Thread: How did Mitt Romney get Rich?

...while Hannity, Limbaugh and the GOP establishment opine that the super rich pay their fair share.

Mitt Romney Pays 15% Income Tax Rate

Mitt Romney admitted Tuesday that he effectively has paid a 15% tax rate on his personal income, but
his comments could signify the start of a barrage of questions that concern the former Massachusetts governor's finances.
Romney said that his tax rate is near 15% because he receives most of his income from past investments instead of through ordinary wages earned, according to multiple reports.

2011 IRS Tax Brackets

Tax Bracket	Single	Married Filing Jointly	Head of Household
10% Bracket	$0 – $8,500	$0 – $17,000	$0 – $12,150
15% Bracket	$8,500 – $34,500	$17,000 – $69,000	$12,150 – $46,250
25% Bracket	$34,500 – $83,600	$69,000 – $139,350	$46,250 – $119,400
28% Bracket	$83,600 – $174,400	$139,350 – $212,300	$119,400 – $193,350
33% Bracket	$174,400 – $379,150	$212,300 – $379,150	$193,350 – $379,150
35% Bracket	$379,150+	$379,150+	$379,150+

I don't like this line of thinking. This is communism at work. What is wrong with wealthy people? The government should be there to provide basic infrastructure and defense. Nothing more. Smart guys who do a good job should not be penalized for their acumen.

This kind of carry on is exactly what Barack Hussein Mohammed Obama would be prattling on about. Does that trouble anybody else?

I am closing this thread.

Can our posters please be advised that the Marxist and rabidly anti-White MoveOn.Org site is not an appropriate source.

White Folks are the only ones on Earth who truly believe in Right and Wrong. Some things can not be justified, and are Wrong, even if there is not specifically a law against it, Wrong is still Wrong.

The wealth of a nation comes from the sweat of a White Man's brow.

When a White Man goes forth, is productive and creates Wealth, that is Right; when an individual destroys productivity just to take away the Wealth that others have labored for, that is Wrong.

Back in the 1980's such individuals were called "Corporate Raiders" and their raids were termed "Hostile Takeovers". Now they are apparently called "Vulture Capitalists".

What the Corporate Raiders did (and I witnessed this myself in Houston, Texas) was to approach a bank for a loan to purchase a working productive company. If the loan was approved, then the Corporate Raiders took possession of that business (that employed hundreds or thousands of employees, which also employed service industries and merchants by the Circulation of Wealth) the Raiders began selling off assets of that business and laying off employees. The raid did not end until there were no remaining assets left to sell, and no more employees left to lay off.

I witnessed the raid on one family owned business that had a fleet of delivery trucks and specialty equipment for the product they sold. In the end there was nothing left but an empty building.

The raid at another family owned business was on a manufacturer; the Raiders immediately began selling off the equipment used to manufacture the products and laying off employees. In that raid nothing was left because they even sold the empty buildings.

The Raiders never repaid the loans; the loans were payable by a corporation and not the Raiders themselves-- once the business had been completely gutted, the corporation declared bankruptcy, and the Raiders walked away rich.

That is simply Wrong!

The Corporate Raiders did not toil, they did not produce, they did not Circulate Wealth; they did the opposite, they prevented work, halted production, and took Wealth out of Circulation.

Everyone is aware that nearly all manufacturing jobs have left America; the Corporate Raiders are the main cause.

I have seen how the Corporate Raiders operate, and I understand the system; I could do the same right here in this area if I chose to, but if I did that it would be Wrong, and I won't do what is Wrong. I also will not support anyone who does what is Wrong.

There is such a thing as what is Right and what is Wrong. When the Citizens of a Nation do what is Right, everyone prospers. When Corporate Raiders are allowed to raid as they please, then the Raiders take the wealth for themselves, and the rest of the Nation suffers.

The Laws of a Nation should protect the Rights of the Citizens and the Wealth of the Nation!

Originally Posted by INVIKTUS

I am closing this thread.

Can our posters please be advised that the Marxist and rabidly anti-White MoveOn.Org site is not an appropriate source.

Thank you for reopening this thread!

The video that I found and posted suggests that Mitt Romney became wealthy operating as a Corporate Raider. If anyone here has any additional information on the source of his wealth, I would be glad to know about it.

I would also be interested in any additional information on where the financial support for his political career has come from, along with his voting record and any legislation that he might have signed into State Law.

I seriously suspect that the more American Citizens lean about that individual, the less they are going to like him.

Originally Posted by INVIKTUS

I am closing this thread.

Can our posters please be advised that the Marxist and rabidly anti-White MoveOn.Org site is not an appropriate source.

What I don't understand is to why no one has acutally questioned why MoveOn specifically used two 50+ White Males for their spot? Could it be that the minaiacle White genocidist over at MoveOn.org are baiting White men for the final solution? MoveOn is controlled by Soros, he is less of friend to the White man than Romney is, that is a fact. I don't endorse Romney, or any of his ilk, but why would you be taken in by MoveOn? Be ever vigillant as to who your enemies actually are.

