chilling is that Mark Leibler was the chairman of the Australia-Israel Jewish Affairs Council, the magazine’s [The Australian Israel Review] publisher back in 1998 That’s right ! The same man who in 2011-12 has Co-Chaired the Panel on Constitutional Change that this article discusses. Liebler was quoted in The Daily Telegraph 1998

"the decision to publish the list of members and donors was in the interests of “political transparency”.

We wonder if he would have the same attitude to transparency if a group obtained and then published in full or in part the membership lists of various Jewish advocacy groups?


The Sydney Daily Telegraph published the astonishing news on July 9 1998 under an angry banner headline that shouted LEIBLER’ LIST. “The presentation associated with the list invites vilification” the newspaper editorialized and “The McCarthy-like imputation is that these people in some way transgressed, their beliefs — like those of communist sympathisers in the United States in the 1950s — are deemed to be a danger to the state.” Interestingly a cartoon in The Sydney Daily Telegraph compared what was named by some as ‘ Lieblers List’ with the Nazis of 1938. What is also notable, is how Leibler can sit idle and take part in harassment against people because of their political beliefs. Harassment which has led to physical violence, persecution and public ‘shaming’. The very activity that Leibler should know very well, doesn’t accord with a free and open society. Yet here he sides with those that would persecute and attack someone based on their beliefs. Irony or hypocrisy?

Just updating you guys on an article posted on the Nationalist Alternative website. It was initially posted back during the "woman hurling vile-racist-abuse" saga in Britain. A separate but similar incident recently lead to a woman being jailed for 21 weeks...a poignant reminder not only of the authorities' real priories but their lingering fear of white racial awareness and desire for self determination.

"A peoples voice is dangerous, when charged with wrath" - Aeschylus

The angry, suppressed voice of Britain.


" Recently in England, a lady on public transport did something that according to our intellectual superiors, no mentally stable, sane person should ever do. What she did was sick, sick enough to warrant YouTube videos from disgusted citizenry, complete with the standard leftist affectations and ‘hand to the forehead’ gestures that come with morally righteous indignation. She didn’t rip a pensioner out of her life savings, or leave a screaming child in a hot car. What she did was worse, pure heresy, heinous. She had the gall to be upset at the demographic trashing of her national identity. She was guilty of being unhappy that her ethnic group is disappearing. For shame!There we have it, England today. A woman on public transport with her child, seeing the future of her home country, perhaps wondering what place her child has in this demographic morass, gets upset as anyone who cares would, and lets loose. This woman, who allegedly hurled racial abuse at people of a “diverse” background was arrested after passengers had filmed her and posted the video online. The video can be viewed here www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzJMPlMrUQA.

In an earlier article, “Cowardly Conservatives”, Michael Kennedy writes about how the Labor party of the UK was using non white immigration as a means of attacking the right and forcing multi-racialism upon Britain. So unfortunately the states genocide against its own indigenous population continues, with opposition to this genocide being essentially illegal, through “hate speech” laws, called “hate” laws, because one must be full of hate against the Western world and its people in order to them to support it.


....This is a sorry state for any nation to be in. "

Thanks for the article. The behavior of this woman is a refection of the frustration that is being felt by millions of White people all around the world. And whether one should agree or not agree with the time and place, and especially with a small child in tow, I think that we nationalist can all agree, that she didn't deserve the persecution that she was subjected to on the part of the authorities.

The continuing vicissitudes of the white race's fortune has prompted many good people to action in order to stem the tide of our dissipation. While these circumstances are a perpetual source of motivation, they can leave one somewhat depressed! This illuminates the need for "positive" activism, which is the subject of the following Nationalist Alternative article.

The necessity of positive activism and supporting the Sea Shepherd


"A core aim of Nationalist Alternative is to safeguard the heritage and identity of the Australian people and culture within the biodiversity of the entire planet. Our appreciation of diverse life must extend beyond the human species and hence includes the various flora and fauna of this vast continent and nearby oceans. In keeping with this mandate, Nationalist Alternative activists have put together over $250 worth of supplies for the activists of the Sea Shepherd.

