Results 1 to 12 of 12
Like Tree4Likes
  • 3 Post By Instauration Fan
  • 1 Post By count markovalley

Thread: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

  1. #1
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    366
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    Spanish History Lesson: When Jews Took the Arab Muslim Side Against White Europeans


    Many “Conservative” White Americans were shocked to learn that Jewish New York City mayor Bloomberg and other American Jewish leaders support Arab Muslims’ right to build a huge mosque/Muslim cultural center on Ground Zero to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the 9/11/01 attack. Aren’t Arab Muslims and Jews supposed to be mortal enemies in the Middle East, why would American Jews want to take the Arab Muslim side?

    The reality is that Jews have a very long history of working with Arab Muslim, Turkish Muslims and just NW Muslims in wars, conflicts against White Europeans. Jews have long lived in wealth and power in Muslim societies and the main Jewish fear has been to get caught alone in a racially conscious, White homogeneous nation that prefers to do without Jewish money lenders, Jewish tax collectors, Jewish white slavers, Jewish “advisors” etc.

    Most Whites in Western Europe and the UK are deeply upset about the Arab, Pakistani, Turk Muslim immigration invasions of their countries, with resulting horrors like Pakistani ("Asian") gangs raping poor White English girls to "groom" them for lives as prostitutes to old Muslim men. Some nationalist groups in the UK/Europe have tried to reach out to Jewish groups - to form alliances against the brutal NW Muslim invaders - after all, Israel is surrounded by hostile NW Muslims that want to destroy Israel, kill the Jews, so wouldn't it be natural for Jewish people to join with good White Europeans to resist the same NW Muslim force in Europe, UK?

    White/Jewish alliances against the NW Muslims don't work - because the Jews just don't go for White/European nationalism in any form. The Jews have long memories and the Jews remember when the Jews took the Muslims side against Whites in Europe and elsewhere.
    Here is a great history lesson on this subject. History is now repeating itself at Ground Zero NYC, the entire White West.

    Spain Might Have Had a Good Reason to Expel the Jews
    Instauration Magazine November 1992




    Spanish Christians didn't "turn the other cheek" against Muslims & Jews



    Spain, Invaded and occupied by Arab Muslims 8th - 15th c


    Every schoolboy is or should be familiar with the year 1492, the year of the (re)discovery of the New world by Christopher Columbus, a Genoese in the service of the Spanish monarchs, Ferdinand and Isabella. For Spain, 1492 was to be the most important year in its history, as well as one of the most important in world history. it was the year the Spanish nation was consolidated, the year it said adi6s to the middle Ages, the year when the splendorous Spanish State took center stage in the political evolution of the West.in the beginning of the year, on January 2, after a long siege, the army of the Spanish monarchs marched into the city of Granada, thus re-conquering the last of the real estate seized by the Arabs and moors seven centuries earlier. Then, on March 31, the Catholic monarchs signed a royal edict that ordered all Jews in Spain to convert to Christianity or ship out. Five months later Columbus sailed out of the Spanish port of Palos hoping to discover a new route to the Indies. His tiny fleet passed boats loaded with Jews sorrowfully complying with Ferdinand and Isabella’s expulsion order.
    *
    In this 500th anniversary of Columbus’s epochal voyage, much of the celebration has been marred by media inspired attacks on Spain for her “cruelty” and “foolishness” in expelling Jews. No one seemed to care what was done to the Muslims, who were also given the choice of conversion or expulsion a few years later, just as no one these days seems to care much about what was done to non-Jews in WWII German and Soviet concentration camps, where the death toll of Gentiles was probably ten times greater than the number of Jewish fatalities. Actually, any Jew who converted to Christianity was perfectly free to stay in Spain. Those who left could take all their earthly possessions with them, except gold and silver coins and trinkets.

    The current media story line is that the Spanish, in a fit of blind religious fanaticism, cut off their noses to spite their faces by kicking out the clever and enterprising Jewish community. Having heard these tearful tales over and over again, history buffs could be forgiven for thinking that only mass insanity could have led Spaniards to commit such an enormous gaffe. Jews, today’s spin doctors insist, were the cultural and economic backbone of Spain, the most educated and verbal segment of the population. Only greed, envy, ignorance and Christian bigotry could possibly explain this act of pure folly. once again, a peaceful, unoffending people were driven out into the cold because of the heartlessness of their wicked neighbors. But that is not the end of the story! As is almost always the case, there was a price to be paid for persecuting the Jews. The price for Spain, according to the Jewish version of history, was its decline and fall, following the loss of so much Jewish brainpower and the economic and cultural benefits which Spain’s rivals, Portugal and Holland, received from swarms of Jewish refugees.

