Thread: Norway Shooter Anders Behring Breivik

Originally Posted by Poor Richard

The two main power blocks of the Oligarchs (International Banks and International Corporations) are the Fundamentalist Christians and the Loony Leftist Atheists.

How did they gain control of two such diametrically opposed camps?

By using Zionists to control Christians, and Communists to control Atheists.

War is deceit.

When I read this line in Breivik’s letter

This is extremely important to remember, brother: "war is deceit". We must do what is required of us to succeed, and this includes adapting so that our enemies will have a harder time to demonize us.

I immediately thought he was indirectly referring back to what he said about National Socialism.

When Marge Schott, owner of the Cincinnati Reds said back in the early 1990’s, “Hitler was good for Germany in the beginning, but he went too far,” she was speaking truthfully, and probably saying what Breivik is trying to say here.

As you know, I am no Hitlerite, but I would be a fool to say there was nothing good about the program of the NASDAP. After all, you can’t get overwhelming(Probably near 90% by 1938) support from the most intelligent and best educated nation in the world without doing something right.

The one big thing the Reich did right was in its monetary system, which brought Germany from over 30% unemployment to a labor shortage in less than 5 years. The mistake many of our people make is to ascribe the strength of this system to the NASDAP and Hitler. This is wrong!

The heart of the system came from America, where several people had written and talked about it for decades. The most notable was, of course, Henry Ford. This is a lengthy quote, but it is taken from one of the most important speeches in the history of the United States, and should be read by everyone. This is Thomas Edison, speaking to the press in 1921, during a visit he and Henry Ford made to Muscle Shoals, Alabama, when Ford was trying to get the government to let him take over and complete what would later become the Tennessee Valley Authority:

“Now, here is Ford proposing to finance Muscle Shoals by an issue of currency. Very well, let us suppose for a moment that Congress follows his proposal. Personally, I don’t think Congress has imagination enough to dot it, but let us suppose that it does. The required sum is authorized –say $30,000,000. The bills are issued directly by the Government as all money ought to be. When the workmen are paid off they receive these United States bills. When the material is bought it is paid in these United States bills. Except that perhaps the bills may have the engraving of the water dam, instead of a railroad train and a ship, as some of the Federal Reserve notes have. They will be the same as any other currency put out by the Government: that is, they will be money. They will be based on the public wealth already in Muscle Shoals, and their circulation will increase that public wealth, not only the public money but the public wealth—real wealth.

“When these bills have answered the purpose of building and completing Muscle Shoals, they will be retired by the earnings of the power dam. That is, the people of the United States will have all that they put into Muscle Shoals and all that they can take out for centuries—the endless wealth-making water power of that great Tennessee River—with no tax and no increase of the national debt.”

“But suppose Congress does not see this, what then?” Mr. Edison was asked.

“Well, Congress must fall back on the old way of doing business. It must authorize an issue of bonds. That is it must go out to the money brokers and borrow enough or our own national currency to complete great national resources, and we then must pay interest to the money brokers for the use of our own money.

“That is to say, under the old way any time we wish to add to the national wealth we are compelled to add to the national debt.

“Now, that is what Henry Ford wants to prevent. He thinks it is stupid, and so do I, that for the loan of $30,000,000 of their own money the people of the United States should be compelled to pay $66,000,000—that is what it amounts to, with interest. People who will not turn a shovelful of dirt nor contribute a pound of material will collect more money from the United States than will the people who supply the material and do the work. That is terrible the terrible thing about interest. In all our great bond issues the interest is always greater than the principal. All of the great public works cost more than twice the actual cost on that account. Under the present system of doing business we simply add 120 to 150 per cent to the stated cost.

“But here is the point: If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good makes the bill good also. The difference between the bond and the bill is that the bond lets the money brokers collect twice the amount of the bond and an additional 20 per cent., whereas the currency pays nobody but those who directly contribute to Muscle Shoals in some useful way.

