Thread: Norway Shooter Anders Behring Breivik

The Shooting Event in Scandinavia is not about the Shooter, it never was.

He did not go out and shoot Race Traitors because he is a member of the Illuminati, or the Knight's Templar, or because he is a heartless psychopath, or for any other reason other that the fact that they were Race Traitors.

He selected them as the target because they were Race Traitors, he committed his actions because they were Race Traitors, the event happened because they were Race Traitors.

If they had not been Race Traitors, perhaps he would have been at home reading a book that day.

Originally Posted by Poor Richard

The Shooting Event in Scandinavia is not about the Shooter, it never was.

He did not go out and shoot Race Traitors because he is a member of the Illuminati, or the Knight's Templar, or because he is a heartless psychopath, or for any other reason other that the fact that they were Race Traitors.

He selected them as the target because they were Race Traitors, he committed his actions because they were Race Traitors, the event happened because they were Race Traitors.

If they had not been Race Traitors, perhaps he would have been at home reading a book that day.

The Title of this thread is "Norway Shooter Anders Behring Breivik", I am sure I have kept to the topic of this young man. Race traitors is a charged term, exclusive and controlling, almost abusive. People are entitle to communicate, reducing other's to the state of the body only, they are in is low communication.

When the shooting happened many people were more concerned about of the effect of the shooting on their cause; young people died. They had foolish notions, but people are allowed in the free world to try and then discard.

I guess a communication can get exhausted and tired and then other communications can get released, or exteriorised. I like the communication of release.

Originally Posted by AustralianLily

When the shooting happened many people were more concerned about of the effect of the shooting on their cause; young people died. They had foolish notions, but people are allowed in the free world to try and then discard.

But, that is one of the main points, Norway is not part of the free world; Norway does not allow freedom of speech for those who strongly disagree with Multicult policies!

The camp that was attacked, was the camp of the ruling Labor party of Norway (read Communist) They support policies to import Muslims into Norway, regardless of the wishes of the people. The Labor Party also has passed laws to prevent freedom of speech for the opponents of the invasion. If freedom of speech is suppressed, then propaganda of the deed is the alternative to surrender and death. I do not necessarily support Brievik's actions but I understand why he did them.

The mostly young activists on the island may not have understood that they were part of a totalitarian party, supporting the destruction of their own race and culture, as well as supporting the suppression of freedom of speech; but, they were there for those purposes.

If my reading of Brievik's Compendium is correct, his purpose was to demonstrate, in the strongest possible manner, to the ruling Labor party, that they can not continue to betray their race, country and culture, without suffering any penalty.

Suppression of freedom of speech is very dangerous!

Iconoclast

If someone had opposed the murderous Marxists in Russia, then MILLIONS of innocent White Children might have been allowed to live.

Marxists don't intend to allow White Children to live.

Originally Posted by AustralianLily

The Title of this thread is "Norway Shooter Anders Behring Breivik", I am sure I have kept to the topic of this young man. Race traitors is a charged term, exclusive and controlling, almost abusive. People are entitle to communicate, reducing other's to the state of the body only, they are in is low communication.

When the shooting happened many people were more concerned about of the effect of the shooting on their cause; young people died. They had foolish notions, but people are allowed in the free world to try and then discard.

I guess a communication can get exhausted and tired and then other communications can get released, or exteriorised. I like the communication of release.

I guess I can never take anything for granted:

Yes I used the term "Race Traitors" but it has already been well established that those Race Traitors are/were UNREPENTANT PROPONENTS of WHITE GENOCIDE. They are the very individuals who are/were poised to bring about the MASS MURDER of MILLIONS of INNOCENT WHITE CHILDREN.

This is nothing new, their kind MURDERED MILLIONS of innocent White Children in the Soviet Union (no regrets, no arrests) and thousands of years ago, their kind caused the wholesale slaughter of my People, by bringing unwanted backward primitive savages into our White Civilization.

The LAW should be brought to bear against the Proponents of White Genocide, but the Government prevents exercise of the Law, which makes the Government accessory to being a PROPONENT of GENOCIDE.