Definitely Move.On is the enemy....had some experiences with them in the early days of their org. Things were fine and they wanted me to run an area for them, fund raise, have Move.On events, etc, until they found out about my politics. They pure pro Israel and Zio Con all the way.

Originally Posted by Poor Richard

Thank you for reopening this thread!

The video that I found and posted suggests that Mitt Romney became wealthy operating as a Corporate Raider. If anyone here has any additional information on the source of his wealth, I would be glad to know about it.

I would also be interested in any additional information on where the financial support for his political career has come from, along with his voting record and any legislation that he might have signed into State Law.

I seriously suspect that the more American Citizens lean about that individual, the less they are going to like him.

Indeed. I don't think anyone here is under any illusions about Romney. He is the modern day equivalent of a robber baron and only wishes to become president to satisfy his own narcissism. Romney has no ideological core or beliefs, he has no strong position. That man will say and do whatever he perceives as required to gain him that slot.

All well and good, but it is important for us to scrutinize sources. MoveOn is adept at using propaganda, and we all know a story can be spun in numerous directions. Nothing that MoveOn has to offer should be given any credibility here. It would be the same as putting credence into an ADL hate report.

If Move On will expose true facts in order to discredit Romney, then their motive would be to help Obama to keep infesting the white house; but the Truth is the Truth, regardless of the source.

It appears the Communist Party might still endorse Obama, while the International Banks seem to endorse Romney in public, but in private the International Bankers and the International Corporations are the Communist Party, so as long as either Obama or Romney wins, our Republic looses.

The more Republicans who stop supporting Romney, the better for Ron Paul.

Mitt Romney, Corporate Raider

Corporate Raiders have earned two things:

A trial and a rope!

Mitt Romney Pays 13.9% Tax Rate

Romney's Father NOT an American

Like the Kenyan Communist, Romney is not an individual who should be in the White House.

Perhaps he should run for President of Mexico?

Democrats begin attacks on Romney's Mormon faith with claims 'because women are not great fans of polygamy' | Mail Online

Romney's Father was a citizen of Mexico.

When the time arose to fight for his nation of Mexico, what did the senior Romeny do? He ran!

What would Romney do if the need came to defend America? Flee to Mexico?

Will the real Mittens Romney Please Stand Up?

If there is a REAL one.

Originally Posted by INVIKTUS

I don't like this line of thinking. This is communism at work. What is wrong with wealthy people? The government should be there to provide basic infrastructure and defense. Nothing more. Smart guys who do a good job should not be penalized for their acumen.

This kind of carry on is exactly what Barack Hussein Mohammed Obama would be prattling on about. Does that trouble anybody else?

I agree w/ this generally, but in my dotage (some say senility) I've come to the conclusion that the Edisons and Fords and Goodyears are the exceptions that disprove the general rule Balzac came up with it ...."Behind every large fortune lies a crime" I know all about the Marxist doctrine being codified into the "progressive" US Tax Code ... and I don't like it one bit.

But as jews and their minion "white" renegades become an ever more outlandish owner of "our" nation's wealth, I'm inclined to agree w/ Balzac more and more.

I can see some merit on both sides, when it comes to the issue of 'Capitalism' in general, and why we need a 'Third Position' approach to any economic vision we may have for a future nationalist state.


I myself abhor the concept of 'Class Warfare' that's obviously supported by the likes of Obama, and yet I'm quite aware of the abuses within the financial markets.

As for the 'wealthy individual' in general. I've always thought that there are those who are focused upon materialism, and as much as I would prefer that they voluntarily give a portion to our cause, and for the betterment of our people, as long as their money is made honestly and is not counterproductive toward the nation, than so be it. But then there's that class of wealthy people, who based upon the immoral means in which their money is obtained, often at the expense of the welfare of the people, and who because of their liberal ideological beliefs, often finance liberal organizations and causes, as well as individual careers, such as Obama for instance, who I wouldn't have any problem in stripping them down to the deepest depths of poverty possible and giving their wealth back to the people as a form of restitution! Does 'Soros' come to mind?

I believe a mixed economic system is best. Leaning much more toward 'Free Enterprise' and yet with limited regulations in order to keep Jews out of the system, to keep it independent, and to make sure 'greed' doesn't have it violate the integrity of our race, as slavery had done, and non-white immigration is now doing.

P.S. Obama has accused Romney of being born with a 'Silver Spoon' in his mouth. But at least Romney wasn't born with a government 'tit' in his mouth tattooed with 'Affirmative Action"! Crude but true!

Mitt Romney, Flip Flopper In Chief!

Does he actually have any real opinions, or does he just adopt any opinion he is paid to adopt?

Romney = Obama