Thread: Is Harry Reid using Electronic Voting Machines to Steal the Election?

Originally Posted by Former Liberal

I dont believe we have Democracy. I dont beleive our vote will affect the future and that our leaders are chosen by the elite.

Example: who the hell is barack hussain obama?

You're confusing some corruption with total corruption.

Most of the Diebold machines were scrapped after the 2004 election or they added paper trails to them, which proves change is possible once you can point out where the votes are being stolen.

Also we shouldn't just complain about vote stealing. We need poll watchers, exit polls and we need to demand changes whenever necessary to stop vote fraud.

I saw one person suggest using a camcorder to record what the electronic voting machine was doing. (Not sure if it's legal to use camcorders at voting locations though.)

The enemy can't get away with stealing much more than about five percent of the vote before people start suspecting fraud.

Of course, I hate the idea of having to get an extra five percent of the vote to overcome Jewish thievery, but that's the way things are.

Rand Paul and Sharon Angle are ahead in the polls, and there's a strong anti-incumbent trend.

We'll have to see how things turn out on Nov. 2nd.

Originally Posted by Former Liberal

I think it was Ron Paul who said "we need less Government, not more Government".

Thats the most intelligent thing a Politician has ever said anywhere!

Id like to see small towns solve their own problems.
Id like to see capital punishment.
Id like to feel safe in my world and proud of being a human being.

Thats Democracy.

You speak of democracy as if it is a good thing. You do realise that America was started as a republic, yes?
Question for you, what do you understand a democracy to be?

Democracy, my friend is the rule of the majority, aka mob rule.
In a democracy, you can make anything legal, as long as you have 50% +1 of the vote.
Tell me, can you say that you see things being legalised now that shouldn't be?
If so, there is your democracy.

No, I don't think DC should run everything in the nation. In fact, I think its power should be curtailed to the bare minimum.
The problem is as I see it, that the nation is bankrupt and the idiots in DC are operating, whether they know it or not, as receivers and therefore they do have a say into everything.

As for the Treaty of Lisbon, that is indeed democracy.
You are starting to get an inkling of why I have been anti-democratic since before I hit my teens.

Look up the word recalcitrant, there is no definition, only my photo!

Voter Fraud...

YouTube - Voter Fraud...

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner!

The union government is restrained by a Constitution in the manner of a Republic, not a free for all as in a Democracy!

The Federal Government is not a nation, the individual States are Nations, members to the union, like the European Union.

Originally Posted by Lord Sidious

Democracy, my friend is the rule of the majority, aka mob rule.
In a democracy, you can make anything legal, as long as you have 50% +1 of the vote.

Whatever gave you the idea that democracy required 50% + 1 of the vote? Jews have done very well out of the 'democratic' system in the United States. And let's not forget Australia where a record 17 members of the House of Representatives and Senate are about to pay homage to their masters in Israel. I'm not sure democracy has anything to do with numbers at all.

Originally Posted by Lord Sidious

Democracy, my friend is the rule of the majority, aka mob rule.


......

That would be an improvement over what we have now. If the White majority KNEW that whatever they voted for would actually get done, they would vote to throw out all the Third Worlders.

Notice that we NEVER got a chance to vote on whether immigration policy should be changed. Liberals and Jews just shoved through a major change in immigration back in the 1960s and things have gotten worse ever since.

There was a time when the will of the White majority was reflected by our immigration law. Prior to 1943, the Asian Exclusion law was still in effect, which prevented any immigration from Asia. The Jewish stooge FDR somehow overturned that law while people were distracted by World War Two.

Originally Posted by apteryx

Whatever gave you the idea that democracy required 50% + 1 of the vote? Jews have done very well out of the 'democratic' system in the United States. And let's not forget Australia where a record 17 members of the House of Representatives and Senate are about to pay homage to their masters in Israel. I'm not sure democracy has anything to do with numbers at all.

It does require that, but they fudge it usually. As others have said, it is the two wolves deal.

Originally Posted by Smedley Butler

That would be an improvement over what we have now. If the White majority KNEW that whatever they voted for would actually get done, they would vote to throw out all the Third Worlders.

Notice that we NEVER got a chance to vote on whether immigration policy should be changed. Liberals and Jews just should through a major change in immigration back in the 1960s and things have gotten worse ever since.

There was a time when the will of the White majority was reflected by our immigration law. Prior to 1943, the Asian Exclusion law was still in effect, which prevented any immigration from Asia. The Jewish stooge FDR somehow overturned that law while people were distracted by World War Two.

But you DO have it already.
Stalin said once, ''It doesn't matter who they vote for, it matters who counts the votes'' and that is where the problem is.

