This helps to put ALL leftist "science" in jeopardy.

**Enoch** · 12-03-2011

>Early last month, prominent social psychologist Diederik Stapel was outed as one of the biggest frauds in scientific history when he admitted to fabricating results in numerous scientific studies.

http://io9.com/5864296/scientific-fraud-diederik-stapel-signs-off-on-his-first-official-retraction

One of his (now known to be faked) papersCoping with Chaos: How Disordered Contexts Promote Stereotyping and Discrimination

**JamesinUSA** · 12-03-2011

White Americans can't put much stock in any of the social sciences that have been taken over by Cultural Marxist going back to the Frankford School and Columbia University, when and where the Marxist who were throughout of Hitler's Germany finally settled, and have been very succeessful in writing our public educations textbooks and influencing how our people view themselves. One good example of this "BIG LIE" is that 'race' doesn't really exist, that it's really just a 'Social Construct'. In other words, I suppose we're all supposed to believe that 'race' is really just a figment of our imagination and that we're supposed to turn our backs on common sense and believe that Zulus are fully capable, with a little change of scenery and a high protein meal, be able to put a Zulunaut on the Moon!

**CymruCelt** · 12-04-2011

I have always discounted the sociologists as a pseudoscience and not a real empirical science. Most all of them seem to be of the same tribe with the exception of the biggest fraud himself, Dr. Phil.

**JamesinUSA** · 12-04-2011

Originally Posted by CymruCelt

I have always discounted the sociologists as a pseudoscience and not a real empirical science. Most all of them seem to be of the same tribe with the exception of the biggest fraud himself, Dr. Phil.

It's like in the field of Anthropology today, I remember in our school textbook, it would show pictures of all the various races and different kinds of people around the world, emphasizing the different eye shapes and everything we would naturally think of in identifying at least the five major races. These books today, totally DE-emphasizes any such differences, and in fact, will come right out and state that 'race' really doesn't exist, except for the superficial characteristics we normally think of when thinking of someones who's black for instance. They completely ignore that race goes right down to the molecular level as determined by geneticist and even forensic anthropologist who can easily identify the race of someone through their DNA.

The idea that we're supposed to think that genes can determine hair,eye,and skin color, and yet think that genes has nothing to do with behavior or intelligence is stupid to say the least, and yet that's exactly what they would have a generation of supposedly educated young people think today.