    Per usual, when it comes to Jews, the story they tell is, shall we say, at variance with the facts. Fourteen hundred and ninety-two was the year Spanish civilization took off like a rocket. Within a century or two, Cervantes was writing Don Quixote; Velasquez was painting his incomparable portraits; Calder6n was writing his brilliant plays. it al most seemed as if the presence of the Jews had kept Spanish culture under wraps and their forced removal unloosed tremendous bursts of artistic, literary and economic energy. (Might it be possible that the same unshackling of cultural forces would produce similar results if the Jews left the U. S.?) In A History of Medieval Spain, Professor Joseph F. O’Callaghan provides us with perhaps the most scholarly and precise treatment of Spanish history in the time between the Arab conquest and the moors’ surrender of Granada. Spain had its origins in the Roman Empire. The Roman provinces in what is now Spain and Portugal furnished the Empire with some of its greatest emperors. with the fall of Rome, Spain was transformed into a kingdom of Visigoths, one of the German tribes which had inherited remnants of the Empire. The Visigothic kings were Christianized and ruled over a population comprised partly of Nordics and largely of mediterraneans, with a heavy sprinkling of Jews. Later, when the Arabs imposed Islam on Spain, the composition of the population was not greatly changed. The overwhelming majority of Arabs and Spaniards belonged to the Mediterranean race, though Nordic racial traits, such as fair complexions and blue eyes (Isabella had them), were discernible in the ruling circles of both peoples. Some Nordic genes had been implanted by the Vandals who swept through Spain before the Visigoths and fought their way as far as Tunis in North Africa. Here, it might also be noted, that the Muslim rulers and caliphs of Spain were not exactly cultural throwbacks. The Alhambra Palace in Granada is the most beautiful and most graceful pleasure dome to be found on any continent. In 675 the Muslims launched their first raid on Spain, which was repulsed by the Visigothic fleet. By 711, the Arabs had conquered North Africa and were ready to invade Western Europe. in only 21 years they penetrated as far north as Tours in France before being defeated and thrown back by the Franks under Charles Martel.

    The reasons for the woefully poor showing of the Visigoths vis-A-vis the Arab invaders had to do with treason in high places. As O’Callaghan remarks, “Certainly the Jews and others who had suffered under Visigothic rule welcomed the invaders as liberators and collaborated with them.” As O’Callaghan also points out, perhaps to avoid endangering his academic standing, the Jewish renegadism was justified by the “disorder” of the Visigothic Kingdom. The re-conquest of Spain started in the rugged mountains’ of Asturias in northern Spain. There a Visigothic knight, Pelayo, refused to bow down to the Muslims and won the first battle in a 700-year-war between Islam and Christianity. The Reconquista, as it is known, was a glorious era in the history of the West. A proud and fierce people would be tried and tested in a thousand battles. The Jews, as is their custom, quickly burrowed into the Arab fabric of Spain. Generally preferring Muslim to Christian overlords, the People of the Book were allowed to practice their religion without interference and became key elements in Muslim society. it need hardly be added that the Christians who had suffered from Jewish moneymen in Visigothic times, came to loathe them more than ever in Muslim Spain.

    By the 11th century the situation in Spain had become fluid, with the Christians slowly nibbling back parts of their lost lands, while constantly under the threat of fierce Muslim counterattacks. It is not surprising that the eternal “middlemen” should rise to the surface in these troubled times. In both the Muslim and Christian parts of Spain, Jews engaged in all their age-old occupational specialties: usury, the slave trade, prostitution, tax “farming” (contracts to collect taxes for the kings and nobles), the law, medicine, administration and any other type of employment that required little or no physical labor. Worst of all from the point of view of the pious Christian population, they were able to infiltrate the church in large numbers. it was this last activity that led to their downfall. As Muslim power waned, Jews relied more and more on the expanding Christian kingdoms of Spain to provide them with their customary perks. Employed by Spanish monarchs in the most sensitive matters of state, especially in finance, Jews never had it so good since the good old days of Solomon. The Chosen, however, could not enter the church without converting. It was not too long before true Christians realized that the Christianity of most “New Christians” was only skin deep. That converted Jews mocked the Christian religion, celebrated Jewish feast days, and were slowly and subtly introducing Talmudic themes into Christian theology were open secrets. It was no wonder they came to be viewed as a hostile element, busy weakening the Christian nation in the very face of the Muslim enemy.

