Thread: Jews are not our buddy pals.

Always the victim, never the aggressor.

Of course they're everywhere and aren't our buddies. But it's what we do moving forward that will be important.

I want to first say that I understand what the writer is trying to say here but I could not disagree with the way he is saying it more. What do I mean by this?

I can not underscore what I am about to say to the people reading this post that this is a losing strategy. I feel that when we look at people to blame, we have to go no further than our own people. Yes we are loving and forgiving and yest we have been manipulated by those who have nothing but plunder on their mind but the ultimate responsibility lies with us and not the Jewish people.

Now if I had my way, the word Jew would not even be allowed on this site. Often time it is used as a pronoun. What I mean when I say this is we as a group tend to name all Zionist as Jews, this is not the case. I despise the ground that Mark Levine walks on but I don't blame him for pushing his agenda but instead blame those people who adopt his viewpoint without doing any research as to what he really wants America to be.

If I subscribe to your thinking then we are all lost and have no way of changing what is happening. You would have us work in our circle of concern but our circle of influence is the only place that we can make any real difference in our life. Yes, many Jewish men and women do work in media and for good reason, they want to influence others to adopt their beliefs. One thing they are not doing is getting on the radio and saying, "Gentiles are not your real friend."

The reason they choose not to do this is their message would be lost just like the message from this writer would be lost to most of his neighbors if they came on this site and read what he wrote. I say this with the utmost love in my heart toward this writer but I can not stress enough how much harm this does to our message. Sometimes frustration has us saying and doing things we later learn to regret.

I wish to take this time to congratulate you on having the most understated thread title of the year.

Originally Posted by MoJoe

I wish to take this time to congratulate you on having the most understated thread title of the year.

I believe it is actually overstated rather than understated, MoJoe. Or maybe that was intended as sarcasm?

It is very understandable, of course, to believe that because something is not said in the controlled media, like the concept of "naming the Jew," we, as White nationalists, are more effective if we state it many more times over and in several, sometimes more destructive, ways; however, that just isn't the case. Less is more, as the saying goes. Constantly "naming" something or shouting something doesn't make it more persuasive. It makes the reader or the listener think that we're nuts, and they probably won't be willing to listen and get our consistent White message. So yes, we want fellow Whites to hear us, to listen to us and to understand our message - not run for the hills away from us.

As my wife says, "We're quite aware, or rather, more than aware, of the Jewish issue on White News Now and any problems they're putting forth onto us."

The following link will let you in on WNN's mission statement: Our WhiteNewsNow Mission Statement

I do apologize!

Okay I admit I overreached there.

It is true that I would not speak that way directly to a neighbor. But I will say, that I am much less politically correct than I used to be. And I am pushing the envelope. I am starting to make the remark that 'they' have countries already. People get it. They are catching on. I also sense increasing pressure on "History". There is a constant drumbeat of pro-Holocaust and Hitler-channel stuff all the time, and there is more talk of Hitler now than I remember from before: and yet there are cracks appearing. The establishment is losing its grip.

I do talk about Jews with trustworthy family members.

Indeed frustration did motivate the tone of my remarks. I sat through at least 15 minutes of Levin, nimbly discussing every aspect of our founding as a country, without regard for the fact that the Founders were eager to exclude his ancestors. He happily cites Sowell and Williams but not Tanika or Tyrone.

I don't know the best way to get the ball rolling on the Jewish problem but I can't think of a good example of an organization that successfully stemmed the free-fall collapse over the past 60 years. Avoiding mention of the Jews is one thing every conservative effort shares.

Anyway I shall endeavor to be more scientific.

Feel free to pretty up the subject, or delete the thread. Or just leave it as is, and make an example of me: pilates_fan, official dart boy of WNN!

"Jews are not our buddy pals."

● "Even the best of the Gentiles should all be killed"

● "Gentiles exist only to serve jews"

● "Serve the jews or Die"

By the way, the other day a neighbor asked me, "How did we get to be a minority in our own country?"

I think Whites want history. They want to know how on earth we got to a point where we have to play dodge-black, dodge-hispanic, dodge-muslim, and other wasteful games.

Today in the food store a nice White lady dropped a dime. I joked, "That dime is worth at least eight cents!" It got a laugh.

We're all ready for more.

I have to admit, for me, trying to avoid the J -word has been like trying to have a quick conversation without saying the words And, The, Is or I during the course of it. But, I also have to admit that I've gotten much better at omitting the word after reading the post over, and asking myself, is it really necessary that I use it, when I could better use the word Liberal, Enemies, Cultural Marxist, for instance?

And even then , I often fall back into bad habits. But I agree with Jamie, that over using the word can have the effect of desensitizing people to it's greater effectiveness if used sparingly and more appropriately.

