Thread: Evidence Emerges Chief Law Commissar Roberts Pulled a Souter-like Flip Flop At the Last Minute!

Astounding! Simply astounding.

Did somebody threaten Roberts w/ revealing his homosexual past(present?) ....or just show him a photoshopped photo of the Chief "Justice" on life-support in some hospital?

Why on Earth would somebody flip at the last second? Presumably there were several meetings at the Supreme Court over this beforehand ...... they had three historic days of theatrical oral arguments ....and the snarky harridan Ruth Bader-Ginsburg did make an astonishing "prediction" a few days ago that the American people would be "surprised" by the decision. Did Antonin Scalia Write The Original Majority Opinion On Obamacare? - Business Insider

Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito Dissent: 'We Cannot Rewrite the Statute to Be What It Is Not' | The Weekly Standard




Conspiracy Planet - Humor - Chief Justice John Roberts: How Gay Is He?

http://underneaththeirrobes.blogs.co...rist_for_.html

I don’t think Souter is the best one to compare Roberts with, unless we are talking about sexual proclivities.

There have been a lot of douchebags on the court over the years, but before Ike put the reprehensible Earl Warren in place, there were several Chief Justices who were real protectors of the citizen’s constitutional rights, from Taney to Stone. There were some bad Chiefs during the first century and a half, the worst being, as you might expect, the one most school children are led to believe was so great, John Marshall.

Marshall was the fourth and longest serving, holding the position for almost 35 years. All the damage the court has done in the last half century can be traced to Marshall. He is the prototype for Roberts. Most of the damage can be traced to the two decisions that we are told were Marshall’s greatest contributions, Marbury v Madison and McCullough v Maryland.

In the former, Marshall claimed for the court the power to declare laws passed by Congress and signed by a President unconstitutional. With the glaring exception of Andrew Jackson, Congresses and Presidents have allowed this spurious claim to stand for over 200 years, giving us the judicial tyranny we have suffered so much under this last 60 years.

The second case I mentioned lays the foundation for BOTH of Roberts’ awful decisions this month. In deciding against Maryland, Marshall laid down the principal that a state couldn’t interfere with anything Congress did, which was the reed upon which the present gang of crooks leaned in their decision striking down Arizona’s attempt to stop the mestizo invasion.

Marshall also stated in MCullough that congress could delegate its sovereignty to a non-governmental agency if it so desired. This referred to the first Bank of the United States, of which McCullough was an officer. This is why no one has taken a case to the Supreme Court asking that the Federal Reserve by disestablished. They know that the Court will just quote Marshall in McCullough and toss them out.

This is also the principle Roberts uses in upholding the most egregious part of Obamacare, the mandate, calling it a tax. After all, if Congress can delegate to a private bank its power to create money, it can delegate its taxing power to the Banksters and the insurance companies they own.

Of course Roberts doesn’t say his recent decisions spring from these two cases, but now you know the rest of the story.

Face it folks, things have been screwed up for a very long time. It’s just that our masters have not previously felt powerful enough to take full advantage. Now they have.