    High-Octane Religiosity

    In the Middle Ages religion was the fault line of the world. In the same way that the West fought communism in this century, so the Christian West fought the power of Islam in those crucial years. Religion was central to all aspects of life, there being no such thing as a secular state. It is a waste of words to argue that Christian Spain should have made room for Jews and Muslims. Such an accommodation was quite out of the question in the Age of Faith. When Spain expelled the Jews, England, France and other European nations had long since sent them on their way, for approximately the same reasons. The main difference was that the number of Jews and their influence and affluence in Spain were vastly greater than elsewhere in Europe. Ironically the European nations that would later condemn Spain for expelling Jews were the first to voice suspicion of Spain’s “purity” because it had been “defiled” by the presence of so many Jews and Muslims. Queen Isabella agreed up to a point. She knew very well that as long as Jews remained in her kingdom they would constitute a political, cultural, philosophical and theological fifth column, not to mention a military liability in the event of a Muslim attempt to retake what they had lost-a scary scenario that was always a possibility.

    Isabella and her husband, Ferdinand, knew in their hearts that only by building one undivided and indivisible Spain could they carry out the tremendous task they had set for themselves. They understood what we seem to have forgotten: You cannot build a nation out of disparate population groups widely separated by culture and religion. Either Jews and Muslims would leave or renounce their faith, or Spain, as a united Christian country, would never endure. Although Jews are not a race, they act like a race and should be treated as one. Anthropologically speaking, they are various mixtures of the Nordic, Alpine and Mediterranean races, with a few distinctive facial traits showing up in many of them. Isabella’s relying on religion to define a Jew may have been adequate in her day, but it would be wide of the mark in 1992. Today, in the U.S. about 70% of Jews are non-religious. To use Judaism as a basis for expelling Jews would allow the more intelligent and more devious Jews to remain in our midst.

    The Jews in the Christian Spain aborning were not fools. They were quite aware that popular sentiment was rising against them. Fighting back in any way they could, they bribed powerful and corrupt nobles and worked their way into high positions in the government and church. All in vain. In 1391 massive anti-Jewish pogroms broke out across Spain. In that year, thousands of Jews were killed in Aragon and Castile.

    In the words of O’Callaghan:

    "Hostility towards the Jews had often been manifested in the past, chiefly because of their involvement in money-lending and tax-farming. Complaints about Jewish usury and Jewish tax collectors occur again and again in the records of the Cones [the Spanish parliament or assembly" . . . . Though the Crown usually promised to attend to these complaints, Jews continued to figure prominently in the management of royal finances. The riots of 1391 spelled the beginning of the end for Spanish Jewry, although it would still hold on for another hundred years. The simple truth was that Spain had outgrown Jews, just as it had outgrown Muslims.

    The Jews, as stated previously, had no part to play in Spain’s great years, which, some cynics say, is why Spain had its “great years.” The Encyclopedia Britannica (1963 edition, vol. 2 1, p. 122) adds: “The tide of national enthusiasm, religious fanaticism and indignation at Jewish financial operations reached its high-water mark about three months after the fall of Granada. . . .” Apparently there were early-bird milkens and Boeskys in the ranks of Spanish jewry. Professor Philip W. Powell, in his book, The Tree of Hate (published in 1985) attributes the expulsion of the Jews to a religious conflict between Judaism and Christianity. He is not afraid to meet the issue of anti-Semitism head on: ‘The very misleading term of ‘anti-Semitism’ is so carelessly, or malevolently, tossed about these days that it virtually has no meaning except as a convenient rock to hurl in anger–but, like a rock, it can hurt.” He goes on to say: The Jews’] impassioned opinions hamper the writing of fair and unbiased accounts of Spain. Jewish emotion, when aroused by historical memory of [the] Spanish Inquisition and expulsion, exaggerates and distorts, and certainly gives little shrift to the Spanish side of the story …. Jewish writers are aided by a popular opinion, much of it created by themselves, which for centuries has influenced writing upon these themes.

