Thread: Shocker: Rand Paul Endorses Romney

Let's not forget who we're dealing with here WGS! Just by virtue of getting in Congress takes a great deal of compromising on the part of one's principles, even among those we favor the most, such as Ron and Rand Paul.

If not, they wouldn't be where they are today. Which brings us back to why we have to throw all our concentration and support behind the A3P.

I'm under no delusions that 2012 is going to be the A3P's year. But possibly we can start making some headway by 2016, by at least working toward getting some much needed publicity.

We're already seeing some great progress in Colorado.

Rather than nationalist attributing various ideas to Ron or Rand Paul that we happen to have in common, I believe that it's time that we made them our own. Let's face it! There's very few ideas that Ron Paul has that hasn't been around for a very long time.

We have an opportunity to take some of theses ideas and leave all the crazy Libertarian baggage behind that has often turned people off from that Party, and has given pause or doubts in the minds of many people, as to just what Rand or Ron Paul really stands for on certain issues important to us, especially immigration, border security, and race and just what they would do, if they were to ever get to the White House.


Given Ron Paul's age, I would also think that he's probably looking toward political retirement whether he wants too or not. And even though Rand Paul is still young and I'm sure has a long political career ahead of him. The longer he stays in there under the present and corrupt political establishment, the more corrupted he'll become, to the point where in a few years, he'll be making deals and compromises just like the rest of those who have sold us out.

"Shocker"? Don't get me wrong ..... I'll cast my worthless vote for Rand Paul, if he's nominated in '16 ....assuming the quadrennial farces called Presidential elections ....and the "United States," for that matter, still exist.

Maybe he has to do these kooky things to have a chance to turn things around down the line in some vast multiplex gameplan he and his Dad cooked up.

IMHO White America's only hope is for a fracturing of the evil US empire into ethnostates .... our ZOGbots won't even negotiate about that ... so, if you have any historical knowledge of how the real world operates, quaint traditions of yesteryear have to be pitched out the windows and a, shall we say, "more masculine" approach is required.

Isn't thatwhat George Washington and Nathan Hale, et. al, were all about ........ but if they were magically transported to 2012, I'd bet they'd actually extol George III's brand of benign "tyranny" over the utter alien monstrosity which oppresses us every second of every damn day.

ISRAEL ZIONISM ZIONIST JEWS AND ZIONIST RACIST RACHEL MADDOW AND RAND PAUL - YouTube

There is no principle for which Rand Paul will stand in the face of pressure from our enemies. He is not just politically pliable, he is nutless.

Of course he could never win re-election if he stood for principle, and he has clearly made his choice. Forget him.

There are only 3 options for White Americans this year, in the order of their preference: Vote A3P, don't vote, vote for Obama.

When you boil it down to the essential core, Sam Francis was right 20 years ago, when he said:"For our race to survive in America, the Republican Party must die."

This holds true, even if Rand Paul is the VP nominee. Of course he will NOT be the VP candidate. The VP will NOT be a White man. Neither major party will ever again run a ticket with two White men on it.

Romney's VP will almost surely be either Congo-lizzie Rice, Marco Rubio, or Bobby Jindal. They are all "Two-fers." Her sex favors Rice, but the odds favor the last two, because they have the double advantage of being both non-White and constitutionally ineligible, since neither was born to American citizens.

Originally Posted by Edmund Ruffin

When you boil it down to the essential core, Sam Francis was right 20 years ago, when he said:"For our race to survive in America, the Republican Party must die."

Does anyone have a link to the article Sam Francis explaining that GOP must die?

Originally Posted by Benjamin Franklin

Does anyone have a link to the article Sam Francis explaining that GOP must die?

I actually heard him say such things at a meeting of the Philadelphia Society in 1982 (in Philadelphia), and can vouch for the attribution's general authenticity!

The neocons subverted and/or obstructed that organization's original purpose BTW. I see the naughty Francis isn't listed as a former speaker: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Society But he was!

http://www.vdare.com/posts/bipartisa...nd-sam-francis

At least Romney is a man of unshakeable convictions.

I'm not an Alex Jones fan, but today he did about the best overview of the 2012 Ron Paul campaign that I've heard.

commercial-free download:

Alex_Jones_Show_2012_06_08FR-o.rar

Romney isn't going to win, but if he did, he would ditch the lip service he's paying to conservative causes the second he gets inaugurated. Obama campaigned on being anti-war and then took the empire/police-state into overdrive. Expect Romney to do the same.

Originally Posted by Benjamin Franklin

Does anyone have a link to the article Sam Francis explaining that GOP must die?

Alright - I'm interested in reading why GOP must die. Surely Sam Francis wrote some explanation why GOP must die. Any link to such article?

Originally Posted by Benjamin Franklin

Alright - I'm interested in reading why GOP must die. Surely Sam Francis wrote some explanation why GOP must die. Any link to such article?

Read all of Sam's books and you will find it. I don't know which one, but I know it's in at least one of them.

Buy the tapes from the first two Amren Conferences, in 1992 and 1994. I don't know which one, but I know I heard him say it there.

Some things exist apart from the internet. Not much, but some.

Sam's view, in a nutshell, was that even though they have never stood up for White interests, millions of Whites will go on thinking the GOP is their party, until it's too late.

He always refered to the Republicans as "The Stupid Party."

