Thread: CIA Asset Susan Lindauer blows the whistle on 9/11, Iraq

Originally Posted by Kalki

Couple things: She perpetuates the 'Al Qaeda' myth as well as 'Muslim hijackers'...Could she be that ignorant as an intelligence asset?

However, she does genuinely seem to fear the Mossad in the Glenn interview.

She says that US/CIA called the various Muslim terrorists the "Enter Arab Group." Later it was renamed to "Al Qaeda"(probably for propaganda reasons). Before the US invasion of the middle east the CIA considered there to be only 200-300 genuine Muslim terrorists, afterword it increased to 2000-3000 genuine Muslim terrorists.

She also says that Saddam keep close tabs on religious terrorism in his own country and gave US intelligence about Muslim terrorism when they asked. Under Saddam's reign there was very little terrorism in Iraq, and all the religious factions got along just fine.

Saddam also desperately wanted to go back to being an ally of the US, as they were in the 1980s, and he promised things like to buy one million US cars every year.

Originally Posted by procopius

She says that US/CIA called the various Muslim terrorists the "Enter Arab Group." Later it was renamed to "Al Qaeda"(probably for propaganda reasons). Before the US invasion of the middle east the CIA considered there to be only 200-300 genuine Muslim terrorists, afterword it increased to 2000-3000 genuine Muslim terrorists.

She also says that Saddam keep close tabs on religious terrorism in his own country and gave US intelligence about Muslim terrorism when they asked. Under Saddam's reign there was very little terrorism in Iraq, and all the religious factions got along just fine.

Saddam also desperately wanted to go back to being an ally of the US, as they were in the 1980s, and he promised things like to buy one million US cars every year.

As a CIA asset she should know that 'Al Qaeda' is the CIA's database of 'Muslim' assets/operatives.

Originally Posted by Kalki

Couple things: She perpetuates the 'Al Qaeda' myth as well as 'Muslim hijackers'...Could she be that ignorant as an intelligence asset?

However, she does genuinely seem to fear the Mossad in the Glenn interview.

Originally Posted by Kalki

As a CIA asset she should know that 'Al Qaeda' is the CIA's database of 'Muslim' assets/operatives.

I'm indifferent to the idea that she was an actual agent with access to CIA Top secret information. A CIA asset would not necessarily know anything unless their CIA handler told them anything.

She was basically used by the CIA to communicate with Nations (Muslim Nations) that the US had no formal relationship with like Iraq at the UN because those Nations trusted her because of her anti-sanction stance. That's exactly how she describes herself.

She presents her case from her perspective. If she is something other then what she says that's just speculation.

Originally Posted by Kalki

As a CIA asset she should know that 'Al Qaeda' is the CIA's database of 'Muslim' assets/operatives.

Yes but you have to remember that the CIA uses Al Qaeda for special operations they want conducted .

That however does not mean that they actually control Al Qaeda .

After all , a list of operatives does not mean that those operatives would be individuals who would do as they are told to do .

It is subterfuge , false stories and false ideas , that are used to pursuade the operatives to engage in particular activities or a general theme of activities .

These are usually promoted to the group in question , by someone who is inserted into the group , or at least their aquaintence , long beforehand .

This is why there are elements of Intellegence agancies who are actively monitoring such groups , always trying to determine if some action is being prepared that they were not aware of .

It is the infiltration of Intellegence agencies by some elements with a specific agenda , i.e. Mossad , that would have their own inner circle of operatives inside such agencies and use the entire agency for their own purposes .

Example , NORAD was shut down on 9/11 . Most elements of the CIA and other agencies were probably just as surprised by that as anyone else .

The Jews have a saying they just love ; Never let the right hand know what the left hand is doing .

The official motto of Mossad is ; By Deception We Make War .

All Large organisations have many departments who are usually not fully aware of what other departments are doing , or not doing .

