Thread: Jesse Ventura Explains Why Governments Are Like Gangs and Owned by the Corporations

Another recent interview of Jesse Ventura about the state of the nation:

KR: Okay. What about this: Tea Party or Occupy Wall Street?
JV: Occupy Wall Street definitely.

KR: Why?
JV: Tea Party is owned by the Koch brothers. The grassroots supporters of the Tea Party will never get what they want, unless they think lower corporate taxes and oligarchy are the answers to their prayers. Occupy is still marginally independent. I attended a Minnesota Occupy rally five different times. I handed out hand warmers. At the time, we were cheering on the Arab Spring protesters and pepper spraying our own protesters at home. Park ordinance didn’t allow them to even have generators at night to keep them warm. But there was one generator that was allowed to run, and that was the one that was powering the surveillance camera that was keeping an eye on them.
KR: Occupy seems to be weakening. They don’t have the monied interests behind them. Is the Tea Party relevant anymore?
JV: I think they are still relevant. They got a lot of people elected, but they are not the answer.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoz...-paddleboards/

He should be leading the independent/third party revolt, instead he wants to surf in Mexico...

KR: What’s your political future?
JV: None. People ask me to run again. I’d rather be surfing in Mexico for four to five months a year.
KR: That sounds much better. I think every ex-President would agree with that. Let’s change the subject. What happened with “Conspiracy Theory”?

OWS? Really?

I'll agree the Tea Party has been subverted or taken over, but OWS? I don't know. Most of the YouTube videos I watched that covered OWS, the people protesting had no idea what they were protesting about. Heck, in some places they were supporting communisim. If OWS was serious, they would have thrown these bums right off the street. Think I'm kidding, just search YouTube for 'communists at occupy wall street', there are pages of videos.

If we're going to get together and occupy/protest somewhere, it needs to be right on Capitol Hill. The bankers aren't going to change a damn thing on their own, only a political movement can do that.

Just like some of the Tea Parties with the Koch brothers, a lot of the OWS protests were "sponsored" by Soros and other globalist interests:

George Soros Funds Occupy Wall Street


10/21/2011 03:01 AM

Radical anti-American billionaire George Soros is a major backer of a left-wing group that is funneling money to the Occupy Wall Street movement.

The nonprofit organization at the receiving end of Soros’ largesse, Alliance for Global Justice, is managing donations benefiting the communists, socialists, anarchists and hippies now occupying Zuccotti Park in lower Manhattan. As of Oct. 19, OWS had taken in a grand total of $435,000 from all sources, including donations made by individuals online and in person, according to reports.

It should surprise no one that Soros (net worth: $22 billion), the ultimate Wall Street insider and preeminent funder of the activist Left today, embraces Occupy Wall Street.

As I note in my new book Subversion Inc., this Communist sympathizer co-founded the ultra-secretive Democracy Alliance, a billionaires’ club that wants to radically transform America. He has said that European-style socialism “is exactly what we need now” and favors American decline. Soros, a currency manipulator with an insider-trading conviction, praises Red China effusively, saying the totalitarian nation has “a better-functioning government than the United States.”

The Alliance for Global Justice has received grants from George Soros’ philanthropy, the Open Society Institute ($100,000 since 2004), and from the left-wing, money launderers of the Tides Foundation ($60,000 since 2004) that allows high-profile donors to give secretly to radical causes.

Much of the money received by the Tides network of philanthropies has come from Soros’ charity, according to philanthropy databases.

http://www.humanevents.com/2011/10/2...y-wall-street/

Originally Posted by Tom Smith

OWS? Really?

I'll agree the Tea Party has been subverted or taken over, but OWS? I don't know. Most of the YouTube videos I watched that covered OWS, the people protesting had no idea what they were protesting about. Heck, in some places they were supporting communisim. If OWS was serious, they would have thrown these bums right off the street. Think I'm kidding, just search YouTube for 'communists at occupy wall street', there are pages of videos.

If we're going to get together and occupy/protest somewhere, it needs to be right on Capitol Hill. The bankers aren't going to change a damn thing on their own, only a political movement can do that.

“Democrips and Rebloodicans”, I wonder what the Crips and the Bloods ever did to Jesse Ventura that he would insult them so unfairly!!

Iconoclast

Lenin said something like, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it."

Both the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street probably started as sincere, grassroots protest movements, but significant portions of them have been bought out by the big money. The Tea Party still has some legs and has gotten some people elected, but many of them have sold out and become part of the bankster/AIPAC establishment. Progress has been made in taking back the government, but it's incremental and will require a sustained, grassroots effort, like the Ron Paul rEVOLution for lasting change.

I think the Zionists/globalists quickly bought out OWS when it sprung up. The last thing they want is for a protest movement to cross the phoney left and right dividing line they have created in the media and through the two big parties. The unification of everyone opposed to the globalist/Zionist media/bankster elite is the only thing that could really oust them from their position of dominance.