“If the Government issues bonds it simply induces the money brokers to draw $30,000,000 out of the other channels of trade and turn it into Muscle Shoals: if the Government issues currency, it provides itself with enough to increase the national wealth at Muscle Shoals without disturbing the business of the rest of the country. And in doing this it increase its income without adding a penny to its debt.

“It is absurd to say that our country can issue $30,000,000 in bonds and not $30,000,000 in currency. Both are promises to pay: but one promise fattens the usurer, and the other helps the people.
If the currency issued by the Government were no good, then the bonds issued would be no good either. It is a terrible situation when the Government, to increase the national wealth, must go into debt and submit to ruinous interest charges at the hands of men who control the fictitious values of gold.

“Look at it another way. If the Government issues bonds, the brokers will sell them. The bonds will be negotiable: they will be considered as gilt-edged paper. Why? Because the Government is behind them, but who is behind the Government? The people. Therefore it is the people who constitute the basis of Government credit. Why then cannot the people have the benefit of their own gilt-edged credit by receiving non-interest bearing currency on the Muscle Shoals instead of the bankers receiving the benefit of the people’s credit in interest-bearing bonds?”

“The people must pay any way: why should they be compelled to pay twice as the bond system compels them to pay? The people of the United States always accept their Government’s currency. If the United States Government will adopt this policy of increasing its national wealth without contributing to the interest collector—for the whole national debt is made up of the interest charges—then you will see an era of progress and prosperity in this country such as could never have come otherwise.”

“Are you going to have anything to do with outlining this proposed policy?” Mr. Edison was asked.

“I am just expressing my opinion as a citizen” he replied. “Ford’s idea is flawless. They won’t like it. They will fight it, but the people of this country ought to take it up and think about it. I believe it points the way to many reforms and achievements which cannot come under the old systems.”

http://publicbankinginstitute.org/thomas-edison-article
So, you never have to mention a regime that 95% of Americans have been taught to hate in order to get the best of their economic program. It’s as American as apple pie!

The racial and cultural preservation Breivik talks about is all there in the Immigration Act of 1924.

Everything we need is available from our own history. It came from the minds of our own people, and needs no baggage from any foreign source. It’s as old a Henry Clay’s “American Plan,” which is now approaching its 200^th birthday. Why would anyone want to call himself a “Nazi?” Or allow others to ascribe that name to him? Oh, they’ll try, alright, but if we just knew our own history, they could not succeed.

What if someone ran for President this year, calling for a government owned bank, issuing its own currency, free of interest to the Banksters? And, proposing to give 160 acres of public land to any American family that would live on it and improve it? And, proposing a massive program of public works to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure, paid for by the issuance of those interest free bills, meaning NO debt? And, calling for government support for college education ONLY for people who should be in college? And, calling for the closing of the borders, deportation of all people of African descent, and specifically excluding Asian immigration?

What would the media say about this candidate? Of course they would call him a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

What do I call him? Why, Abraham Lincoln, of course, because I have just described Lincoln’s program for you. Lincoln was an acolyte of Henry Clay. His greenback currency, his massive railroad building program, his land grant colleges, his Homestead Act, his support for the Chinese Exclusion act, his "The only good indian is a dead indian" aboriginal policy, and his often stated desire to repatriate the Africans would have put the US at the top of the world heap at least half a century earlier. And we would be debt-free and exploring outer space today. That is why he was killed.

Of course you know the congress rejected the wisdom of Ford and Edison, and financed TVA with debt, on which the Shylocks are still collecting interest today, as the debt is rolled over again and again.

From the lengthy quote in my post above, here is the most profound statement about money and finance you will ever read:

It is absurd to say that our country can issue $30,000,000 in bonds and not $30,000,000 in currency. Both are promises to pay: but one promise fattens the usurer, and the other helps the people.

One fattens the usurer, the other helps the people. End the FED! Yesss!!!!

Great posts Edmund #543 and #544 directly above!