Originally Posted by procopius

I'm indifferent to the idea that she was an actual agent with access to CIA Top secret information. A CIA asset would not necessarily know anything unless their CIA handler told them anything.

She was basically used by the CIA to communicate with Nations (Muslim Nations) that the US had no formal relationship with like Iraq at the UN because those Nations trusted her because of her anti-sanction stance. That's exactly how she describes herself.

She presents her case from her perspective. If she is something other then what she says that's just speculation.

true

Originally Posted by 30.06

Yes but you have to remember that the CIA uses Al Qaeda for special operations they want conducted .

That however does not mean that they actually control Al Qaeda .

After all , a list of operatives does not mean that those operatives would be individuals who would do as they are told to do .

It is subterfuge , false stories and false ideas , that are used to pursuade the operatives to engage in particular activities or a general theme of activities .

These are usually promoted to the group in question , by someone who is inserted into the group , or at least their aquaintence , long beforehand .

This is why there are elements of Intellegence agancies who are actively monitoring such groups , always trying to determine if some action is being prepared that they were not aware of .

It is the infiltration of Intellegence agencies by some elements with a specific agenda , i.e. Mossad , that would have their own inner circle of operatives inside such agencies and use the entire agency for their own purposes .

Example , NORAD was shut down on 9/11 . Most elements of the CIA and other agencies were probably just as surprised by that as anyone else .

The Jews have a saying they just love ; Never let the right hand know what the left hand is doing .

The official motto of Mossad is ; By Deception We Make War .

All Large organisations have many departments who are usually not fully aware of what other departments are doing , or not doing .

On 9/11 there were many 'exercises' being run concurrently with the actual 'hijackings' to confuse many govt agencies. However, the laws were changed months prior to take away the power of the generals to respond in such a situation and placed in Cheney's hands - who ordered a 'stand-down'!

Originally Posted by procopius

I'm indifferent to the idea that she was an actual agent with access to CIA Top secret information. A CIA asset would not necessarily know anything ....

A CIA Asset spilling the beans on 9/11 is nothing to be indifferent about, or to keep posting repeatedly that one is "indifferent" about it. After a while that "indifference" becomes obstruction.

Kalki has a great lead article here. Lindauer is a CIA asset at the very least. With her Smith College and London School of Economics background, she is higher ranking than a low level asset. Low level assets are paid because they are corruptible. They are paid corrupt assets, they do things for the agency, they are not entrusted with even the information they collect. Higher level assets, or agents, are motivated for means other than money.

Lindauer comes from both Alaska poliitcs and a cement making fortune. She has no need to be a simple desperate corrupt asset. She has the Smith College mind to be motivated beyond payment and money.

Lindauer describes herself as a CIA asset. I see no reason to deny that, to downplay that. She is another White who was in the CIA who had a conscience and she can help us.

Kalki has an important thread here which is not to be downplayed.

Originally Posted by Aspen

A CIA Asset spilling the beans on 9/11 is nothing to be indifferent about, or to keep posting repeatedly that one is "indifferent" about it. After a while that "indifference" becomes obstruction.

Kalki has a great lead article here. Lindauer is a CIA asset at the very least. With her Smith College and London School of Economics background, she is higher ranking than a low level asset. Low level assets are paid because they are corruptible. They are paid corrupt assets, they do things for the agency, they are not entrusted with even the information they collect. Higher level assets, or agents, are motivated for means other than money.

Lindauer comes from both Alaska poliitcs and a cement making fortune. She has no need to be a simple desperate corrupt asset. She has the Smith College mind to be motivated beyond payment and money.

Lindauer describes herself as a CIA asset. I see no reason to deny that, to downplay that. She is another White who was in the CIA who had a conscience and she can help us.

Kalki has an important thread here which is not to be downplayed.

I think you are misreading my posts.

Originally Posted by procopius

I think you are misreading my posts.

I don't think I am.