    Powell points out that while it is true that all the 165,000 or so Jews who refused to give up Judaism were expelled in 1492, many more chose to stay and converted. Those who only converted superficially underwent various forms of capital punishment. Jews and other writers of anti-Spanish tendencies, have preferred to focus attention upon these Spanish crimes as a means of demonstrating Spanish cruelty and bigotry. The usual groundwork for this is a morality of later centuries applied to 15th and 16th century historical situations, without that sense of justice so essential to historical interpretations. Or, sometimes more simply, it may come from the well-known Jewish propensity for cultural replenishment out of martyrdom. Professor Powell gets to the nitty-gritty in these words: But the majority of the Spanish people, witnessing [all the] evidence of Jewish-Converso influence . . . . and simply the numbers of Jews daily discernible in the population would, and did, view the situation with antagonism.

    Explaining that this antagonism sometimes led to mob attacks on Jews, Powell dryly adds, “If there was anything uniquely Spanish in all this, it was not intolerance or bigotry, but rather a notable forbearance in comparison to the ways the Jewish problem was handled elsewhere in Europe.”

    Inquisition Hype The chief purpose of the Spanish Inquisition, established in 1480, was to ensure that Jews did not create a “state within a state.” The Inquisition was a defense of the monarchy and a defense against treason. Many European states applauded its creation as a needed step to rein in Jewish power. Whatever the Inquisition was to become once the Jews had gone, it served its primary purpose in ridding Spain of a hostile force of infiltrators and subversives at a time when the church and nation were in grave danger. The ferocity of the Spanish Inquisition may well stem from the fact that it was in large part staffed by Jewish converts, who amply demonstrated that they had lost none of their innate venom by switching religions. Jewish converts who fell all over themselves to prove their loyalty to their new faith were the driving force behind the grim and fanatical persecution of other Jews. Tomas de Torquemada, the ferocious inquisitor General, who sent so many of his brethren to the stake, is said to have been of Jewish descent. No less an authority than Salvador de madariaga, one of modern Spain’s leading intellectuals, holds to the view that the peculiar intolerance of the Spanish Inquisition can be traced, in part, to the presence of Jewish converts in its highest ranks. Madariaga, by the way, made up for this “anti-Semitic” opinion by stating that Columbus was a converso, but not necessarily a Marrano (pig in Spanish), a derogatory term for a convert who practiced Judaism secretly.

    Several Jewish scholars, including the non-scholars of Time magazine, have accused King Ferdinand of being “part Jewish,” though they never satisfactorily explain where the Jewish genes came from. To sum up, Spain’s expulsion of the Jews was logical, rational and, for the times, not overly cruel-far less cruel than what modern Jews have done and continue to do to the Palestinians. The Spanish have no need to apologize for their actions in freeing their nation from a harmful internal enemy. The Jews resented their expulsion, as they have resented other forced exoduses in their history. The truth is, contemporary Jews should not blame Spain for their ancestors’ misfortunes five centuries ago. They need only to look in the mirror.
    *
    N.B.F. and W.R.
    Last edited by Instauration Fan; 05-21-2012 at 12:10 PM. Reason: fonts

  2. #2
    Christeo-Christian Nordic Angel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NorthWest Front
    Age
    27
    Posts
    3,693
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    I would have supported the Spanish Inquisition. I get really tired of Hollywood setting the time frame stage for their movies by showing Christians burning everyone at the stake. Hollywood even likes to show an Inquisition in nations that never had an Inquisition. Hollywood tries to show the Spanish Inquisition as religious persecution rather then a political move against non white foreign invaders in illegal occupation of white homelands.

    There were very few capital punishments performed by the Spanish Inquisition but such a thing makes sense for war criminals and spies of an invading army from a foreign nation.


    I am not ashamed of White Christian Europe.
    I think there is a problem with non white Christians. They think that just because they adopt the same faith it automatically makes them the same people.
    I think modern Mexicans are totally hypocritical when they accuse of white man of forcing Amerindians to convert and then ...off to the church next Sunday of their own accord. The Amerindians would not have remained Christian if they did not find the humanity of Christianity and farming more favorable than the constant human sacrifices and scavenging of their ancestors.