And allow me to repeat, with emphasis a few lines you wrote above:

The racial and cultural preservation Breivik talks about is all there in the Immigration Act of 1924.

Everything we need is available from our own history. It came from the minds of our own people, and needs no baggage from any foreign source. It’s as old a Henry Clay’s “American Plan,” which is now approaching its 200^th birthday. Why would anyone want to call himself a “Nazi?” Or allow others to ascribe that name to him? Oh, they’ll try, alright, but if we just knew our own history, they could not succeed.

Iconoclast

Norway killer Anders Breivik ruled sane, given 21-year prison term

Norway killer Anders Breivik ruled sane, given 21-year prison term - CNN.com

He was sentenced to the maximum possible term of 21 years and was ordered to serve a minimum of 10 years in prison. The time he has already spent in prison counts toward the term.

The sentence could be extended, potentially indefinitely, in the future if he is considered still to pose a threat to society. Norway does not have the death penalty.

Breivik pronounced "guilty" in government court

Government court up holds White Genocide.

Will this be the beginning of the end of Multiculturalism?

Originally Posted by Sigrid

Norway killer Anders Breivik ruled sane, given 21-year prison term

Norway killer Anders Breivik ruled sane, given 21-year prison term - CNN.com

...and, in the Cell?

Originally Posted by AustralianLily

...and, who else in the Cell?

Maybe a palestine dressed as a jew?

Originally Posted by AustralianLily

...and, in the Cell?

We sure don't know all of the details, AustralianLily, but suffice to say that he received a sentence that most thought he would obtain.

It's difficult to figure out why the Norwegian system thinks 21 years (or more, depending upon what is ruled later) is a sufficient amount of time to be sentenced for his crimes. I'm curious to know whether or not there was an uproar on that same subject due to the bombing and shootings.

Norway, where gun ownership is high---about one privately owned gun for every three people, had only 5 murders where guns were the weapon in 2005. Brievik not considered, the rate has more than doubled due to the influx of third-world immigrants. This article says: "Norway distinguishes two kinds of rapes: rape and attack-rape. In rapes, the rapist and the victim know each other beforehand, while an attack-rape is when the two do not know each other before the rape. In Oslo, 100 percent of the attack-rapes are committed by non-Western immigrants." Oslo, Norway: 69 percent increase in rapes (76 rapes in 91 days). Share of non-Westerners among 'attack-rapists': 100 percent. - Jihad Watch

Prior to the influx of non-White immigrants, Norway, where the police are unarmed, had no real need for a prison term longer than 21 years. Of course they should have kept the death penalty of first degree murder, but they didn't.

The people Breivik killed wanted to increase the flood of violent non-Whites into their peaceful White country. All of Breivik's victims were guilty of the offense of "Accessory before the fact" to murder and rape. None were innocent.

By the same logic, every American who supports non-White immigration into our country is a criminal. I know that is strong language, but we are going to have to muster the courage to make that very argument if we are ever to gain the moral high ground.

To devide the sentence to "three months for each child" is to not realise twenty-one years in this fast world is a long time, as well as, it is a harsh sentence in Norway, it is the first validation to the families of the murdered children. The second validation to the families of the murdered children is, Breivik was deemed sane.

Too many times people confuse punishment and correction. Punishment is of a lower tone than correction. During the course of correction, the offender is challenged to accept the reality of his crimes. During the course of correction, the many years, the offender becomes obliged to tell the truth, and/or the drug blockages start to reduce, or remove. Once again, the families of the murder victims may be given the details which put their minds to rest.

It will be of interest to see if anything changes in Scandinavia's situation. I'd be willing to make a wager that while nationalism is still on the rise there (and is healthy, for the most part), it still has to gain momentum. Both America and Scandinavia have a ways to go, but we're working at it.

