Thread: Woman convicted of police veil-lifting lie set to go free

Carnita Matthews, covered centre, is shielded by a group of men yesterday.

A MAGISTRATE had described the Muslim woman's crime as ''malicious'' and ''ruthless'' and sentenced her to six months' jail for falsely accusing a police officer of trying to rip off her veil during a random breath test.

Yesterday, flanked by a scrum of about 20 men screaming ''Allahu Akbar'' (God is great), Carnita Matthews again emerged from court, having successfully appealed against her conviction of knowingly making a false complaint.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/woman-conv...#ixzz1PqVASI4C

And the Police screamed from the ugliness and smell and put the veil back over her face! Get over it - you are NOW in Australia, where women have the right to be seen in public and you dick is small and you are jealous of our White men!

"Carnita Matthews" surely isn't a born Arab/Muslim, so we know that this must be a convert... oh so sad.

DJ Australia May Use Fingerprints To ID Burqa Wearers

http://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/markets/newsfeeditem.aspx?id=146256521464308

Originally Posted by Robertvincent

DJ Australia May Use Fingerprints To ID Burqa Wearers

Australian police are considering using fingerprints to identify people wearing face-covering veils, after a judge said he couldn't be sure a burqa-clad woman was who she told police she was.

The judge said this week that a case against Carnita Matthews, who a magistrate earlier found had made a false complaint against police, couldn't be upheld partly because he couldn't be sure she had made the complaint.

http://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/markets/newsfeeditem.aspx?id=146256521464308

Can't ID fingerprints after the bomb has blasted!

Originally Posted by AustralianLily

Can't ID fingerprints after the bomb has blasted!

No, but it would be cool if they did it beforehand, especially if these people were in protests or something. But what do I know.

THE woman who won an appeal over her conviction for making a deliberately false statement that a policeman tried to lift her burqa will now seek legal costs. ...

Judge Jeffreys said that the prosecution had failed to prove two aspects of the charge "beyond a reasonable doubt".

He said there wasn't enough evidence it was Ms Matthews who handed in the written complaint to Campbelltown police station and, even if it were, there wasn't enough evidence to prove that she "intentionally, deliberately and purposefully" made a false complaint.



A factor that the prosecution had relied on was the fact the signature on the statutory declaration matched that on Ms Matthew's licence, but Mr Jeffreys said he thought there were "a number of differences" between the two.

As Judge Jeffreys yesterday delivered his reason for upholding Ms Matthews' appeal, her legal team indicated that they would apply for costs.

Ms Matthews' lawyer Stephen Hopper said a costs application would be filed.

"We haven't calculated all of that yet (but) our costs are fairly modest because both (Ms Matthews's barrister Phillip Boulten SC) and I did it at a reduced fee because of Mrs Matthews' circumstances," Mr Hopper said.

The Daily Telegraph's online poll yesterday showed an overwhelming majority of people thought police should have the power to demand women lift their burqa for identity purposes. Of 12,600 votes, 96.5 per cent were in favour, while 3.4 per cent thought it was inappropriate.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/new...-1226080397075

Regardless of who signed the false complaint against Sen-Constable Fogarty, it was the intimidating behaviour of some of Matthews’ male supporters outside court this week that was most offensive.
The bearded men who chanted “Allah akbar” (Allah is great) as they marched roughshod on cameramen weren’t behaving normally.
Their theatrics were a declaration of war – on Australia, on the media, on police.
Linking arms and striding down the street, chanting the phrase we have heard terrorists utter when they plough a plane into a building or commit some other appalling crime, was a show of power by people who only seem to want to obey their god.
It looked like a direct challenge to Australian law and order.
We increasingly see the same challenge whenever a hardline Islamist appears in court, as the call goes out for “brothers” to run “protection” for the accused.
Matthews’ husband, Hamdi Abu Ibrahim, sent out the call on his Facebook page this week and later thanked: “All the hero’s (sic) and lions of Allah whom (sic) had the chance to come to the court and fight for the sake of Allah . . . Allah has granted your oppressed sister victory over his enemies and he granted us a judge that from the word go he was defending your sister where everyone else was determined to see her jailed, but Allah had other plans. They plot, but Allah is the best of plotters.”
His Facebook page, which had the profile picture of a bloodied fist replaced yesterday by a handcuffed figure in a burqa, contains messages from supporters such as: “Allah akbar, may all the pigs burn in hell inshallah”.

http://www.faithfreedom.org/features...ly-head-again/

Originally Posted by apteryx

It looked like a direct challenge to Australian law and order.
We increasingly see the same challenge whenever a hardline Islamist appears in court, as the call goes out for “brothers” to run “protection” for the accused.
http://www.faithfreedom.org/features...ly-head-again/

You hit the nail on the head here mate. You see this countless times when muslims have to goto court.
It's disgraceful behaviour from people who want nothing more than to destroy our laws and culture and to turn this country in to an Islamic nation.

Originally Posted by Sigrid

No, but it would be cool if they did it beforehand, especially if these people were in protests or something. But what do I know.

Maybe all the fingerprints and a DNA sample. Carnita Matthews, if found guilty, would have been severely beaten by her now crowing husband.

Originally Posted by apteryx

"We haven't calculated all of that yet (but) our costs are fairly modest because both (Ms Matthews's barrister Phillip Boulten SC) and I did it at a reduced fee because of Mrs Matthews' circumstances," Mr Hopper said.

Exactly what circumstances are they?

Liberal traitors.

The police should never have accepted the complaint in the first place without confirming the ID of the complainant. Why not accept complaints from anonymous callers ringing from a public phone box?

Originally Posted by leon_the_14

The police should never have accepted the complaint in the first place without confirming the ID of the complainant. Why not accept complaints from anonymous callers ringing from a public phone box?

That is a good point.We need to ban the burqua. Simple as that. Deport those violent scum that met this liar outseide court would also be a good start. This just makes me hate them more.
Another thing...Allah is not great and he is not God..

Originally Posted by AustralianLily

Great picture AustralianLily.

Originally Posted by Sigrid

"Carnita Matthews" surely isn't a born Arab/Muslim, so we know that this must be a convert... oh so sad.

I don't look at it as so much sad as pathetic. This woman is nothing but a race traitor and deserves to be treated as such. I'd love to see that veil ripped off her head and shoved....They have no place is our society.

I've heard 2 stories, 1st that shes a filo muzzie, 2nd is that shes a south african coloured.
Love to know how she got her surname

Originally Posted by leon_the_14

I've heard 2 stories, 1st that shes a filo muzzie, 2nd is that shes a south african coloured.
Love to know how she got her surname

Does it really matter what she is? She should be deplored, no matter what's under the veil.