I sometimes think that by focusing on the Jews too much, we DE-emphasize the role of the white liberals, who are way more numerous, and as being 'Traitors', are just as deserving of our wrath.

I have two follow-up points.

The first is that any idea well stated is never offensive to White people. Now of course in this thread I was over-the-top and a bit silly.

The other thing is that the idea is always 'we know that'. The point is that certain language repels the Jews, and forces them to self-identify. This is key. White people are always hoping to create a new knife to cut the onion that is being grown around us, and that new blade becomes another layer of the onion, because the Jews get into it and emphasize some of what we agree with, and deselect other topics. Jews hate certain topics, and these need to be mentioned, because the Jews are repulsed in this manner.

Yes, more "sensible" jews such as Levin and David Horowitz are indeed the trickiest. These guys are slick...

One would do well to refer to ALL of our enemies as anti-White.

Originally Posted by Jamie Kelso

Less is more, as the saying goes. Constantly "naming" something or shouting something doesn't make it more persuasive. It makes the reader or the listener think that we're nuts, and they probably won't be willing to listen and get our consistent White message. So yes, we want fellow Whites to hear us, to listen to us and to understand our message - not run for the hills away from us.

Very well-put. Also I'd suggest that we pick "easy targets" first and focus on information that can be spread point-form.

Africans are an easy target. La Raza is an easy target. Islam is an easy target. They do poorly in school, they commit crime, they refuse to assimilate and they have hordes of children.

Jews on the other hand are not an easy target. Asians are not an easy target. They do well in school, they have few children, they don't break the law. Negatives, particularly in the case of Jews, are very difficult to establish, even with a lengthy essay. In order to believe that their actions are negative, you have to accept what we're saying about the "easy targets" above anyway.

So we should pick easy targets first. Once people see that being realistic about blacks, Arabs or Mexicans answers pressing questions and brings immediate improvements, they will be more open to racial thinking in general. They will be looking to figure out how such a great error could have been made.

One can make some very good arguments against Liberals and Cultural Marxist, or those we label Anti-American, with wide spread agreement among most white Conservatives and Christians, but the minute we mention Jew, we lose a portion of these simply because of their own 'ignorance', even though the vast majority of these Jews would fall into those categories we could generally call our enemies.

I suppose for this reason alone, we should minimize our use of the word Jew, for the simply reason that it's just not necessary in most cases in order to make our argument or give our people the bear information needed to join our Nationalist Movement. We should make our message as easy to swallow as possible for those who aren't well acquainted with the truth concerning certain aspects of our population.

Contrary to what many may think who oppose this position of WNN or the A3P concerning this particular issue. there's no desire to completely ignore or deny the detrimental participation or efforts of any group that we know is trying to undermine our people's rights in this nation. It's merely a matter of taking a more professional stance that will have our movement, 'move forward'.

It is amazing how after reading ANY thread either here or over at SF, I always end up fighting the uncontrollable urge to post the Mantra. That is the real answer most of you are looking for. You just don't know it yet.

I am pretty sure my molars are completely flat from all the grinding of my teeth. sheeesh...

"Jews do not break the law"

They are writing and rewriting the laws and their re written laws are against the supreme law of the land.

"Jews do not break the law"

They are writing and rewriting the laws and their re written laws are against the supreme law of the land.

This is the same type of crap the jews always do. They just corrupt society in order to destroy it.

Originally Posted by pilates_fan

I do apologize!

Okay I admit I overreached there.

It is true that I would not speak that way directly to a neighbor. But I will say, that I am much less politically correct than I used to be. And I am pushing the envelope. I am starting to make the remark that 'they' have countries already. People get it. They are catching on. I also sense increasing pressure on "History". There is a constant drumbeat of pro-Holocaust and Hitler-channel stuff all the time, and there is more talk of Hitler now than I remember from before: and yet there are cracks appearing. The establishment is losing its grip.

I do talk about Jews with trustworthy family members.

Indeed frustration did motivate the tone of my remarks. I sat through at least 15 minutes of Levin, nimbly discussing every aspect of our founding as a country, without regard for the fact that the Founders were eager to exclude his ancestors. He happily cites Sowell and Williams but not Tanika or Tyrone.

I don't know the best way to get the ball rolling on the Jewish problem but I can't think of a good example of an organization that successfully stemmed the free-fall collapse over the past 60 years. Avoiding mention of the Jews is one thing every conservative effort shares.

Anyway I shall endeavor to be more scientific.

Feel free to pretty up the subject, or delete the thread. Or just leave it as is, and make an example of me: pilates_fan, official dart boy of WNN!

I see I'm in the minority supporting your thread, naming the Jew, and especially sorry to see you back off your first, and quite natural, response...Personally, I will name the Jew until the day I die.

FYI: Sadly, this is the same debate that drove so many outstanding patriots to leave SF years ago.