History says they are guilty, the current situation says they are guilty, they admit they are guilty, the Law says they are guilty, and according to the Shooter, he only shot them because they are guilty.

Knock it off. The man's a deranged menace to any virtue of biology and morality which we wish to safeguard and cultivate as they are the hallmarks of what is our peaking crowns. Sometimes crazies get it in their head to channel their insanity outwardly and through elaborate, ideological scenarios (usually, the cleverer they are, the more ideological their obsessive taste of the hour gets). Either repeat what Breivik did if you support it as a heroic and necessary deed, or be branded as cowards by your own reasoning... or... come to grips with reality and understand the horror of the moral devience as well as the strategic fopp of a deed it was. End of story.

Originally Posted by Kaelen

Knock it off. The man's a deranged menace to any virtue of biology and morality which we wish to safeguard and cultivate as they are the hallmarks of what is our peaking crowns. Sometimes crazies get it in their head to channel their insanity outwardly and through elaborate, ideological scenarios (usually, the cleverer they are, the more ideological their obsessive taste of the hour gets). Either repeat what Breivik did if you support it as a heroic and necessary deed, or be branded as cowards by your own reasoning... or... come to grips with reality and understand the horror of the moral devience as well as the strategic fopp of a deed it was. End of story.

The difference between the Shooter and a Viking of old was that the Shooter used a gun.

Vikings used "the blood red eagle" as a punishment for Traitors.

Make of this what you will, but it causes me to wish I hadn't been so quick to react early in this thread.(Bolding is mine)

Anders Breivik Letter 12-05-07 to Russian colleagues

Dear Russian colleagues!

Anders Behring Breivik
Postboks 150
1332 Østerås
Norway

Oslo/Bærum, 07.05.12

[Please send a photocopy of this letter to email: XXXXXX]

Dear Russian brother! :-)

It is true that I am working to create a pan-European prison network. I'm in the process of contacting Beate Zschäpe in Germany (she, Uwe Mundlos and Uwe Bornhardt had the group NSU, National Socialist Underground, who killed 12 from 2002 to 2011) and Peter Mangs in Sweden (who shot 10, killing 1 maybe 3 in Malmo) among several others. Beate and Peter have not been convicted yet so I doubt I will hear from them until after their trial is done, due to the fact that they are both pleading innocent.

I'm already in contact with a couple of Norwegians and a patriotic brother in Denmark. This is a slow process for me as I haven't had much time yet for corresponding due to several critical issues. One positive thing with my case though is that the massive media coverage has resulted in several hundred letters from patriots from more than 24 countries, which has enabled me to get in contact with key individuals across the world. This will make the job of creating the network easier for sure, and I am willing to forward contact details as soon as I have gained permission from them to do so ;-)

I have fought very hard to de-legitimize the first fake psychiatric report and this struggle has taken a lot of time. I have also had to prepare for the ongoing trial that started April 16th and will last until July 20th. After that I will have much more time to spend on the patriotic prison network. I estimate that there are at least up to 1000 patriotic prisoners in western-Europe who will be interested to join but it will take years of work to organize them and unite them all, but this will go much faster if we can work together effectively, and share contact addresses, and recruiting more leaders who are fluent in English and willing to network. I am sorry to hear that your regime disallows contact between prisoners. That is unfortunately an extremely effective and a very crippling policy. I'm glad you have found a way to bypass this.

As for Europe, it is a big problem in Western Europe that muslims are dominating in many prisons, especially in France where approximately 70% of the prisoners are muslim. Many European prisoners are even forcefully converted to Islam against their will, or have had to convert to Islam to stay alive. Other prisoners in a couple of countries are forced to eat halal meat because the prison authorities have decided that serving this is "more economical". Of course this is completely unacceptable. My brother in Denmark has a prize on his head set by muslims so he and other ethnic Danes have been segregated in one wing of the prison in order to prevent violence. You are of course aware of many of these problems and they will increase the next decade because Europe is slowly being drowned to death by especially Islamic Asian and African immigrants.