Originally Posted by Lord Sidious

....

Stalin said once, ''It doesn't matter who they vote for, it matters who counts the votes'' and that is where the problem is.

If we want out votes to count, we need to corner the rats, who are doing the vote-stealing.

We've got voter fraud from 2008 which nothing has been done about. We have to demand that something be done and that these ACORN members actually start being investigated and sent to jail.

YouTube - Did Ron Paul Win New Hampshire?

YouTube - RON PAUL VOTE FRAUD NEW HAMPSHIRE DISTRICT SUTTON PT1

Originally Posted by Former Liberal

We all know voting doesn't change the direction our countries are going, right?

If the entire American population voted to have ALL troops come home and to have all military bases closed on foreign soil, the war-machine would still keep running.

If the same voted the borders be closed, nothing would be done.

This is why i say each community should govern itself.

If there is dog sh*t in your back yard, dont vote and hope someone else will clean it up.

Democracy is a sad joke on all the people who vote and think things will change.

I have to agree with all your points. The bit about the crap in the back yard unfortunately matches the mentality of the masses to a large degree.

If we lived in a democracy, forced integration of our schools would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, integrated schools.

If we lived in a democracy, affirmative action would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, affirmative action.

If we lived in a democracy, mass immigration would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, mass immigration.

If we lived in a democracy, the Obama health care bill would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, to be forced to purchase health care insurance.

See, we don't actually live in a democracy at all!

Originally Posted by pk1225

If we lived in a democracy, forced integration of our schools would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, integrated schools.

If we lived in a democracy, affirmative action would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, affirmative action.

If we lived in a democracy, mass immigration would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, mass immigration.

If we lived in a democracy, the Obama health care bill would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, to be forced to purchase health care insurance.

See, we don't actually live in a democracy at all!

Excellent post! We don't live in a democracy because we never get to vote on anything important that will affect our lives or the lives of our children.

We don't live in a republic either because our so-called representatives FAILED to represent us when it came to letting in millions of Third World people and when NAFTA and GATT came up. (Over 80 percent of Americans opposed NAFTA and GATT, which led to massive outsourcing of jobs from America.)

We need to start RECALLING bad Senators instead of waiting six years to get rid of them. Harry Reid and John McCain should be at the top of the list for recalls.

Imagine the psychological effect. These hacks spend about $20 million or more to get elected (or to steal the election through various dirty tricks). They think they'll be in office for six years, but they get hit with a recall election and they have to go through it all over again.

Originally Posted by pk1225

If we lived in a democracy, forced integration of our schools would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, integrated schools.

If we lived in a democracy, affirmative action would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, affirmative action.

If we lived in a democracy, mass immigration would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, mass immigration.

If we lived in a democracy, the Obama health care bill would never had happened. At no time did a majority of Americans press their government, much less want, to be forced to purchase health care insurance.

See, we don't actually live in a democracy at all!

That is true, there is no Democracy in America, and the Rule of Law of our Republic is not followed either; we live under a Tyrannical Government that is out of control, while they force their Genocide of White Children in every way that they possibly can. It is not yet illegal for a White Man to marry a White Woman and produce a White Child, but that might be their next step.

YouTube - Did Harry Reid Steal Nevada? - Alex Jones Tv

This election is looking suspicious to me.

How could the Democrats get their butt kicked so badly in the House races, and yet, they hold onto a majority in the Senate?

The Dems only needed to steal five or six Senate races to keep their majority. I'd want to examine all the close elections for Senator this year.

They need to check the voters' roles for illegal aliens and felons and dead people for every one of these Senate races that were within five percent, because the Dems routinely steal 5 percent of the vote.

Sharron Angle files voter intimidation complaint - Molly Ball - POLITICO.com

LAS VEGAS — A lawyer for Nevada Senate candidate Sharron Angle has filed a complaint with the Justice Department alleging illegal voter intimidation on behalf of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's campaign.

The complaint is based on an article, which appeared Tuesday morning in National Review, that alleged Reid's campaign worked with sympathetic executives to put pressure on union casino employees to vote.


Reid's campaign offered money and buses to get the workers to the polls, proposed that Reid personally intervene and told the bosses at Harrah's to "put a headlock" on supervisors to make sure they got workers out to vote, according to the e-mails between an unnamed Reid staffer and Harrah's executives. A casino executive distributed a spreadsheet with the names of employees and asked supervisors to track whether they'd voted.


(cont.)

Losers Endorsed as Winners?

In Commiefornia, the Commies count the votes?

YouTube - NBC4 LA projected Boxer victory when she had fewer votes.