Thread: TIME FOR A SEA CHANGE!!!

A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history.

This small body of detemined spirits must first be fully awaken psychologically and in full knowledge about the system we are brought under (this time is different than the time of Ghandi, no mind control screens in Ghandi's time) Mind control screens can also mean mind unlocking screens (determined spirits on this kind of forums)
We are under a heavy bombardement of masonic propaganda, deception and ideology.
There are a few movies in which you can see what is going on;

Star Wars - Revenge of the Sith (2005) - In this movie you see how the system gets into darkness more and more.

The Matrix (1999-2003) - In these movies you can see that the mind can be altered to a new (artificial) environment.

Minority Report (2002) - In this movie you see the 'Orwellian' system they have created, and are still creating around us.

The Wave (1981) - This short movie shows how a teacher gets control over his students by using mind control (used in Germany, and we see it happen again today)

That's how advertising works, too.
People are told what should be important to them. Take for example, the Progressive commercials, where an insane woman puts men down. The storyline is that the man always submits to her. But a smart man would just tell her to buzz off or walk away, period.

Feminism is terrible for women. Women were far stronger long ago. So many now are slaves to the media. They hang onto every word that comes out of Oprah's orifice.

Reject ALL violence? Perhaps clarifying that to the violence against us. The American Revolution was a violent act.

jm

k

+ 1

Welcome to the board, Last of the Caucasians!

Originally Posted by Last of the Caucasians

Yes we must Reject ALL Violence. There is no real senario in which we can wage some guerilla war and "win." Books like The Brigade or The Turner Diaries are fantasy and NOT reality. Just ask Robert Jay Mathews and he will tell you, or ask Eric Rudolph what he would do differently. I have read his writing from ADMAX: Eric Rudolph Homepage It doesn't sound very pleasant, ADMAX that is. These brave men actually did something instead of just talking, but their course of action led to their utter ruin. There has been enough White Men destroyed by Them, not to mention the 50 million plus abortions which have robbed us of how many Mozart's or Andrew Jackson's? The American Revolution was possible to win because of differing variables. They would/will just wage biological warfare against the world if they are losing. They probably will anyway, as They more than likely have vaccines to protect themselves. The murder of microbiologists is well underway as I am sure you are well aware of: Steve Quayle News Alerts Just my personal opinion, I could be wrong. Thanks for your insights and opinions though, everyone is always welcome to critique my posts. It is the only way I will be able to gain further insight into my personal philosophy and correct course if needs be. Best of luck and hope to hear from you again soon!

What do you propose Whites do if they are attacked, if you oppose all forms of violence?
I agree that the American Revolutionary War was a different deal. There were not the same parameters.

I personally think this is won with economics, aka more money than the enemy, but if you won't fight to defend yourself, ala pacifism,
what will you do?

good luck with singing kumbaya around the campfire..the reason some of our great men (robert matthews)have failed is because good white men did not stand up when needed.

Originally Posted by Last of the Caucasians

The time has come for our movement to change tactics. Hithertofore we have not been using Strategy in any form whatsoever. This Must stop Immediately! We must begin by changing ourselves, instead of demanding others to conform to something which has never been supported in any real way in all of American History. The whole neo-nazi shtick must be tossed Post Haste! We need a New Vision and that vision must be positive, wholesome and eagerly accepted. What we need is Americanism!

Welcome to the forum. It is true that a change in strategy is needed. As to the sentiment that the "neo-nazi shtick must be tossed", seems not to be germane as to the members of this forum. In fact, I have never met or associated with a neo-nazi, and the neo-nazi movement in America seems to consist of a few scattered puddles in the larger white nationalist sea that the media focuses on.

Two cases in point, CBS 60 minutes recently aired a segment on the murder of Jeff Hall and the 10 people who attended his meetings shouting "Sieg Heil" after every sentence spoken, and the reporting of the ANP whose 50 nation-wide members have endorsed the Ocuppy Wall Street crowd. Far from being a major concern for us to dwell upon.

Even the late William Pierce who was associated with Rockwell after writing the Turner Diaries said about the dozen or so uniform wearing activists, "Most level-headed people, even if they think of themselves as National Socialists, are going to be hesitant to get involved with that kind of circus."

A new vision yes, to dwell and condemn a few dozen malcontents occassionally, yes also. At this time they seem to be the problem of the Occupied Wall Street Reds.

I agree we need to stay positive.

Originally Posted by Sinterklaas

A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history.

Only 10% is required to influence the remaining 90% and change things.

....

l;

hg

I agree with you that we should 'Reject Violence', or rather the initiation of any such violence. As you've noted, violence usually has a way of playing into the hands of our enemies. But, unfortunately I'm afraid that 'violence', will be initiated by are opponents in due time, especially as our nationalist party or movement makes more progress.
These people on the Left aren't going to watch all that they've worked for, and the many gains they've made over the last 60 years or so be taken away from them by force, or even by the vote for that matter without a fight.
I suppose what we need in a conjunction with a 'rejection of violence', which is by any means to imply or advocate 'pacifism', is just to encourage a more knowledgeable and disciplined membership, that can be patient of what seems to be an eternity in realizing real progress ,and those who will hold the course and not allow their interest in the cause to wan over time.

But all in all, you've made some great suggestions here.

I would like to add, that we, (including myself,) stop referring to ourselves as 'White' Nationalist, and that we call ourselves 'American Nationalist' instead, or just Nationalist for short.

It's really not a compromise on the racial component of our political and social philosophy of life, when one thinks of being 'American', we think white, just as our Founding Fathers and our Constitution would have an American be.
Aside the reality of the Law of the Land as it now stands, and whether I like it or not, I personally, as an American Nationalist, don't recognize non-whites as being 'Americans'.

Calling ourselves 'American Nationalist', makes more sense in a patriotic and national sense as well, especially in trying to appeal to....White Americans.


'White' Nationalist or nationalism can encompass all sorts of factions that really has very little to do with our national aspirations.


Take the 'National Alliance' for instance. They call themselves White Nationalist, and yet their program is 'International' in character, and they very explicitly reject the word and notion of 'Nationalism' itself , as being too narrow in bringing ALL whites of the world under one umbrella, so to speak.
White Nationalism, can also so conjure up in the minds of the public, images of Nazis, KKK, Skin Heads, and those people who I'm sure include many good folks,(and you know who you are), but who often don't present the external presence and personal discipline that we would rather see in those who that we are to depend upon to seek political office, speak at rallies, go door to door, communicate with the media, etc, etc.


'American Nationalism' sounds more inclusive whether it's actually inclusive or not. It sounds more politically oriented rather than racial, which is really the direction we need to move toward at the moment.

I believe by that by prioritizing this seemingly simple and single change in 'name' for ourselves and our movement, we can reap great dividends in recruitment, and in giving ourselves a greater sense of political legitimacy.

Another point. Is that first impressions means a lot to people, and words have meaning. It's probably not a very good idea to rush things things that many of us may be partial, or have definite sympathies toward, such as 'National Socialism" for instance, and yet know that the vast majority of the public is going to reject your entire message if such a notion is introduced prematurely, inappropriately, or in most cases, brought up at all, into a conversation, or recruitment effort. Once you've gained the trust of someone, and they better have an idea of the total you, being just a normal working class decent human being, more steps can be taken later to educate a person about things that many nationalist take for granted as just being the simple truth, about race, Jewish history, and other things that are of interest specifically to us, as a race.

It's like someone recently here at the forum wrote, 'Allow people to come to their own conclusions'.
I suppose it makes sense to realize that no one can convince YOU, more of a simple truth, than YOU.

g

h