So yes, my goal is to develop a pan-European prison network consisting of European patriotic martyrs and other politically orientated prisoners. The goal should be to develop a fully operational support organisation for European patriotic martyrs.

The long term goals of the network/organisation should be to provide the following to our brothers: 1. Creating a brotherhood in several prisons in Europe, which should offer protection against muslim attacks in prisons. 2. To educate our brothers and sisters - focus on general education, to learn English (for cross border communication) and essay writing skills. The pen is in fact just as powerful as the sword. The last goal of the organisation should be to attempt to create an economical fundament to support the wives and children of our martyrs.

As far as I know, a similar network exists in the US (Aryan brotherhood) but not in Europe. As you might be aware of I will be in prison for several decades so I have a lot of time to invest in building this network. But in any case, I would very much like to work with you on the task. Please forgive my ignorance, because I have not yet studied Russian patriotic heroes, so I did not know about Nikolai Korolev. As long as you believe that Mr. Korolev is a unifying person and leader who has a talent for communication and diplomacy, then of course I would be willing to work with him. As my network is only in the very beginning of taking shape, it is not for me to decide who is to become the leaders of the Russian network. This is something that you, my Russian brothers, must decide. But if it is decided that Mr. Korolev is to be that person then it would of course be an honour, privilege and a pleasure to work with him. Is he fluent in English or will you play a role in communicating? Your plan to unite 1500 under Nikolai Korolev sounds like a very fascinating plan btw. I must say that I admire your initiative and I hope you are willing to commit and work hard so that you succeed. I will work hard to contribute in Western Europe so that we may unite our efforts and become stronger together.

I do not know much about Russian patriotic heroes, but I have learned about the following imprisoned people from Anna working with international support in Orenburg city. The problem is that her letter was in Russian only and ironically, it was the Oslo Police who translated it and gave me a copy. Unfortunately I haven't had the time to contact her yet. When I do, I hope that she is fluent in English. Btw, she only asked if I wanted to forward any drawings or poems to her.

As for Russian patriotic heroes, I have only heard about Alexis Kostrachenkova, Artem Prokhorenko, Nikolai Pavlenko, Andrew Konakova, Dmitry Erofeev, Yaroslav Vorobyov, Sergei Rumyantsev, Roman Orlov, Evgeny Zakalistogo, Andrew Malyugina, which, as I understand it, relate to group-Borovikova Vojvodina. I also heard about a man who was called Datsik, a member of the Slavic Union, who was sent to a psychiatric hospital in the St. Petersburg area. He escaped to Norway and was deported a year ago. I heard that he is now released from the mental institution though. There is another man Eugene Dyankandu from Uzbekistan, supposedly a freelance journalist connected to the Slavic Union, living in Norway atm. But I'm not sure about this because he has asked publicly that I am executed.

You are correct that I risk being sent to a mental institution and forcefully drugged. Me and my lawyers are doing everything we can to prevent this but in the worst case scenario, I will be sent to psychiatric treatment where I will be forcefully chemically lobotomized with weekly anti-psychotic drugs so that I am unable to function and work. But as of now, I believe that the judges will find me "sane" and convict me to imprisonment. I am 90% certain of this so I am not worried.

I will forward contact addresses to you as soon as I get permission from the individuals to do so.

Regarding the structure of the network/organization, it is too early to make a decision yet. I have not had much time to correspond with others yet, so the network is very limited.
I must admit that it is a well known fact thatmilitant oriented nationalists in Russia are considered by militant oriented organizations in Western Europe to be the most well organized and ideologically aware in the European world.To illustrate, there are more than 90,000 skinheads in Russia whereas there are probably less than 9,000 in Northern Europe.