We, all of us, sometimes find ourselves inside the prevailing right-left paradigm, guilty of seeing the two parties as real opponents, rather than just two wings of the same Bankster bird.

The actual historical truth is that legislation, judicial edicts and foreign policy moves usually come from the other party. The real ravaging of Social Security came during Clinton’s first term, when the method of computing the cost of living was changed. The biggest hit to Medicare so far has been Obama’s arbitrary subtraction of $500 billion from Medicare and using it to fund Obamacare. This last is a blatantly racist move, since over 80% of Medicare beneficiaries are White, while over 80% of the uninsured beneficiaries of Obamacare are non-White. The biggest addition to the programs came from the “Conservative,” GW Bush, with his Drug Plan.

Social Security is not the brainchild of FDR’s Red advisers. It was invented by Germany’s Iron Chancellor, Bismarck, half a century before FDR, and has survived under Kaisers, Social Democrats, National Socialists and Christian Democrats.

School integration came from a Supreme Court presided over by the Republican Earl Warren, appointed by the Republican, Eisenhower, who enforced it at the points of the bayonets of regular army airborne troops.

In 1957, Republicans pushed a Civil Rights Bill, very similar to the one that passed 7 years later. It was stopped by the Democrats in the Senate. Most of the opposition came from Southern stalwarts, like Richard Russell and Strom Thurmond, but none other than the Junior Senator from Massachusetts, John F. Kennedy voted against that Civil Rights Bill.

More Republicans than Democrats voted for LBJ’s Civil Rights Bill and the Voting Rights Bill.

Affirmative Action was instituted under Nixon’s “Philadelphia Plan.”

Reagan gave us the ML King Holiday and a mestizo amnesty. George Bush, Sr. gave us both a Civil Rights “Quota Bill” and the ADA.

Obama reappointed both Bush's Fed Chairman and Secretary of Defense, and continues the neo-con wars for Israel, and allows the Wall Street criminal Banksters to continue to ravage the wealth of the nation.

It is absolutely astounding that, even though war and the economy are the two most hotly contested political issues, few people attach any importance to Obama reappointing Bush's choices to run both operations!

Republicans today rail against the Roe decision, which was based on something supposedly in "The penumbra" of the Constitution, but they strongly support Brown v Topeka, which was based mainly on the writings of the Marxist sociologist, Gunnar Myrdal, with no claim to any constitutional basis.

Jackie Robinson and Martin Luther King were Republicans.

I could go on, but I think you get my drift.

Originally Posted by William Gayley Simpson

Lenin said something like, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it."

.

Jesse Ventura did a show where he supposedly was confronting the banking cartel. I watched that show and I knew Jesse was Controlled Opposition immediately. In that show the scene began inside an immaculate room with a very large expensive looking conference table. Around that table sat about ten men who had the physical appearance of being 30 year old Mexicans or Arabs. They are quietly talking.

Suddenly Jesse Ventura pushes open the too large doors with an angry look on his face and enters the room.... all the men around the table look surprised at his presence and sit quietly looking at Jesse Ventura as if he had interrupted them. Jesse walks up to them and begins to confront them asking them questions about why they are gambling with other people's money and the men at the table explain to Jesse that what they do is legal.

DO I HAVE STUPID WRITTEN ON MY FACE?

1- Was I seriously expected to believe that these were the top banksters engaged in financial transactions and had no clue their party was about to be busted by Jesse Ventura while Jesse's camera crew was setting up in their conference room preparing to film Jesse's dramatic entrance? What I.Q. level does Jesse think I have?

2- Am I supposed to believe a holding company (bank) such as the federal reserve has no security and anyone can just burst into back room meetings?

3- Am I supposed to believe that these young Turks were Oligarchs who own the large corporations and run the U.N.?

4- Am I too stupid to recognize the seeds of a commie class war of employee against employer as well as the fact that Jesse Ventura did not give the names of a single bankster in that room during his interview? Or that Ben Bernanke's name was never mentioned throughout his whole show?

5- Did Jesse Ventura really expect that I didn't know his "banksters" were nothing but paid actors as was Jesse Ventura himself....to enact a Communist rebuttal to capitalism? Should I be shocked when Jesse leads the people from REVOLT to ....... Socialist/Communist organizations.

6- Am I so uninformed that I don't know the goal of the U.N. at the behest of Israel's Jewish World Congress intends to move from the Federal Reserve Note to a global IMF currency... and....Is my I.Q. so low that I'm not going to figure out or recognize that "patriots" like Jesse Ventura are funded to lead the masses in a revolt against the Federal Reserve and Capitalism so the real culprits can save us all with their "Un-privatized World Socialist IMF U.N. currency? Perhaps I was three years ago.

Not today.

Am I so naive that I don't know Communist Organizers read my commentaries on WNN everyday?