‘Sea Shepherd are a volunteer based organisation that uses innovative direct-action tactics to investigate, document, and take action when necessary to expose and confront illegal activities on the high seas. By safeguarding the biodiversity of our delicately-balanced ocean ecosystems, Sea Shepherd works to ensure their survival for future generations.’

This article does not concentrate on other elements of their philosophy but specifically supports the direct action they take in protecting and thereby preserving the various forms of whales and other oceanic life in the southern oceans. Indeed their activism is congruent with one of our stickers – Radical Autonomous Resistance
Why positive Nationalism is necessary
The old paradigms associated with Nationalism reflect an image of fear-mongering and negativity which is perpetuated by the media and other self-serving interests. These outdated portrayals consist of angry individuals, namely white single males from poor socioeconomic backgrounds, who’s single modus operandi is to ‘protest’ or ‘oppose’. Nationalism has been given a bad name, and in some respects it’s well deserved. If Nationalism were personified as a friend, it would quite often be perceived as complaining, negative and dysfunctional. Too often activism performed by Nationalists is seen as contrary or in opposition of something, rather than being supportive and nurturing of the things worthy of respect, admiration and love. In a previous article written by Michael Kennedy, he clearly stated “To love your country, make it more lovable.” The same can be said of Nationalism. To love Nationalism, make it more loveable.
Positivity breeds positivity
Louise Hay, a renowned author, has an underlying philosophy of positive affirmation, where she believes strongly in the metaphysical law of attraction. According to Wikipedia:

The law of attraction is a metaphysical belief that “like attracts like“, that positive and negative thinking bring about positive and negative physical results, respectively. According to the law of attraction, the phrase “I need more money” allows the subject to continue to “need more money”. If the subject wants to change this they would focus their thoughts on the goal (having more money) rather than the problem (needing more money). This might take the form of phrases such as “I do have more money” or “I will have more money”.

For Nationalists, rather than the only form of activism being testosterone fuelled and combative, a positive and supporting form of Nationalist activism is also needed. Changing negative stereotypes is a matter of being unashamedly involved and committed to the community. In each action you take, you are representing what it means to be a Nationalist to the community. Act as though you are the only Nationalist an individual might meet in their lifetime. This means working positively and positively working in a community which not only doesn’t share your values, your beliefs or ideals, but is openly hostile towards you.

Nationalism is paradoxically thought to be about segregation from the community. However, as the law of attraction clearly demonstrates, society will always reflect those who are willing to engage in it. Positive activism will support and cultivate goodwill, which in turn will cultivate and support Nationalism. For this reason, Nationalist Alternative seeks to engage in more regular positive activism, that supports various causes of environmental and social significance."

Here's another Nationalist Alternative article that cuts through the language used by our pollies, right down to the blatant ideological hypocrisy that is so congenial to these media harlots.


Anti-racism is anti-white, whichever way you cut it. Whether you are ‘tolerating’ sustained mass immigration, or wanting to ban any event which could be construed as ‘pro-white’. Political Correctness says white people must go, and anyone who disagrees isn’t just wrong, but should be marginalized, fined, or even jailed.

It would seem the Independent member for Burnett, Rob Messenger agrees. He has launched an online petition to protest the Hammered Music Festival which is a supposedly neo-Nazi event. You can see the flyer for the event here, State won't stop 'morons' from gathering neo-Nazi Hammered music festival in Brisbane | The Courier-Mail . Rob Messenger and those like him should ask the real questions, What is Racism, What is Neo Nazism? If investigated honestly they would quickly find they are mere labels designed to shut down any expression of appreciation and pride in ones ancestry and heritage. Something available to all people groups, except apparently those of European descent.

...


This concert is a fairly insignificant even in the scheme of things. Most Australians would have never heard of it, and its impact on others is negligible. There are quite simply no real consequences to letting these people have their concert, as evidenced by the fact that they have been held before around Australia and nothing has happened as a result. The proposed laws which Mr Messenger is agitating for though, could have real consequences for Citizen rights to speak on issues and concerns that affect their families, nation and our collective future. Mr Messenger’s ideas in our opinion reek of Stalinist authoritarianism and are a dangerous threat to a free progressive society.