    Amerindians continue to find white culture more favorable even to this day. Otherwise they wouldn't be risking death to get into our homelands. Speaking of Amerindians. Many of them traded their lands and even their daughters to white man to obtain white man's guns and horses. Many of them welcomed and allied with Europeans because of their technology fro protection against neighboring hostile tribes. Most of them race mixed.

    Amerindians didn't have cash or coins so they traded land for white man's tools, guns, horses, clothes, and even education (There was no such thing as compulsory public education back then but there were many Indians that traded as much as they could to get white teachers for their children.) The idea that white man was stealing lands came later from a few radical Amerindians who chose to remain hostile thieves...they had just stopped raiding their fellow Amerindians and started raiding white men. The difference is that white man had the strength to show those thieves who was boss. Relocation was much more kind then imprisonment. It has nothing to do with the land. Amerindians have sovereign reservation lands today and they want to live with White Man, wear white man clothes, live in white man housing, ect act ect. Just like they did back then.
    AGENDA : Grinding America Down
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SH8LkIqu1c8

    A Future For White Children.

  3. #3
    On leave
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Age
    40
    Posts
    915
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    In at least one case the jews literally opened the gates of the city for the mudslims.
    To be blunt the jews were treated far better than they deserved.

  4. #4
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    366
    Rep Power
    9

    Default Re: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    There are many important lessons to be learned from this 1492 Spanish history lesson.

    One key lesson is that despite the Middle East Israeli Jew vs Arab Muslim conflict, Jews in the USA, Europe and UK will be taking the side of the Arab/NW Muslim immigrant invaders against us. That's just what Jews do.

    So our choice as racially aware White Indo Europeans is not to try to choose sides in the supposedly Jew vs Arabs, Jews vs Muslim conflict. We need to just be pro White and not try to form alliances with bad NW Muslims, or with anti White Jews.

    No amount of groveling and apologizing and pandering to the Jews for the Inquisition, World War II some quotas for Jews at Ivy League college during the 1920s will ever make the Jews our loyal allies against anyone - not against criminal Blacks and not against invading Arab/NW Muslims.

  5. #5
    Voice for Our White People
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    978
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    The inquisition and the expulsion ,in no small part , was the result of the hardwork and zeal of Torquemada. we need more torquemadas . the inquisition only effected conversos [those who played the role of christian ] but still practiced their old beliefs .

    isabela was not in favor of expulsion ,but torqy talked her into it. he was the spanish rasputin ..
    Nordic Angel likes this.

  6. #6
    Christeo-Christian Nordic Angel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NorthWest Front
    Age
    27
    Posts
    3,693
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordic Angel View Post
    I would have supported the Spanish Inquisition. I get really tired of Hollywood setting the time frame stage for their movies by showing Christians burning everyone at the stake. Hollywood even likes to show an Inquisition in nations that never had an Inquisition. Hollywood tries to show the Spanish Inquisition as religious persecution rather then a political move against non white foreign invaders in illegal occupation of white homelands.

    There were very few capital punishments performed by the Spanish Inquisition but such a thing makes sense for war criminals and spies of an invading army from a foreign nation.


    I am not ashamed of White Christian Europe.
    I think there is a problem with non white Christians. They think that just because they adopt the same faith it automatically makes them the same people.
    I think modern Mexicans are totally hypocritical when they accuse of white man of forcing Amerindians to convert and then ...off to the church next Sunday of their own accord. The Amerindians would not have remained Christian if they did not find the humanity of Christianity and farming more favorable than the constant human sacrifices and scavenging of their ancestors.

    Amerindians continue to find white culture more favorable even to this day. Otherwise they wouldn't be risking death to get into our homelands. Speaking of Amerindians. Many of them traded their lands and even their daughters to white man to obtain white man's guns and horses. Many of them welcomed and allied with Europeans because of their technology fro protection against neighboring hostile tribes. Most of them race mixed.

    Amerindians didn't have cash or coins so they traded land for white man's tools, guns, horses, clothes, and even education (There was no such thing as compulsory public education back then but there were many Indians that traded as much as they could to get white teachers for their children.) The idea that white man was stealing lands came later from a few radical Amerindians who chose to remain hostile thieves...they had just stopped raiding their fellow Amerindians and started raiding white men. The difference is that white man had the strength to show those thieves who was boss. Relocation was much more kind then imprisonment. It has nothing to do with the land. Amerindians have sovereign reservation lands today and they want to live with White Man, wear white man clothes, live in white man housing, ect act ect. Just like they did back then.