Originally Posted by Edmund Ruffin

Norway, where gun ownership is high---about one privately owned gun for every three people, had only 5 murders where guns were the weapon in 2005. Brievik not considered, the rate has more than doubled due to the influx of third-world immigrants. This article says: "Norway distinguishes two kinds of rapes: rape and attack-rape. In rapes, the rapist and the victim know each other beforehand, while an attack-rape is when the two do not know each other before the rape. In Oslo, 100 percent of the attack-rapes are committed by non-Western immigrants." Oslo, Norway: 69 percent increase in rapes (76 rapes in 91 days). Share of non-Westerners among 'attack-rapists': 100 percent. - Jihad Watch

Prior to the influx of non-White immigrants, Norway, where the police are unarmed, had no real need for a prison term longer than 21 years. Of course they should have kept the death penalty of first degree murder, but they didn't.

The people Breivik killed wanted to increase the flood of violent non-Whites into their peaceful White country. All of Breivik's victims were guilty of the offense of "Accessory before the fact" to murder and rape. None were innocent.

By the same logic, every American who supports non-White immigration into our country is a criminal. I know that is strong language, but we are going to have to muster the courage to make that very argument if we are ever to gain the moral high ground.

According to my understanding of the facts as they are known by me: If I had been on that Jury, I would have voted not guilty, because the Shooter only did the job that Government Agents refuse to do.

Just because a government refuses to up hold the Law and basic Morality, that does not make White Genocide legal.

Refusing to say that the Loony Leftist PC Multicultural Immigration Flood = White Genocide = Mass Murder, is to become an accessory after the fact to Mass Murder and Genocide.

True, these children may have been raised by Leftist PC parents, but Breivik chose to target the most innocent and defenseless of society. Unarmed kids on an isolated island.

His glorious raid on the parliament of Norway must have been postponed because of bad weather. Right. Like most mass murdering cowards he went onto his plan B.

Birgitte Smetbak
age 15




Sharidyn Svebakk-Boehn
age 14



Eivind Hovden
age 15



Karin Elena Holst
age 15




Andreas Dalby Groennesby
age 17




Aleksander Aas Eriksen
age 16




Johannes Buoe
age 14




Asta Sofie Helland Dahl
age 16




Emil Okkenhaug
age 15




Margrethe Boeyum Kloeven
age 16

If the Shooter's actions will help to bring about an end to Multiculturalism (White Genocide) then he will have helped to save the lives of BILLIONS of innocent White Children.

The Proponents of White Genocide he executed would have helped to carry out a White Genocide which would have murdered those billions of innocent White Children.

The Law states that Mass Murders who carry out Genocide are to be executed.

Enforce the Law, defend innocent White Children!

Well, the reality of such deeds is that it never helps our cause, if anything it only reverts the progress. As a rule it lacks any jolting power. So, beyond the debased nature of the killing frenzy, it was and will always be strategic idiocy. We will never win an inch on behalf of the future of our white children by lending support or creed to the backs of cold-blooded murderers.

Originally Posted by Sigrid

It will be of interest to see if anything changes in Scandinavia's situation.

I haven't noticed many directly linked consequences as of yet, except negative ones mostly; e.g the rise of membership within the Labour Party in Norway.

Originally Posted by Kaelen

Well, the reality of such deeds is that it never helps our cause, if anything it only reverts the progress. As a rule it lacks any jolting power. So, beyond the debased nature of the killing frenzy, it was and will always be strategic idiocy. We will never win an inch on behalf of the future of our white children by lending support or creed to the backs of cold-blooded murderers.

Those particular Mass Murders will not commit Genocide against any White Children in the future.

Millions of White Children were murdered in the Soviet Union, over the course of DECADES, and yet no one raised a finger to stop it.

The lives of innocent White Children are much more important than the lives of guilty Mass Murders.

Anyone joining the Labor Party (Party of White Genocide) is giving their approval to continue the White Genocide.

When the Law clearly states that Genocide is wrong and punishable by DEATH, then I stand with Justice, and not with the Proponents of White Genocide.