And regarding Russian militant nationalists, it is well known that you are more hardcore than the average Western European militant nationalist. I am not representative at all for Western Europe, but rather a self-driven, independent attack cell attempting to inspire, develop and introduce new brutal traditions to militant nationalists in Europe. My network, the Knights Templar network have embraced Al Qaeda methods, as probably know. In theory this only means that we have focused on "spectacular attacks," with the attempt to introduce the glorification of martyrdom and what follows with it (so called shock suicide attacks). But there are very few people in my network and I am not supposed to contact them, nor would I ever do it from where I am today. However time will show that others will follow, but it will take time. But you should keep in mind that the average Western European militant nationalist is a lot less hardcore than our Russian brothers. But you knew this already.

I will share my input on the future structure, but keep in mind that this is just a suggestion at this point.

The first thing is to decide on who who we want to be. Because in order to contribute to a struggle there must first be a "we". I have suggested in the compendium 2083 that we should create a network which should include all indigenous rights activists, anti-marxists and anti-islamist individuals. There are three primary groups in Western Europe, and probably in Russia as well: 1. National Socialists, 2. National Conservatives, 3. Devou Christians (militant Christians). There aren't many of group 3 in Western Europe yet and I must admit that the most dominating, among militants, is 1, but 2 is gaining ground fast in Western Europe. They are not yet very militant, like 1, but they will be in the future.

The second thing we must clarify is what identity shall be chosen: more specifically which name and identity. This is not an easy decision, because most people will have strong meanings about it. There are several ideological / political identities from which to choose, my network is, as you well know, crusader nationalism. There are other identities of course, like the devout Christianity identity, Odinistic identity, and National Socialist identity. I think the identity should not be too narrow as it should include all these groups. But another problem that arises is that imprisoned brothers want a very strong identity that shows clear defiance. Balancing the two is critical and makes it even harder. A combining factor for all would be an ethnocentric (indigenous rights), Christian identity, which also uses some Odinistic principles / symbols. I believe we should try to learn a lesson from the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda, because they are now considered the most successful revolutionary movement in the world. In addition there is the Arab League. What unites them: Islam and the Arab supremacist ideology. What unites us? Christendom, Nordic ethnocentrism and our traditions and old gods - Odinism. As for vital information on Nordicism, do a search on Madison Grant on Wikipedia and see where the Nordic tribes live. I am not sure how important nordicism is to Russian National Socialism though?

As for names (identities) the possible suggestions would be; Nordic League, European League, Russian contra-Jihadists, Nordic/European/Christian contra-Jihadists, Russian anti-communists, Nordic/European/Christian anti-communists, the Brotherhood, the European Brotherhood, the Christian Brotherhood, the Holy League (after the Christian alliance led by John Sobieski in 1683 and the Battle of Vienna), Knights Templar, the Indigenous, Indigenous defense league, Indigenous defense force, Russian Human Rights, Indigenous Human rights, Russian Human Rights Watch, Indigenous Human Rights Watch, European Defense League, European Defense Force, Nordic Defence League, Nordic Defense Force, Christian Defence League, Christian Defense Force. I must admit that I do not support the use of for example Aryan (for example Aryan Brotherhood), as it is not very inclusive and future-oriented. Also Odinist names will immediately be linked to National Socialism also but can be considered. I will have to ask many people what they feel. It is possible that what works in Western Europe does not work in Russia and vice versa. We should not rush this but ask several brothers what they think about these suggestions and others.

The best thing would probably be to start building the network for at least a year before we consider naming it. Because it might be counterproductive to use a clear label at first as it might scare some people. Please share your thoughts on this. We should however create awareness about this network in progress right away.

Btw, I feel I must clarify my own political conviction so that there is no room for misunderstanding. I am not a militant national socialist but a militant national conservative (crusader nationalist) and it’s important that you know exactly what this is.