Hi all, updating the thread with another Nationalist Alternative article, please read discuss and forward on if you like!
This Excerpt is from the article titled:

Nationalist Cities of the Future and the A-A-A plan

"Why is it, for instance, that cities like Melbourne and Sydney – cities in one of the richest countries in the world, with the best standard of living – are so ugly? Why do the people seem so pinched and frustrated? (One can tell a lot from someone else’s body language: one can tell what they’re feeling and thinking. My observations are based on my everyday experience with most working Melbournites). One can blame Facebook, Twitter, mobile phones, SMS-texting; as well as that, there are crowds. (On that note, quite a few economists and demographers see crowds, population increase and immigration as being beneficial to ‘the economy’ and ‘growth’: perhaps they are – but they are not beneficial to human beings).

Really, though, I put it down to at least three reasons:

1) The first is cars. Today’s cities, in the West and elsewhere, are built on top of highways, throughways and parking lots. In Melbourne CBD, cars can come out at pedestrians (viz., human beings) at all four directions: one can be walking along a footpath (a sidewalk, to Americans) and suddenly be barged into a car emerging from the entrance to a fifty-floor carpark building, or perhaps a little alleyway (which the driver has decided, sneakily, to drive his car along). On top of that, cars have the right to go through traffic lights, even when pedestrians are crossing. Often, even when crossing the (always busy) road at a green ‘go’ signal, one risks being run down by an impatient driver. So one can’t walk across the road; one has to dash – for one’s life.

2) The second reason for our spiritual discontent is, of course, immigration. One particular sub-class of immigrant, which I won’t name here (out of political correctness), almost always dresses shabbily, but flaunts expensive mobile phones – which on which the male of that sub-class jibber-jabbers, for hours, to his brethren back in his home country. In the ‘old’ Australia, certain classes of immigrant used to be, well, quiet; but now that they are congregating here, in huge numbers, they tend to be unrestrained, noisy, boisterous among their own kind. (Certainly, we humans can be uninhibited when part of a large group).

3) The third reason, for the absence of calm in our lives, is: animals. As a society which (like all human societies for the past million years or so) exploits, kills, tortures and consumes animals, we are generating (what a hippie would call) ‘bad karma’ for ourselves. In fact, were I an occultist type, I would say that the sum of collective animal suffering, in our cities and suburbs, generates ‘psychic waves’ which disturbs the ‘psychic ether’. Our survival and well-being, in the 21st century, doesn’t depend on hurting, killing and eating animals: for an Eskimo in his igloo, or Grizzly Adams in his mountain shack, one has to kill animals to survive; in Melbourne, Sydney, New York, London, Berlin, one doesn’t.

We whites, in short, have devised a trap for ourselves. I often see a kind of discontent on the faces of immigrant families, when I pass them in the street. I wonder if the source of that discontent is disillusionment with their lives here in Australia: the feeling that they have been sold a false bill of goods. Not only does the white man not like them very much (certain immigrant groups are always complaining, vocally, of how Australians are “racist” and how Australians “discriminate” against them); but perhaps the white man’s life isn’t so good, after all. They have the accouterments of the white Australian – a massive mortgage, a mobile phone, middle-class welfare payments for having children, the dreadful morning and evening commute, the chance to shop at an outer-suburban mall on weekends – but this life really isn’t so great. "

In this article Wade Chambers discusses whether the NSDAP, if around today, would win an election with its extant policies. Also (with particular relevance today as Muslim's riot worldwide) if Islam will/can replace the communism of the 1920 and 30's as the target of fascist energies. Read the full article at Nationalist Alternative

Why I am not a National Socialist: or, do we need ‘Neo-Nazism’ any more?