    Please forgive me...

    I need to be more careful.

    Sometimes I start talking on topic at the beginning of my paragraph and then my thoughts bubble over in scattered directions and I'm off topic by the end of the paragraph.

    The female brain is known to multi-task whilst males have tunnel vision.

    I will try and keep my thoughts bubbling in the right direction.

    It's not going to be easy so
    wish me luck.

    For what it's worth...I think many mexicans have Arabic blood in them from the Spanish who race mixed with the Arabs in Spain... so it's sort of the same people.

    AGENDA : Grinding America Down
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SH8LkIqu1c8

    A Future For White Children.

  7. #7
    Voice for Our White People
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    978
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordic Angel View Post
    I would have supported the Spanish Inquisition. I get really tired of Hollywood setting the time frame stage for their movies by showing Christians burning everyone at the stake. Hollywood even likes to show an Inquisition in nations that never had an Inquisition. Hollywood tries to show the Spanish Inquisition as religious persecution rather then a political move against non white foreign invaders in illegal occupation of white homelands.

    There were very few capital punishments performed by the Spanish Inquisition but such a thing makes sense for war criminals and spies of an invading army from a foreign nation.


    I am not ashamed of White Christian Europe.
    I think there is a problem with non white Christians. They think that just because they adopt the same faith it automatically makes them the same people.
    I think modern Mexicans are totally hypocritical when they accuse of white man of forcing Amerindians to convert and then ...off to the church next Sunday of their own accord. The Amerindians would not have remained Christian if they did not find the humanity of Christianity and farming more favorable than the constant human sacrifices and scavenging of their ancestors.

    Amerindians continue to find white culture more favorable even to this day. Otherwise they wouldn't be risking death to get into our homelands. Speaking of Amerindians. Many of them traded their lands and even their daughters to white man to obtain white man's guns and horses. Many of them welcomed and allied with Europeans because of their technology fro protection against neighboring hostile tribes. Most of them race mixed.

    Amerindians didn't have cash or coins so they traded land for white man's tools, guns, horses, clothes, and even education (There was no such thing as compulsory public education back then but there were many Indians that traded as much as they could to get white teachers for their children.) The idea that white man was stealing lands came later from a few radical Amerindians who chose to remain hostile thieves...they had just stopped raiding their fellow Amerindians and started raiding white men. The difference is that white man had the strength to show those thieves who was boss. Relocation was much more kind then imprisonment. It has nothing to do with the land. Amerindians have sovereign reservation lands today and they want to live with White Man, wear white man clothes, live in white man housing, ect act ect. Just like they did back then.
    Inquisition in Nueva España
    Main portal


    From nearly the beginning of the colonial period until the Mexican War of Independence, this spot has been the headquarters of the Inquisition in the colony of New Spain.[2][3] While the Tribunal of the Holy Inquisition was not fully established here until 1571, the first cleric with inquisitorial duties was Martin de Valencia, who came to the colony in 1524. The Dominicans, in whom the papacy had invested Inquisition duties, arrived in 1526 and proceeded to build a monastery in the area occupied by both the current Palace and the Church of Santo Domingo. The first official Inquisitor for the colony, Pedro Moya de Contreras, worked in the section of the monastery where the later, 18th century Palace would be built.[2]
    The Inquisition was officially established here due to a 1566 conspiracy led by Martin Cortes, son of Hernán Cortés, threatened to make the new colony independent of Spain. The plot was denounced by Baltazar de Aguilar Cervantes and Inquisition trials of various Creoles began. The accused were subject to torture and harsh sentences, especially when before a magistrate by the name of Muñoz. The first victims of this series of trials were the brothers Alonso and Gil Gonzalez de Alvila Alvarado. Despite having the sympathy of the local citizens and of the chroniclers, both brothers were convicted. Their punishment was to be decapitated, and their house, located on part of the site of the Templo Mayor, was razed to the ground, and the site sown with salt[1]
    The Inquisition here heard a number of other famous cases during its time, including the prosecution of the Carbajal family for reversion to Judaism, and the case of Martin Villavicencio, alias Martin Garatuza, which would inspire one of the best-known 19th century Mexican novels, Vicente Riva Palacio's Martín Gartuza. Servando Teresa de Mier spent time in the jail here, and this court sentenced Miguel Hidalgo to defrocking and excommunication before his 1815 execution. Soon after, in 1820, the Inquisition was officially disbanded in Mexico.[1]