NS is relatively popular in Eastern Europe and Russia but it has been a failure in most Western European countries the last decade. The reason is because of the intense demonization by the media and the fact that Western Europe has been so rich and managed to keep unemployment low, so that there is no real incentive to fight against the establishment. All the people that have tried to revitalize NS have failed and I believe any attempt to do this in Western Europe will continue to fail. So what is the National Conservative ideology? National Conservatism or the new nationalism of Western Europe and the new far right is now fighting among themselves for what is to be included in this ideology. It is not even agreed that this is the term of the ideology, and this is something I just call it. There are so many different right wing political parties in Europe with slightly different policies.
However, know that it is the individual policies that is important and not what you call the ideology. :-) My ideology is basically 80% the same as NS, all the most important aspects but not the most unpopular policies. It is basically the same as the state ideology of Japan and South Korea. I support ethnic and cultural protectionism (ensuring that the nordic ethnic groups, the indigenous peoples of Northern Europe will always dominate demographically), a deportation of Islam from Europe, anti-marxism which is opposition to feminism and the sexual revolution (support to reintroduce the patriarchy, women should have a secondary professional role similar to Japan and South Korea).

All Asian, Africans and Southern Europeans who are defined as disloyal towards the interests of the indigenous peoples (Nordics) should be deported. All jews who are disloyal towards the interests of the indigenous peoples (Nordics) should be deported. In reality, this will mean that more than 80% of them will be deported. However, I do support Israel's struggle against Jihad. We should not forget that there is a minority of Israeli Jews (20%) that shares our ideology of ethnocentric nationalism and they too want to deport the disloyal foreigners from their country. So no, I'm not a "Zionist". And is it true that I am against National Socialism? Well, yes. But this means that I am against the 20% of the negative policies of National Socialism; the expansionistic nature (I'm an isolationist) and the anti-semitic nature (I'm not against all Jews, only against the disloyal Jews which make out approximately 80%), and the anti-Christian nature (I believe Christendom can be reformed into an ethnocentric militant Christendom somewhat like it was before the enlightenment-reforms).

And yes, I understand that many militant nationalists in Russia have fought under the Nationalist Socialist banner. However, the name of that ideology is just a label, a flag, a banner. The important thing is actually the policies and doctrines the banner represents and not the banner itself, because it is just a flag. By conserving all the positive policies and discarding 20% of it, and creating a new ideology is the key. This is the only way we are going to seize political and military power in our countries in the future. This is our goal. And we will do what we have to to reach this goal. We will adapt because without adaptation we will not succeed. The creator of Islam, Mohammed said the following: "war is deceit". This is extremely important to remember, brother: "war is deceit". We must do what is required of us to succeed, and this includes adapting so that our enemies will have a harder time to demonize us.

This is why I have spent so much time to contributing to create a new ideology, national conservatism. Ethnic and cultural protectionism is the core of this ideology.

Regarding Vladimir Putin, I have said that I do not exactly know what he has been doing and will be doing in Russia in the future. I have said that he is either our best friend or our worst enemy, depending if he embraces ethnic and cultural protectionism or not. It seems that you are right, that he is trying to destroy European Russia and trying to create an Asian empire... So no, I don't support his policies at all.

Why I haven't demonized the Jews so much in 2083. I have written that in Russia (1 million) and in the US (6 million) the Jews are very influential. But the Jews in Western Europe are not that influential. There are only 1 million in the whole of Western Europe and France and the UK have 800,000 of them. However, I have written that all disloyal Jews are an enemy of Europe, which defines 80% of them. Western Europe's biggest problem however is the liberals and cultural marxists which are 10 times as powerful as the Jews. In the US and Russia, however, the situation is different. But the compendium 2083 was written for Western Europe only, so a Russian translation and version should be adapted for the circumstances in Russia in order to make good use of it. Keep in mind though that the manifesto 2083 is a draft and not a finished product. I do stand for almost everything written in it with some exception.

Looking forward to hearing from you, brother! :-)

Sincere regards,

[signature]

Anders Behring Breivik

Breivik's 1500 page Compendium, answers a lot of questions. If you have not already download and save a copy from the link given. It is a must read!

My opinion is that Breivik is desperate to stop his country and all Europe from being overrun by non-White Islamics!

Iconoclast

Originally Posted by Iconoclast

Breivik's 1500 page Compendium, answers a lot of questions. If you have not already download and save a copy from the link given. It is a must read!

My opinion is that Breivik is desperate to stop his country and all Europe from being overrun by non-White Islamics!

Iconoclast

Yes. This sums it up pretty well:

I am not a militant national socialist but a militant national conservative........My ideology is basically 80% the same as NS, all the most important aspects but not the most unpopular policies. It is basically the same as the state ideology of Japan and South Korea. I support ethnic and cultural protectionism (ensuring that the nordic ethnic groups, the indigenous peoples of Northern Europe will always dominate demographically), a deportation of Islam from Europe, anti-marxism which is opposition to feminism and the sexual revolution (support to reintroduce the patriarchy, women should have a secondary professional role similar to Japan and South Korea)

Here is another Gem, from the letter you posted, Edmund:

"The creator of Islam, Mohammed said the following: "war is deceit". This is extremely important to remember, brother: "war is deceit". We must do what is required of us to succeed, and this includes adapting so that our enemies will have a harder time to demonize us."

Iconoclast

Originally Posted by Iconoclast

Here is another Gem, from the letter you posted, Edmund:

"The creator of Islam, Mohammed said the following: "war is deceit". This is extremely important to remember, brother: "war is deceit". We must do what is required of us to succeed, and this includes adapting so that our enemies will have a harder time to demonize us."

Iconoclast

For us that is the most salient part of the letter. Thanks. I wish everyone who posts here would read your post and let it sink in.

Originally Posted by Transilvanian

As I said, traitors run that party. What I note with discouragement is that Norway is not likely to become host to a real Nationalist movement in the next years/decades, and will have to rely on foreign Nationalists ultimately having to save whatever will be left of Norway when they're in a position to do so.

People make parties. Party do not make people.
There is no excuses for those which support pro-liberal parties in Europe , no matter are they "indoctrinated" or not.

Originally Posted by JamesinUSA

Every time a nationalist party should dare lefts its head, especially in calling for an end to 'Multiculturalism', which apparently was one of Breiviks main social targets, you'll hear the call, 'Remember Brievik"!

Yes , but everything will change when arabic muslims become 70 % of population in Norway. Then ethnic Norwegians will stop and think a little about everything from one different point of view.

When Norway get its Sharia law as in Saudi Arabia ...

Originally Posted by Kaelen

Knock it off. The man's a deranged menace to any virtue of biology and morality which we wish to safeguard and cultivate as they are the hallmarks of what is our peaking crowns. Sometimes crazies get it in their head to channel their insanity outwardly and through elaborate, ideological scenarios (usually, the cleverer they are, the more ideological their obsessive taste of the hour gets). Either repeat what Breivik did if you support it as a heroic and necessary deed, or be branded as cowards by your own reasoning... or... come to grips with reality and understand the horror of the moral devience as well as the strategic fopp of a deed it was. End of story.

Which part of Breivik's Manifesto you find illogical or deranged?

Originally Posted by Transilvanian

We are in a war of IDEAS, and if we make our ideas repugnant, by associating them with the mass-murder of youths, we LOSE.

You know my friend , it sound logical , but logic often have no say.

Communists KILLED a millions of white YOUTH , but nevertheless they are in power in Norway. How is that possible?
Explain it to me. Not only in Norway , but in almost whole Europe Leftist Communists are in power.

They killed millions of youth , their ideas are repugnant but still , they are in charge.
It seems to me that WE must FIGHT if we want to WIN.

The Shooter entered this War Against White Genocide as a Private, as did Patrick Cleburne, who made it through the ranks to General due to his tactical importance on the battle field.

The War Against White Genocide is the only war that matters, and White Genocide is the only issue of any real importance.

Right now the on going World Wide Genocide of White Children is being prosecuted in many different ways, and we must oppose every single one of those ways.

Resistance is the key. If we offer resistance to White Genocide we will win.

The on going World Wide Genocide of White Children will not be able to continue in the face of Resistance.

This is a long thread with over 500 posts and I didn't go through all of it, so this already may have been posted, but in the chance that it hasn't, I recommend everyone read: "Anders Breivik and the Clash of Civilizations".

Written by K. R. Bolton, it makes the case that Breivik is an arch-Zionist and counter-jihadist -- not a White Nationalist.