" Would anyone vote for Hitler, were he alive today? Let us perform a thought-experiment: suppose that, by a miracle, Hitler and the NSDAP were around today, in the year 2012. Despite the NSDAP’s chequered history (the mass gassing of 8 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals and others, in giant gas chambers disguised as showers and vans; turning those said people into, according to the Nuremberg trial, bars of soap, lampshades, upholstery, pocketbooks, gloves and other items), all the party’s past excesses are forgiven. Hitler and the NSDAP are allowed to run on the same electoral platform as they did in the 1930s. How successful would they be?"

....

" So, in 2012, we live in a West without communism. Which brings us to the next topic: fascism and the street-fighting man. In an article by Donald Winters, (‘The Neofascist Method’, at: The Neofascist Method: the EDL, Breivik and ‘Double Legality’ ), the topic of fascism and its tradition of association combat with communist opponents is explored. Just as Islamism relies upon terrorism as method for gaining power, fascism relied upon a violent, theatrical and paramilitarised confrontation, played out in public, with communism. The fascist strategy was obvious. The resulting social and political chaos, brought about by the confrontation (bordering on civil war), destabilises liberal democratic governments. This, in turn, leads to the opening of the field, so to speak, in politics: radical, extra-parliamentary movements, like fascism or communism, have the chance of seizing power from a weak, embattled liberal democratic government. (Liberal democracy is ‘suspended’ by the new fascist government in the interests of upholding ‘law and order’ and ‘decency’). It was a simple enough method – so simple that even the most dim-witted brownshirt or blackshirt could understand it – and, at the time, extremely effective.
One of the theses of the Winters article was that, possibly, the fascist method could be transposed to the present: Islamism could take the place of communism, and a series of highly stylised, ritualised and theatrical street confrontations with Islamism could destabilise liberal democracy – just as the fascist and communist confrontations did in the 1920s and 1930s.
This is logical enough: after all, it is fairly easy to draw comparisons between Islamism and communism. Both are dogmatic; both are intolerant of opposing creeds and religions; both are hierarchical and led from the top down (clerics and mullahs, Marxist intellectuals and philosopher-kings); both have a large compendium of theoretical texts behind them, ‘holy scriptures’ (Marx, Engels, Lenin for one, the Koran on the other); both have millions of fanatical adherents willing to die for the cause; both, once they are implemented, have a terrible record when it comes to liberalism, human rights and basic freedoms (all of which are taken for granted in the West); both are politically active and want to control their immediate environments (and the people in them); both use subversion, violence and extra-parliamentary activities in order to achieve that control; both are – and this is the most important thing – willing to come out, in large numbers, and fight fascists in the street. "

Hi Guys, here's another Nationalist Alternative article I found interesting.

Animal Cruelty and Kosher/Halal slaughter, by Ryan Walsh


Nationalist Alternative condemns the exemption to pre-stunning slaughter methods extended on religious grounds to Kosher and Halal as a further example of multiculturalism in action. We have previously published an article on live export and our support for pre slaughter stunning Australia wide in an effort to improve animal welfare.

.....

We condemn such practices as barbaric, inhumane, cruel and a affront to Australian morality and further examples of multiculturalism NOT enriching Australian culture. Some fellow opponents of ritual slaughter may baulk or sidestep our inclusion of multiculturalism with this issue but they are clearly linked particularly when some supporters claim their religion or culture demands/obligates this practice and that they would be discriminated against or lead ‘less fulfilling lives’ if not allowed to continue.

.....

We call to STOP ALL SLAUGHTER of ANIMALS that are NOT FULLY, PERMANENTLY STUNNED and UNCONSCIOUS PRIOR to throat slitting.
There is no use being tricked into the often decades long slow reform path of ‘ compromise ‘ with the supporters of religious slaughter.
Politically correct politicians need to gain some backbone and ensure there are no exemptions for anyone and simply weather the minority lobby groups attempts to cry foul inevitability with the old chestnuts of ‘anti semitism or islamaphobia’ and ‘ how can we possibly live without these exemptions’ et al. In 2012 general citizens are slowly waking up to the fact that these labels are merely attempts to shut down discussion and close down opponents without debating them.
We would invite those proponents of such slaughter to emigrate to lands where these methods and values hold sway.