    Some years ago I visited the exact spot where converso Jews were burned at the stake . I believe it was on the far side of the national cathedral ,close by but must be pointed out by a tour guide. You can still see a darkish smudge from the flames that left their mark on the outer wall . The last converso jew that was burned was I believe in 1815. Spanish people don't mess around .. Now ,the jews pretty much control the country; the media, the banks and business. even the pawnshops are almost entirely owned by jews and they do a brisk business cheating and swindling the dumb mexicans.

  8. #8
    Contributing Member FriendofRPO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    N. Labrador (summer); Peten Prov. Guatemala (winter)
    Posts
    4,613
    Rep Power
    28

    Default Re: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    Good Queen Isabella I .....First foreign head of state and first woman to appear on a US postage stamp:



    "If the race is good, so is the place." --Ralph Waldo Emerson

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3ifRA0Kj-8
    [Tavern scene w/ the German girl-captive]

  9. #9
    Contributing Member FriendofRPO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    N. Labrador (summer); Peten Prov. Guatemala (winter)
    Posts
    4,613
    Rep Power
    28

    Default Re: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    Oh, how the ZOGists deplore that Spanish Queen of yore ............. http://img.docstoccdn.com/thumb/orig/43965302.png
    Last edited by FriendofRPO; 05-25-2012 at 01:19 PM.
    "If the race is good, so is the place." --Ralph Waldo Emerson

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3ifRA0Kj-8
    [Tavern scene w/ the German girl-captive]

  10. #10
    Christeo-Christian Nordic Angel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NorthWest Front
    Age
    27
    Posts
    3,693
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by count markovalley View Post
    Inquisition in Nueva España
    Main portal


    Some years ago I visited the exact spot where converso Jews were burned at the stake . I believe it was on the far side of the national cathedral ,close by but must be pointed out by a tour guide. You can still see a darkish smudge from the flames that left their mark on the outer wall . The last converso jew that was burned was I believe in 1815. Spanish people don't mess around .. Now ,the jews pretty much control the country; the media, the banks and business. even the pawnshops are almost entirely owned by jews and they do a brisk business cheating and swindling the dumb mexicans.
    Are you saying that executing two Joos left a visible stain for 200 years in Mexico?

    But the execution of six million Joos in Germany left no stains and very little evidence.
    AGENDA : Grinding America Down
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SH8LkIqu1c8

    A Future For White Children.

  11. #11
    Voice for Our White People
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    5
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    Well I think if anyone would be look after only for the things that could might have any lesson for the nation in the history than I don't think so there would be any single which will be without a lesson but thing is nation must get it as it always teaches people as well. Simply We can consider here just for example the 1492 of the Spanish history.

  12. #12
    WhichWayWesternMan? William Gayley Simpson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    2,488
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Re: Whites, Arab Muslims and Jews - Who's Who, What's What, Instauration Magazine

    I doesn't surprise me. Throughout history Jews have acted in their own interest - their ethnocentrism is the reason they are still here today after thousands of years as a minority in many countries.

    And think of it, Arabs and Jews are Semitic cousins, have similar languages, and Islam and Judaism are actually quite similar. The biggest difference is that Islam is a universal religion, whereas Judaism is an ethnocentric (racist!) religion.


    Get Positive, Get Involved, or Get Out of the Way!

    Buy Merlin Miller's New Book! Click Below:








Similar Threads

  1. The Latest Uploads of Instauration Magazine
    By Jamie Kelso in forum Instauration Magazine Reading Room
    Replies: 199
    Last Post: 07-20-2012, 10:12 AM
  2. Imam says Muslims being persecuted like Jews
    By Silver Stallion in forum Canadian White News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-14-2011, 12:09 AM
  3. Muslims, Jews warn Europe: conform or else
    By Enoch in forum British News For Britons
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-10-2011, 09:24 PM
  4. Topic for discussion: Muslims and Jews working together?
    By silent cal in forum American News For White America
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-21-2011, 01:02 AM
  5. Jews Being Ran Out of Sweden... by Muslims!
    By Alexander Hamilton in forum Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Iceland
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-06-2010, 10:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •