Thread: Anti-racism is a code word for “Anti-White.”

What a great find. I was not fully aware that the Amerindians held that many black slaves, this does not suprise me though. The Amerindins held and traded slaves long before the white man re-emerged on the North American continet.
DID YOU KNOW,,,, that when the Pilgrins showed up, shortly there after they passed laws stating that No indian or Black could hold "Christian" (read white) Slaves.
Hoffman reveals: The Forgotten Slaves--Whites in Servitude

Originally Posted by Edmund Ruffin

Jesse Jackson clearly hates White people. The hatred oozes from his every pore. On the other hand, by his own words, he has great love for the Indians. Since the historical record clearly shows that the Indians treated the Reverend’s negro ancestors worse than Whites treated them, We are left with only one conclusion: Jesse Jackson hates White people simply for being White.


Anti-racism is a code word for “Anti-White.”

I agree with your description of the deliberate disregarding (whether by professional negros, or progressive liberal Whites) of the Injuns' historical disdain of Bantus, to promote an imaginary "coalition"-strength Righteous Phalanx of ALL people-of-color, whose purpose is to dispossess Whites.
In fact, the historical record and truth in general are treated casually and disregarded entirely (as convenience dictates) by non-Whites, thanks to their empowerment in this country by grovelling White Academicians, Intellectuals, Artistic Celebrities and other filth.

I am all for reparations. They get some money and a mandatory one-way ticket back to Africa, never to set foot here again.

Originally Posted by DESERTFOX63

What a great find. I was not fully aware that the Amerindians held that many black slaves, this does not suprise me though. The Amerindins held and traded slaves long before the white man re-emerged on the North American continet.
DID YOU KNOW,,,, that when the Pilgrins showed up, shortly there after they passed laws stating that No indian or Black could hold "Christian" (read white) Slaves.
Hoffman reveals: The Forgotten Slaves--Whites in Servitude

In Chesapeake Virginia a few years back the American Indians held a pow-wow and invited the public. I spoke with an American Indian who held a Doctorate in history. He told me the Indians had black slaves, and also captured and made slaves out of white folks.

I wonder why thats not taught in history class?

But did you know the first slave in the colonies for life was owned by a black man?

Slavery was officially established in Virginia in 1654, when Anthony 
Johnson, a black man, convinced a court that his servant (also black) 
John Casor was his for life. Johnson himself had been brought to 
Virginia some years earlier as an indentured servant (a person who must 
work to repay a debt, or on contract for so many years in exchange for 
food and shelter) but he saved enough money to buy out the remainder of 
his contract and that of his wife. The court ruled in Johnson’s favor, 
and the very first officially state-recognized slave existed in 
Virginia. Johnson eventually became very wealthy and began importing his
own black slaves from Africa.

White male construction workers?

Hardly a super-wealthy group.


YouTube - ‪Lou Dobbs on Robert Riech "No White Construction Workers"‬‏

Many of my childhood years were spent with and around Indians. One of my relatives was married to an Indian man who still spoke his mother tongue and he taught us kids a lot about the language...most of which I have long forgotten. In his language, the worst thing anyone could be called was "gigibo lusti" which translated to English means, "black ass".

Some of the Indian ceremonies were restricted to tribe members only, but a surprising number were open to white people willing to abide by the rules. Whites were not only allowed to observe but to also participate, if desired.

In no uncertain terms, NEGROS WERE NEVER ALLOWED!!!!

Since there was no money involved, I doubt the Jew question ever arose.

Originally Posted by Jesse

In Chesapeake Virginia a few years back the American Indians held a pow-wow and invited the public. I spoke with an American Indian who held a Doctorate in history. He told me the Indians had black slaves, and also captured and made slaves out of white folks.

I wonder why thats not taught in history class?

But did you know the first slave in the colonies for life was owned by a black man?

Slavery was officially established in Virginia in 1654, when Anthony 
Johnson, a black man, convinced a court that his servant (also black) 
John Casor was his for life. Johnson himself had been brought to 
Virginia some years earlier as an indentured servant (a person who must 
work to repay a debt, or on contract for so many years in exchange for 
food and shelter) but he saved enough money to buy out the remainder of 
his contract and that of his wife. The court ruled in Johnson’s favor, 
and the very first officially state-recognized slave existed in 
Virginia. Johnson eventually became very wealthy and began importing his
own black slaves from Africa.

I knew this.

Now this is Poetic justice...
Type into youre search engine, "The First slave owner in America"
and listed in nineth position on the first page iiis, a thread I started at Scheiss Front under my Nom De Gure Auslander2000, I was hell IP banned under that name...

White slaves, Black slave owners in America

When negro leaders call for reparations, they don't exempt anyone who is White. The descendants of Joshua Chamberlain, one of the minority of Yankee officers who actually thought they were fighting to free the negroes, and the soldiers of his Maine regiment have to pay the same as the descendants of John B. Hood and his Texans.

Anti-racism is just a code word for anti-White.

I could go on all day proving that anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Most people can't see it because they are so brainwashed. Even Pro Whites are brainwashed, into taking "anti-racists" at face value.

Here's a few:

Anti-whites only take "racism" seriously, when it affects non-whites.

There is no, nor has there ever been, an "anti-racist" movement, targeting Hollywood over its negative portrayals of Southern Whites and White Blonds.

Black people have 55 countries all to themselves. Africa has half of the world's natural resources and half of the most productive farmland.

So if Blacks want "Equality", they could have it right now around other Black people. But Black people don't want "Equality" around other Blacks.

They only want "Equality" around White people. Which as you know, means taking jobs from better qualified White people and block busting White neighborhoods.

Funny how Anti-Whites have no problem identifying Whites as a unique and distinct racial/ethnic group, when it comes to blaming all Whites for the Holocaust, Slavery, Colonialism etc... And yet. When we talk about the ethnic displacement and constructive genocide of those same Whites, even in Europe. Anti-Whites act like they could not tell an African from an Eskimo.

No one says a neighborhood that is 100% black needs more diversity.

No one says a neighborhood that is 100% asian needs more diversity.

No one says a neighborhood that is 100% oriental needs more diversity.

They are already 100% diverse.

All white neighborhoods and only white neighborhoods always need to be more diverse. White neighborhoods only stop needing to be more diverse when there are no white people left in them.


Obama administration: California’s whitest county MUST BE FORCIBLY INTEGRATED.

And only TV Shows that are white need diversity:

Midsomer Murders is not racist, says Anthony Horowitz - Telegraph

"African-American studies" celebrates blacks

"Asian-American studies" celebrates asians

"Chicano studies" celebrates hispanics

"Whiteness studies" denies that white people even EXIST, and that these white people (who don't exist) have unearned "white privilege"

Who are they kidding?

"Anti-racism" is a code word for anti-WHITE

This post about a group of "youths" pulling a gun on a group of whites because one of them was wearing a confederate flag bikini illustrates the point.

What motivated the "youths?" Anti-racism, of course. Their precious sensibilities were offended. They, or their peers, were taught in public school, in the name of anti-racism, that the confederate flag is an evil symbol of the oppression of black people, and that the only people who would display it are evil, horrible, sub-human whites.

How did the anti-racist behavior manifest? As aggression (with the obvious threat of violence) toward white people.