Originally Posted by procopius

I'm indifferent to the idea that she was an actual agent with access to CIA Top secret information.

There isn't much to misread there.

The Mossad is very worried that credible inside information via CIA agents about 9/11 is making the public internet press. They will do everything to deny Lindauer was an actual CIA asset, to minimize her as a high level CIA Asset, to reduce her.

They will spend all day reducing and minimizing the truth that a highly educated CIA Asset now has come forward to blame the Mossad for 9/11.

I don't think I am.

Yes you are. I said she was a CIA asset not a trained CIA agent with a desk in Langley.

I'm indifferent to the idea that she was an actual agent with access to CIA Top secret information. A CIA asset(What she is) would not necessarily know anything unless their CIA handler told them anything.

She was basically used by the CIA to communicate with Nations (Muslim Nations) that the US had no formal relationship with like Iraq at the UN because those Nations trusted her because of her anti-sanction stance. That's exactly how she describes herself.(I'm referring to her stating that she was a CIA asset)

She presents her case from her perspective. If she is something other then what she says that's just speculation.

Originally Posted by Aspen

I don't think I am.



There isn't much to misread there.

The Mossad is very worried that credible inside information via CIA agents about 9/11 is making the public internet press. They will do everything to deny Lindauer was an actual CIA asset, to minimize her as a high level CIA Asset, to reduce her.

They will spend all day reducing and minimizing the truth that a highly educated CIA Asset now has come forward to blame the Mossad for 9/11.

Jews control the entire (US) system - including the CIA & the courts!

Originally Posted by Kalki

Jews control the entire (US) system - including the CIA & the courts!

I think that's a negative defeatist view and concedes institutions before the political war is over.

For example Ron Paul is a Republican Party member. You have to remember this is a very tiring and extensive political war. Conceding is defeatism. It is also not true because if the Jews controlled the CIA, then Libby wouldn't have had to "out" agents from outside the CIA. Give more credit to our White people, such as Lindauer, Plame, and many others.

We can think more clearly and positive.

This looks like a very interesting thread. I am now going to watch the videos. Those of us who have studied the 9/11 issue already know that Israel is the most likely culprit in the 9/11 attacks.

Originally Posted by Aspen

I think that's a negative defeatist view and concedes institutions before the political war is over.

For example Ron Paul is a Republican Party member. You have to remember this is a very tiring and extensive political war. Conceding is defeatism. It is also not true because if the Jews controlled the CIA, then Libby wouldn't have had to "out" agents from outside the CIA. Give more credit to our White people, such as Lindauer, Plame, and many others.

We can think more clearly and positive.

Look how far Ron Paul got during the elections - despite his massive online and grass roots support! And that's assuming he's 'legit' and not just 'controlled opposition'! Remember, he's been a career politician, and that normally means 'Jew-tool'. The last true opposition to the Hidden Jewish Tyranny were JFK and Wallace - and look how they ended! Jews definitely do control the system - that's not a concession - that's acknowledging reality! And I do give credit to the rare individuals who step up and buck the system - but remember, they are an anomaly!

If Jews didn't control the CIA (which cooperated w/ the Mossad) then 9/11 couldn't have happened.

90% of Germans doubt the official (US govt) version of 9/11!
A recent poll in the German magazine “Welt der Wunder” conducted by the well known Emnid Institute results in an astonishing 89.5% of the German respondents not believing the official (US govt) line about 9/11! Deep mistrust of what politicians claim to be the truth is not a marginal phenomenon. Almost 90% of Germans are convinced that the US government is not telling us the real truth about the attacks of 9/11!
source

Extreme Prejudice by Susan Lindauer

Product Description

What if the government decided to invent a great lie to justify a disastrous war? What would happen to the people who know the truth? EXTREME PREJUDICE delivers an explosive, high tension expose of the real facts surrounding the CIA's advance warning of 9/11 and an insider's look at Iraqi Pre-War Intelligence, told by one of the very few U.S. Assets covering Iraq before the War. It reveals the depths of deception by leaders in Washington and London to promote a questionable image of their successful anti-terrorism policy, and the shocking brutality used to suppress that truth from the American people and the world community.

About the Author

Former Congressional staffer Susan Lindauer performed as a U.S. Intelligence Asset covering Libya and Iraq at the United Nations, as a back channel on matters of anti-terrorism from 1993 to 2002. Most notoriously, in the summer of 2001, her team warned about a major terrorist attack involving airplane hijackings and a strike on the World Trade Center. Lindauer also campaigned heavily against the War in Iraq, and developed a comprehensive peace framework through her back-channel in the run up to War. This is the story of what happened when Lindauer tried to disclose the true facts of Iraqi Pre-War Intelligence and the 9/11 warning to Congress and the American people. It details the nightmare of her arrest on the Patriot Act and her imprisonment without a trial at the notorious Carswell Prison inside a Texas military base. EXTREME PREJUDICE is a true life spy thriller.


Product Details

• Paperback: 466 pages
• Publisher: CreateSpace (October 15, 2010)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1453642757
• ISBN-13: 978-1453642757
• Product Dimensions: 10 x 7 x 1.2 inches
• Shipping Weight: 2.2 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
  6 Reviews
  5 star: (3) 4 star: (0) 3 star: (0) 2 star: (0) 1 star: (3)
  › See all 6 customer reviews...
• Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #7,588 in Books ... #3 in Non-fiction > Espionage

Originally Posted by Kalki

Well, it's all happening today, here's CIA Asset Susan Lindauer blowing the whistle on 9/11 and Iraq, and Israel.

Susan Lindauer, author of Amazon.com: Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq (9781453642757): Ms. Susan Lindauer: Books, is the first CIA asset to have spoken out, under her own name and for the record, on Israeli complicity in 9/11, the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, and the specific, detailed foreknowledge of the time, target, and means of the 9/11 attacks held throughout the months prior to 9/11 by the CIA in general and Lindauer's CIA handler, Richard Fuisz, in particular. She has also exposed her first-hand knowledge of pre-war intelligence and negotiations showing that Iraq was willing to give the US "anything it asked" and that the war was therefore--from the perspective of US interests--not only utterly unnecessary, but wildly counter-productive. Lindauer's evidence points strongly to 9/11 being a coup d'etat by hard-line Zionists determined to steer the US into a self-destructive war on Israel's enemies.

more:
FREE PLANET

Another insider is confirming absolutely everything the 911 Truth movement has been saying for years.

Originally Posted by Smedley Butler

Another insider is confirming absolutely everything the 911 Truth movement has been saying for years.

Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory

January 22, 2011 by kalki666
NSC 10/2 directed CIA to conduct “covert” rather than merely “psychological” operations, defining them as all activities “which are conducted or sponsored by this Government against hostile foreign states or groups or in support of friendly foreign states or groups but which are so planned and executed that any US Government responsibility for them is not evident to unauthorized persons and that if uncovered the US Government can plausibly disclaim any responsibility for them.” – Furthermore, in order to preempt such uncovering, to continually seed red herrings and false theories; to delegitimize their unraveling by labeling them as kookish “conspiracy theories”; to defocus public energies by introducing “beneficial cognitive diversity”, fabricated leaks of half-truths which retain core-lies, and “Limited Hangout” mea culpae, all fed through the “Mighty Wurlitzer” messaging machinery; to brand the few daring and persistent unravellers of “truth’s protective layers” as deniers of reality suffering from “emotional or mental illness”, an “oppositional defiant disorder” exhibiting a pattern of “negativistic, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward authority figures” and therefore a threat to themselves and to society; and when all else fails, to eliminate these ‘malcontents’ who refuse to tow the official line by branding them “domestic terrorists”.

Much more here:A Project Humanbeingsfirst Document: Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory