Thread: Norway Shooter Anders Behring Breivik

If you read his Compendium he does not sound crazy, but sounds like someone desperate to stop the ongoing Islamification of Europe, by any means necessary!

Iconoclast

Originally Posted by Iconoclast

If you read his Compendium he does not sound crazy, but sounds like someone desperate to stop the ongoing Islamification of Europe, by any means necessary!

Iconoclast

Breivik's being locked up for insanity keeps a lot of difficult questions from being answered. There is a lot of things wrong with the official story of how all this took place.

Last but not least,he was still a wharped SOB.

Originally Posted by Silver Stallion

Last but not least,he was still a warped SOB.

I can't argue with that. If he was so hell bent on killing people, the government officials should have been the target (and not on a day that was a holiday when the bomb exploded at the government's headquarters) and not some silly teenagers and young adults.

In any case, this is a case that should be followed up now and again. Norway doesn't receive this much attention for things like this and it would be interesting to find out what happens anyway.

Originally Posted by Sigrid

I can't argue with that. If he was so hell bent on killing people, the government officials should have been the target (and not on a day that was a holiday when the bomb exploded at the government's headquarters) and not some silly teenagers and young adults.

In any case, this is a case that should be followed up now and again. Norway doesn't receive this much attention for things like this and it would be interesting to find out what happens anyway.

Yes.. he was a fool, to have mass-murdered those young kids like he did. A TRUE Norwegian nationalist simply does NOT do such a thing, ever, regardless of what those kids are learning at that camp. Had he really been concerned with the Muslim problem and desperate enough to go "all the way", he'd have gone after the traitors running the country, or after Muslims, not after young and innocent White Norwegians.

Your assuming he even did it. The kids in question were not all white and the ones that were,
were there to sell out their race by the way.

Originally Posted by Astragoth

Your assuming he even did it. The kids in question were not all white and the ones that were,
were there to sell out their race by the way.

1) Most of those kids were White.

2) Unless there's some kind of giant conspiracy, a heavily-armed guy surrounded by 70 corpses on an island is usually your man.

3) Even with the kids that weren't White, mass-murder is NOT the answer. They must be sent back to their nations, not murdered. They're kids.

4) Those kids in that camp were not there to "sell out their race". They were in a damn youth camp. What they would have become later on in life wasn't decided yet. Some may well have become Liberal Marxists who'd fight against us, but others might have also been awakened at some point, joining White Nationalism. The way I see it, Breivik murdered dozens of potential White Nationalists as much as he murdered dozens of potential Liberal Marxists, not that either act is in any way acceptable. The day a society begins to murder kids who MIGHT become something we wouldn't like, is the day that society has become evil. Pure evil.

I'm not going to get into this one with you. Suffice to say I wont lose sleep over them.

Originally Posted by Transilvanian

4) Those kids in that camp were not there to "sell out their race". They were in a damn youth camp. What they would have become later on in life wasn't decided yet.

My friend , they were the youth of liberal marxist movement in Norway.

I don't think they would ever become WNs.

Originally Posted by SRBSKA SPARTA

My friend , they were the youth of liberal marxist movement in Norway.

I don't think they would ever become WNs.

People change, especially when their indoctrination is still in its early stages, in adolescence. I wasn't a White Nationalist when I was 14-15. I know people who became White Nationalists much later in their lives, after living decades as Liberals. It happens, people awaken at all ages.

Originally Posted by SRBSKA SPARTA

My friend , they were the youth of liberal marxist movement in Norway.

I don't think they would ever become WNs.

I agree with Transilvanian on this one.

They were children, brainwashed into liberal-marxist crap. What choice do they have? About the same amount of choice a child with devout Catholic parents has. It's not ok to kill people so young, who have had no time to even make up their minds.

What we need to do is the opposite of this. We need to love our people, not kill them for disagreeing, at least not until we have power to maintain. Violence is a cliche thing the media attributes to us, we should only use self-defense. If those children were shown love by Norwegian nationalists, they would probably explore nationalism once they matured. But now, not one of them would become a nationalist, after being attacked like that.

It's been reported that Breivik was pro Jewish/Israel. If so, he should have done his homework and figured out that the root of all of this liberal immigration and Multicultural policies in Europe has Jewish fingerprints all over it.

Whether he's as insane as the media would like people think is probably debatable, since just about any supposed nationalist who opposes what's happening to their country today is thought to be a 'nut' by those of the left.

Like so many others of obvious talents, he went after the wrong target!

Originally Posted by JamesinUSA

It's been reported that Breivik was pro Jewish/Israel. If so, he should have done his homework and figured out that the root of all of this liberal immigration and Multicultural policies in Europe has Jewish fingerprints all over it.

Whether he's as insane as the media would like people think is probably debatable, since just about any supposed nationalist who opposes what's happening to their country today is thought to be a 'nut' by those of the left.

Like so many others of obvious talents, he went after the wrong target!

That's the problem with nationalism in Europe, when it becomes Kosher.

I think of Europe, and surrounding lands, like this, a fortress. We Europeans live inside the fortress, going about our daily business, while the miserable peasants outside live in squalor. They envy us, because of our success, so they try and break in to the fortress whenever they can. At the moment, the gates are open, and the peasants are flooding in. Who do we get rid of first? The peasants flooding in or the Jew holding the gates open?

As soon as a nationalist movement goes against Islam, rather than Judentum, you know it has compromised itself. Unfortunately for some, parties like the BNP and Geert Wilder's band of jokers are the best thing they have.

I would agree that nationalism that becomes 'kosher' is no longer nationalism, but rather a pawn of Zionism. I look at all Semitic peoples like all non-whites as being alien and detrimental to our way of life.

I don't think that it's a matter of having to chose one people over the another, as to who's to be dealt with first in taking our countries back, but rather, to look upon them all, as equal adversaries to be dealt with in mass, and at the same time.

If we can build racial consciousness in our people and have them challenge the status quo of Multiculturalism, Affirmative Action, Diversity, and Cultural Marxism we'll eventually take away the power of the Jews whether we go directly after them or not. The power of the Jews rest not in themselves, put in the power we allow them to have, and in allowing them to manipulate us.

Another problem, is that the masses of Whites are still too ignorant of the 'Jewish Problem' for us to focuse upon or prioritized them at this particular time. There are too many people who still look upon them as 'Victims', and or as 'Chosen People', to effectively target them specifically, or openly. They must be lumped together with Liberals, Marxist, and Anti-white adversaries!

The Muslims on the other hand, at least here in the United States is another matter sense most White Americans has little regard or use for Muslims. It's our government and it's support of 'Diversity' that seems more concerned with protecting the Muslims in this country.

Originally Posted by JamesinUSA

I would agree that nationalism that becomes 'kosher' is no longer nationalism, but rather a pawn of Zionism. I look at all Semitic peoples like all non-whites as being alien and detrimental to our way of life.

I don't think that it's a matter of having to chose one people over the another, as to who's to be dealt with first in taking our countries back, but rather, to look upon them all, as equal adversaries to be dealt with in mass, and at the same time.

If we can build racial consciousness in our people and have them challenge the status quo of Multiculturalism, Affirmative Action, Diversity, and Cultural Marxism we'll eventually take away the power of the Jews whether we go directly after them or not. The power of the Jews rest not in themselves, put in the power we allow them to have, and in allowing them to manipulate us.

Another problem, is that the masses of Whites are still too ignorant of the 'Jewish Problem' for us to focuse upon or prioritized them at this particular time. There are too many people who still look upon them as 'Victims', and or as 'Chosen People', to effectively target them specifically, or openly. They must be lumped together with Liberals, Marxist, and Anti-white adversaries!

The Muslims on the other hand, at least here in the United States is another matter sense most White Americans has little regard or use for Muslims. It's our government and it's support of 'Diversity' that seems more concerned with protecting the Muslims in this country.

I agree completely, we cannot choose between our enemies, which is worth fighting and which is worth allying with, since at this point all are invading or otherwise abusing White nations, and all must go with equal urgency.

The trouble with the Jewish Question is that it's much more delicate to approach than other, more readily obvious issues such as Negro, Muslim and Mestizo criminality and rampant abuse. Any person with their eyes half open can see that Negroes in a city are bad news. But it takes more understanding and effort to know how the Jews function in society, what they do and how they commit their crimes against us. They usually do it subtly, over a long period of time, and from behind the scenes. It's much easier to see the Negro committing a hands-on crime on the street, such as assault, rape, burglary, murder, than to see the Jews' malicious manipulation of financial institutions, government officials or media. It's a question which requires, I think, an important level of previous racial and national awareness, especially when it's been brainwashed out of people by decades of propaganda. Before WWII most people knew about the Jewish Question, at least nominally, even in the West, but now only in Eastern Europe is it still widely-known to be an issue, and even there it's much less than before.

Finally, a word about the notion of "Kosher Nationalism" in Europe, and its reverse counterpart in America, "pro-Islam Nationalism". As much as we've seen European "Nationalists" wanting to ally themselves with the Jews/Israel in a direct reaction to the massive Muslim threat against Europe, in America some of those who are fully aware of the Jews tend to view the Muslims as potential allies, basically reversing the situation of European pseudo-Nationalists. This is a dangerous trend, since it puts some of our European and American comrades at odds with each other, simply due to the most visible immediate threat faced by each. One has to wonder whether this reality is not a deliberate one, so as to confuse and fragment Nationalist reactions throughout the White World. How can we be allies if we're not even fighting the same thing? That's a fallacy of course, we ARE fighting the same thing, but its tactics against us differ in Europe and in America, and we must be conscious of that, and both continents must adopt an uncompromising stance of opposing all kinds of non-White interests in our nations, be they Jewish, Black, Indian, Muslim, Asian, Mestizo, and so on. It is us, and them; there are no allies among non-Whites, there are only potentially beneficial neutrals such as those who wish to take their people out of our nations (some Black Nationalists, for example).

Originally Posted by Transilvanian

I agree completely, we cannot choose between our enemies, which is worth fighting and which is worth allying with, since at this point all are invading or otherwise abusing White nations, and all must go with equal urgency.

The trouble with the Jewish Question is that it's much more delicate to approach than other, more readily obvious issues such as Negro, Muslim and Mestizo criminality and rampant abuse. Any person with their eyes half open can see that Negroes in a city are bad news. But it takes more understanding and effort to know how the Jews function in society, what they do and how they commit their crimes against us. They usually do it subtly, over a long period of time, and from behind the scenes. It's much easier to see the Negro committing a hands-on crime on the street, such as assault, rape, burglary, murder, than to see the Jews' malicious manipulation of financial institutions, government officials or media. It's a question which requires, I think, an important level of previous racial and national awareness, especially when it's been brainwashed out of people by decades of propaganda. Before WWII most people knew about the Jewish Question, at least nominally, even in the West, but now only in Eastern Europe is it still widely-known to be an issue, and even there it's much less than before.

Finally, a word about the notion of "Kosher Nationalism" in Europe, and its reverse counterpart in America, "pro-Islam Nationalism". As much as we've seen European "Nationalists" wanting to ally themselves with the Jews/Israel in a direct reaction to the massive Muslim threat against Europe, in America some of those who are fully aware of the Jews tend to view the Muslims as potential allies, basically reversing the situation of European pseudo-Nationalists. This is a dangerous trend, since it puts some of our European and American comrades at odds with each other, simply due to the most visible immediate threat faced by each. One has to wonder whether this reality is not a deliberate one, so as to confuse and fragment Nationalist reactions throughout the White World. How can we be allies if we're not even fighting the same thing? That's a fallacy of course, we ARE fighting the same thing, but its tactics against us differ in Europe and in America, and we must be conscious of that, and both continents must adopt an uncompromising stance of opposing all kinds of non-White interests in our nations, be they Jewish, Black, Indian, Muslim, Asian, Mestizo, and so on. It is us, and them; there are no allies among non-Whites, there are only potentially beneficial neutrals such as those who wish to take their people out of our nations (some Black Nationalists, for example).

Great points.

I think we can coin a few good terms here, "Kosher Nationalism" and "Halal Nationalism."

Personally, I'm more inclined to support nationalist movements that are on good terms with Islamic nations. Not that we should have anything at all to do with muslims in our own nations, "The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy", but outside of our borders, I think we should and could find support in the Middle East. So we must never seek support from non-whites in our nation, but there is no reason as to why we can't be friends with people outside of our borders.

Those Whites here in America who would ally themselves with Muslims based on the idea that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" are not 'Nationalist', but rather damned fools! Muslims from the Middle East are just a dumber breed of Semitic trash, and should be shunned by true nationalist!

The SPLC as well as the MSM would like nothing better than to make some connection between Muslim terrorist and legitimate White Nationalist, in order to damage our movement and efforts to reach out to the common White citizen.

PS. LeRoux your point about dealing with Muslim nations outside our own countries is well taken, but I would like to see our White nations work toward economic independence as much as possible, and foreign trade be almost exclusively with other White nations. To isolate ourselves from the non-white world as much as possible, and yet have military defenses against any invasion from them, with also the ability to utterly destroy them militarily if necessary, would probably the best foreign policy for our people.

Originally Posted by leRoux

Great points.

I think we can coin a few good terms here, "Kosher Nationalism" and "Halal Nationalism."

Personally, I'm more inclined to support nationalist movements that are on good terms with Islamic nations. Not that we should have anything at all to do with muslims in our own nations, "The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy", but outside of our borders, I think we should and could find support in the Middle East. So we must never seek support from non-whites in our nation, but there is no reason as to why we can't be friends with people outside of our borders.

Good points; Halal Nationalism, I like it. Once all Muslims have been evacuated from our nations, as well as from Europe in general (I'm talking about those in Russia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Albania, Thrace, Constantinople, Cyprus, the Anatolian coast, and so on), we could consider local strategic alliances with nations such as Syria and Iran, as an extra hand in keeping the "Chosen" in line.

On an unrelated note, those Whites who suffer from various forms of yellow fever, including but not limited to expressing the opinion that race-mixing is bad, but for some reason doing it with Asians makes it less bad, or that Asians in general are a noble group whom we should be closely allied with, fall under the category of "Egg Nationalists". That is, Nationalists who combine White & Yellow.

Originally Posted by JamesinUSA

Those Whites here in America who would ally themselves with Muslims based on the idea that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" are not 'Nationalist', but rather damned fools! Muslims from the Middle East are just a dumber breed of Semitic trash, and should be shunned by true nationalist!

The SPLC as well as the MSM would like nothing better than to make some connection between Muslim terrorist and legitimate White Nationalist, in order to damage our movement and efforts to reach out to the common White citizen.

They would indeed, I've seen them try to pin down the recent France Muslim terrorist as having "ties with White far-right extremists". Luckily that particular line of BS didn't gain much traction, but the efforts are definitely there.

Originally Posted by JamesinUSA

Those Whites here in America who would ally themselves with Muslims based on the idea that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" are not 'Nationalist', but rather damned fools! Muslims from the Middle East are just a dumber breed of Semitic trash, and should be shunned by true nationalist!

The SPLC as well as the MSM would like nothing better than to make some connection between Muslim terrorist and legitimate White Nationalist, in order to damage our movement and efforts to reach out to the common White citizen.

Like the people who think Louis Farrakhan is our friend? haha

Originally Posted by JamesinUSA

PS. LeRoux your point about dealing with Muslim nations outside our own countries is well taken, but I would like to see our White nations work toward economic independence as much as possible, and foreign trade be almost exclusively with other White nations. To isolate ourselves from the non-white world as much as possible, and yet have military defenses against any invasion from them, with also the ability to utterly destroy them militarily if necessary, is probably the best thing for our people.

As do I. I was speaking more on a political level, rather than an economic one.

I have this theory, that once we win, we can embrace Nikola Tesla's theories of nationwide wireless electricity, as there is nothing implausible about them, except that they do not agree with fat-cat energy tycoons' bank accounts. If we had that, we could start producing cars that run off of that electricity, and minimise our need of oil. I foresee that we would be able to almost become completely independent of middle Eastern oil.