I have some small hope left that Ron Paul's people (count me in that group) find a new champion once he retires. His son may still stick to principle when voting despite his endorsement of a serial flip flopper. Politics is a game of compromise. I have no problem with compromise - IF it's a compromise between two healthy, nationalist positions. Our political elites are so corrupt and self serving that they only compromise on how fast, and in what way, they are going dismantle our nation and hand it over to the NWO and third-world invaders.

On the surface, the Republicans appear to be the best choice, because they offer a slower path to death. But, as we saw with both Bushes, there's little opposition to globalism, third world immigration and the police state, when a Republican is in the White House. Republicans are like a chronic disease - you don't realize you're sick until it's too late. With the Democrats, and especially a black one, it's quite apparent, like coming down with the plague, that you are sick. Neither type of disease, or party, is good for the body/nation, but at least with Democrats/acute illness you know you're sick and can take some action to fix it.

My long held suspicions have been confirmed over the last 24 hours: Rand Paul needs to begin Testosterone Replacement Therapy immediately. He is a wuss.

Right. Too bad that won't get him his dignity, or the respect of anyone in America with principles, back.

Originally Posted by Nathan B. Forrest

My long held suspicions have been confirmed over the last 24 hours: Rand Paul needs to begin Testosterone Replacement Therapy immediately. He is a wuss.

______

Both Pauls have had the JFK assassination explained to them.

The Rand Paul thing got me thinking about the election again. I have said from the beginning that Obama is a lock for re-election, and I still believe it, but the recent surge by Romney is cause for re-examining it.

It is possible, but not likely that our rulers place so much importance on continuing the Judaic conquest of the Middle East that Obama’s hesitancy in opening new fronts in Syria and Iran might cause them to change horses. After all, Romney has publicly assured them that the bombs will be falling on Iran within weeks, if not days, of his inauguration.

The big downside for the system in a defeat of the Kenyan is the virtual certainty that their urban pets will burn several major cities in their rage of not being ‘over’ the White man anymore. But, as long as the world accepts the Dollar as the reserve currency, they can always print enough dough to rebuild the “Hoods.”

I allow for the possibility of a switch this fall only because I believe that the primary reason for Obama being raised from neighborhood rabble-rouser to POTUS in half a decade was to show White females that they can lay down with a negro, even one fresh out of the African jungle, and get a President as a result. That goal is accomplished.

There is one way to know for sure in advance: If the stock market takes out this month’s lows and continues to swoon, it’s all over for the African. The Banksters and their Federal Reserve have shown that they are capable of manipulating the market. They can surely boost it for 4 months if they want to, or they can knock it for a loop. Three jews, Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, Dimon of JP Morgan and Bernanke of the Fed can do this without even consulting anyone else.

So watch the market. If it rallies over the coming quarter, Michelle is going to have many more expensive vacations. If it tanks, Detroit will be ashes in November.

My money is still on Barry Sotero.

Originally Posted by Edmund Ruffin

So watch the market. If it rallies over the coming quarter, Michelle is going to have many more expensive vacations. If it tanks, Detroit will be ashes in November.

My money is still on Barry Sotero.

Are you assuming the Feds will manipulate the vote counting process? That is, more unhappy unemployed voters will continue to "vote" for the black man, despite how things have worsen since he was elected 4 years ago?

Of course Rand will support Romney. They belong to the same Party. Rand's career in the Party would come to an abrupt halt if he did not support the decision of the Party/Establishment. It is party requirement.

I have been unhappy with Ron ever since I found him an investor in project 60 as well as a strong advocate for the world IMF currency. I concluded that Ron was a person who's job was to take the "Disenfranchised" and mold/lead them back into the controlled parties. I got really upset when his online profile said he had a picture of one of the professors from the Socialist College in England. Frankfurt I think it was. In my opinion Ron Paul should have pictures of our Founding Fathers on his wall. Not Foreign Communists.

Although I am a member of a political party I feel no allegiance to any politician or party today.

You see,

The establishment owns/controls the parties. They are the ones who financially support both Republican and Democrat for sure. People like Ron Paul cannot just "Run for president" on the Republican ballot. He has to be chosen by the college Electorates to be a candidate. The College Electorates are members of the establishment. Ron has to convince the establishment they will benefit by putting him on the ballot.

After I learned how the party actually functions. I wouldn't trust any politician who was picked by the party.

The real race is run even before the people have a chance to vote.
The real race is the campaign with the establishment/party to get on the ballot.

Who elects the college electorates?

They elect themselves. They are high members of the party who get together by invitation only.... in a special clique to vote themselves as the electorates.
Lower members of the party do not have the opportunity of voting on who will be their party candidate.

Everything within the parties are decided by the establishment. That is why they created political parties in the first place. Truth is....there is no need for "Parties". Because the right decision for a nation of people is right regardless.

Mr Ruffin's conception of the "election's" outcome is plausible. But it seems to me there's a simpler scenario: False flag op on American soil involving a dirty bomb on the eastern seaboard or a small tactical nuke detonation in some innocent, civilian-rich locale (Mall of America, Yankee Stadium, 10 Mississippi bridges, etc.) and/or a USS Maine/Tonkin Incident/"Lusitania dastardly nautical tragedy instantly proven & blamed on Persian malefactors in early fall ...... Obongo, with that snooty pose of his chin held high sails into office as the saviour of the nation and resolute modern "FDR."

What does Edmund Ruffin have to say about this?